Nature conservation in Polish agriculture under conditions of EU membership
Аннотация
The paper’s aim is to assess effectiveness of the implementation of nature conservation measures in Polish agriculture. Environmental regulations influence main groups of Common Agricultural Policy instruments. In the I pillar of the policy, it refers to cross–compliance, in the II pillar it refers to agri-environmental programmes, the Natura 2000 payments and organic farming support. In Poland they are ineffectively implemented and insufficiently directed to nature conservation. This refers both to domestic environmental and agricultural policy. In some aspects they are not coordinated. This is connected with delay in construction of protection plans which are necessary for proper policy in the Natura 2000 network. Consequently, the specialized payments for farmers in the Natura 2000 network have not been implemented yet while the extent in which agri-environmental measures have been implemented is too small. Moreover, the system of control and certification in organic farming does not involve requirements referring to biodiversity. There are some deficiencies in biodiversity protection standards within domestic regulations of cross-compliance. In this situation, Polish agriculture could contribute to degradation of biological diversity in rural areas.
Ключевые слова:
environment protection in agriculture, biodiversity, sustainable development of agriculture, agri-environmental programmes, rural development measuresБиблиографические ссылки
Alliance Environment (2007). Evaluation of environmental impact of the CMO and direct support measures of the CAP for arable crops. Brussels: Alliance Environment, Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development.
Google Scholar
ARiMR (2011). Broszura wzajemna zgodność (cross compliance). Minimalne normy, Obszar A i Obszar B obowiązujący od 2011 r. Warszawa.
Google Scholar
Bołtromiuk, A. (2011). Koncepcja sytemu publicznego wsparcia rolnictwa na obszarach europejskiej sieci ekologicznej, in: A. Bołtromiuk, M. Kłodziński (eds.), Natura 2000 jako czynnik zrównoważonego rozwoju obszarów wiejskich regionu Zielonych Płuc Polski. Warszawa: IRWiR PAN.
Google Scholar
Brodzińska, K. (2011). Problemy środowiskowej oceny zrównoważonego rozwoju rolnictwa ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem instrumentów WPR. In: Graczyk, A. (ed.). Kryzys a rozwój zrównoważony rolnictwa i energetyki: 84-98. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu 231.
Google Scholar
Commission of the European Communities (2006). Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, A Thematic Strategy on the Sustainable Use of Pesticides. Brussels COM(2006) 372 final.
Google Scholar
Commission of the European Communities (2008). Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament, Environment Policy Review. COM(2008) 409 final. Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora (O. J. L 206, 22/07/1992 P. 0007 – 0050).
Google Scholar
Council Regulation (EEC) No 73/2009 establishing the common rules for direct support schemes for farmers under common agricultural policy and establishing certain schemes for farmers (O. J. L 30, 31.01.2009).
Google Scholar
Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on the conservation of wild birds (O. J. L 20/7 26.1.2010).
Google Scholar
Directive 2009/128/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 establishing a framework for Community action to achieve the sustainable use of pesticides (O. J. L 309, 24.11.2009).
Google Scholar
Directorate General for Agriculture and Rural Development (2012). Rural Development in the European Union, Statistical and Economic Information. Report 2012. Brussels: European Union.
Google Scholar
European Commission (2011a). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Our life insurance, our natural capital: an EU biodiversity strategy to 2020. COM(2011) 244 final.
Google Scholar
European Commission (2010a). Natura 2000 barometer. Natura 2000. Nature and Biodiversity Newsletter 29.
Google Scholar
European Commission (2011b). Proposal for regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing rules for direct payments to farmers under support schemes within the framework of the common agricultural policy. COM(2011) 625 final/2, SEC(2011) 1153, SEC(2011) 1154.
Google Scholar
European Commission (2010b). Situation and Prospects of Agriculture and rural areas. Brussels.
Google Scholar
European Commission (2005). Agri-environment Measures, Overview on General Principles, Types of Measures, and Application. Unit G-4 - Evaluation of Measures applied to Agriculture, Studies. Brussels.
Google Scholar
Europejski Trybunał Obrachunkowy (2008). Czy zasada współzależności jest skuteczna? Sprawozdanie specjalne 2008, nr 8. Luksemburg.
Google Scholar
Eurostat (2010). Environmental Statistics and Accounts in Europe. Eurostat statistical books. 2010 edition, Luxembourg: Publication Office of European Union.
Google Scholar
IJHARS (2005). Rolnictwo ekologiczne w Polsce w 2004 roku. Warszawa: IJHARS.
Google Scholar
IJHARS (2012). Rolnictwo ekologiczne w Polsce w 2011 roku. Warszawa: IJHARS.
Google Scholar
Kociszewski, K. (2013). Ekologizacja polskiego rolnictwa a jego zrównoważony rozwój w warunkach członkostwa w Unii Europejskiej. Wrocław: Wyd. Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu.
Google Scholar
Makomaska-Juchiewicz, M. (2009). Stan wdrożenia sieci Natura 2000 w Polsce. Chrońmy przyrodę ojczystą 65(1):11-28.
