UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts: A Powerful Instrument that Unites rather than Further Divides

Tomasz Tomczak

doi:10.25167/fj.5890

Opublikowane: 2025-07-29

Tom 2 (2025)

UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts: A Powerful Instrument that Unites rather than Further Divides

Tomasz Tomczak

Forthem Journal

Dział: Essays

https://doi.org/10.25167/fj.5890

Abstrakt

The UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts have been in commercial use for over 30 years. This article aims to examine this instrument from a broader perspective, demonstrating why it is an extraordinary legal tool that seems to be gaining in importance in an increasingly divided world. This study analyses these principles from the perspective of their international character, their drafters, and their content. It is then demonstrated why this instrument has the potential to build, within the framework of international cooperation, one rational voice regarding their interpretation.

This article employs the dogmatic-legal method. The primary objective of this research approach is to analyze the character of the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts and their background. The aim is to determine whether these principles are indeed an outstanding soft-law international instrument that can still be of seminal importance in today's world.

Pobierz pliki

pdf (English)

Zasady cytowania

Tomczak, T. (2025). UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts: A Powerful Instrument that Unites rather than Further Divides. Forthem Journal, 2. https://doi.org/10.25167/fj.5890

Cited by / Share

Licencja

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 Międzynarodowe.

Bibliografia

Baptista, L.O. (1995). The UNIDROIT Principles for International Commercial Law Project: Aspects of International Private Law, Tulane Law Review, 69.
Google Scholar

Berger, K.P., (2014). The Role of the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts in International Contract Practice: The UNIDROIT Model Clauses, Uniform Law Review, 19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ulr/unu028
Google Scholar

Bonell, M.J. (2005). An International Restatement of Contract Law. The UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004177161.i-692
Google Scholar

Bonell, M.J. (2019). The law governing international commercial contracts and the actual role of the UNIDROIT Principles, Uniform Law Review, 23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ulr/uny001
Google Scholar

Dennis, M.J. (2014). Modernizing and harmonizing international contract law: the CISG and the UNIDROIT Principles continue to provide the best way forward, Uniform Law Review, 19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ulr/unu003
Google Scholar

Ferrari F., Clayton P., Torsello M. and Walt S.D. (2017). The Inappropriate Use of the PICC to Interpret Hardship Claims under the CISG, Internationales Handelsrecht, https://doi.org/10.9785/ihr-2017-0303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9785/ihr-2017-0303
Google Scholar

Finn, P. (2010). The UNIDROIT Principles: An Australian Perspective, Australian International Law Journal, 17.
Google Scholar

Gabriel, H.D. (2016). The Role of Soft Law in Institutional International Commercial Law and Why It is a Good Idea, In Peters, L. (Ed.), Eppur si muove: The Age of Uniform Law. Essays in honour of Michael Joachim Bonell, UNIDROIT.
Google Scholar

Goode, R. (2022). Official Commentary on the Convention on International Interests in Mobile Equipment and Protocol thereto on Matters Specific to Aircraft Equipment, UNIDROIT.
Google Scholar

Mistelis L. (2001). Is Harmonisation a Necessary Evil? The Future of Harmonisation and New Sources of International Trade Law’ In I. Fletcher, L. Mistelis and M. Cremona (eds), Foundations and Perspectives of International Trade Law, Sweet and Maxwell.
Google Scholar

Perillo, J.M. (1994). UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts: The Black Letter Text and a Review, Fordham Law Review, 43.
Google Scholar

Radicati di Brozolo, L. (2012). Non-National Rules and Conflicts of Laws: Reflections in Light of the UNIDROIT and Hague Principles, Rivista diritto internazionale privato e processuale, XLVIII.
Google Scholar

Schlechtriem, P. (2005). Requirements of Application and Sphere of Applicability of the CISG, Victoria University of Wellington Law Review, 36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26686/vuwlr.v36i4.5625
Google Scholar

Symeonides, S.C. (2014). Codifying Choice of Law around the World: An International Comparative Analysis, Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199360840.001.0001
Google Scholar

Veneziano, A. (2013). The Soft Law Approach to Unification of International Commercial Contract Law: Future Perspectives in Light of UNIDROIT’s Experience, Villanova Law Review, 58.
Google Scholar