The Efficiency of Eco-Innovation. Systematic Literature Studies

Dawid Szutowski; Aleksandra Szulczewska- Remi; Piotr Ratajczak

doi:10.25167/ees.2017.42.4

Opublikowane: 2020-11-23

Tom 17 Nr 2 (42) (2017)

Efektywność ekoinnowacji. Systematyczne studia literaturowe

Dawid Szutowski

, Aleksandra Szulczewska- Remi

, Piotr Ratajczak

Economic and Environmental Studies

Dział: Articles

https://doi.org/10.25167/ees.2017.42.4

Abstrakt

Cel badań Ekoinnowacje leżą w samym sercu polityki Unii Europejskiej, co jest szczególnie istotne zarówno dla pojedynczych spółek jak i całych systemów ekonomicznych. Jednocześnie, ekoinnowacje zależą od niezliczonej liczby czynników, stąd też celem podjętych badań było wskazanie determinant warunkujących efektywność ekoinnowacji. Metodologia badań Badania przeprowadzono w oparciu o systematyczny przegląd literatury z wykorzystaniem metody SALSA (Search, AppraisaL, Synthesis, Analysis). Skoncentrowano się na artykułach opublikowanych między styczniem 2000 a czerwcem 2016 roku, łącznie przeanalizowano 469 publikacji korzystając z bazy danych Scopus. Szczegółowe badania pozwoliły na określenie tych, które dotyczyły czynników warunkujących efektywność ekoinnowacji. Wyniki badań Studia literaturowe wskazały 24 determinant. Ponadto, wyniki badań pozwoliły na dokonanie podziału czynników określających efektywność ekoinnowacji według dwóch następujących kryteriów: zależnych od kosztów i przychodów, oraz na poziomie operacyjnym i strategicznym. Ograniczenia badań Łącznie 11 publikacji zostało pominiętych w badaniu z uwagi na ich niekompletność lub niedostępność. Zastosowanie praktyczne przeprowadzonych badań Stymulowanie ekoinnowacji ma szczególne znaczenie dla wszystkich przedsiębiorstw. Zestawienie czynników warunkujących efektywność ekoinnowacji może wspierać kierownictwo w ich zarządzaniu. Oryginalność/znaczenie przeprowadzonych badań Praca wypełnia lukę badawczą w zakresie czynników warunkujących efektywność ekoinnowacji.

Słowa kluczowe:

ekoinnowacja, efektywność

Pobierz pliki

PDF (English)

Zasady cytowania

Szutowski, D., Szulczewska- Remi, A., & Ratajczak, P. (2020). Efektywność ekoinnowacji. Systematyczne studia literaturowe. Economic and Environmental Studies, 17(2 (42), 205–219. https://doi.org/10.25167/ees.2017.42.4

Cited by / Share

Bibliografia

Alegre, J.; Chiva, J. (2006). A measurement scale for product innovation performance. European Journal of Innovation Management 9(4): 333-346.
Google Scholar

Amore, M.; Bennedsen, M. (2016). Corporate governance and green innovation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 75: 54-72.
Google Scholar

Arundel, A.; Kemp, R. (2009). Measuring eco-innovation. Working paper, UNU-MERIT, Maastricht 17: 1-40.
Google Scholar

Booth, A.; Papaioannou, D.; Sutton, A. (2012). Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review. London: Sage.
Google Scholar

Bossle, M.; Dutra de Barcellos, M.; Vieira, L. (2016). The drivers for adoption of eco-innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production 113: 861-872.
Google Scholar

Burritt, R.; Schaltegger, S. (2001). Eco-efficiency in corporate budgeting. Environmental Management and Health 129(20): 158-174.
Google Scholar

Carroll, A. (1999). Corporate Social Responsibility. Evolution of a Definitional Construct. Business & Society 38(3): 268-295.
Google Scholar

Doran, J.; Ryan, G. (2012). Regulation and firm perception. Eco-innovation and firm performance. European Journal of Innovation Management 15(4): 421-441.
Google Scholar

