Sustainability and antifragility

Joost Platje


https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6274-1467


Abstract

In this article, some general conceptual issues regarding the relevance of antifragility for sustainable development and organizational sustainability are developed. This is done against the background of the general research hypothesis which is the basis for future research, requiring a paradigm shift from resilience of systems and organizations towards antifragility: Antifragility is the basis of intra- and intergenerational sustainability as well as long-term survival. More is needed than resilience, which rather focuses on the capacity and capability to recover from different shocks. Sustainability strategies should focus on the prevention or elimination of unsustainable activities or fragilities, replacing them, when necessary, with less unsustainable activities. This is a first step in enabling organizations or systems to handle unexpected future events, potentially threatening their existence.

Keywords:

sustainable development, sustainability, fragility, antyfragility, subtractive epistemology

Admati, A.; Helwig, M. (2013). The Bankers' New Clothes - what is wrong with banking and what to do about it. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  Google Scholar

Akerlof, G.A. (1970). The Market for “Lemons”: quality, uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics 84: 488-500.
  Google Scholar

Akerlof, G.A.; Shiller, R.J. (2009). Animal Spirits – how human psychology drives the economy, and why it matters for global capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  Google Scholar

Borys, T. (2005). Indicators for Sustainable Development – a Polish experience. Warszawa-Białystok: Fundacja Ekonomistów Środowiska i Zasobów Naturalnych.
  Google Scholar

Bullen, G. (2015). Sustainable service – strategic perspective. In: Liu, X.; Li, Y. (eds.). Green Services Engineering, Optimization, and Modeling in the Technological Age, Information Science Reference: 61-90. IGI Global, USA, pp. 61-90.
  Google Scholar

Burchard-Dziubińska, M. (2015). Social responsibility, consumption and production patterns in textile and cloth industry in Poland. Economic and Environmental Studies 15(3): 257-270.
  Google Scholar

Castells, M. (1998). End of Millennium. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers.
  Google Scholar

Commission of the European Communities (2005). Sustainable Development Indicators to Monitor the Implementation of the EU Sustainable Development Strategy. Communication from Mr. Almunia to the Members of the Commission, SEC(2005) 161final. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
  Google Scholar

Costanza, R.; Daly, H.E.; Bartholomew, J.A. (1991). Goals, Agendas and Policy Recommendations for Ecological Economics. In: Costanza, R. (ed.). Ecological Economics – the science and management of sustainability: 1-20. New York: Columbia University Press.
  Google Scholar

Furubotn, E.G.; Richter, R. (1997). Institutions and Economic Theory – the contributions of the New Institutional Economics. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
  Google Scholar

Gądek-Hawlena, T., Wróbel, M. (2015). The effects of innovative solutions implemented in the supply chain of the public postal operator in Poland. Wrocław School of Banking Research Journal (Zeszyty Naukowe Wyższej Szkoły Bankowej we Wrocławiu) 15(1): 35-44.
  Google Scholar

Hayek, F.A. (1937). Economics and Knowledge. Economica 4(13): 33-54.
  Google Scholar

Hayek, F.A. (1945). The Use of Knowledge in Society. American Economic Review 35( 4): 519-530.
  Google Scholar

Hayek, F.A. (ed.) (1935). Collectivist Economic Planning. London: Routledge. Lambrechts, W.; Van Liederkerke, W.; Rymenams, S. (2015). Connecting sustainability initiatives with efficiency measures: an opportunity for business schools. Central and Eastern European Journal of Management and Economics 3(2): 161-173.
  Google Scholar

Leal Filho, W.; Platje, J.; Gerstlberger, W.; Ciegis, R.; Kääriäe, J.; Klavins, M. (2016). The Role of Governance in Realising the Transition towards Sustainable Societies. Journal of Cleaner Production. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.060
  Google Scholar

Piasecka-Głuszak, A. (2015). The implementation of practical solutions in logistic processes in companies familiar with lean management by means of benchmarking methods. Wrocław School of Banking Research Journal (Zeszyty Naukowe Wyższej Szkoły Bankowej we Wrocławiu) 15(1): 45-47.
  Google Scholar

Platje, J. (2015). Beyond resilience – new institutional economics, fragilities and indicators of unsustainability. Central and Eastern European Journal of Management and Economics 3(4). Forthcoming.
  Google Scholar

Rao, P.K. (2000). Sustainable Development - economics and policy. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
  Google Scholar

Słupik, S. (2015). Challenges and barriers to sustainable energy consumption in the Silesian Voivodeship. Economic and Environmental Studies 15(3): 303-322.
  Google Scholar

Szołtysek, J. (2015). The city as a pretext for developing logistic concepts. Wrocław School of Banking Research Journal (Zeszyty Naukowe Wyższej Szkoły Bankowej we Wrocławiu) 15(1): 25-34.
  Google Scholar

Taleb, N.M. (2007). The Black Swan - the impact of the highly improbable. London: Penguin Books.
  Google Scholar

Taleb, N.M. (2012). Antifragile - things that gain from disorder. London: Penguin Books.
  Google Scholar

Van Dam, Y.K.; De Jonge, J. (2015). The positive side of negative labelling. J Consum Policy. forthcoming.
  Google Scholar

WCED (1987). Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  Google Scholar

Will, M.; Haidig, J.; Platje, J. (2015). Dysfunctional Leadership – Management in the CSR-case. Central and Eastern European Journal of Management and Economics 3(2): 155-160.
  Google Scholar

Zepada Quintana, D.S.; Mungia Vega, N.E.; Velazquez, L.E. (2015). The importance of Occupational Safety and Health in Management Systems in the Construction Industry: Case study of Construction in Hermosillo. Central and Eastern European Journal of Management and Economics 3(1): 51-69.
  Google Scholar

Download


Published
2020-12-10

Cited by

Platje, J. (2020). Sustainability and antifragility. Economic and Environmental Studies, 15(4 (36), 469–477. Retrieved from https://czasopisma.uni.opole.pl/index.php/ees/article/view/2983

Authors

Joost Platje 
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6274-1467

Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.


License

Copyright (c) 2020 Economic and Environmental Studies

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.