DEVELOPMENT OF THE CITTASLOW NETWORK  IN POLAND AND IN CHINA

Eliza Farelnik

doi:10.25167/sm.4557

Published: 2022-10-14

Vol. 43 (2022)

DEVELOPMENT OF THE CITTASLOW NETWORK IN POLAND AND IN CHINA

Eliza Farelnik

Studia Miejskie

Section: Articles

https://doi.org/10.25167/sm.4557

Abstract

ABSTRACT: The purpose of this article has been to present the genesis and development of the Polish National Cittaslow Network and China National Cittaslow Network and to draw the attention to the differences in the Polish and Chinese ‘slow city’ model. The period of analysis is 2007 to 2021. The research methods included a critical analysis of the literature and source materials (statutes, regulations and other strategic documents of the association), comparative analysis and case study. The main differences between the Polish and Chinese Cittaslow Network are related to cultural differences between these countries, with the different political system and administrative division. The model of development of Cittaslow in Poland is closer to the European ‘slow city’ model. The Chinese network is at the stage of searching for individual solutions adequate to the social, cultural and economic realities of the country.

Keywords:

network of cities, Cittaslow, slow city

Download files

Artykuł Farelnik

Citation rules

Farelnik, E. (2022). DEVELOPMENT OF THE CITTASLOW NETWORK IN POLAND AND IN CHINA. Studia Miejskie, 43, 67–82. https://doi.org/10.25167/sm.4557

Cited by / Share

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

A new urban planning ‘slow’: Changshan, a new challenge for International Cittaslow. 2017. Access: 20.09.2021. https://www.cittaslow.org/sites/default/files/content/news/files/6515/report_cittaslow_town_in_changshan_china.pdf.
Google Scholar

Blakely, Edward J. 2016. The evolution of American (spatial) local and regional economic development policy and planning. In Theories of local economic development. Linking theory to practice, edited by James E. Rowe, 39-63. London: Routledge Taylor&Francis Group.
Google Scholar

Brodziński, Zbigniew and Krystyna Kurowska. 2021. Cittaslow idea as a new proposition to stimulate sustainable local development. Sustainability, 13(5039): 1-15. DOI: 10.3390/su13095039. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095039
Google Scholar

Carp, Jana. 2012a. Cittaslow mean resilience. In Alterarchitectures Manifiesto: observatory of innovative architectural and urban processes in Europe, edited by Thierry Paquot, Yvette Masson-Zanussi and Marco Stathopoulos, 169-172. Milan: Eterotopia.
Google Scholar

Carp, Jana. 2012b. The study of slow. In Collaborative resilience. Moving through crisis to opportunity, edited by Bruce Goldstein, 99-125. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Google Scholar

Cittaslow International Charter. 2017. Access: 12.09.2021. https://www.cittaslow.org/sites/default/files/ content/page/files/257/charter_cittaslow_en_05_18.pdf.
Google Scholar

Cittaslow – International network of cities where living is easy. Innovation by tradition. 2019. Access: 12.09.2021. https://www.cittaslow.org/sites/default/files/content/page/files/246/cittaslow_2019_brochure_1.pdf.
Google Scholar

Cittaslow List. 2021. Access: 12.09.2021. https://www.cittaslow.org/sites/default/files/content/page/files/246/cittaslow_list_june_2021.pdf.
Google Scholar

Clancy, Michael. 2017. Practicing slow. Political and ethical implications. In Slow tourism, food and cities. Pace and the search for the ‘good life’, edited by Michael Clancy, 63-75. London: Routledge Taylor&Francis Group. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315686714-5
Google Scholar

Drobniak, Adam. 2015. Koncepcja ‘urban resilience’. Narzędzie strategicznej diagnozy i monitoringu miast. Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny, 77(1): 119-143. DOI: 10.14746/rpeis.2015.77.1.7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/rpeis.2015.77.1.7
Google Scholar

Farelnik, Eliza. 2018. Smart slow city jako hybrydowy model rozwoju współczesnych miast. Biuletyn Komitet Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania Kraju Polskiej Akademii Nauk, 272: 137-146.
Google Scholar

Farelnik, Eliza. 2020. Determinants of the development of slow cities in Poland. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 64(7): 18-36. DOI: 10.15611/pn.2020.7.02.
Google Scholar

Farelnik, Eliza. 2020. Determinants of the development of slow cities in Poland. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 64(7): 18-36. DOI: 10.15611/pn.2020.7.02 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15611/pn.2020.7.02
Google Scholar

Farelnik, Eliza. 2021. Revitalisation as a tool for the development of slow city (Cittaslow). Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 9(2): 169-185. DOI: 10.9770/jesi.2021.9.2(11) DOI: https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2021.9.2(11)
Google Scholar

Farelnik, Eliza., Agnieszka Stanowicka and Wioletta Wierzbicka. 2017. International cooperation between cities based on the example of the Cittaslow network. Olsztyn Economic Journal, 12(4): 415-425. DOI: 10.31648/oej.2842. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31648/oej.2842
Google Scholar

