Czy Pan Jezus zniósł prawo odwetu?
Mirosław Rucki
PoznańRésumé
It is often claimed, especially in popular Bible commentaries, that the principle “eye for eye” had constituted the ius talionis observed by Jews, which Jesus Christ has nullified. In the article, the effort was undertaken to understand what kind of law this principle really represented in Judaism, with references to rabbinic literature both found in Qumran and in use today. In that context, the Jewish commandment “not to revenge” was analysed, too. It was pointed also that the function of a “goel” (called “the revenger of blood” in KJV) is often confused with the revenge which is really not the case. It is the matter of fact, however, that if Jesus nullify the law on “goel” it would make His own mission of redemption baseless. So, keeping in mind His attitude to Torah, we should understand that Jesus Christ wasn’t able to nullify any law of Old Testament, and He didn’t mean it.
Mots-clés :
prawo odwetu, mściciel krwi, zemstaAuthors
Mirosław RuckiStatistics
Téléchargements
Licence
Ce travail est disponible sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d’Utilisation Commerciale - Partage dans les Mêmes Conditions 4.0 International.
Articles les plus lus par le même auteur ou la même autrice
- Mirosław Rucki, Karol Szymański, Monotrynitarne powitanie w Apokalipsie , Scriptura Sacra: No 19 (2015): Scriptura Sacra
- Mirosław Rucki, Modlitwa Pańska w kontekście mentalności żydowskich adresatów Ewangelii Mateusza , Scriptura Sacra: No 16 (2012): Scriptura Sacra
- Mirosław Rucki, Jehuda Makkabi a modlitwa za zmarłych , Scriptura Sacra: No 18 (2014): Scriptura Sacra