Wycena ekonomiczna miejskich terenów zieleni jako głos w debacie nad ich rolą w zrównoważonych miastach
Abstrakt
Uwzględnienie preferencji społeczeństwa wydaje się być kluczowe dla prawidłowego planowania przestrzennego miejskich terenów zieleni. Wycena ekonomiczna jest jedną z metod poznania tych preferencji. W tym artykule analizuję i wyciągam wspólne wnioski z trzech badań wyceny hedonicznej przeprowadzonych niedawno w Łodzi, które ujawniają ekonomiczny potencjał terenów zieleni oraz podkreślają ich wielowymiarową wartość. Te trzy porównywalne badania analizują wpływ terenów zieleni na ceny mieszkań. Każde z nich kładzie nacisk na inny atrybut lub cechę terenów zieleni jak ich rozmiar, społeczne postrzeganie czy wartość biokulturową. Razem tworzą one kompleksowy obraz preferencji mieszkańców miasta względem terenów zieleni i stanowią platformę dla dalszej dyskusji nad rolą terenów zieleni w zrównoważonych miastach przyszłości.
Słowa kluczowe:
wycena ekonomiczna, zintegrowana wycena, wycena hedoniczna, zielona infrastruktura, zrównoważony rozwójBibliografia
Bayer, P.; Keohane, N.; Timmins, C. (2009). Migration and hedonic valuation: the case of air quality. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 58(1): 1–14.
Bazyl, M. (2009). Hedonic Price Model for Warsaw Housing Market. Warsaw: Department of Applied Econometrics, Warsaw School of Economics. Available at: https://ideas.repec.org/p/wse/wpaper/42.html. Accessed 27 April 2016.
Bergier, T.; Kronenberg, J.; Lisicki, P. (2013). Zrównoważony Rozwój — Zastosowania; Przyroda W Mieście — Rozwiązania. Fundacja Sendzimira.
Borkowska, M.; Rozwadowska, M.; Śleszyński, J.; Żylicz, T. (2001). Environmental amenities on the housing market in Warsaw: hedonic price method research. Ekonomia 3: 70–82.
Chattopadhyay, S. (1999). Estimating the demand for air quality: new evidence based on the Chicago housing market. Land Economics 75(1): 22–38.
Czembrowski, P.; Kronenberg, J. (2016). Hedonic pricing and different urban green space types and sizes: Insights into the discussion on valuing ecosystem services. Landscape and Urban Planning 146: 11–19.
Czembrowski, P.; Kronenberg, J.; Czepkiewicz, M. (2016a). Integrating non-monetary and monetary valuation methods – SoftGIS and hedonic pricing. Ecological Economics 130: 166–175.
Czembrowski, P.; Łaszkiewicz, E.; Kronenberg, J. (2016b). Bioculturally valuable but not necessarily worth the price:Integrating different dimensions of value of urban green spaces. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 20: 89–96.
Elands, B.H.M.; Wiersum, K.F.; Buijs, A.E.; Vierikko, K. (2015). Policy interpretations and manifestation of biocultural diversity in urbanized Europe: conservation of lived biodiversity. Biodiversity and Conservation, 24(13): 3347–3366.
Gómez-Baggethun, E. et al. (2014). State-of-the-Art Report on Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services. Barcelona: EU FP7 OpenNESS Project. Available at: http://www.opennessproject.eu/sites/default/files/Deliverable%204%201_Integrated-Valuation-Of-Ecosystem-Services.pdf. Accessed 8 May 2015.
Goodman, A.C. (1998). Andrew Court and the invention of hedonic price analysis. Journal of Urban Economics 44(2): 291–298.
Haas, G.C. (1922). Sale Prices as a Basis for Farmland Appraisal. St. Paul: University Farm. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/2027/hvd.hne59k. Accessed 8 May 2015.
Kim, K.S.; Park, S.J.; Kweon, Y.-J. (2007). Highway traffic noise effects on land price in an urban area. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 12(4): 275–280.
Larson, E.K.; Perrings, C. (2013). The value of water-related amenities in an arid city: The case of the Phoenix Metropolitan Area. Landscape and Urban Planning 109(1): 45–55.
Łowicki, D. (2010). Wartość krajobrazu w świetle cen terenów pod zabudowę w latach 1995–2000. Ekonomia i Środowisko 37: 147–156.
Łowicki, D. (2012). Land prices as an indicator of the recreational services of ecosystems. Ekonomia i Środowisko 42: 167–175.
Łowicki, D.; Piotrowska, S. (2015). Monetary valuation of road noise. Residential property prices as an indicator of the acoustic climate quality. Ecological Indicators 52: 472–479.
Luttik, J. (2000). The value of trees, water and open space as reflected by house prices in the Netherlands. Landscape and Urban Planning 48(3–4): 161–167.
Martín-López, B.; Gómez-Baggethun, E.; García-Llorente, M.; Montes, C. (2014). Trade-offs across value-domains in ecosystem services assessment. Ecological Indicators 37: 220–228.
Melichar, J.; Kaprová, K. (2013). Revealing preferences of Pragues homebuyers towards greenery amenities: the empirical evidence of distance-size effect. Landscape and Urban Planning 109(1): 56–66.
Murzyn-Kupisz, M. (2010). Sustainable approaches to natural environment and cultural heritage. Two sides of the same coin. Economic and Environmental Studies 10(4): 379–397.
Nicholls, S.; Crompton, J.L. (2005). The impact of greenways on property values: Evidence from Austin, Texas. Journal of Leisure Research 37(3): 321–341.
