DEVELOPMENT OF THE CITTASLOW NETWORK IN POLAND AND IN CHINA
Abstrakt
The purpose of this article is to present the genesis and development of the Polish National Cittaslow Network and the Chinese National Cittaslow Network, as well as to draw attention to differences between the two ‘slow city’ models, respectively. The period of analysis spans the years 2007-2021. The research methods included a critical analysis of the relevant literature and source materials (statutes, regulations and other strategic documents of the association) and a comparative analysis. The main differences between the Polish and Chinese Cittaslow networks are related to cultural differences between these countries, with the dissimilar political systems and administrative divisions. The model of Cittaslow development in Poland is closer to the European ‘slow city’ model. The Chinese network is at the stage of searching for individual solutions corresponding to social, cultural and economic realities of the country.
Słowa kluczowe:
network of cities, Cittaslow, slow city , Polish Cittaslow Network, Chinese Cittaslow NetworkBibliografia
A new urban planning ‘slow’: Changshan, a new challenge for International Cittaslow. 2017. Access: 20.09.2021. https://www.cittaslow.org/sites/default/files/content/news/files/6515/report_cittaslow_town_in_changshan_china.pdf.
Google Scholar
Blakely, Edward J. 2016. The evolution of American (spatial) local and regional economic development policy and planning. In Theories of local economic development. Linking theory to practice, edited by James E. Rowe, 39-63. London: Routledge Taylor&Francis Group.
Google Scholar
Brodziński, Zbigniew and Krystyna Kurowska. 2021. Cittaslow idea as a new proposition to stimulate sustainable local development. Sustainability, 13(5039): 1-15. DOI: 10.3390/su13095039.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095039
Google Scholar
Carp, Jana. 2012a. Cittaslow mean resilience. In Alterarchitectures Manifiesto: observatory of innovative architectural and urban processes in Europe, edited by Thierry Paquot, Yvette Masson-Zanussi and Marco Stathopoulos, 169-172. Milan: Eterotopia.
Google Scholar
Carp, Jana. 2012b. The study of slow. In Collaborative resilience. Moving through crisis to opportunity, edited by Bruce Goldstein, 99-125. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Google Scholar
Cittaslow International Charter. 2017. Access: 12.09.2021. https://www.cittaslow.org/sites/default/files/ content/page/files/257/charter_cittaslow_en_05_18.pdf.
Google Scholar
Cittaslow – International network of cities where living is easy. Innovation by tradition. 2019. Access: 12.09.2021. https://www.cittaslow.org/sites/default/files/content/page/files/246/cittaslow_2019_brochure_1.pdf.
Google Scholar
Cittaslow List. 2021. Access: 12.09.2021. https://www.cittaslow.org/sites/default/files/content/page/files/246/cittaslow_list_june_2021.pdf.
Google Scholar
Clancy, Michael. 2017. Practicing slow. Political and ethical implications. In Slow tourism, food and cities. Pace and the search for the ‘good life’, edited by Michael Clancy, 63-75. London: Routledge Taylor&Francis Group.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315686714-5
Google Scholar
Drobniak, Adam. 2015. Koncepcja ‘urban resilience’. Narzędzie strategicznej diagnozy i monitoringu miast. Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny, 77(1): 119-143. DOI: 10.14746/rpeis.2015.77.1.7.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/rpeis.2015.77.1.7
Google Scholar
Farelnik, Eliza. 2018. Smart slow city jako hybrydowy model rozwoju współczesnych miast. Biuletyn Komitet Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania Kraju Polskiej Akademii Nauk, 272: 137-146.
Google Scholar
Farelnik, Eliza. 2020. Determinants of the development of slow cities in Poland. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 64(7): 18-36. DOI: 10.15611/pn.2020.7.02.
Google Scholar
Farelnik, Eliza. 2020. Determinants of the development of slow cities in Poland. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 64(7): 18-36. DOI: 10.15611/pn.2020.7.02
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15611/pn.2020.7.02
Google Scholar
Farelnik, Eliza. 2021. Revitalisation as a tool for the development of slow city (Cittaslow). Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 9(2): 169-185. DOI: 10.9770/jesi.2021.9.2(11)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2021.9.2(11)
Google Scholar
Farelnik, Eliza., Agnieszka Stanowicka and Wioletta Wierzbicka. 2017. International cooperation between cities based on the example of the Cittaslow network. Olsztyn Economic Journal, 12(4): 415-425. DOI: 10.31648/oej.2842.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31648/oej.2842
Google Scholar
Farelnik, Eliza., Agnieszka Stanowicka and Wioletta Wierzbicka. 2020. Cittaslow – model rozwoju i współpracy małych miast. Olsztyn: Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski w Olsztynie.
