Evaluation of Old Oyo National Park efficiency using DEA Approach
Аннотация
Abstract: Measuring the efficiency of a national park is difficult due to, among other factors, the heterogeneity of resources supplied (e.g., budget, staffs) and outcomes expected (e.g., income, visitors’ flow). While this is an issue in protected area management, it has been approached successfully in other fields by using data envelopment analysis (DEA). DEA has a number of advantages over other techniques as it simultaneously uses multiple heterogeneous inputs and outputs to determine which projects are performing most efficiently, referred to as being at the efficiency frontier, when compared to others in the data set. This study therefore uses DEA for the evaluation of management efficiency in Old Oyo National Park for the period of 2001-2015. The results showed that the park was efficient for 11 and 13 years, respectively, in terms of its overall technical and pure technical efficiency with a mean scale efficiency of 97%. Also, the park operated at 80% of its productive scale size. These results, and the use of DEA, highlight both the success of using this technique in helping determine protected area efficiency and those factors to consider while allocating resources for new projects at the park.
Ключевые слова:
national park, efficiency, resource allocation, protected area managementБиблиографические ссылки
Adejumo, A. A., Amusa, T.O. and Adamu, T.2014.Assessment of Tourists Flow And Revenue Generation In Kainji Lake National Park, Nigeria.Journal Of Research In Forestry, Wildlife And Environmental Volume 6(2): 2141 – 1778
Google Scholar
Apospori, E.; Nikandrou, I.; Brewster, C.; Papalexandris, N. (2008).‘HRM and Organizational Performance in Northern and Southern Europe,’ International Journal of Human Resource Management 19(7), 1187–1207.
Google Scholar
Ayodele, I. A. (2002). Essentials of Tourism Management. Elshaddai Global Ventures Ltd, Ibadan. 90p.
Google Scholar
Balmford, A.; Bresford, J.; Green, J.; Naidoo, R.; Walpole, M; Manica, A. (2009). A Global Perspective on Trends in Nature-Based Tourism. PLoS Biology 7 (6):1-6.
Google Scholar
Banker, R. D.; Cooper, W. W.; Seiford, L. M.; Thrall, R. M.; Zhu, J. (2004). Returns to Scale in Different DEA Models. European Journal of Operational Research, 154(2), 345-362.
Google Scholar
Bhandari, M. (1999). Tourism Raised Problems in Masai Mara National Park Narok, Kenya. Report prepared for APEC, Nepal.14p.
Google Scholar
Bosetti, V.; Locatelli, G. (2006). A Data Envelopment Analysis Approach to the Assessment of Natural Parks’ Economic Efficiency and Sustainability. The Case of Italian National Parks. Sustainable Development 4, No. 4, pp. 277 - 286 DOI: 10.1002/sd.288.
Google Scholar
Bowlin, W. F. (1998). Measuring Performance: An Introduction to Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). The Journal of Cost Analysis, 15(2), 3-27.
Google Scholar
Cava, P. B.; Junior, A. P. S.; A. M. D. Branco (2016). Evaluation of Bank Efficiency in Brazil: A Dea Approach, Ram, Rev. Adm. Mackenzie, 17(4), 62-84
Google Scholar
Challender, D. W. S.; MacMillan, D. C. (2014). Poaching is More Than an Enforcement Problem. Conservation Letters 7: 484–494
Google Scholar
Challender, D.; Harrop, S.; MacMillan, D. (2015). Towards Informed and Multi-Faceted Wildlife Trade Interventions. Global Ecology and Conservation 3:129–148.
Google Scholar
Charnes, A.; Cooper, W. W.; Lewin, A. Y.; Seiford, L. M. (1994). Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology, and Application. (1st ed.) New York: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
Google Scholar
Charnes, A.; Cooper, W.; Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429-444.
Google Scholar
Charnley, S. (2005) From Nature Tourism to Ecotourism? The Case of the Nerorongoro Conservation Area, Tanzania. Hum Organ 64, 75–88.
Google Scholar
Cooper, W. W.; Seiford, L. M.; Tone, K. (2006). Introduction to Data Envelopment Analysis and Its Uses: With DEA-Solver Software and References. New York: Springer Science and Business Media, Inc.
Google Scholar
Cooper, W. W.; Seiford, L. M.; Tone, K. (2007). Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software (2nd Ed.). New York: Springer Science & Business Media, LLC.
Google Scholar
Cracolici, M.F. (2005). La Competitività tra Destinazioni Turistiche. Un’Analisi di Destination Benchmarking, PhD Dissertation, Faculty of Economics, University of Palermo, Italy.
