The problem of multiple interpretations of the terms “Information” and “Data” in the Polish Criminal Code and its consequences
Wojciech Filipkowski
University of BialystokAbstract
This paper examines the legal definitions of “information” and “data” within the Polish Criminal Code (CC), highlighting their implications for criminal liability, particularly in the realm of cybercrime. The research addresses the problem of definitional ambiguity, which poses challenges to the principles of legal certainty and consistency in criminal law. The study employs a dogmatic analysis of both general and specific parts of the CC,
including an evaluation of commentaries and relevant judicial decisions. Findings indicate that the interchangeable use of “information” and “data” across various provisions leads to interpretational inconsistencies, potentially broadening the scope of criminal liability
in a manner that contradicts constitutional principles. Moreover, the lack of precise legal definitions complicates the application of law by practitioners and undermines efforts to standardize legal frameworks for international cooperation in combating cybercrime. The author concludes that establishing clearer definitions is essential for the effective enforcement of criminal law and the protection of fundamental rights in the digital age.
Keywords:
information, criminal law, cybercrime, legal definitions, criminal liabilityReferences
Act of 2 April, 1997, The Constitution of the Republic of Poland, Official Journal of the Republic of Poland of 1997, No. 78, item 483.
Google Scholar
Act of 5 August, 2010, on the protection of classified information, Official Journal of the Republic of Poland of 2019, item 742.
Google Scholar
Act of 6 June, 1997, the Criminal Code, Official Journal of the Republic of Poland of 2022, item 1138.
Google Scholar
Directive 2013/40/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 August 2013 on attacks against information systems and replacing Council Framework Decision 2005/222/JHA, Official Journal of the European Union of 2013, L 218/8.
Google Scholar
The Convention on Cybercrime of the Council of Europe, European Treaty Series – No. 185, Official Journal of the Republic of Poland of 2015, item 728.
Google Scholar
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 25 May, 1999, ref. U 19/97 OTK 1998, no. 4, item 47.
Google Scholar
Ruling of the Supreme Court, 30 September, 2015, II KK 115/15. LEX No. 1866883.
Google Scholar
Ruling of the Supreme Court, 5 March, 2019, II KK 208/18. LEX No. 2639897.
Google Scholar
Resolution of the Supreme Court, 22 January, 2003, I KZP 43/02, LEX No. 57085.
Google Scholar
Adamski, Adam. 2000. Prawo karne komputerowe. Warszawa: C.H. Beck.
Google Scholar
Barański, Michał. 2017. Informacja w ujęciu prawnym przez pryzmat zagadnień terminologicznych. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.
Google Scholar
Budyn-Kulik, Magdalena. 2023. In: Kodeks karny. Komentarz aktualizowany, (ed.) Marek Mozgawa. LEX.
Google Scholar
Chlebowicz, Piotr. 2012. Interpretacja pojęcia dezinformacji w świetle art. 132 k.k. Studia Prawnoustrojowe 15: 41–48.
Google Scholar
Clough, Jonathan. 2014. A World of Difference: The Budapest Convention on Cybercrime and the Challenges of Harmonisation. Monash University Law Review 40(3): 698–736. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2615789.
Google Scholar
Draft United Nations convention against cybercrime. https://documents.un.org/doc/undoc/gen/v24/055/06/pdf/v2405506.pdf.
Google Scholar
Filipkowski, Wojciech. 2023. Dane i informacja jako przedmioty zamachu cyberprzestępstwa. In: Współczesne oblicze prawa karnego, prawa wykroczeń, kryminologii i polityki kryminalnej, (eds.) Janusz Bojarski, Natalia Daśko, Jerzy Lachowski, Tomasz Oczkowski,
Google Scholar
Agata Ziółkowska. 187–196. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer.
Google Scholar
Giezek, Jacek. 2021. In: Kodeks karny. Część ogólna. Komentarz, (ed.) Jacek Giezek. LEX.
Google Scholar
Gordon, Sara and Richard Ford. 2006. On the definition and classification of cybercrime. Journal in Computer Virology 2: 13–20. DOI: 10.1007/s11416-006-0015.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11416-006-0015-z
Google Scholar
Gruszecka, Dagmara. 2021. In: Kodeks karny. Część szczególna. Komentarz, (ed.) Jacek Giezek. LEX.
Google Scholar
Jahankhani, Hamid. Ameer Al-Nemrat and Amin Hosseinian-Far. 2014. Chapter 12, Cybercrime classification and characteristics. In: Cyber Crime and Cyber Terrorism Investigator’s Handbook, (eds.) Francesca Bosco, Andrew Staniforth and Babak Akhgar. 149–164.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800743-3.00012-8
Google Scholar
Walham: Elsevier Science.
Google Scholar
Kardas, Piotr. 2016. In: Kodeks karny. Część ogólna. Tom I. Cześć I. Komentarz do art. 1-52, (eds.) Włodzimierz Wróbel and Andrzej Zoll. LEX.
Google Scholar
Konarska-Wrzosek, Violetta. 2023. In: Kodeks karny. Komentarz, (ed.) Violetta Konarska-Wrzosek. LEX.
Google Scholar
Kozłowska-Kalisz, Patrycja. 2023. In: Kodeks karny. Komentarz aktualizowany, (ed.) Marek Mozgawa. LEX.