Farelnik, Eliza., Agnieszka Stanowicka and Wioletta Wierzbicka. 2020. Cittaslow – model rozwoju i współpracy małych miast. Olsztyn: Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski w Olsztynie.
Google Scholar

Glaeser, Edward L., Giacomo A. M. Ponzetto and Yimei Zou. 2015. Urban networks: connecting markets, people, and ideas. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Papers, 21794: 1-61. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2703452. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w21794
Google Scholar

Gruszecka-Tieśluk, Agata. 2013. Sieć Cittaslow strategią rozwoju małych miast w Polsce? Studia Ekonomiczne, 144(2): 383-393.
Google Scholar

Hausner, Jerzy. 2019. Społeczna czasoprzestrzeń gospodarowania. W kierunku ekonomii wartości. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Nieoczywiste.
Google Scholar

Jaszczak, Agnieszka et al. 2021. Revitalization of public spaces in Cittaslow towns: recent urban redevelopment in Central Europe. Sustainability, 13(2564): 1-24. DOI: 10.3390/su13052564. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052564
Google Scholar

Kiełczewski, Dariusz. 2012. Różnorodność stylów życia jako czynnik rozwoju zrównoważonego. Ekonomia i Środowisko, 3(43): 73-84.
Google Scholar

Król, Karol. 2021. Assessment of the cultural heritage potential in Poland. Sustainability, 13(6637): 1-16. DOI: 10.3390/su13126637. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126637
Google Scholar

Local Data Bank of Statistics Poland. 2021. Access: 12.09.2021. https://bdl.stat.gov.pl/BDL/dane/teryt/jednostka
Google Scholar

Murzyn-Kupisz, Monika. 2012. Dziedzictwo kulturowe a rozwój lokalny. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie.
Google Scholar

Murzyn-Kupisz, Monika et al. 2019. Museums and local governments in Poland: partners in local development? Museum International, 71(3-4): 28-45. DOI: 10.1080/13500775.2019.1706944. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13500775.2019.1706944
Google Scholar

Pink, Sarah and Kirsten Seale. 2017. Imagining and making alternative futures: Slow cities as sites for anticipation and trust. In Another economy is possible: Culture and economy in a time of crisis, edited by Manuel Castells et al. 187-204. Cambridge: Polity.
Google Scholar

Pink, Sarah and Tania Lewis. 2014. Making resilience: everyday affect and global affiliation in Australian slow cities. Cultural Geographies. Special Issue: Excursions – Telling Stories and Journeys, 21(4): 695-710. DOI: 10.1177/1474474014520761. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474014520761
Google Scholar

Shi, Yijun et al. 2019. Slow city development in China: process, approaches and acceptability. Third World Quarterly, 40(7): 1265-1282. DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2019.1594181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2019.1594181
Google Scholar

Strzelecka, Elżbieta. 2017. Małe miasta a nowoczesne modele rozwoju miast. In Alternatywne modele rozwoju miast. Sieć miast Cittaslow, edited by Elżbieta Strzelecka. 13-41. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Łódzkiej.
Google Scholar

Strzelecka, Elżbieta. 2018. Concept of resilience and development of small towns and rural area. Barometr Regionalny, 16(3): 121-130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56583/br.357
Google Scholar

Szczech-Pietkiewicz, Ewelina. 2019. Konkurencyjność miasta w kontekście współczesnych koncepcji teoretycznych i zjawisk gospodarczych. Warszawa: Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH.
Google Scholar

Szmytkowska, Magdalena. 2017. Kreacje współczesnego miasta. Uwarunkowania i trajektorie rozwojowe polskich miast średnich. Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego.
Google Scholar

Tocci, Giovanni. 2018. Slow and intelligent cities. When slow is also smart. In Slow tourism, food and cities. Pace and the search for the ‘good life’, edited by Michael Clancy. 110-128. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315686714-8
Google Scholar

Wierzbicka, Wioletta. 2020. Socio-economic potential of cities belonging to the Polish National Cittaslow Network. Oeconomia Copernicana, 11(1): 203-224. DOI: 10.24136/oc.2020.009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2020.009
Google Scholar

Zadęcka, E. 2018. Slow city as a local development model. Economic and Regional Studies, 11(3): 84-106. DOI: 10.2478/ers-2018-0027. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ers-2018-0027
Google Scholar

Zielińska-Szczepkowska, Joanna. 2019. Cittaslow movement as a concept for promoting small cities. Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzanie, 20 (2/1): 301-316.
Google Scholar

Żyć powoli: inna strona nowoczesności. Manifest miast SLOW dla nowego humanizmu bycia i mieszkania. 2020. Access: 12.09.2021. http://cittaslowpolska.pl/images/PDF/Manifest_miast_Cittaslow.pdf.
Google Scholar