Partnership Forms in Europe: A Systematic Literature Review

Andersson, G., Obućina, O. and Scott, K. (2015) ‘Marriage and divorce of immigrants and descendants of immigrants in Sweden’. Demographic Research, 33(2), pp. 31–64. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2015.33.2.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2015.33.2   Google Scholar

Andreev, E.M., Churilova, E. and Jasilioniene, A. (2022) ‘Partnership Context of First Births in Russia: The Enduring Significance of Marriage’. European Journal of Population, 38, pp. 37–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-021-09600-5.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-021-09600-5   Google Scholar

Beaujouan, E´. (2016) ‘Second Unions Now More Stable than First? A Comparison of Separation Risks by Union Order in France’. European Journal of Population, 32, pp. 293–321. doi: 10.1007/s10680-016-9376-2.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-016-9376-2   Google Scholar

Berrington, A., Perelli-Harris, B. and Trevena, P. (2015) ‘Commitment and the changing sequence of cohabitation, childbearing, and marriage: Insights from qualitative research in the UK’. Demographic Research, 33(12), pp. 327–362. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2015.33.12.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2015.33.12   Google Scholar

Berrington, A. (2020) ‘Expectations for family transitions in young adulthood among the UK second generation’. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 46(5), pp. 913–935. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2018.1539276.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2018.1539276   Google Scholar

Bernardi, F. and Martínez-Pastor, J-I. (2011) ‘Divorce risk factors and their variations over time in Spain’. Demographic Research, 24 (31), pp. 771–800. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2011.24.31.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2011.24.31   Google Scholar

Berghammer, C., Fliegenschnee, K. and Schmidt, E-M. (2014) ‘Cohabitation and marriage in Austria: Assessing the individualization thesis across the life course’. Demographic Research, 31(37), pp. 1137–1166. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2014.31.37.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2014.31.37   Google Scholar

Bhrolcháin, M.N. and Beaujouan, É. (2013) ‘Education and Cohabitation in Britain: A Return to Traditional Patterns?“ Population and Development Review, 39(3), pp. 441–458. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2013.00611.x.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2013.00611.x   Google Scholar

Castiglioni, M. and Dalla Zuanna, G. (2009) ‘Marital and Reproductive Behavior in Italy After 1995: Bridging the Gap with Western Europe?“ European Journal of Population, 25, pp. 1–26. doi: 10.1007/s10680-008-9155-9.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-008-9155-9   Google Scholar

Castro-Martín, T., Domínguez-Folgueras, M. and Martín-García, T. (2008) ‘Not truly partnerless: Non-residential partnerships and retreat from marriage in Spain’. Demographic Research, 18(16), pp. 443–468. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2008.18.16.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2008.18.16   Google Scholar

Domínguez-Folgueras, M. and Castro-Martín, T. (2008) ‘Women’s changing socioeconomic position and union formation in Spain and Portugal’. Demographic Research, 19(41), pp. 1513–1550. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.41.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.41   Google Scholar

Di Julio, P. and Rosina, A. (2007) ‘Intergenerational family ties and the diffusion of cohabitation in Italy”. Demographic Research, 16 (14), pp. 441–468. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2007.16.14.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2007.16.14   Google Scholar

Dudić, A. (2020) ”Mladi u Bosni i Hercegovini o braku i alternativnim oblicima partnerstva”. Društvene devijacije, 5(1), pp. 181–193. https://doi.org/10.7251/ZCMZ2001181D.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7251/ZCMZ2001181D   Google Scholar

Franke, S. and Kulu, H. (2018) ‘Mortality Differences by Partnership Status in England and Wales: The Effect of Living Arrangements or Health Selection?“ European Journal of Population, 34. pp. 87–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-017-9423-7.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-017-9423-7   Google Scholar

Frémeaux, N. and Leturcq, M. (2022) ‘Wealth Accumulation and the Gender Wealth Gap Across Couples’ Legal Statuses and Matrimonial Property Regimes in France’. European Journal of Population, 38, pp. 643–679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-022-09632-5.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-022-09632-5   Google Scholar

Fulda, B.E. (2016) ‘The diversity in longitudinal partnership trajectories during the transition to adulthood: How is it related to individual characteristics and regional living conditions?“ Demographic Research, 35(37), pp. 1101–1134. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2016.35.37.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2016.35.37   Google Scholar

Gabrielli, G. and Hoem, J.M. (2010) ‘Italy’s Non-Negligible Cohabitational Unions’. European Journal of Population, 26, pp. 33–46. doi: 10.1007/s10680-009-9193-y.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-009-9193-y   Google Scholar