European Commission (2014). Eco-Innovation. Enabling the transition to a resource-efficient circular economy. Available at: http://www.eco-innovation.eu/images/stories/Reports/eio_2014_report.pdf. Accessed 6 June 2017.
Google Scholar

European Commission (2001). Green Paper. Promoting a European Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility. COM (2001) 366, Brussels.
Google Scholar

European Commission (2006). Green Paper. A European Strategy for Sustainable, Competitive and Secure Energy. COM (2006) 105. Brussels.
Google Scholar

European Commission (2009). Eco-innovation the key to Europe’s future competitiveness. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/pubs/pdf/factsheets/ecoinnovation/en.pdf. Accessed 6 June 2017. European Commission (2011). A Renewed EU Strategy 2011-14 for Corporate Social Responsibility. COM (2011) 681. Brussels.
Google Scholar

European Economic and Social Committee (2012). Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the ‘Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Innovation for a Sustainable Future — The Ecoinnovation Action Plan (Eco-AP). Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52012AE1224&from=PL (20.05.2016). Accessed 6 June 2017.
Google Scholar

Fatemi, A.; Fooladi, I. (2013). Sustainable Finance a New Paradigm, Global Finance Journal 24: 101-113.
Google Scholar

Gerstlberger, W.; Knudsen, M.; Stampe, I. (2014). Sustainable Development Strategies for Product Innovation and energy Efficiency. Business Strategy and the Environment 23: 131–144.
Google Scholar

Ghisetti, C.; Rennings, K. (2014). Environmental innovations and profitability: How does it pay to be green? An empirical analysis on the German Innovation survey. Journal of Cleaner production 75: 106-117.
Google Scholar

Guagnano, G. (2001). Altruism and market-like behavior: an analysis of willingness to pay for recycled paper products. Popular Environment 22: 425–438.
Google Scholar

Guoyou, Q.; Saixing, Z.; Chiming, T.; Haitao, Y.; Hailiang, Z. (2013). Stakeholders' Influences on Corporate Green Innovation Strategy: A Case Study of Manufacturing Firms in China. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 20: 1-14.
Google Scholar

Haila, F.; Rundquist, J. (2011). The development and market success of eco-innovations. European Journal of Innovation Management 14(3): 278-302.
Google Scholar

Heras-Saizarbitoria, I.; Casadesus, M.; Marimon, F. (2011). The impact of ISO 9001 standard and the EFQM model: The view of the assessors. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence 22(2): 197-218.
Google Scholar

Hojnik, J.; Ruzzier, M. (2016). What drives eco-innovation? A review of an emerging literature. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 19: 31-41.
Google Scholar

Hollanders, H.; Esser, F. (2007). Measuring innovation efficiency. INNO-Metrics Thematic Paper 1: 1-26.
Google Scholar

Horbach, J.; Rammer, Ch.; Rennings, K. (2012). Determinants of eco-innovations by type of environmental impact - the role of regulatory push/pull, technology push and market pull. Ecological Economics 78: 112-122.
Google Scholar

Jalali, S.; Wohlin, C. (2012). Systematic Literature Studies: Database Searches vs. Backward Snowballing. International Conference on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, ESEM’12, September 1920, Lund, Sweden.
Google Scholar

Jones, E.; Harrisom, D.; Mclaren, J. (2001). Managing creative eco-innovation, structuring outputs from ecoinnovation project. The Journal of Sustainable Product Design 1: 27-39. Miedzinski, M. (2015). Measuring eco-innovation. Lessons from the Eco-Innovation Observatory. Available at: https://www.ceps.eu/sites/default/files/Measuring%20eco-innovation%20-%20lessons%20from%20the%20 Eco-Innovation%20Observatory.pdf. Accessed 6 June 2017.
Google Scholar

Nidumolu, R.; Prahalad, C.; Rangaswami, M. (2009). Why Sustainability Is Now the Key Driver of Innovation. Harvard Business Review September.
Google Scholar

Nill, J.; Kemp, R. (2009). Evolutionary approaches for sustainable innovation policies: From niche to paradigm. Research Policy 38: 668–680.
Google Scholar

Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs (2009). Corporate social responsibility in a global economy. Norway: Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Google Scholar

