Promocja miast XXI w. poprzez ikony architektoniczne – przykład krzywego domku w Sopocie

Rafał Rouba

Published: 2020-11-21

Vol. 7 (2012)

Twenty-first century city promotion through architectural icons – an example of leaning house in Sopot

Rafał Rouba

Abstract

Twenty-first century is a period of dynamically growing competition among cities as tourist and investment destinations. With the increase of prizes in the global competition for world glamorous place also increases range of tools to charm a potential customer / tourist/potential inhabitant. As part of the struggle from two – three decades in urban centers began to grow architectural objects whose main task was to surprise the viewer and promote its urban location. The icon of all icons is created in the mid 90s The Guggenheim Foundation museum building in Bilbao. Questions that arise are: whether the twenty-first century city promotion should be based on the creation of extravagant architectural solutions in the form of individual objects – icons? Does the city architectural icon is the perfect panacea for all promotional and other shortcomings and is able to transform any urban center in the world tourist object of desire? Attempt to reflect on these issues is the perception of the promotional role of Leaning House in Sopot –founded in 2004, as one of the most important architectural icons at that time in Poland.

Keywords:

city, promotion, iconic buildings, Sopot, Krzywy Domek, tourism

Download files

PDF (Język Polski)

Citation rules

Rouba, R. (2020). Twenty-first century city promotion through architectural icons – an example of leaning house in Sopot. Studia Miejskie, 7, 91–105. Retrieved from https://czasopisma.uni.opole.pl/index.php/sm/article/view/2650

Cited by / Share

References

Anholt S., 2006, The Anholt-GMI City Brand Index. How the World sees the world’s best cities, „Place Branding" vol. 2, nr 1.

Castells M.,1996, The rise of the network society, Blackwell, Cambridge.

Cudny W., 2006a, Przemiany przestrzenne i funkcjonalne Tomaszowa Mazowieckiego w okresie transformacji, „Szlakami Nauki” nr 35, Łódzkie Towarzystwo Naukowe, Łódź.

Cudny W., 2006b, Przemiany w fizjonomii ul. Piotrkowskiej w Łodzi, „Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Geographica Socio-Oeconomica” nr 7, s. 183-200.

Cudny W., 2008a, Rola prywatnych inwestorów w rewitalizacji terenów poprzemysłowych Łodzi, „Prace Komisji Krajobrazu Kulturowego” nr 10, Komisja Krajobrazu Kulturowego, Sosnowiec, s. 379-385.

Cudny W., 2008b, The Radegast Station Holocaust Monument — its history, contemporary function and perception in the eyes of tourists and Lodź inhahitants, „Bulletin of Geography. Socio-Economic Series” vol. 9, s. 97-106.

Cudny W., 2011, Model przemian miasta postsocjalistycznego - przykład Łodzi, „Studia Miejskie” t. 4, s. 153-159.

Cudny W., 2012, Socio-economic transformation of smali towns in East Germany after 1990 — Colditz case study, „Bulletin of Geography. Socio-Economic Series” (w druku).

Gieryn T.F., 2002, What buildings do, „Theory and Society” vol. 31.

Gospodini A., 2004, Urban morphology and place identity in european cities: Built heritage and innovative design, „Journal of Urban Design" vol. 9, nr 2.

Haila A., 1997, The neglected builder ofglobal cities, [w:] Cities in transformation - transformation in cities. Social and symbolic change of urban space, red. O. Kalltorp, I. Elander, O. Ericson, M. Franzen, Avebury, Hampshire.

Harvey D.,1989, From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: The transformation in urban governance in late capitalism, „Geografiska Annaler” vol. 71B.

http://suw.biblos.pk.edu.pl/resources/il/i3/i8/i7/rl387/KurylowiczE_DzieloArcydzielo.pdf.

http://popupcity.net/2009/05/top-20-of-the-worlds-best-city-icons/ (dostęp 10 maja 2011).

Jencks C., 2006, The iconic building is here to stay, „City” vol. 10, nr 1.

Kosiński W., 2008, Kontekst i kontrast, [w:] Definiowanie przestrzeni architektonicznej, red. D. Kozłowski, M. Misiągiewicz, Wyd. Politechniki Krakowskiej, Kraków.

Kuryłowicz E„ 2011, Dzieło-arcydzieło a ikona we współczesnym mieście. Detronizacja czy nobilitacja dla idoli XXI wieku? BPK, Biblioteka Cyfrowa Politechniki Krakowskiej, Kraków.

Technology, talent, and tolerance: Attracting the best and brightest to Memphis, 2002, aut. C. Coletta, D. Mabury, D. Williams, T. Jones, The Memphis Talent Magnet Report, Memphis.
Temelova J., 2004, Contemporary buildings in citypromotion: Attributes andfoundation ofhigh-profile structures.

The case ofPrague and Helsinki, „Research and Training NetWork Urban Europę” nr 10.

Ward J„ 2008, City branding, [w:] Crucial words. Conditionsfor temporary architecture, Birkhauser.

www.szancer.pl

Zukin, S., 1997, Cultural strategies and urban identities: Remarkingpublic space in New York, [w:] Cities in transformation - transformation in cities. Social and symbolic change of urban space, red. O. Kalltorp, I. Elander, O. Ericson, M. Franzen, Avebury, Hampshire. Google Scholar