Google Scholar
Cracolici, M. F. (2004) Tourist Performance Evaluation: a Novel Approach, Atti XLII Riunione Scientifica della Società Italiana di Statistica, June 2004, Bari.
Google Scholar
Cracolici, M.F., Nijkamp, P. (2006) Competition among Tourist Destination. An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis to Italian Provinces, in Giaoutzi M. and Nijkamp P. (eds.), Tourism and Regional Development: New Pathways, Ashgate, Aldershot, UK.
Google Scholar
Fethi, M.; Pasiouras, F. (2010). Assessing Bank Performance with Operational Research and Artificial Intelligence Techniques: A Survey. European Journal of Operational Research, 204(2), 189-198.
Google Scholar
Fischer, F. (2008). The Importance of Law Enforcement for Protected Areas: Don't Step Back! Be Honest Protect. Pp. 101–103.
Google Scholar
Ginsberg, L. (1997). ̳Training for the Long Haul‘ Computer Shopper 17, pp. 04
Google Scholar
Jackson, G. B.; Wirt, J. G. (1996). Putting Students to Work. Training and Development 50: 58-59
Google Scholar
Jackson, R. H.; Jackson, M. W. (2009). Student Assessment of a semi-directed internship program. Journal of Geography108: 57–67
Google Scholar
Jacob, D. E.; Eniang, E. A.; Nelson, I. U.; U. I. Udoakpan (2015). Vegetation Assessment of Sclater’s Guenon Habitat in Ikot Uso Akpan Forest, Itu, Southeastern Nigeria, Intl. J. of Mol. Ecol. and Conserv. 2(6): 32-38 (doi: 10.5376/ijmec.2015.05.0001)
Google Scholar
Jacob, D. E.; Nelson, I. U. (2015). A Survey of Sclater’s Guenon in Ikot Uso Akpan Community Forest, Itu, Nigeria, Intl. J. of Mol. Ecol. and Conserv. 5(2): 32-38 (doi: 10.5376/ijmec.2015.05.0002)
Google Scholar
Jacob, D. E.; Nelson, I. U.; Udoakapn, U. I.; Etuk, U. B. (2015). Wildlife Poaching in Nigeria National Parks: A Case study of Cross River National Park, International Journal of Molecular Ecology and Conservation 5(4): 1-7 (doi: 10.5376/ijmec.2015.05.0004)
Google Scholar
Jacob, D.E.; A.U. Ogogo (2011). Community Participation in Protected Area Management: A Case Study of Cross River National Park. In: Popoola, L., K. Ogunsanwo and F. Idumah (eds). Forestry in the context of the millennium development goals, Proceeding of the 34th Annual Conference of the Forestry Association of Nigeria held in Osogbo, Osun State, Nigeria. Vol.1 p412-415.
Google Scholar
Jacob, D.E.; Udoakpan U.I.; Nelson, I. U (2013). Issues in Conflict Resolution in Cross River National Park, Southeastern Nigeria. 1st International Conference on Environmental Crisis and its Solution. Scientific and Research Branch, Khouzeslan, Islamic Azad University, Kish Island, Iran, 13th-14th February, 2013. pp 76-82.
Google Scholar
Kruger, O. (2005) The Role of Ecotourism in Conservation: Panacea or Pandora's box? Biodivers Conserv 14, 579–600.
Google Scholar
Kulshreshtha, M.; Parikh, J. K. (2002). Study of Efficiency and Productivity Growth in Opencast and Underground Coal Mining in India: A DEA Analysis. Energy Economics, 24(5), 439-453
Google Scholar
Kumar, S.; Gulati, R. (2008). An Examination of Technical, Pure Technical, and Scale Efficiencies in Indian Public Sector Banks Using Data Envelopment Analysis. Eurasian Journal of Business and Economics 1 (2), 33-69.
Google Scholar
Lindsey, P. A.; Alexander, R.; Mills, M. G. L.; Romanãch, S.; Woodroffe, R. (2007). Wildlife Viewing Preferences of Visitors to Protected Areas in South Africa: Implications for the Role of Ecotourism in Conservation. Journal of Ecotourism, 6(1):19-33.
Google Scholar
Liu, S. (2009). Slacks-Based Efficiency Measures for Predicting Bank Performance. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(2), 2813-2818
Google Scholar
Macedo, M. A.; Barbosa, A. T. (2009). Eficiência no sistema bancário brasileiro: uma análise do desempenho de bancos de varejo, atacado, middle-market e financiamento utilizando DEA. Revista de Informação Contábil (RIC), 3(3), 1-24.
