Zredefiniowana rodzina jako wyzwanie dla współczesnego społeczeństwa i bioetyki.
Tadej Strehovec
Abstrakt
The redefinition of family and marriage is an ideological and political topic in modern society, where the public is more and more interested in issues like IVF, surrogate motherhood and child adoption for LGBT couples. What is the definition of family? why is the conventional nuclear family being replaced by new types of households? and what are the potential consequences of redefinition of family for society as a whole? These are some of the most important questions. Family ethics and bioethics could be an excellent framework to present the historical and social background of these kinds of phenomena.
Słowa kluczowe:
Family ethics, bioethics, same-sex marriages, surrogate motherhood, assisted reproduction, cohabitation, childrenBibliografia
Acock, Alan C., in David H. Demo. 1994. Family diversity and well-being. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Google Scholar
Adkins, Kate S. 2008. Implications of violent and controlling unions for mother's mental health leaving. The Ohio State University 2008 (Accessed 12.7.2011). Available from http://crcw.princeton.edu/workingpapers/WP08-14-FF.pdf.
Google Scholar
Allan V. Horwitz and Helene Raskin. 1998. The Relationship of Cohabitation and Mental Health: A Study of a Young Adult Cohort,. Journal of Marriage and the Family 60 (2):505–514.
Google Scholar
Amato, Paul R., in Alan Booth. 1997. A generation at risk : growing up in an era of family upheaval. Cambridge, Mass ; London: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar
Anderson Moore, Kristin et al. 2002. Marriage From a Child’s Perspective: How Does Family Structure Affect Children, and What Can We Do about It? Child Trends Research Brief, http://www.childtrends.org/Files/MarriageRB602.pdf (Accessed 20.3.2008).
Google Scholar
Angel, Ronald, in Jacqueline Lowe Worobey. 1988. Single Motherhood and Children's Health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 29 (1):38–52.
Google Scholar
Bai, Meijiadai. 2012. Love, Sex, Marriage. Qualitative Inquiry 18 (6):475–481.
Google Scholar
Belsey, Catherine. 2001. Denaturalizing the family. European Journal of Cultural Studies 4 (3):289–303.
Google Scholar
Bruce Ellis et al. 2003. Does Father Absence Place Daughters at Special Risk for Early Sexual Activity and Teenage Pregnancy? Child Development 74:801–821.
Google Scholar
Cerna, Christina M. 2010. Schalk & Kopf v. Austria (Eur. Ct. H.R.), Introductory Note by Christina M. Cerna. International Legal Materials 49 (5):1302–1324.
Google Scholar
Cherlin, Andrew J. 2004. The Deinstitutionalization of American Marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family 66 (4):848–861.
Google Scholar
Cutler, David M., Edward Glaeser, in Karen Norberg. 2001. Explaining the Rise in Youth Suicide: Working paper no. 1917. National Bureau of Economic Research, http://www.nber.org/papers/w7713.pdf (Accessed 20.3.2008).
Google Scholar
Elizabeth Marquardt. 2005. Between Two Worlds: The Inner Lives of Children of Divorce. New York: Crown.
Google Scholar
———. 2005. Family Structure and Children’s Educational Outcomes. New York: Institute for American Values.
Google Scholar
Gallagher, Maggie. 2006. If Marriage is Natural, Why is defending it so hard? Taking up the Challenge to Marriage in the Pews and the Public Square. Ave Maria Law Review (2), http://www.avemarialaw.edu/assets/documents/lawreview/articles/AMLR.v4i2.gallagher.final3.pdf (Accessed 20.3.2008).
Google Scholar
Gross, Aeyal. 2007. Queer Theory and International Human Rights Law: Does Each Person Have a Sexual Orientation? Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law) 101:129–132.
Google Scholar
Gunilla Ringback Weitoft, Anders Hjern, Bengt Haglund, and Mans Rosen,. 2003. Mortality, Severe Morbidity, and Injury in Children Living with Single Parents in Sweden: A Population-Based Study. The Lancet 361:289–295.
Google Scholar
Harper, Cynthia, in Sara McLanahan. 2004. Father Absence and Youth Incarceration. Journal of Research on Adolescence 14 (3):369–397.
Google Scholar
Hetherington, E. Mavis, in John Kelly. 2002. For Better or for Worse: Divorce Reconsidered New York: W.W. Norton.
