Influence of technical innovation on citizens’ residential choices. A historical perspective
Abstract
The paper focuses on the influence of technological progress on the location choices of city dwellers. The aim of this study was to reveal how the housing preferences of different social groups evolved over the centuries and what influenced changes in the perception of properties’ value in different historical periods. The paper is intended to initiate academic discussion about potential impact of current developments in the field of communication technology and transportation on the location choices of citizens.
Keywords:
geographical segregation of city dwellers, technological progressReferences
Ackerman J.S., Rosenfeld M.N., 1989, Social Stratification in Renaissance Urban Planning, [w:] Urban Life in the Renaissance, eds. S. Zimmerman, R. Weissman, Associated University Press, Newark.
Google Scholar
Breen R., 2005, Foundations of a Neo-Weberian Class Analysis, [w:] Approaches to Class Analysis, ed. E. o Wright, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Google Scholar
Budnikowski A., 2001, Globalizacja a integracja europejska, “Zeszyty Naukowe Kolegium Gospodarki „Światowej” 10.
Google Scholar
Burgess E.W., 1925, The growth of a city – an introduction to a research project, [w:] The City, eds. E.W. Burgess, R.D. Mc Kenzie, E. Park, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Google Scholar
Coniglio N., 2004, Migropolis: migration networks and formation of ethnic clusters in cities, ERSA Conference Papers, Vienna.
Google Scholar
Czarny B., 2000, Wzrost gospodarczy, “Bank i Kredyt” 11.
Google Scholar
Engels F., 1887, The Condition of the Working Class in England, New York.
Google Scholar
Glaeser E.L., 1992, Growth In Cities, “The Journal of Political Economy” 100.
Google Scholar
Glaeser E.L., Gottlieb J.D., 2009, The Wealth of Cities: Agglomeration Economies and Spatial Equilibrium in the United States, “Journal of Economic Literature” 47(4).
Google Scholar
Glikman A., Semyonov M., 2012, Ethnic Origin and Residential Attainment of Immigrants in European Countries, “City & Community” 11(2).
Google Scholar
Graham S., Marvin S., 2001, Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition, Routledge, London.
Google Scholar
Harris C., Ullman E., 1945, The Nature of Cities, “Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science” 242.
Google Scholar
Holzer H.J., 1991, The Spatial Mismatch Hypothesis: What Has the Evidence Shown, “Urban Studies” 28(1).
Google Scholar
Knox P., Pinch S., 2006, Urban social geography: an introduction, Pearson Education Ltd.
Google Scholar
Laurence R., 1995, The organization of space In Pompeii, [w:] Urban Society in Roman Italy, eds. T. Cornell, K. Lomas, St. Martins Press, New York.
Google Scholar
Marcuse P., 2002, The Partitioned City in History, [w:] Of States and Cities. The Partitioning of Urban Space, eds. P. Marcuse, R. van Kempen, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Google Scholar
Massey D.S., Denton N., 1991, Patterns of neighborhood transition in a multiethnic world: US metropolitan areas, 1970–1980, “Demography” 28.
Google Scholar
Mayer J., 2001, Technology diffusion, human capital and economic growth in developing countries, [w:] United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, http://unctad.org/en/docs/dp_154.en.pdf
Google Scholar
Pohjola M., 2000, Information Technology and Economic Growth: A Cross-Country Analysis, UNU-WIDER [b.m. wyd.].
Google Scholar
Rex J., Moore R., 1967, Race, Community and Conflict. A study of Sparkbrook, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Google Scholar
Rosen S., 1974, Hedonic prices and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure competition, “Journal of Political Economy” 118(4).
Google Scholar
Schelling T.C., 1971, Dynamic Models of Segregation, “Journal of Mathematical Sociology” 1.
Google Scholar
Schelling T.C., 1969, Models of Segregation, “The American Economic Review” 59(2).
Google Scholar
Simon P., 2005, Gentrification of Old Neighbourhoods and Social Integration in Europe, [w:] Cities of Europe. Changing contexts, local arrangements and the challenge to urban cohesion, ed. Y. Kazepov, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.
Google Scholar
Sjoberg G., 1955, The Preindustrial City, “American Journal of Sociology” 60(5).
Google Scholar
Storper M., Venables A.J., 2004, Buzz: Face-To-Face Contact and the Urban Economy, “Journal of Economic Geography” 4(4).
Google Scholar
Vance J.E., 1971, Land Assignment in the Precapitalist, Capitalist, and Postcapitalist City, “Economic Geography” 47(2).
Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill A., 1995, Public honour and private shame: the urban texture of Pompeii, [w:] Urban Society in Roman Italy, eds. T. Cornell, K. Lomas, St. Martin’s Press, New York.
Google Scholar
Węcławowicz G., 2007, Geografia społeczna miast. Zróżnicowania społeczno-przestrzenne, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
Google Scholar
Wiesiołowski J., 1982, Socjotopografia późnośredniowiecznego Poznania, Prace Komisji Historycznej – Poznańskie Towarzystwo Przyjaciół Nauk, Tom 36, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
Google Scholar
Woods R., 2000, The Demography of England and Wales, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Google Scholar
Zelinsky W., Lee B.A., 1998, Heterolocalism: an alternative model of the sociospatial behaviour of immigrant ethnic communities, “Population, Space and Place” 4(4).
Google Scholar
Zhang J., 2004, A Dynamic Model of Residential Segregation, “The Journal of Mathematical Sociology” 28(3).
Google Scholar
Statistics
Downloads
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Studia Miejskie
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.