OECD (2008). Open Innovation in Global Networks, Paris: OECD Publishing.
Google Scholar

OECD (2009). OECD Innovation Strategy. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Google Scholar

Ormazabal, M.; Sarriegi, J. (2012). Environmental management evolution: empirical evidence from Spain and Italy. Business Strategy and the Environment 23(2): 73-88.
Google Scholar

Porter, M.; Kramer, M. (2011). Creating Shared Value. Harvard Business Review January - February.
Google Scholar

Przychodzen, J.; Przychodzen, W. (2015). Relationships between eco-innovation and financial performance - evidence from publicly traded companies in Poland and Hungary. Journal of Cleaner Production 90: 253-263.
Google Scholar

Rennings, K.; Zwick, T. (2003). Employment Impacts of Cleaner Production. Heidelberg: ZEW Economic Studies.
Google Scholar

Rexhepi, G.; Kurtishi, S.; Bexheti, G. (2013). Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Innovation the Drivers of Business Growth? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 75: 532-541.
Google Scholar

Sarkar, A. (2013). Promoting Eco-innovations to Leverage Sustainable Development of Eco-industry and Green Growth. European Journal of Sustainable Development 2(1): 171–224.
Google Scholar

Siau, K.; Long, Y. (2005). Synthesizing e-government stage models – a meta-synthesis based on meta-ethnography approach. Industrial Management and Data Systems 105(4): 449-450.
Google Scholar

Son I.; Lee D.; Lee J.; Chang Y. (2011). Understanding the impact of IT service innovation on firm performance: The case of cloud computing. In: Seddon, P.; Shirley, G. (eds.). Quality Research in Pacific Asia: 180-194. Queensland: Queensland University of Technology.
Google Scholar

Szutowski, D. (2016). Innovation and market value. The case of tourism enterprises. Warsaw: Difin.
Google Scholar

Szutowski, D.; Ratajczak, P. (2016). Exploring the Relationship between CSR and Innovation. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal 7(2): 295-318.
Google Scholar

Triguero, A.; Moreno-Mondejar, L.; Davia, M.A. (2013). Drivers of different types of eco-innovation in European SMEs. Ecological Economy 92: 25-33.
Google Scholar

Tsen, C.; Phang, G.; Hasan, H.; Buncha, M. (2006). Going green: a study of consumers’ willingness to pay for green products in Kota Kinabalu. International Journal of Business and Society 7: 40-54.
Google Scholar

Tundys, B. (2015). Eco innovation indicators as element of green supply chain. Logistyka 2: 783-795.
Google Scholar

Valle, S.; Avella, L. (2003). Cross-functionality and leadership of the new product development teams. European Journal of Innovation Management 6(1): 32-47.
Google Scholar

Visser, W. (2010). The Age of Responsibility CSR 2.0 and the New DNA of Business. Journal of Business Systems, Governance and Ethics 5(3): 7-22.
Google Scholar

Wang, S.; Fan, J.; Zhao, D.; Wang, S. (2016). Regional innovation environment and innovation efficiency: the Chinese case. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 28(4): 396-410.
Google Scholar

Wang, E.; Huang, W. (2007). Relative efficiency of R&D Activities: A cross-country study accounting for environmental factors in the DEA approach. Research Policy 36: 260-273.
Google Scholar

Weiss, M.; Hoegl, M.; Gibbert, M. (2011). Making Virtue of Necessity: The role of Team Climate for Innovation in Resource-Constrained Innovation Projects. Journal of Product Innovation Management 28: 196-207.
Google Scholar

Xue, L.; Ray, G.; Sambamurthy, V. (2012). Efficiency or Innovation: How do the Industry Environments Moderate the Effects of Firms' IT Asset Portfolios. MIS Quarterly 36(2): 509-528.
Google Scholar

Zhang, Q.; Doll, W. (2001). The fuzzy front end and success of new product development causal model. European Journal of Innovation Management 4(2): 95-112.
Google Scholar

Ziółkowski, B. (2013). The world trends in eco-innovaiton assessment. Modern Management Review 20(1): 153-162.
Google Scholar