How to combat littering – an analysis with a focus on the Czech Republic
Abstrakt
The work attempts to comprehend why littering is so extensive and, with the use of several findings provided in Gary S. Becker's article entitled “Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach”, to explain why under current conditions more waste discarded in the environment can be expected. The article was created from the perspective of the Czech Republic, where the author lives. He analysed some past research carried out by other scientists and institutions from all over the world, and he was also observing the situation in different Czech regions in order to approximately learn how large the problem with littering in his country is and what kind of litter can be found in the Czech nature. Afterwards, the author decided to address the Ministry of the Environment of the Czech Republic so as to learn what measures were planned to be taken in order to significantly reduce littering. As a result of all this, the author himself decided to pay special attention to beverage containers and proposed to impose mandatory deposits on them in order to reduce the volume of litter that can be found out of the appropriate places. The author, basing his arguments on findings of other authors, gets to the conclusion that such a measure – provided that some conditions are respected – can work anywhere in the world, beverage containers not being the only type of litter suitable for this step.
Klíčová slova:
deposit, beverage container, Czech Republic, environment, litteringReference
AGVU; Roland Berger Strategy Consultants (2007). The consequences of a deposit system for disposable packaging based on the German example [pdf]. Available at: http://www.foodnet.cz/soubor.php?id=11315&kontrola=47963fffea4a1dfa9745ec4015fa54aa&foodnet. Accessed 29 November 2017.
Google Scholar
Bayerisches Landesamt für Umwelt (2016). Littering – Vermüllung der Landschaft und deren Vermeidung. Available at: http://www.lfu.bayern.de/abfall/abfallvermeidung/vermuellung/index.htm Accessed 19 March 2016.
Google Scholar
Becker, Gary S. (1974). Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach. In: Gary S. Becker and William M. Landes, eds. Essays in the Economics of Crime and Punishment: 1-54. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
Google Scholar
Cantner, J. et al. (2010). Bewertung der Verpackungsverordnung: Evaluierung der Pfandpflicht. Texte 21/2010. Dessau-Roßlau: Umweltbundesamt. Bifa Umweltinstitut GmbH. ISSN 18624804.
Google Scholar
City of Edmonton (2016). Litter Management Program. Litter FAQ. Available at: http://www.edmonton.ca/programs_services/documents/PDF/LitterFAQ.pdf. Accessed 28 February 2016.
Google Scholar
Clark, R.N., Burges, R.L., Hendee, J.C. (1972). The Development of Anti-Litter Behavior in a Forest Campground. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 5(1): 1–5.
Google Scholar
Czech Republic (2016). Návrh zákona ze dne 2016 o odpadech a o změně některých zákonů (zákon o odpadech) [draft of a law].
Google Scholar
European Commission’s Directorate-General Environment (2011). Plastic Waste: Ecological and Human Health Impacts. Science for Environment Policy, 41 pp.
Google Scholar
Finnie, W. C. (1973). Field experiments in litter control. Environment and Behavior. 5(2): 123–144.
Google Scholar
Hogg, D.; Elliott, T.; Croasdell, S. (2011). Options and Feasibility of a European Refund System for Metal Beverage Cans. Final Report, Appendix 3: Impacts Associated with Incompatibility, 55 pp.
Google Scholar
Keep Britain Tidy (2014). Litter Composition Survey Of England, 21 pp. Available at: http://www.incpen.org/docs/KBTINCPENLitterComposition2014.pdf. Accessed 29 November 2017.
Google Scholar
Keizer, K.; Lindenberg, S.; Steg, L. (2008). The Spreading of Disorder. Science, 322, 2008 Dec 12, 1681–5. doi: 10.1126/science.1161405
Google Scholar
Lee, D.; Graves, P.; Sexton, R. (1988). On Mandatory Deposits, Fines, and the Control of Litter. Natural Resources Journal. 28(4): 837–847.
Google Scholar
Lopez Lozano R.; Mouat, J. (2009). Marine litter in the North-East Atlantic Region. London: OSPAR Commission. ISBN 978-1-906840-26-6.
Google Scholar
Ministry of the Environment of the Czech Republic (2016). Answers to the author’s questions provided by two representatives of the Ministry (Ms. Marie Vorlíčková and Mr. Libor Dvořák), dated 1 and 15 April 2016.