Gattig, A. and Minkus, L. (2021) ‘Does Marriage Increase Couples’ Life Satisfaction? Evidence Using Panel Data and Fixed-effects Individual Slopes’. Comparative Population Studies, 46, pp. 123–148. https://doi.org/10.12765/CPoS-2021-05.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12765/CPoS-2021-05   Google Scholar

Giddens, A. (1992) The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  Google Scholar

González, M.J., Miret, P. and Treviño, R. (2010) ‘Just Living Together’: Implications of cohabitation for fathers’ participation in child care in Western Europe’. Demographic Research, 23(16), pp. 445–478. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2010.23.16.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2010.23.16   Google Scholar

Hajnal, J. (1965) ‘European marriages patterns’. In: D. V. Glass and D. F. C. Eversley (eds.), Population in History (pp. xxx). London.
  Google Scholar

Hannemann, T. and Kulu, H. (2015) ‘Union formation and dissolution among immigrants and their descendants in the United Kingdom’. Demographic Research, 33(10), pp. 273–312. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2015.33.10.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2015.33.10   Google Scholar

Hannemann, T.,Kulu, H., González-Ferrer, A., Pailhé, A., Rahnu, L. and Puur, A. (2020) ‘Partnership dynamics among immigrants and their descendants in four European countries’. Population, Space and Place, 26(5), e2315. doi: 10.1002/psp.2315.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.2315   Google Scholar

Hiekel, N. and Keizer, R. (2015) ‘Risk-avoidance or utmost commitment? Dutch focus group research on cohabitation and marriage’. Demographic Research, 32(10), pp. 311–340. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2015.32.10.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2015.32.10   Google Scholar

Hiekel, N., Liefbroer, A.C. and Poortman, A-R. (2015). ‘Marriage and separation risks among German cohabiters: Differences between types of cohabiter’. Population Studies, 69(2), pp. 237–251, doi: 10.1080/00324728.2015.1037334.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.2015.1037334   Google Scholar

Hiekel, N., and Fulda, B.E. (2018) ‘Love. Break up. Repeat: The prevalence and stability of serial cohabitation among West German women and men born in the early 1970s’. Demographic Research, 39(30), pp. 855–870. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2018.39.30.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2018.39.30   Google Scholar

Hellstrand, J., Nisén, J. and Myrskylä, M. (2022) ‘Less Partnering, Less Children, or Both? Analysis of the Drivers of First Birth Decline in Finland Since 2010’. European Journal of Population, 38, pp. 191–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-022-09605-8.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-022-09605-8   Google Scholar

Hoem, J. M., Kostova, D., Jasilioniene, A. and Mures¸an, C. (2009) ‘Traces of the second demographic transition in four selected countries in central and eastern Europe: Union formation as a demographic manifestation’. European Journal of Population / Revue Europe´enne De De´mographie, 25, pp. 239–255. doi:10.1007/s10680-009-9177-y.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-009-9177-y   Google Scholar

Hoem, J.M., Gabrielli, G., Jasilioniene, A., Kostova, D. and Matysiak, A. (2010) ‘Levels of recent union formation: Six European countries compared’. Demographic Research, 22(9), pp. 199–210. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2010.22.9.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2010.22.9   Google Scholar

Hoem, J. M. and Mures¸an, C. (2011) ‘The Total Marital Fertility Rate and Its Extensions’. European Journal of Population, 27, pp. 295–312. doi: 10.1007/s10680-011-9237-y.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-011-9237-y   Google Scholar

Hoem, J.M., Jalovaara, M. and Mureşan, C. (2013) ‘Recent fertility patterns of Finnish women by union status: A descriptive account’. Demographic Research, 28(14), 409–420. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2013.28.14.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2013.28.14   Google Scholar

Holland, J.A. (2013) ‘Love, marriage, then the baby carriage? Marriage timing and childbearing in Sweden’. Demographic Research, 29(11), pp. 275–306. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2013.29.11.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2013.29.11   Google Scholar

Impicciatore, R. and Billari, F.C. (2012) ‘Union Formation Practices, and Marital Stability: Evidence from Italy’. European Journal of Population, 28, pp. 119–138. doi:10.1007/s10680-012-9255-4.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-012-9255-4   Google Scholar

Inanc, H. (2015) ‘Unemployment and the timing of parenthood: Implications of partnership status and partner’s employment’. Demographic Research, 32(7), pp. 219–250. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2015.32.7.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2015.32.7   Google Scholar

