Cities and destroying ‘the other’
Agnieszka Szpak
Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu, Wydział Nauk o Polityce i BezpieczeństwieAbstract
The aim of this article is to show that cities are very often attacked because of their characteristic of ‘otherness’. ‘The other’ may be understood as other religion, other ethnicity, other culture, other political views or other people which is closely related to the idea of diversity, heterogeneity, pluralism and density as essential features of contemporary cities. The author examines theories explaining motives for destroying cities like the latter being a part of genocide or a distinct theory of urbicide. Finally the author proposes looking at the destruction of cities through the lens of destroying ‘the other’ and the possibility of a community. The research methods used include desk research and formal-legal analysis. Formal-legal analysis focuses on the jurisprudence of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia and the desk research on the relevant literature at the intersection of urban studies and international studies.
Keywords:
cities, 'the other', urbicide, genocideReferences
References
Google Scholar
Beall, J. 2006. “Cities, Terrorism and Development.” Journal of International Development 18: 105–120.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.1265
Google Scholar
Berman, Marshall. 1987. “Among The Ruins.” New Internationalist. December 5, http://newint.org/features/1987/12/05/among/. Accessed 6 October 2021.
Google Scholar
Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide of 1948. http://treaties.un.org/doc/Treaties/1951/01/19510112%2008-12%20PM/Ch_IV_1p.pdf. Accessed 6 October 2021.
Google Scholar
Coward, M. 2006. “Against anthropocentrism: the destruction of the built environment as a distinct form of political violence.” Review of International Studies 32: 419–437.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210506007091
Google Scholar
Coward, M. 2002. “Community as Heterogeneous Ensemble: Mostar and Multiculturalism.” Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 27 (1): 29-66.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/030437540202700102
Google Scholar
Coward, M. 2009. Urbicide. The politics of urban destruction. Oxon: Routledge.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203890639
Google Scholar
Dobrowolska-Polak, J. 2008. „Przeciwdziałanie i karanie zbrodni ludobójstwa – dziedzictwo Rafała Lemkina.” Biuletyn Instytutu Zachodniego 9. https://www.iz.poznan.pl/plik,pobierz,718,02a3d95112ece641815c71bccc979cfa/71-Biuletyn%20IZ%20nr%209.%20Lemkin.pdf. Accessed 6 October 2021.
Google Scholar
Golan, A. 2020. “The City and War: The Case of Tel Aviv-Jaffa.” Urban Studies and Public Administration 3 (3): 194-210.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22158/uspa.v3n3p194
Google Scholar
Graham, S (ed.). 2004. Cities, War, and Terrorism. Towards an Urban Geopolitics. Malden: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470753033
Google Scholar
Hewitt, K. 1983. “Place Annihilation: Area Bombing and the Fate of Urban Places.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 73 (2): 257-284.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1983.tb01412.x
Google Scholar
ICTY. 2000. “Blaskić case. Trial Chamber.” https://www.icty.org/en/cases. Accessed 6 October 2021.
Google Scholar
ICTY. 2004. “Brdanin case. Trial Chamber.” https://www.icty.org/en/cases. Accessed 6 October 2021.
Google Scholar
ICTY. 2004. “Jokić case. Trial Chamber.” https://www.icty.org/en/cases. Accessed 6 October 2021.
Google Scholar
ICTY. 2016. “Karadzić case. Trial Chamber.” https://www.icty.org/en/cases. Accessed 6 October 2021.
Google Scholar
ICTY. 2001. “Kordić and Cerkez case. Trial Chamber.” https://www.icty.org/en/cases. Accessed 6 October 2021.
Google Scholar
ICTY. 2004. “Kordić and Cerkez case. Appeals Chamber.” https://www.icty.org/en/cases. Accessed 6 October 2021.
Google Scholar
ICTY. 2006. “Krajiśnik case. Trial Chamber.” https://www.icty.org/en/cases. Accessed 6 October 2021.