Google Scholar
Müller, T. (2015). Litter as a Sign of Public Disorder? The Meaning(s) of Litter as Part of Adolescents’ Presentation of Self in Public. In: Bude, H.; Dellwing, M.; Grills, S. (eds.). Kleine Geheimnisse: Alltagssoziologische Einsichten: 21–39. Weisbaden: Springer.
Google Scholar
Muñoz-Cadena, C.E.; Lina-Manjarrez, P.; Estrada-Izquierdo, I., Ramón-Gallegos, E. (2012). An Approach to Litter Generation and Littering Practices in a Mexico City Neighborhood. Sustainability 4(8): 1733–1754. doi:10.3390/su4081733.
Google Scholar
Parliament of Victoria (1997). Litter Act (1987). Act No. 54/1987. Version incorporating amendments as at 1 July 1997, 29 pp.
Google Scholar
Procházka, O. (2009). Uliční smetky a littering. Odpadové fórum 10(1): 12–14.
Google Scholar
Přibylová, M. (2009). Průzkum situace volně pohozených odpadů. Odpadové fórum 10(1) : 17–18.
Google Scholar
Rege, M.; Telle, K. (2001). An Experimental Investigation of Social Norms. Discussion Papers No. 310, October 2001. Statistics Norway, Research Department, 25 pp.
Google Scholar
Robinson, S.N. (1975). Social and Environmental Influences on Littering Behavior. A dissertation presented to The Faculty of the Division of Graduate Studies and Research, 109 pp.
Google Scholar
Southeast Environmental Association (2009). Roadside Litter Survey Report 2009, 46 pp. Available at: http://www.gov.pe.ca/photos/original/eef_litter09.pdf. Accessed 28 February 2016.
Google Scholar
State of New South Wales (2013). NSW Litter Prevention Kit, 14 pp. ISBN 978-174359-332-5.
Google Scholar
Tehan, R.; Jackson, L.; Jeffers, H.; Burns, T. (2017). Beacons of litter: A social experiment to understand how the presence of certain littered items influences rates of littering. Journal of Litter and Environmental Quality 1(1): 5–15.
Google Scholar
Texas Department of Transportation (2013). 2013 Litter Attitudes And Behaviors. Pre-Campaign Report April 3, 2013. Available at:http://www.dontmesswithtexas.org/docs/DMWT_2013_Attitudes_Behaviors_Full_Report.pdf. Accessed 24 February 2018.
Google Scholar
The Victorian Litter Action Alliance (2014). Litter Statistics Fact Sheet, 6 pp. Available at: http://www.litter.vic.gov.au/-/media/sv-vlaa/downloads/litter_statistics_fact_sheet_-_2014.pdf?la=en. Accessed 8 March 2016.
Google Scholar
Torgler, B.; García-Valiñas, M.A.; Macintyre, A. (2008). Justifiability of Littering: An Empirical Investigation. Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts. Working Paper No. 2008, 31 pp.
Google Scholar
UNEP (2015). Biodegradable Plastics and Marine Litter. Misconceptions, concerns and impacts on marine environments. UNEP, 33 pp. ISBN 978-92-807-3494-2.
Google Scholar
United Nations (2017). World Population Prospects: The 2017 Revision, Key Findings and Advance Tables. Working Paper No. ESA/P/WP/248.
Google Scholar
Viscusi, W. Kip; Huber, J.; Bell J.; Cecot, C. (2013). Discontinuous Behavioral Responses to Recycling Laws and Plastic Water Bottle Deposits. American Law and Economics Review 15(1): 110–155.
Google Scholar
Walls, M. (2011). Deposit-Refund Systems in Practice and Theory. RFF Working Paper DP. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future, pp. 11–47.
Google Scholar
Williams, E.; Curnow, R.; Strecker, P. (1997). Understanding Littering Behaviour in Australia. Prepared for the Beverage Industry Environment Council, 88 pp. ISBN 0646326678.
Google Scholar
##libcom.statistics##
Stažení
Licence
Copyright (c) 2020 Economic and Environmental Studies
Tato práce je licencována pod Mezinárodní licencí Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0.
