Mechanisms of counterfeiting scientific facts – pseudoscience and pseudo-archaeology
Katarzyna JAROSZ
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to identify the mechanisms and techniques of counterfeiting science. Archaeological non-rational hypothesis seem to be very attractive for the public in spite of the fact that genuine information is widely available. I aim to verify how and why these pseudoscientific theories diffused in Polish reality, to what extent the reality influenced them and how the attitude towards such topics was changing in the second part of the 20th century. Materials for my analysis were articles about archaeology, published in Polish popular science journals in the years 1945-1999. Two different tendencies can be observed. Some authors –mostly renowned scientists- explain to the readers, why these theories are impossible to prove scientifically. On the other side, running parallel, there are many articles written by proponents of pseudo-archaeology. The most common mechanisms of counterfeiting facts are: presenting artifacts without archaeological context, distorting their scale, distorting the facts, leaving a reader in a state of uncertainty, rejection of rational argument, lack of skepticism, care and logic. Sometimes other alternatives are not checked, and the concepts of greater probability, but less attractive for the public, are not even considered, only in order to attach a reader’s attention.
Keywords:
archaeology, pseudoscience, pseudo-archaeologyReferences
Carnac P. (1977). Historia zaczyna się w Bimini. Problemy 7: 123.
Churchward, J. (2004). Mu zaginiony kontynent. Warszawa: wyd. Amber.
Håkan, K.; Nilsson B. (2001). Arkeologins publika relation. En kritisk rannsakning. Göteborg : Bricoleur press.
Breuil H.; Boyle, M.; Scherz, E. R. (1955). The White Lady of the Brandberg. New York: Faber & Fabe.
Hurwic, J. (2006). Wspomnienia i refleksje. Toruń: Wydaw. Comer.
Lewis. W.; David, J. (1981). Believing and Seeing: Symbolic Meanings in Southern San. Rock Paintings. London: Academic Press.
Jacobson, L. (1980). The White Lady of the Brandberg: A re-interpretation. Namibiana 2(1): 21-29.
Jakubowski, J. (1956). UNESCO ostrzega przed fałszywymi naukami. Problemy 7: 445.
Johnson, D. (1997). The Relationship Between the Lines of Nasca and Water Resources. Paper presented to the 16th Annual Meeting of the Northeast Conference on Andean Archaeology and Ethnohistory. University of Maine, Orono, October 5.
Keenan, J. (ed.). (2004). The Lesser Gods of the Sahara: Social Change and Indigenous Rights. Cass Series--History and Society in the Islamic World. Frank Cass: Rutledge.
Krzak, Z. (1978). Jeśli istniała Atlantyda. Problemy 4: 45-51.
Lhote, H. (1959). The Search for the Tassili Frescoes: The story of the prehistoric rock-paintings of the Sahara. London: Hutchinson.
Lhote, H. (1977). Malowidła kwitnącej pustyni. Warszawa: Wyd. Iskry.
Luce, J. (1987). Koniec Atlantydy. Warszawa: WAiF.
Pager, H. (1975). Stone age myth and magic: As documented in the rock paintings of South Africa. Akademische Druck- u. Verlagsanstalt Skowron, S.(1945). Z historii rodu ludzkiego. Wszechświat 1: 12.
Skowron, S.(1947). Czy giganci byli przodkami roku ludzkiego. Wszechświat 8-9: 482-487.
Weidenreich, F.(1944). Giant early man from Java an South China. Science 99(2581): 479-482.
Wendt, W.E. (1972). Preliminary report on an archaeological research programme in South West Africa. Cimbebasia(B) 2: 1–61.
Wolańscy, T. N. (1958). Zagadkowa forma w Groseto. Problemy 12: 9-19.
Wolański, N. (1959). Czy rzeczywiście nasi przodkowie byli olbrzymami? Problemy 7(160): 513.
Zajdler, L. (1979). Atlantyda 1979. Problemy 1: 12-18.
Ziółkowski, M. (1976). Geometria pustyni Nazca. Problemy 9: 32-35.
Authors
Katarzyna JAROSZStatistics
Downloads
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Katarzyna JAROSZ, Cultural heritage and museums in Central Asia: The Role of Cultural Institutions in disseminating Information , Economic and Environmental Studies: Vol. 16 No. 2 (38) (2016)