Google Scholar
Kulik, Marek. 2023. In: Kodeks karny. Komentarz aktualizowany, (ed.) Marek Mozgawa. LEX.
Google Scholar
Lach, Arkadiusz. 2023. In: Kodeks karny. Komentarz, (ed.) Violetta Konarska-Wrzosek. LEX.
Google Scholar
Lewulis, Piotr, 2021. O rozgraniczeniu definicyjnym pomiędzy przestępczością „cyber” i „komputerową” dla celów praktycznych i badawczych. Prokuratura i Prawo 3: 12–32.
Google Scholar
Lipiński, Konrad. 2021. In: Kodeks karny. Część szczególna. Komentarz, (ed.) Jacek Giezek. LEX.
Google Scholar
Łabuda, Grzegorz. 2021. In: Kodeks karny. Część szczególna, Komentarz, (ed.) Jacek Giezek. LEX.
Google Scholar
Łakomiec, Katarzyna. 2015, Konstytucyjne gwarancje ochrony prywatności informacyjnej wobec rozwoju nowych Technologii. Przegląd Legislacyjny 1(91): 57–73.
Google Scholar
Małecki, Mikołaj. 2016. In: Kodeks karny. Część ogólna. Tom I. Cześć I. Komentarz do
Google Scholar
art. 1-52, (eds.) Włodzimierz Wróbel and Andrzej Zoll. LEX.
Google Scholar
Miquelon-Weismann, Miriam F. 2005. The Convention on Cybercrime: A Harmonized Implementation of International Penal Law: What Prospects for Procedural Due Process?
Google Scholar
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law 23: 329–362.
Google Scholar
Mozgawa, Marek. 2023. In: Kodeks karny. Komentarz aktualizowany, (ed.) Marek Mozgawa. LEX.
Google Scholar
Mozgawa, Marek and Magdalena Budyn-Kulik, Patrycja Kozłowska-Kalisz, Marek Kulik. 2023. In: Kodeks karny. Komentarz aktualizowany, (ed.) Marek Mozgawa. LEX.
Google Scholar
Oczkowski, Tomasz. 2023. In: Kodeks karny. Komentarz, (ed.) Violetta Konarska-Wrzosek. LEX.
Google Scholar
Phillips, Kirsty. Julia C. Davidson, Ruby R. Farr, Christine Burkhardt, Stefano Caneppele and Mary P. Aiken. 2022. Conceptualizing Cybercrime: Definitions, Typologies and Taxonomies. Forensic Science 2: 379-398. DOI: 10.3390/forensicsci2020028.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/forensicsci2020028
Google Scholar
Rabinská, Ivana. 2019. Preservation and Rendition of Computer Data in Slovak Criminal Procedure Code. International and Comparative Law Review 19(2): 285–299. DOI:10.2478/iclr-2019-0025.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2019-0025
Google Scholar
Radoniewicz. Filip. 2016. Odpowiedzialność karna za hacking i inne przestępstwa przeciwko danym komputerowym i systemom informatycznym. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer.
Google Scholar
Razowski, Tomaz. 2021. In: Kodeks karny. Część szczególna. Komentarz, (ed.) Jacek Giezek. LEX.
Google Scholar
Shkëmbi, Aldo and Darjel Sina. 2013. Cybercrime in the Perspective of the European Legal Framework. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences 4 (9): 327–331. DOI: 10.5901/mjss.2013.v4n9p327.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2013.v4n9p327
Google Scholar
Siwicki, Maciej. 2012. Podział i definicja cyberprzestępstw. Prokuratura i Prawo 7-8: 246–25.
Google Scholar
Sokolewicz, Wojciech and Krzysztof. Wojtyczek. 2016. In: Konstytucja Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej. Komentarz, Tom II, (eds.) Leszek Garlicki and Marek Zubik. LEX.
Google Scholar
Wróbel, Włodzimierz and Dominik Zając. 2016. In: Kodeks karny. Część szczególna, Tom II, Cześć II, Komentarz do art. 212-277d, (ed.) Włodzimierz Wróbel and Andrzej Zoll. LEX.
Google Scholar
Wróbel, Włodzimierz and Mikołaj Iwański. 2022. In: Kodeks karny. Część szczególna, Tom III, Komentarz do art. 278-363 k.k., (ed.) Włodzimierz Wróbel and Andrzej Zoll. LEX.
Google Scholar
Authors
Wojciech FilipkowskiStatistics
Downloads
License
Copyright (c) 2024 The Opole Studies in Administration and Law
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Author’s economic rights to published works are held by Opole University (collective works) and individual Authors (individual parts of the collective work, ones that form a separate entity).
The journal Opole Studies in Administration and Law accepts for publication only works which have not been in circulation before.
On the basis of the Regulation (2016/679) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (referred to as General Data Protection Regulation or RODO) Opole University, based at 11a Plac Kopernika, 45-040 Opole, is the personal data controller for all the authors publishing their works in the Opole Studies in Administration and Law.
The articles published in Opole Studies in Administration and Law are available under a licence Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
For aricles till 2017 your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation – see:
Ustawa z dnia 4 lutego 1994 r. o prawie autorskim i prawach pokrewnych
Read more about the license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
View Legal Code:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode
