Circular economy (CE) assumptions in WEEE management: Polish case study
Marzena SMOL
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5833-2954
Anna AVDIUSHCHENKO
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6744-1968
Joanna KULCZYCKA
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4377-5506
Abstrakt
It is currently emphasised at European level that an essential way to deliver the resource efficiency agenda established under the Europe 2020 Strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth is through moving towards a more circular economy (CE). European Union (EU) documents indicate that greater and sustained improvements of resource efficiency performance can bring large economic benefits. One of the most important advantages of CE systems is to keep the added value in products for as long as possible and eliminate waste. This also applies to the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) regulations. The WEEE regulations are intended to reduce the amount of e-waste being disposed of and require EEE producers to pay for its reuse, recycling and recovery. According to Chief Inspectorate of Environmental Protection (GIOS) data, every Pole generates approx. 14 kg of electronic waste annually (in EU – 17 kg/capita annually) and only 4 kg of these waste is selective selected. This indicates that the recovery of raw materials from WEEE, i.e. cell phones, computers, screens, monitors, household goods is one of the largest potential sources of raw materials, but it is wasted. Currently, the management and recovery of materials from WEEE is on the agenda of the EU and many individual countries as its disposal in an improper manner could have a significant impact on the environment. Efficient WEEE management has become a key goal, due to the pollution that could potentially result from the hazardous substances its components contain, but also because reusing its materials can be an important potential supply of resources. It should be mentioned that action on the circular economy is closely linked with key EU priorities, including jobs and growth, the investment agenda, climate and energy, the social agenda and industrial innovation, and with global efforts on sustainable development. The paper presents the importance of economic actors in Poland, such as business and consumers, which play a fundamental role in moving to a more CE model. Their eco-innovative actions support the CE at each step of the value chain – from production to consumption, repair and remanufacturing, waste management, and secondary raw materials that are fed back into the economy. The proposed actions should be consistent with the local, regional, national and European level regulations, which are also presented.
##semicolon##
circular economy (CE)##common.commaListSeparator## waste management##common.commaListSeparator## waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE)##submission.citations##
Act on waste of 14 December 2012 (Journal of Law 2013, item. 21).
Google Scholar
Act on waste electrical and electronic equipment of 1 September 2015 (Journal of Law 2015, item 1688).
Google Scholar
Bastein; T., Roelofs, E.; Rietveld, E.; Hoogendoorn, A. (2013). Opportunities for a Circular Economy in the Netherlands. Report commissioned by the Netherlands Ministry of Infrastructure and Environment. Delft: TNO.
Google Scholar
Central Statistical Office of Poland (CSO, 2015). Raport o funkcjonowaniu systemu gospodarki odpadami zużytym sprzętem elektrycznym i elektronicznym w 2014 roku. Warsaw: Central Statistical Office of Poland.
Google Scholar
Cholewa M.; Jarosiński A.; Kulczycka J. (2014). Możliwość pozyskiwania surowców nieenergetycznych z elektroodpadów w Polsce. In: Czyż, M. (ed.). Finansowe i ekologiczne aspekty działalności gospodarczej, Cracow: AGH Press.
Google Scholar
Commission of European Communities. Communication No. 297, 2014. On the review of the list of critical raw materials for the EU and the implementation of the Raw Materials Initiative (COM, No. 297, 2014).
Google Scholar
Commission of European Communities. Communication No. 398, 2014. Towards a circular economy: A zero waste programme for Europe. (COM, No. 398, 2014).
Google Scholar
Commission of European Communities. Communication No. 614, 2015. Closing the loop - An EU action plan for the Circular Economy. (COM, No. 614, 2015).
Google Scholar
Cucchiella, F.; D’Adamo, I.; Koh, S. L.; Rosa, P. (2015). Recycling of WEEEs: An economic assessment of present and future e-waste streams. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 51: 263-272.
Google Scholar
digitaleurope.org. Accessed 21 November 2016.
Google Scholar
Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives (Directive 2008/98/EC).
Google Scholar
Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives 2000/53/EC on end-of-life vehicles, 2006/66/EC on batteries and accumulators and waste batteries and accumulators, and 2012/19/EU on waste electrical and electronic equipment.
Google Scholar
Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 establishing a framework for the setting of ecodesign requirements for energy-related products (Directive 2009/125/EC).
Google Scholar
ec.europa.eu. Accessed 21 November 2016.
Google Scholar
ec.europa.eu/eurostat. Accessed 21 November 2016.
Google Scholar
elektrosmieciwsieci.pl. Accessed 21 November 2016.
Google Scholar
euromanuforum.com. Accessed 21 November 2016.
Google Scholar
Grodzińska-Jurczak, M.;, Tomal, P.; Tarabuła-Fiertak, M.; Nieszporek, K.; Read, A. D. (2006). Effects of an educational campaign on public environmental attitudes and behaviour in Poland. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 46(2): 182-197.
Google Scholar
Karpus, K. (2013). The new Polish Act on Waste of 2012. Polish Yearbook of Environmental Law (3): 31-52.
Google Scholar
Koellner, T.; Suh, S.; Weber, O.; Moser, C.; Scholz, R. W. (2007). Environmental Impacts of Conventional and Sustainable Investment Funds Compared Using Input‐Output Life‐Cycle Assessment. Journal of Industrial Ecology 11(3): 41-60.
Google Scholar
Kulczycka J.; Karaś H. (2016). Legalny a nielegalny handel ZSEE – skutki i zagrożenia. Cuprum Czasopismo Naukowo-Techniczne Górnictwa Rud 1(78): 65-73.
Google Scholar
Smol, M.; Kulczycka, J.; Henclik, A.; Gorazda, K.; Wzorek, Z. (2015). The possible use of sewage sludge ash (SSA) in the construction industry as a way towards a circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production 95: 45-54.
Google Scholar
##libcom.statistics##
##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##
Najaktuálnejšie články rovnakého autora (rovnakých autorov)
- Agnieszka Bielecka, Anna Avdiushchenko, Joanna Kulczycka, Marzena Smol, Application of the circular economy in the power sector of Małopolska Region –benefits and challenges , Economic and Environmental Studies: Diel 18 Číslo 1 (45) (2018)
- Marcin CHOLEWA, Joanna KULCZYCKA, Marzena SMOL, The e-waste management system in Poland , Economic and Environmental Studies: Diel 16 Číslo 4 (40) (2016)