Google Scholar
ICTY. 2017. “Mladić case. Trial Chamber”. https://www.icty.org/en/cases. Accessed 6 October 2021.
Google Scholar
ICTY. 2013. “Prlic case. Trial Chamber.” https://www.icty.org/en/cases. Accessed 6 October 2021.
Google Scholar
ICTY. 2009. “Sainović case. Trial Chamber.” https://www.icty.org/en/cases. Accessed 6 October 2021.
Google Scholar
ICTY. 2003. “Stakić case. Trial Chamber.” https://www.icty.org/en/cases. Accessed 6 October 2021.
Google Scholar
ICTY. 2005. “Strugar case. Trial Chamber.” https://www.icty.org/en/cases. Accessed 6 October 2021.
Google Scholar
Lemkin, R. 1944. Axis Rule in Occupied Europe. Laws of Occupation, Analysis of Government, Proposals for Redress. Washington: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Google Scholar
Lemkin, R. 1946. “Genocide.” American Scholar 2: 227-230.
Google Scholar
Lemkin, R. 1945. “Genocide – A Modern Crime.” Free World 4: 39-43.
Google Scholar
Mourby, A. 2015. “ Where are the world's most war-damaged cities?” The Guardian. December 17, https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2015/dec/17/where-world-most-war-damaged-city. Accessed 6 October 2021.
Google Scholar
Nersessian, D. L. 2003-2004. “The Razor’s Edge: Defining and Protecting Human Groups Under the Genocide Convention.” Cornell International Law Journal 36: 293-327.
Google Scholar
Palmieri, D. 2021. “War and the city: a history.” April 21, https://blogs.icrc.org/law-and-policy/2021/04/29/war-city-history/. Accessed 6 October 2021.
Google Scholar
Riedlmayer, A. 1993. “Libraries Are Not for Burning: International Librarianship and the Recovery of the Destroyed Heritage of Bosnia and Herzegovina.” MELA Notes 63: 36-45.
Google Scholar
Shaw, M. 2004. New Wars of the City: Relationships of “Urbicide” and “Genocide”. In Graham S. Malden (ed.). Cities, War, and Terrorism. Towards an Urban Geopolitics, 141-153. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470753033.ch8
Google Scholar
Spencer, J. 2018. “Why Militaries Must Destroy Cities to Save Them.” Modern Institute of War. August 11, https://mwi.usma.edu/militaries-must-destroy-cities-save/. Accessed 6 October 2021.
Google Scholar
Spencer, J. 2019. “The Destructive Age of Urban Warfare; or, How to Kill a City and How to Protect it.” Modern Institute of War. March 28, https://mwi.usma.edu/destructive-age-urban-warfare-kill-city-protect/. Accessed 6 October 2021.
Google Scholar
Syrian Network for Human Rights, Destroying Ma’aret al Numan and Saraqeb Cities and Displacing Their Residents Is a Clear Example of the Syrian Regime’s Tactics in the Recent Military Campaign Since Early December 2019 Until March 2020 Destroying Cities and Their Environs, Displacing Their People, and Seizing Their Properties Is the Syrian Regime’s Malicious Tripartite Crime to Punish Those Demanding or Dreaming of Political Change. 2020. May 28, https://reliefweb.int/report/syrian-arab-republic/destroying-ma-aret-al-numan-and-saraqeb-cities-and-displacing-their. Accessed 6 October 2021.
Google Scholar
Authors
Agnieszka SzpakStatistics
Downloads
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Studia Miejskie
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Agnieszka Szpak, LEGAL ASPECT OF URBAN WARFARE. SOME REMARKS IN THE LIGHT OF THE 2016 NEW URBAN AGENDA , Studia Miejskie: Vol. 33 (2019)
- Agnieszka Szpak, The right to the city as a new direction for urban development , Studia Miejskie: Vol. 25 (2017)