Isupova, O. (2015) ‘Trust, responsibility, and freedom: Focus-group research on contemporary patterns of union formation in Russia’. Demographic Research, 32(11), pp. 341–368. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2015.32.11.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2015.32.11   Google Scholar

Ivanova, K., Kalmijn, M. and Uunk, W. (2013) ‘The Effect of Children on Men’s and Women’s Chances of Re-partnering in a European Context’. European Journal of Population, 29, pp. 417–444. doi: 10.1007/s10680-013-9294-5.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-013-9294-5   Google Scholar

Ivkov Dzigurski, A., Vučković, S., Stajić, S., Sekulić, M., Bibić, L., Jovanov, J. and Dragin, A. (2023) ‘Attitudes of university students towards institution of a marriage”. Family Forum, 12, pp. 15–30. https://doi.org/10.25167/FF/4809.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25167/FF/4809   Google Scholar

Jalovaara, M. and Fasang, A.E. (2015) ‘Are there gender differences in family trajectories by education in Finland?“ Demographic Research, 33(44), pp. 1242–1256. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2015.33.44.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2015.33.44   Google Scholar

Jónsson, A.K. (2021) ‘A Nation of Bastards? Registered Cohabitation, Childbearing, and FirstMarriage Formation in Iceland, 1994–2013’. European Journal of Population, 37, pp. 65–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-020-09560-2.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-020-09560-2   Google Scholar

Kalmijn, M. (2011) ‘The Influence of Men’s Income and Employment on Marriage and Cohabitation: Testing Oppenheimer’s Theory in Europe’. European Journal of Population, 27, pp. 269–293. doi: 10.1007/s10680-011-9238-x.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-011-9238-x   Google Scholar

Kalmijin, M. (2013) ‘The Educational Gradient in Marriage: A Comparison of 25 European Countries’. Demography, 50, pp. 1499–1520. doi: 10.1007/s13524-013-0229-x.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-013-0229-x   Google Scholar

Katus, K., Puur, A., Põldma, A. and Sakkeus, L. (2007) ‘First union formation in Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania: Patterns across countries and gender’. Demographic Research, 17(10), pp. 247–300. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2007.17.10.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2007.17.10   Google Scholar

Kiernan, K. (2004) ‘Redrawing the boundaries of marriage’. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, pp. 980–987. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00068.x.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00068.x   Google Scholar

Klärner, A. (2015) ‘The low importance of marriage in eastern Germany – social norms and the role of peoples’ perceptions of the past’. Demographic Research, 33(9), pp. 239–272. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2015.33.9.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2015.33.9   Google Scholar

Klärner, A. and Knabe, A. (2017) ‘On the normative foundations of marriage and cohabitation: Results from group discussions in eastern and western Germany’. Demographic Research, 36(53), pp. 1637–1666. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2017.36.53.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2017.36.53   Google Scholar

Kleinepier, T. and de Valk, H. A.G. (2016) ‘Ethnic differences in family trajectories of young adult women in the Netherlands: Timing and sequencing of events’. Demographic Research, 35(24), pp. 671–710. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2016.35.24.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2016.35.24   Google Scholar

Keenan, K., Kenward, M.G., Grundy, E. and Leon, D.A. (2014) ‘The impact of alcohol consumption on patterns of union formation in Russia 1998–2010: An assessment using longitudinal data’. Population Studies, 68(3), pp. 283–303, doi: 10.1080/00324728.2014.955045.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.2014.955045   Google Scholar

Kok, J. and Leinarte, D. (2015) ‘Cohabitation in Europe: a revenge of history?“ The History of the Family, 20(4), pp. 489–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/1081602X.2015.1067240.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1081602X.2015.1067240   Google Scholar

Kravdal, Ø., Wörn, J. and Reme, B.A. (2022) ‘Mental health benefits of cohabitation and marriage: A longitudinal analysis of Norwegian register data’. Population Studies, 77(1), pp. 91–110, doi: 10.1080/00324728.2022.2063933.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.2022.2063933   Google Scholar

Kulu, H. and Boyle, P.J. (2010) ‘Premarital cohabitation and divorce: Support for the ‘Trial Marriage” Theory?“ Demographic Research, 23 (31), pp. 879–904. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2010.23.31.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2010.23.31   Google Scholar