Google Scholar
Glaeser, Edward L., Giacomo A. M. Ponzetto and Yimei Zou. 2015. Urban networks: connecting markets, people, and ideas. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Papers, 21794: 1-61. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2703452.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w21794
Google Scholar
Gruszecka-Tieśluk, Agata. 2013. Sieć Cittaslow strategią rozwoju małych miast w Polsce? Studia Ekonomiczne, 144(2): 383-393.
Google Scholar
Hausner, Jerzy. 2019. Społeczna czasoprzestrzeń gospodarowania. W kierunku ekonomii wartości. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Nieoczywiste.
Google Scholar
Jaszczak, Agnieszka et al. 2021. Revitalization of public spaces in Cittaslow towns: recent urban redevelopment in Central Europe. Sustainability, 13(2564): 1-24. DOI: 10.3390/su13052564.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052564
Google Scholar
Kiełczewski, Dariusz. 2012. Różnorodność stylów życia jako czynnik rozwoju zrównoważonego. Ekonomia i Środowisko, 3(43): 73-84.
Google Scholar
Król, Karol. 2021. Assessment of the cultural heritage potential in Poland. Sustainability, 13(6637): 1-16. DOI: 10.3390/su13126637.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126637
Google Scholar
Local Data Bank of Statistics Poland. 2021. Access: 12.09.2021. https://bdl.stat.gov.pl/BDL/dane/teryt/jednostka
Google Scholar
Murzyn-Kupisz, Monika. 2012. Dziedzictwo kulturowe a rozwój lokalny. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie.
Google Scholar
Murzyn-Kupisz, Monika et al. 2019. Museums and local governments in Poland: partners in local development? Museum International, 71(3-4): 28-45. DOI: 10.1080/13500775.2019.1706944.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13500775.2019.1706944
Google Scholar
Pink, Sarah and Kirsten Seale. 2017. Imagining and making alternative futures: Slow cities as sites for anticipation and trust. In Another economy is possible: Culture and economy in a time of crisis, edited by Manuel Castells et al. 187-204. Cambridge: Polity.
Google Scholar
Pink, Sarah and Tania Lewis. 2014. Making resilience: everyday affect and global affiliation in Australian slow cities. Cultural Geographies. Special Issue: Excursions – Telling Stories and Journeys, 21(4): 695-710. DOI: 10.1177/1474474014520761.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474014520761
Google Scholar
Shi, Yijun et al. 2019. Slow city development in China: process, approaches and acceptability. Third World Quarterly, 40(7): 1265-1282. DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2019.1594181.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2019.1594181
Google Scholar
Strzelecka, Elżbieta. 2017. Małe miasta a nowoczesne modele rozwoju miast. In Alternatywne modele rozwoju miast. Sieć miast Cittaslow, edited by Elżbieta Strzelecka. 13-41. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Łódzkiej.
Google Scholar
Strzelecka, Elżbieta. 2018. Concept of resilience and development of small towns and rural area. Barometr Regionalny, 16(3): 121-130.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.56583/br.357
Google Scholar
Szczech-Pietkiewicz, Ewelina. 2019. Konkurencyjność miasta w kontekście współczesnych koncepcji teoretycznych i zjawisk gospodarczych. Warszawa: Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH.
Google Scholar
Szmytkowska, Magdalena. 2017. Kreacje współczesnego miasta. Uwarunkowania i trajektorie rozwojowe polskich miast średnich. Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego.
Google Scholar
Tocci, Giovanni. 2018. Slow and intelligent cities. When slow is also smart. In Slow tourism, food and cities. Pace and the search for the ‘good life’, edited by Michael Clancy. 110-128. London: Routledge.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315686714-8
Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Wioletta. 2020. Socio-economic potential of cities belonging to the Polish National Cittaslow Network. Oeconomia Copernicana, 11(1): 203-224. DOI: 10.24136/oc.2020.009.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2020.009
Google Scholar
Zadęcka, E. 2018. Slow city as a local development model. Economic and Regional Studies, 11(3): 84-106. DOI: 10.2478/ers-2018-0027.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ers-2018-0027
Google Scholar
Zielińska-Szczepkowska, Joanna. 2019. Cittaslow movement as a concept for promoting small cities. Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzanie, 20 (2/1): 301-316.
Google Scholar
Żyć powoli: inna strona nowoczesności. Manifest miast SLOW dla nowego humanizmu bycia i mieszkania. 2020. Access: 12.09.2021. http://cittaslowpolska.pl/images/PDF/Manifest_miast_Cittaslow.pdf.
Google Scholar
Statystyki
Downloads
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2022 Studia Miejskie
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 Międzynarodowe.