Artefakty śledcze: porównywanie scenariuszy przestępstwa

Anna Ibek

doi:10.25167/osap.1240

Criminal artefacts: comparing scenarios of crimes

Anna Ibek

Krakowska Akademia im. Andrzeja Frycza Modrzewskiego. Katedra Kryminalistyki, Kryminologii i Nauk o Policji

DOI: https://doi.org/10.25167/osap.1240

Abstract

The objective of the article is to present narrative elements of investigative analysis as criminal artefacts. The key concepts of this perspective, such as: criminal artefact, scenario, generalization, evidential reasoning, are characterized. The methods and criteria of constructing scenarios are also presented in accordance with the discussed model. Moreover, the method of inference to the best explanation (so-called IBE) and explanatory evidential theory (so-called EET) are recognized as the basic methods of a criminal case reconstructions analysis. The practical aspects of using these methods are also presented. It was noted that a criminal scenario prepared according to relevant criteria is a good basis to justify person’s decisions in the course of fact-finding. However, as the final decision about the choice of the best scenario belongs to the part of the authority conducting the proceedings, the criminal trial should not be transformed into the trial by mathematics.

Keywords:

criminal artefact, criminal scenario, eet standard, evidential reasoning, generalization, IBE standard

References

Anderson T., Schum D., Twining W., Analysis of evidence, Cambridge 2005.
Google Scholar

Bex F., Arguments, stories and criminal evidence. A formal hybrid theory, Dordrecht 2011.
Google Scholar

Bex F., Evidence for a good story. A hybrid theory of arguments, stories and criminal evidence. Ph.D thesis, Groningen 2009.
Google Scholar

Braak W.S. van den, Sensemaking software for crime analysis, Utrecht 2010.
Google Scholar

Doyle A. Conan, Studium w szkarłacie, tł. T. Evert, Gdańsk 2000.
Google Scholar

Ibek A., Generalizacje w rozumowaniach dowodowych, „Studia Prawnicze. Rozprawy i Materiały” 2012, nr 1(10).
Google Scholar

Ibek A., O modelach śledztwa, [w:] Kryminalistyka w walce z przestępczością. Materiały z konferencji, Katowice 2013.
Google Scholar

Ibek A., Rozumowania dowodowe w toku dokonywania ustaleń faktycznych. Pomiędzy logiką, procesem karnym i kryminalistyką, niepublikowana rozprawa doktorska z zasobów Wydziału Prawa, Administracji i Stosunków Międzynarodowych Krakowskiej Akademii im. Andrzeja Frycza Modrzewskiego, Kraków 2015.
Google Scholar

Ibek A., Struktura argumentu dowodowego, [w:] Współczesna kryminalistyka – wyzwania i zagrożenia, red. V. Kwiatkowska-Wójcikiewicz, M. Zubańska, Szczytno 2015.
Google Scholar

Konieczny J., Analiza w wywiadzie zagranicznym, [w:] Analiza informacji w służbach policyjnych i specjalnych, red. J. Konieczny, Warszawa 2012.
Google Scholar

Konieczny J., Kryzys czy zmiana paradygmatu kryminalistyki?, „Państwo i Prawo” 2012, z. 1(791).
Google Scholar

Konieczny J., Opowieści o przestępstwie, [w:] Paradygmaty kryminalistyki, red. J. Wójcikiewicz, V. Kwiatkowska-Wójcikiewicz, Kraków 2016.
Google Scholar

Konieczny J., Ibek A., Kryminalistyczne aspekty czynności wiedzotwórczych a zasada prawdy w procesie karnym, [w:] Przestępczość, dowody, prawo. Księga jubileuszowa prof. Bronisława Młodziejowskiego, red. J. Moszczyński, D. Solodov, I. Sołtyszewski, Olsztyn 2016.
Google Scholar

Kowalski M.K., Artefakty jako źródła poznania. Studium z teorii nauki historycznej, Gdańsk 1993.
Google Scholar

Verheij B., Bex F., Timmer T.S. et al., Arguments, scenarios and probabilities: connections between three normative frameworks for evidential reasoning, “Law, Probability and Risk” 2016, No. 15(1).
Google Scholar

Widacki J., Detektywi na tropach zagadek historii, Katowice 1998.
Google Scholar

Download

pdf (Język Polski)

Published

2017-09-25

Cited by

Ibek, A. (2017). Criminal artefacts: comparing scenarios of crimes. The Opole Studies in Administration and Law, 15(3), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.25167/osap.1240

Authors

Anna Ibek

Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

License

Author’s economic rights to published works are held by Opole University (collective works) and individual Authors (individual parts of the collective work, ones that form a separate entity).

The journal Opole Studies in Administration and Law accepts for publication only works which have not been in circulation before.

On the basis of the Regulation (2016/679) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (referred to as General Data Protection Regulation or RODO) Opole University, based at 11a Plac Kopernika, 45-040 Opole, is the personal data controller for all the authors publishing their works in the Opole Studies in Administration and Law.

The articles published in Opole Studies in Administration and Law are available under a licence Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).