Smith, V.K.; Huang, J.-C. (1995). Can markets value air quality? A meta-analysis of hedonic property value models. Journal of Political Economy 103(1): 209–227.
Tyrväinen, L. (1997). The amenity value of the urban forest: an application of the hedonic pricing method. Landscape and Urban Planning 37(3–4): 211–222.
Tyrväinen, L.; Miettinen, A. (2000). Property prices and urban forest amenities. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 39(2): 205–223.
Zygmunt, R.; Gluszak, M. (2015). Forest proximity impact on undeveloped land values: A spatial hedonic study. Forest Policy and Economics 50: 82–89.
Bazyl, M. (2009). Hedonic Price Model for Warsaw Housing Market. Warsaw: Department of Applied Econometrics, Warsaw School of Economics. Available at: https://ideas.repec.org/p/wse/wpaper/42.html. Accessed 27 April 2016.
Bergier, T.; Kronenberg, J.; Lisicki, P. (2013). Zrównoważony Rozwój — Zastosowania; Przyroda W Mieście — Rozwiązania. Fundacja Sendzimira.
Borkowska, M.; Rozwadowska, M.; Śleszyński, J.; Żylicz, T. (2001). Environmental amenities on the housing market in Warsaw: hedonic price method research. Ekonomia 3: 70–82.
Chattopadhyay, S. (1999). Estimating the demand for air quality: new evidence based on the Chicago housing market. Land Economics 75(1): 22–38.
Czembrowski, P.; Kronenberg, J. (2016). Hedonic pricing and different urban green space types and sizes: Insights into the discussion on valuing ecosystem services. Landscape and Urban Planning 146: 11–19.
Czembrowski, P.; Kronenberg, J.; Czepkiewicz, M. (2016a). Integrating non-monetary and monetary valuation methods – SoftGIS and hedonic pricing. Ecological Economics 130: 166–175.
Czembrowski, P.; Łaszkiewicz, E.; Kronenberg, J. (2016b). Bioculturally valuable but not necessarily worth the price:Integrating different dimensions of value of urban green spaces. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 20: 89–96.
Elands, B.H.M.; Wiersum, K.F.; Buijs, A.E.; Vierikko, K. (2015). Policy interpretations and manifestation of biocultural diversity in urbanized Europe: conservation of lived biodiversity. Biodiversity and Conservation, 24(13): 3347–3366.
Gómez-Baggethun, E. et al. (2014). State-of-the-Art Report on Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services. Barcelona: EU FP7 OpenNESS Project. Available at: http://www.opennessproject.eu/sites/default/files/Deliverable%204%201_Integrated-Valuation-Of-Ecosystem-Services.pdf. Accessed 8 May 2015.
Goodman, A.C. (1998). Andrew Court and the invention of hedonic price analysis. Journal of Urban Economics 44(2): 291–298.
Haas, G.C. (1922). Sale Prices as a Basis for Farmland Appraisal. St. Paul: University Farm. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/2027/hvd.hne59k. Accessed 8 May 2015.
Kim, K.S.; Park, S.J.; Kweon, Y.-J. (2007). Highway traffic noise effects on land price in an urban area. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 12(4): 275–280.
Larson, E.K.; Perrings, C. (2013). The value of water-related amenities in an arid city: The case of the Phoenix Metropolitan Area. Landscape and Urban Planning 109(1): 45–55.
Łowicki, D. (2010). Wartość krajobrazu w świetle cen terenów pod zabudowę w latach 1995–2000. Ekonomia i Środowisko 37: 147–156.
Łowicki, D. (2012). Land prices as an indicator of the recreational services of ecosystems. Ekonomia i Środowisko 42: 167–175.
Łowicki, D.; Piotrowska, S. (2015). Monetary valuation of road noise. Residential property prices as an indicator of the acoustic climate quality. Ecological Indicators 52: 472–479.
Luttik, J. (2000). The value of trees, water and open space as reflected by house prices in the Netherlands. Landscape and Urban Planning 48(3–4): 161–167.
Martín-López, B.; Gómez-Baggethun, E.; García-Llorente, M.; Montes, C. (2014). Trade-offs across value-domains in ecosystem services assessment. Ecological Indicators 37: 220–228.
Melichar, J.; Kaprová, K. (2013). Revealing preferences of Pragues homebuyers towards greenery amenities: the empirical evidence of distance-size effect. Landscape and Urban Planning 109(1): 56–66.
Murzyn-Kupisz, M. (2010). Sustainable approaches to natural environment and cultural heritage. Two sides of the same coin. Economic and Environmental Studies 10(4): 379–397.
Nicholls, S.; Crompton, J.L. (2005). The impact of greenways on property values: Evidence from Austin, Texas. Journal of Leisure Research 37(3): 321–341.
Smith, V.K.; Huang, J.-C. (1995). Can markets value air quality? A meta-analysis of hedonic property value models. Journal of Political Economy 103(1): 209–227.
Tyrväinen, L. (1997). The amenity value of the urban forest: an application of the hedonic pricing method. Landscape and Urban Planning 37(3–4): 211–222.
Tyrväinen, L.; Miettinen, A. (2000). Property prices and urban forest amenities. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 39(2): 205–223.
Zygmunt, R.; Gluszak, M. (2015). Forest proximity impact on undeveloped land values: A spatial hedonic study. Forest Policy and Economics 50: 82–89.
CZEMBROWSKI, P. (2020). Wycena ekonomiczna miejskich terenów zieleni jako głos w debacie nad ich rolą w zrównoważonych miastach. Economic and Environmental Studies, 16(3(39), 365–375. Pobrano z https://czasopisma.uni.opole.pl/index.php/ees/article/view/3029
Statystyki
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