Kulu, H. (2014) ‘Marriage Duration and Divorce: The Seven-Year Itch or a Lifelong Itch?“ Demography, 51, pp. 881–893. doi:10.1007/s13524-013-0278-1.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-013-0278-1   Google Scholar

Kulu, H. and González-Ferrer, A. (2014) ‘Family Dynamics Among Immigrants and Their Descendants in Europe: Current Research and Opportunities’. European Journal of Population, 30, pp. 411–435. doi: 10.1007/s10680-014-9322-0.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-014-9322-0   Google Scholar

Kulu, H. and Hannemann, T. (2016) ‘Introduction to research on immigrant and ethnic minority families in Europe’. Demographic Research, 35(2), pp. 31–46. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2016.35.2.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2016.35.2   Google Scholar

Lampard, R. (2013) ‘Age at marriage and the risk of divorce in England and Wales’. Demographic Research, 29(7), pp. 167–202. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2013.29.7.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2013.29.7   Google Scholar

Lappegård, T. and Noack, T. (2015) „The link between parenthood and partnership in contemporary Norway – Findings from focus group research”. Demographic Research, 32(9), pp. 287–310. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2015.32.9.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2015.32.9   Google Scholar

Lersch, P.M. (2017) ‘The Marriage Wealth Premium Revisited: Gender Disparities and Within-Individual Changes in Personal Wealth in Germany’. Demography, 54, pp. 961–983. doi: 10.1007/s13524-017-0572-4.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-017-0572-4   Google Scholar

Lesner, R.V. (2018) ‘The long-term effect of childhood poverty’. Journal of Population Economy, 31. pp. 969–1004. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-017-0674-8.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-017-0674-8   Google Scholar

Lesthaeghe, R. and van de Kaa, D. J. (1986) ‘Twee demografische transities“. Bevolking: groei en krimp, pp. 9–24.
  Google Scholar

Lesthaeghe, R. (2010) ‘The unfolding story of the second demographic transition’. Population and Development Review, 36, pp. 211–251. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2010.00328.x.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2010.00328.x   Google Scholar

Lesthaeghe, R. (2014) ‘The second demographic transition: A concise overview of its development’. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 111(51), pp. 18112–18115. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.142044111.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1420441111   Google Scholar

Maenpaa, M. and Jalovaara, M. (2014) ‘Homogamy in socio-economic background and education, and the dissolution of cohabitin unions’. Demographic Research, 30(65), pp. 1769–1792. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2014.30.65.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2014.30.65   Google Scholar

Milić, A. (2001) Sociologija porodice, kritika i izazovi, Beograd: Čigoja štampa.
  Google Scholar

Mavropoulos, G. and Panagiotidis, T. (2022) ‘Why Do Young Adults Retreat from Marriage? An Easterlin Relative Income Approach’. Comparative Population Studies, 47, pp. 57–86. https://doi.org/10.12765/CPoS-2022-03.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12765/CPoS-2022-03   Google Scholar

Meggiolaro, S. and Ongaro, F. (2008) ‘Repartnering after marital dissolution: Does context play a role?“ Demographic Research, 19 (57), pp. 1913–1934. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.57.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.57   Google Scholar

Meggiolaro, S. and Ongaro, F. (2010) ‘The implications of marital instability for a woman’s fertility: Empirical evidence from Italy’. Demographic Research, 23(34), pp. 963–996. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2010.23.34.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2010.23.34   Google Scholar

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J. and Altman, D.G. , The PRISMA Group (2009) ‘Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement”. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097   Google Scholar

Mooyaart, J.E. and Liefbroer, A.C. (2016) ‘The Influence of Parental Education on Timing and Type of Union Formation: Changes Over the Life Course and Over Time in the Netherlands’. Demography, 53, pp. 885–919. doi: 10.1007/s13524-016-0473-y.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-016-0473-y   Google Scholar

Mynarska, M., Baranowska-Rataj, A. and Matysiak, A. (2014) ‘Free to stay, free to leave: Insights from Poland into the meaning of cohabitation’. Demographic Research, 31(36), pp. 1107–1136. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2014.31.36.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2014.31.36   Google Scholar

Mureşan, C., Hărăguş, P-T., Hărăguş, M. and Schröder, C. (2008) ‘Romania: Childbearing metamorphosis within a changing context’. Demographic Research, 19 (23), pp. 855–906. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.23.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.23   Google Scholar

Nishikido, M., Cui, Q. and Esteve, A. (2022) ‘Partnership dynamics and the fertility gap between Sweden and Spain’. Genus, 78:26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41118-022-00170-w.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41118-022-00170-w   Google Scholar

