Published: 2017-12-10

A gloss on the verdict of the Supreme Court of 11 April 2017, II KK 35/17

Zbigniew Kwiatkowski
The Opole Studies in Administration and Law
Section: Articles
DOI https://doi.org/10.25167/osap.1236

Abstract

The gloss presents the question of notification of the injured person of the date of hearing in the understanding of Art.387 § 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The author expresses the opinion that the injured party should be notified by the Court of the date of the hearing and instructed on the possibility of submitting an application to the Court, which is mentioned in § 1 Art. 387 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, along with being sent the notification of the date of the main hearing. The requirement of proper notification of the injured person of the date of the hearing will be realized on condition that this procedural action is executed in compliance with the regulations contained in Chapter 15 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which deals with “Deliveries).

Keywords:

hearing, notification of the date of hearing, injured party, prosecutor

Download files

Citation rules

Kwiatkowski, Z. (2017). A gloss on the verdict of the Supreme Court of 11 April 2017, II KK 35/17. The Opole Studies in Administration and Law, 15(4), 111–118. https://doi.org/10.25167/osap.1236

This website uses cookies for proper operation, in order to use the portal fully you must accept cookies.