Google Scholar
Konecny, M. (2004). EU Enlargement and Agriculture: Risks and Opportunities. Brussels: Friends of Earth Europe.
Google Scholar
MRiRW (2013). Biuletyn informacyjny 4-5/2013. Warszawa: Ministerstwo Rolnictwa i Rozwoju Wsi.
Google Scholar
MRiRW (2005). Plan rozwoju obszarów wiejskich na lata 2004–2006. Warszawa: Ministerstwo Rolnictwa i Rozwoju Wsi.
Google Scholar
MRiRW (2011). Plan rozwoju obszarów wiejskich na lata 2007–2013. Warszawa: Ministerstwo Rolnictwa i Rozwoju Wsi.
Google Scholar
MRiRW (2013). Wyznaczanie obszarów cennych przyrodniczo. Available at: http://www.minrol.gov.pl/pol/Ministerstwo/Biuro-Prasowe/Informacje-Prasowe/Wyznaczanie-obszarow-cennych-przyrodniczo. Accessed 04 February 2014.
Google Scholar
Najwyższa Izba Kontroli (2008). Informacja o wynikach kontroli wdrażania ochrony na obszarach Natura 2000. Warszawa: NIK.
Google Scholar
Stalenga, J.; Tyburski, J. (2012). Rolnictwo ekologiczne i wsparcie PROW w Polsce w okresie programowania 2007–13. In: Proceedings from the Conference „Programy rolnośrodowiskowe – z korzyścią dla człowieka i środowiska”, organised by Polish Ecological Club and MARD, Kluczbork, Poland 11–12.04.2012.
Google Scholar
Szymborska, E. (2012). Programy rolnośrodowiskowe chroniące wody i bioróżnorodność w okresie programowania 2007–2013 – stan wdrożenia 2012. In: Proceedings from the Conference „Programy rolnośrodowiskowe – z korzyścią dla człowieka i środowiska”, organised by Polish Ecological Club and MARD, Kluczbork, Poland 11–12.04.2012.
Google Scholar
Ustawa z 18 grudnia 2003 r. o ochronie roślin (Dz.U. z 2008 r. Nr 133, poz. 849).
Google Scholar
Ustawa z 8 marca 2013 r. o środkach ochrony roślin (Dz.U. z 2013 poz. 455).
Google Scholar
Willer, H.; Kilcher, L. (eds.) (2012). The world of organic agriculture: Statistics and emerging trends 2012. Bonn–Frick: FIBL and IFOAM.
Google Scholar
Tyburski, J.; Żakowska-Biemans, S. (2007). Wprowadzenie do rolnictwa ekologicznego. Warszawa: SGGW.
Google Scholar
Statistics
Скачивания
Лицензия
Copyright (c) 2020 Economic and Environmental Studies
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike» («Атрибуция — Некоммерческое использование — На тех же условиях») 4.0 Всемирная.
Наиболее читаемые статьи этого автора (авторов)
- Karol KOCISZEWSKI, Sustainable development of agriculture - theoretical aspects and their implications , Economic and Environmental Studies: Том 18 № 3 (47) (2018)
- Karol KOCISZEWSKI, The changes in financial support for agrienvironmental programme in Poland , Economic and Environmental Studies: Том 16 № 4 (40) (2016)
- Karol KOCISZEWSKI, Nature conservation in Polish agriculture under conditions of EU membership , Economic and Environmental Studies: Том 14 № 1 (29) (2014)
- Karol KOCISZEWSKI, The Final solutions for Common Agricultural Policy in years 2014-2020 – step towards environmental sustainability or business as usual? , Economic and Environmental Studies: Том 16 № 1(37) (2016)
- Karol KOCISZEWSKI, EU FINANCIAL SUPPORT FOR MULTI-FUNCTIONAL DEYELOPMENT OF RURAL AREAS IN POLAND , Economic and Environmental Studies: Том 7 (2005)
- Irena Kociszewska, Karol Kociszewski, SEWAGE SLUDGE MANAGEMENT IN AGRICULTURE IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF EU AND POLISH LEGISLATION , Economic and Environmental Studies: Том 3 (2003): Sustainable Waste Management
- Karol KOCISZEWSKI, POTENTIAL ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL CONSEQUENCES OF INTRODUCING EU AGRO-ENVIRONMENTAL MEASURES IN POLAND , Economic and Environmental Studies: Том 6 (2004): CHALLENGES IN AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE
- Karol KOCISZEWSKI, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION IN AGRICULTURE WITHIN THE EU STRATEGY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEYELOPMENT - IMPLICATIONS FOR POLAND , Economic and Environmental Studies: Том 8 (2006)
- Karol KOCISZEWSKI, THE PERSPECTIVES OF EU FINANCIAL SUPPORT FOR ENYIRONMENTAL PROTECTION IN POLAND IN THE YEARS 2007-2013 , Economic and Environmental Studies: Том 11 (2008)