Pailhé, A. (2015) ‘Partnership dynamics across generations of immigration in France: Structural vs. cultural factors’. Demographic Research, 33(16), pp. 451–498. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2015.33.16.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2015.33.16   Google Scholar

Palumbo,L., Berrington, A., Eibich, P. and Vitali, A. (2022) ”Uncertain steps into adulthood: Does economic precariousness hinder entry into the first co-residential partnership in the UK?” Population Studies, doi: 10.1080/00324728.2022.2102672.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.2022.2102672   Google Scholar

Perelli-Harris, B., Berrington, A., Sánchez Gassen, N., Galezewska, P. And Holland, A.J. (2017) ‘The Rise in Divorce and Cohabitation: Is There a Link?” Population and Development Review, 43(2), pp. 303–329. https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.12063.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.12063   Google Scholar

Perelli-Harris, B. and Blom, N. (2022) ”So happy together … Examining the association between relationship happiness, socio-economic status, and family transitions in the UK”. Population Studies, 76(3), pp. 447–464. doi:10.1080/00324728.2021.1984549.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.2021.1984549   Google Scholar

Perez Amador, J. (2016). Continuity and change of cohabitation in Mexico: Same as before or different anew. Demographic Research, 35(42), 1245-1258. DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2016.35.42.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2016.35.42   Google Scholar

Poortman, A. and Kalmijn, M. (2002) ‘Women’s Labour Market Position and Divorce in the Netherlands: Evaluating Economic Interpretations of the Work Effect”. European Journal of Population, 18, pp. 175–202. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015520411449.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015520411449   Google Scholar

Potaˆrca˘, G., Mills, M. and Lesnard, L. (2013) ‘Family Formation Trajectories in Romania, the Russian Federation and France: Towards the Second Demographic Transition?” European Journal of Population, 29, pp. 69–101. doi:10.1007/s10680-012-9279-9.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-012-9279-9   Google Scholar

Prskawetz, A., Sobotka, T., Buber, I., Engelhardt, H. and Gisser, R. (2008) ‘Austria: Persistent low fertility since the mid-1980s”. Demographic Research, 19(12), pp. 293–360. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.12.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.12   Google Scholar

Pullin, A. S. and Stewart, G. B. (2006) ‘Guidelines for systematic review in conservation and environmental management”. Conservation biology, 20(6), pp. 1647–1656. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00485.x.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00485.x   Google Scholar

Plakans, A. and Lipša, I. (2014) ‘Stigmatized cohabitation in the Latvian region of the eastern Baltic littoral: nineteenth and twentieth centuries’. The History of the Family http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1081602X.2014.963640.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1081602X.2014.963640   Google Scholar

Perelli-Harris, B., Mynarska, M., Berghammer, C., Berrington, A., Evans, A., Isupova, O., Keizer, R., Klarner, A., Lappegard, T. and Vignoli, D. (2014) ‘Towards a deeper understanding of cohabitation: insights from focus group research across Europe and Australia’. Demographic Research, 31(34), pp. 1043–1078. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2014.31.34.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2014.31.34   Google Scholar

Pechholdová, M. and Šamanová, G. (2013) ‘Mortality by marital status in a rapidly changing society: Evidence from the Czech Republic’. Demographic Research, 29(12), pp. 307–322. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2013.29.12.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2013.29.12   Google Scholar

Rahnu, L., Sakkeus, L., Puur, A. and Klesment, M. (2015) ‘Partnership dynamics among migrants and their descendants in Estonia’. Demographic Research, 32(56), pp. 1519–1566. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2015.32.56.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2015.32.56   Google Scholar

Régnier-Loilier, A. (2016) ‘Partnership trajectories of people in stable non-cohabiting relationships in France’. Demographic Research, 35(40), pp. 1169–1212. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2016.35.40
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2016.35.40   Google Scholar

Rijken, A.J. and Liefbroer, A.C. (2009) ‘The Influence of Partner Relationship Quality on Fertility’. European Journal of Population, 25, pp. 27–44. doi:10.1007/s10680-008-9156-8.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-008-9156-8   Google Scholar

Rutigliano, R. and Esping-Andersen, G. (2018) ‘Partnership Choice and Childbearing in Norway and Spain’. European Journal of Population, 34, pp. 367–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-017-9432-6.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-017-9432-6   Google Scholar

Sandström, G. (2017) ‘A reversal of the socioeconomic gradient of nuptiality during the Swedish mid-20th-century baby boom’. Demographic Research, 37(50), pp. 1625–1658. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2017.37.50.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2017.37.50   Google Scholar