Google Scholar
J.A. Seltzer and S.M. Bianchi. 1988. Children’s Contact with Absent Parents. Journal of Marriage and the Family 50:663–677.
Google Scholar
Jaynes, William H. 2000. The Effects of Several of the Most Common Family Structures on the Academic Achievement of Eight Graders. Marriage & Family Review 73 (1–2):73–97.
Google Scholar
Johnson, Gregory R. et al. 2000. Suicide Among Adolescents and Young Adults: A Cross – national Comparison of 34 Countries. Suicide&Life-threatening Behavior 30 (1):74–82.
Google Scholar
Kollman, Kelly. 2007. Same-Sex Unions: The Globalization of an Idea. International Studies Quarterly 51 (2):329–357.
Google Scholar
Lannutti, Pamela J. 2005. For better or worse: Exploring the meanings of same-sex marriage within the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered community. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 22 (1):5–18.
Google Scholar
Lundberg, O. 1993. The impact of childhood living conditions on illness and mortality in adulthood. Social science & medicine 36:1047–52.
Google Scholar
McLanahan, Sara. 2000. Family, State and Child Wellbeing. Annual Review of Sociology 26: 703–706.
Google Scholar
McLanahan, Sara, in Gary D. Sandefur. 1994. Growing up with a single parent : what hurts, what helps. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar
The New Encyclopædia Britannica. 2010. 15th ed. ed. Chicago ; London: Encyclopædia Britannica.
Google Scholar
Nicholas Zill et al. 1993. Long-Term Eff ects of Parental Divorce on Parent-Child Relationships, Adjustment, and Achievement in Young Adulthood. Journal of Family Psychology 7 (1):91–103.
Google Scholar
Pienta, Amy Mehraban, Mark D. Hayward, in Kristi Rahrig Jenkins. 2000. Health Consequences of Marriage for the Retirement Years. Journal of Family Issues 21 (5):559–586.
Google Scholar
Popenoe, David. 2008. Cohabitation, Marriage and child wellbeing. A Cross-National Perspective. Piscataway: The National Marriage Project.
Google Scholar
Rank, Mark R., in Thomas A. Hirschl. 1999. The Economic Risk of Childhood in America: Estimating the Probability of Poverty Across the Formative Years. Journal of Marriage and the Family 61 (4):1058–1067.
Google Scholar
Regnerus, Mark. 2012. How different are the adult children of parents who have same-sex relationships? Findings from the New Family Structures Study. Social Science Research 41 (4):752–770.
Google Scholar
Risman, Barbara J. 2004. Gender as a Social Structure: Theory Wrestling with Activism. Gender and Society 18 (4):429–450.
Google Scholar
Saiz, Ignacio. 2004. Bracketing Sexuality: Human Rights and Sexual Orientation: A Decade of Development and Denial at the UN. Health and Human Rights 7 (2):48–80.
Google Scholar
Sastriyani, Siti Hariti. 2009. Gender and politics : proceeding International Seminar of ”Gender and Politics”, Yogyakarta, January 23–24, 2009. Cet. 1. ed. Yogyakarta: Diterbitkan atas kerjasama Pusat Studi Wanita, Universitas Gadjah Mada dengan Sekolah Pascasarjana, Universitas Gadjah Mada, dan Penerbit Tiara Wacana.
Google Scholar
Schwartz, Joseph E. et al. 1995. Sociodemographic and Psychosocial Factors in Childhood as Predictors of Adult Mortality. American Journal of Public Health 85:1237–1245.
Google Scholar
Simons, Ronald L., Kuei-Hsiu Lin, Leslie C. Gordon, Rand D. Conger, in Frederick O. Lorenz. 1999. Explaining the Higher Incidence of Adjustment Problems among Children of Divorce Compared with Those in Two-Parent Families. Journal of Marriage and the Family 61 (4):1020–33.
Google Scholar
Steven Stack and J. Ross Eshleman. 1998. Marital Status and Happiness: A 17 Nation Study. Journal of Marriage and the Family 60:527–536.
Google Scholar
The Witherspoon Institute. 2008. Marriage and the Public Good: Ten Principles. Princeton, New Jersey: The Witherspoon Institute.
Google Scholar
Autorzy
Tadej StrehovecStatystyki
Downloads
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2024 Family Forum
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 Międzynarodowe.