Google Scholar
Macoris, L.; Salgado, A. P. Jr.; Falsarella, E., Jr. (2015). The Different Approaches of Banking Efficiency: A Meta-Analysis. Proceedings of the International Conference on Data Envelopment Analysis. Braunschweig, Germany, 13.
Google Scholar
Meduna, A. J.; Amusa, T.O.; Ogunjinmi, A. A.; Ibeun, J. S. (2005). Environmental Friendly Tourism in Nigeria: A Case Study of Nigerian National Park Service. Nigerian Journal of Forestry 35 (1): 36-43.
Google Scholar
Ogogo, A. U.; A. A. Nchor; D. E. Jacob (2010). Challenges of Buffer Zone Management in Cross River National Park, Southeastern Nigeria. Journal of Research in Forestry, Wildlife and Environment 2(2): 156-163
Google Scholar
Périco, A.; Rebelatto, D. N.; Santana, N. B. (2008). Eficiência bancária: os maiores bancos são os mais eficientes? Uma análise por envoltória de dados. Gest. Prod., 15(2), 421-431.
Google Scholar
Raab, R. L.; Lichty, R. W. (2002). Identifying Subareas that Comprise a Greater Metropolitan Area: The Criterion of County Relative Efficiency. Journal of Regional Science, 42(3), 579-594.
Google Scholar
Renz, T. (2015). The Transition from an Unpaid, Unprotected Internship Model. WWW document, http://www.the-wagnerreview.org/2015/04/the-transition-from-an-unpaid-unprotectedinternship-model/
Google Scholar
Pai, J. T.; W. Liao; D. Hu. (2017). Research on Eco-efficiency of Industrial Parks in Taiwan. Proceedings of 2017 International Conference of Asian-Pacific Planning Societies, 20pp.
Google Scholar
Rusielik, R.; W, Zbaraszewski. (2014). The Efficiency of Scientific and Tourism Activity of Polish National Parks with use DEA method. Economic and Environmental Studies 14 (3 (31)), 283-297
Google Scholar
Saha, A.; Ravisankar, T. (2000). Rating of Indian commercial banks: a DEA approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 124(1), 187-203.
Google Scholar
Sánchez, L.E., Croal, P. (2012). Environmental impact assessment, from Rio-92 to Rio + 20 and beyond. Ambiente and Sociedade 15, 41–54
Google Scholar
Sathye, M. (2003). Efficiency of banks in a developing economy: The case of India. European Journal of Operational Research, 148(3), 662-671.
Google Scholar
Sovilla, E. S. (1998). Co-op’s Odyssey. ASSEE Prism 7: 18–23
Google Scholar
Soysal-Kurt, H. (2017). Measuring Tourism Efficiency of European Countries by Using Data Envelopement Analysis, European Scientific Journal 13(10): 1857 – 7881
Google Scholar
Thanassoulis, E. (2003). Introduction to the Theory and Application of Data Envelopment Analysis: A Foundation Text with Integrated Software (2nd ed.). New York: Springer
Google Scholar
Toloo, M. ; Nalchigar, S. (2009). A New Integrated DEA Model for Finding Most BCC-Efficient DMU. Applied Mathematical Modelling 33(1): 597-604
Google Scholar
Tranquilli, S.; Abedi-Lartey, M.; Abernethy, K.; Amsini, F.; Asamoah, A.; Balangtaa, C.; et al. (2014) Protected Areas in Tropical Africa: Assessing Threats and Conservation Activities. PLoS ONE 9(12): e114154. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114154
Google Scholar
Wanke, P.; Barros, C.; Faria, J. (2015). Financial Distress Drivers in Brazilian Banks: A Dynamic Slacks Approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 240(1), 258-268
Google Scholar
Yang, Y.; Zhao, J. (2009), Study on Commercial Bank Credit Risk based on AGA and Camel Rating System., Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 562-565.
Google Scholar
Yu, Z.; Chen, H.; Liu, J.; Zhang, H.; Yan, Y.; Zhu, N.; Guo, Y.; Yang, B.; Chang, Y.y Dai, F.; et al. (2014). Various Applications of TALEN and CRISPR/Cas9-mediated Homologous Recombination to Modify the Drosophila genome. Biol Open. 3:271–280.
Google Scholar
Authors
Samuel OnadekoAuthors
Imaobong NelsonAuthors
Abdul ShotuyoStatistics
Скачивания
Лицензия
Copyright (c) 2020 Economic and Environmental Studies
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike» («Атрибуция — Некоммерческое использование — На тех же условиях») 4.0 Всемирная.