Sapiro, P. (2020) ‘Religious Intermarriage in England and Wales: Differences in Individual and Area Characteristics of Endogamous and Exogamous Couples’. European Journal of Population, 36, pp. 415–437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-019-09534-z.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-019-09534-z   Google Scholar

Schnor, C. (2014) ‘The Effect of Union Status at First Childbirth on Union Stability: Evidence from Eastern and Western Germany’. European Journal of Population, 30, pp. 129–160. doi: 10.1007/s10680-013-9304-7.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-013-9304-7   Google Scholar

Schnor, C. (2015) ‘Does waiting pay off for couples? Partnership duration prior to household formation and union stability’. Demographic Research, 33(22), pp. 611–652. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2015.33.22.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2015.33.22   Google Scholar

Sobotka, T. (2008) ‘Overview Chapter 6: The diverse faces of the Second Demographic Transition in Europe’. Demographic Research, 19(8), pp. 171–224. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.8.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.8   Google Scholar

Sobotka, T. and Toulemon, L. (2008) ‘Overview Chapter 4: Changing family and partnership behaviour: Common trends and persistent diversity across Europe’. Demographic Research, 19(6), pp. 85–138. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.6.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.6   Google Scholar

Steele, F., Kallis, C., Goldstein, H.aAnd Joshi, H. (2005) ‘The relationship between childbearing and transitions from marriage and cohabitation in Britain’. Demography, 42 (4), pp. 647–673. https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2005.0038.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2005.0038   Google Scholar

Thane, P. (2013) ‘The changing legal regulation of cohabitation. From fornicators to family, 1600–2010’. Population Studies, 67, pp. 246–248. doi:10.1080/00324728.2013.788320.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.2013.788320   Google Scholar

Thomson, E. and Eriksson, H. (2013) ‘Register-based estimates of parents’ coresidence in Sweden, 1969–2007’. Demographic Research, 29(42), pp. 1153–1186. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2013.29.42
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2013.29.42   Google Scholar

Van Houdt, K. and Poortman, A-R. (2018) ‘Joint lifestyles and the risk of union dissolution: Differences between marriage and cohabitation’. Demographic Research, 39(15), pp. 431–458. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2018.39.15.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2018.39.15   Google Scholar

Van de Kaa, D. J. (1987) Europe’s second demographic transition, Washington, D.C: Population Reference Bureau.
  Google Scholar

Van den Berg, L., Neels, K. and Wood, J.(2021) ‘Socioeconomic preconditions to union formation: Exploring variation by migrant background’. Demographic Research, 45(32), pp. 973–1010. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2021.45.32.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2021.45.32   Google Scholar

Van den Berg, L. and Mortelmans, D. (2022) ‘Endogamy and relationship dissolution: Does unmarried cohabitation matter?“ Demographic Research, 47(17), pp. 489–528. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2022.47.17.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2022.47.17   Google Scholar

Vignoli, D. and Salvini, S. (2014) ‘Religion and union formation in Italy: Catholic precepts, social pressure, and tradition’. Demographic Research, 31(35), pp. 1079–1106. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2014.31.35.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2014.31.35   Google Scholar

Vignoli, D., Matysiak, A., Styrc, M. and Tocchioni, V. (2018) ‘The positive impact of women’s employment on divorce: Context, selection, or anticipation?“ Demographic Research, 38(37), pp. 1059–1110. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2018.38.51.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2018.38.37   Google Scholar

Vitali, A. and Fraboni, R. (2022) „Pooling of Wealth in Marriage: The Role of Premarital Cohabitation’. European Journal of Population, 38, pp. 721–754. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-022-09627-2.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-022-09627-2   Google Scholar

Vuletić, A. (2008) ‘Bračna politika u Kneževini Srbiji između tradicionalizma i modernizma“, Istorijski časopis, 57, pp. 283–298.
  Google Scholar

Wachter, G.G. and de Valk, H.A.G. (2022) ‘Cohort Succession in the Timing of Marriage Among the Children of Turkish and Moroccan Immigrants’. European Journal of Population, 38, pp. 485–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-022-09616-5.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-022-09616-5   Google Scholar

Čikić, J. (2017) ‘Ljubav u postmoderno doba – savremena potreba za intimnošću i njene posledice po brak i porodicu’. Sociološki godišnjak, 12, pp. 113–131.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/SocGod1712113Q   Google Scholar