Il diritto biblico contro l’usura.
Studio comparativo dei frammenti della Torah (Es 22,24; Lv 25,35-38; Dt 23,20-21)
Anna Rambiert-Kwaśniewska
Papieski Wydział Teologiczny we WrocławiuAbstrakt
Among other moral or law regulations in ancient Close East, biblical law against usury should be treated as an exception due to the fact, that Tora recognized borrowing money at interest, especially to the compatriots, as definitively wrong. In order to present this exceptional status of biblical codifications, a careful exegesis as well as insightful analysis of terms nešek and tarbît has been performed. Both words turned out to be unclear when it comes to their origin and semantics. Besides mentioned analysis, a comparison of passages from three different Codes of Pentateuch has been performed. All above led to an attempt of explaining if – and how – differences between codifications can be brought together, as well as answering the question: why all three regulations were treated by Jews as obligatory, despite a serious internal incompatibilities.
Słowa kluczowe:
Usura, nešek e tarbît, legge biblica, Codice di Santità, Codice Alleanza, codice DeuteronomicBibliografia
Biddle M.E., The Biblical Prohibition Against Usury, “Interpretation” 65 (2011), no. 2, 117–127.
Botterweck G.J., Farby H.J. (ed.), Theological Dictionary of the Old Testament, v. 10 e 13, Grand Rapids – Cambridge 1999–2004.
Buckley S.L., Teachings on Usury in Judaism, Christianity and Islam, Lewiston – New York 2000.
Buhl F., Some Observations on the Social Institutions of the Israelites, “American Journal of Theology” 1 (1897), 728–740.
Cohen M.L., Meislin B.J., Backgrounds of the Biblical Law against Usury, “Comparative Studies in Society and History” 6 (1964), 250–267.
Craige P.C., The Book of Deuteronomy, Grand Rapids 1976.
Driver S.R., A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on Deuteronomy, New York 1895.
Gamoran H., The Biblical Law against Loans on Interest, “Journal of Near Eastern Studies” 30 (1971), 127–134.
Hayes J.H., Miller J.M., A History of Ancient Israel and Judah, Philadelphia 1986.
Jacob B., The Second Book of the Bible: Exodus, Hoboken 1992.
Jones D.W., Reforming the Morality of Usury, Oxford 2004.
Lippman E.J., Biblical Safeguards and Traditions as Potential Guidance for the Lending of Monies, “Journal of Business Ethics” 78 (2008), 109–120.
Loewenstamm S.E., נשך and מ/תרבת, “Journal of Biblical Literature” 88 (1969), no. 1, 78–80.
Lohfink N., Poverty in the Laws of the Ancient Near East and the Bible, “Theological Studies” 52 (1991), no. 1, 34–50.
Maloney R.P., Usury and Restrictions on Interest-Taking in the Ancient Near East, “Catholic Biblical Quaterly” 36 (1974), 1–20.
Neufeld E., The Prohibitions against Loans at Interest in Ancient Hebrew Laws, “Hebrew Union College Annual” 26 (1955), 355–412.
Römer T., Dal Deuteronomio al Libro dei Re, Torino 2007.
Sarna N.M., Exodus – šmwt, Jerusalem – New York – Philadelphia 1991.
Varšo M., Interest (Usury) and its Variations in the Biblical Law Codices, “Communio Viatorum” 50 (2008), no. 3, 323–338.
de Vaux R., Ancient Israel. Its Life and Institutions, Trowbridge 1998.
Wenham G.J., The Book of Leviticus, Grand Rapids 1988.
