Cultural aspects of sustainable development

Małgorzata Pink

doi:10.25167/ees.2018.45.18

Published: 2020-11-20

Vol. 18 No. 1 (45) (2018)

Cultural aspects of sustainable development

Małgorzata Pink

Economic and Environmental Studies

Section: Articles

https://doi.org/10.25167/ees.2018.45.18

Abstract

The main objective of this paper is to identify cultural aspects of sustainable development, by examining the interdependence of selected cultural characteristics and the index of sustainable development. Accordingly, the hypothesis of this article is that: Sustainable development achieves higher rates in countries that have a specific cultural profile, representing the values of western civilisation. The hypothesis was verified using Pearson's interdependence test. The arguments adopted in the tests described cultural features such as the distance to power, masculinity vs. femininity, individualism vs. collectivism, a degree of avoidance of uncertainty, long term orientation, indulgence and also materialism and postmaterialism syndromes in the context of the SDG index. Due to the specific nature of the data, the number of observations in individual tests ranges from 19 to 94. Data describing materialism and post-materialism are related to the period 2010-2014. other cultural data come from permanent indexes developed and made available within the Hofstede Insight project, Index SDG is given for 2016. The hypothesis has been verified. There is a positive correlation between values defining European culture and the SDG index. The conclusions resulting from this observation were formulated regarding the specificity of sustainable development in the cultural context.

Keywords:

sustainable development, actors, culture, civilization

Download files

pdf

Citation rules

Pink, M. (2020). Cultural aspects of sustainable development. Economic and Environmental Studies, 18(1 (45), 323–339. https://doi.org/10.25167/ees.2018.45.18

Cited by / Share

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

Cameron K.S., Quinn R.E., (1999) Diagnosing and Changing Organizational Culture, The Jossey-Bass, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, San Francisco.
Google Scholar

Dahl, A.L., (1997). The Big Picture: Comprehensive Approaches. Part One – Introduction, Moldan, B., Billharz, S. and Matravers, R. (eds.) Sustainability Indicators: A Report on the Project on Indicators of Sustainable Development, SCOPE 58. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.
Google Scholar

Deal T., Kennedy A., (1982), Corporate Cultures: The Rites and Rituals of Corporate Life, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Google Scholar

Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions. (1999) A Better Quality of Life: A Strategy for Sustainable Development for the UK. DETR, London.
Google Scholar

Grimm, J.W., The Peasant's Clever Daughter. Available at: http://www.surlalunefairytales.com/authors/grimms/94peasantcleverdaughter.html. Accessed: 23.04.2017.
Google Scholar

Hametner, M., Steurer, R., (2007). Objectives and Indicators of Sustainable Development in Europe: A Comparative Analysis of European Coherence, ESDN Quarterly Report December. Available at: http://www.sd-network.eu/?k=quarterly%20reports&report_id=7. Accesed 05.05.2017.
Google Scholar

Handy Ch.B., (1976), Understanding Organisation, Oxford University Press, USA.
Google Scholar

Harrison R., (1972), Understanding your organisation's character, Harvard Business Review.
Google Scholar

Hofstede G., (1997), Cultures and Organizations, (1st ed.) McGraw Hill, New York.
Google Scholar

Hofstede G., (2010), Cultures and Organizations, McGraw Hill, New York.
Google Scholar

Hofstede Insight, Available at: https://www.hofstede-insights.com. Accessed: 09.03.2018.
Google Scholar

Holme R., Watts P., (2000), Corporate Social Responsibility: making good business, World Business for Sustainable Development. Available at: http://www.ceads.org.ar/downloads/Making%20good%20business%20sense.pdf. Accessed: 09.03.2018.
Google Scholar

Inglehart R., (2015), The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles Among Western Publics, Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar

Kubiczek A., (2014) Jak mierzyć dziś rozwój społeczno-gospodarczy krajów, Nierówności Społeczne a Rozwój Gospodarczy, 38 (2): 40-56.
Google Scholar

McGuire S.J.J., (2003), Entrepreneurial Organizational Culture: Construct Definition and Instrument Development and Validation, George Washington University.
Google Scholar

Nordhaus, W.D., Tobin, J., (1972), Is Growth Obsolete? Economic Research: Retrospect and Prospect, Economic Growth, Volume 5: 1-80.
Google Scholar

Olsson, J.A., Hilding-Rydevik, T., Aalbu, H., Bradley, K., (2004), Indicators for Sustainable Development, European Regional Network on Sustainable Development. Paper for discussion, European Regional Network on Sustainable Development, Cardiff.
Google Scholar

Reigeluth C.M. (ed.) (2009), Instructional-Design Theories and Models. A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory vol. 2., Routledge Taylor and Francis Group, London, New York.
Google Scholar

SDG Index and Dashboards. A Global Report, (2016), Available at: http://www.sdgindex.org. Accessed: 29.04.2017.
Google Scholar

United Nations Development Program, (1990), Human Development Report 1990, Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

United Nations Development Program, Human Development Reports. Available at: http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/human-development-index-hdi. Accessed: 23.04.2017.
Google Scholar

United Nations General Assembly, (1987), Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Oslo, Norway: United Nations General Assembly, Development and International Co-operation: Environment. Available at: http://www.un-documents.net/wced-ocf.htm. accessed: 09.03.2018.
Google Scholar

Verbruggen H., Kuik O., (1991) Indicators of Sustainable Development. An Overview, O. Kuik et al., In Search of Indicators of Sustainable Development, Springer-Science+Business Media, Dordrecht.
Google Scholar