The participation of environmental NGOs in (Austrian) criminal proceedings in the light of Art. 9 (3) Aarhus Convention

Lara Szalk-Unger

doi:10.25167/osap.4772

Published: 2022-11-29

Vol. 20 No. 1 (2022)

The participation of environmental NGOs in (Austrian) criminal proceedings in the light of Art. 9 (3) Aarhus Convention

Lara Szalk-Unger

The Opole Studies in Administration and Law

Section: Articles

https://doi.org/10.25167/osap.4772

Abstract

One of the three main pillars of the Aarhus Convention is access to justice for members of the public. Access to justice can not only be provided for in administrative proceedings but also via criminal proceedings in cases of environmental crime. Members of the public with an interest in environmental protection are especially environmental NGOs. In some European countries NGOs play an active role in criminal proceedings, however in many they are banished to the sidelines. This article describes the implications and requirements of Art. 9 (3) of the Aarhus Convention for access to justice via criminal proceedings, analyzes the existing ways for environmental NGOs to participate in Austrian criminal proceedings and presents ways in which criminal procedure law can be reformed to meet the requirements of the Aarhus Convention. The end goal is to make the prosecution of environmental crime as effective as possible.

Keywords:

access to justice, Aarhus Convention, environmental crime, criminal procedure law

Download files

pdf

Citation rules

Szalk-Unger, L. (2022). The participation of environmental NGOs in (Austrian) criminal proceedings in the light of Art. 9 (3) Aarhus Convention. The Opole Studies in Administration and Law, 20(1), 211–236. https://doi.org/10.25167/osap.4772

Cited by / Share

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

References

Allgemeines bürgerliches gesetzbuch für die gesammten deutschen erbländer der Oesterreichischen Monarchie, JgS 1811/946 idF BgBl I 2021/175 (translates to austrian civil code).
Google Scholar

Allgemeines Verwaltungsverfahrensgesetz 1991 – aVg, BgBl I 1991/51 idF BgBl I 2018/58 (translated to austrian administrative Procedure act).
Google Scholar

Bundes-Verfassungsgesetz (B-Vg), BgBl 1930/1 idF BgBl I 2021/235 (translates to: austrian constitution).
Google Scholar

Bundesgesetz über die Prüfung der Umweltverträglichkeit (Umweltverträglichkeitsprüfungs-gesetz 2000 – UVP-g 2000), BgBl 1993/697 idF BgBl I 2018/80 (translates to austrian environmental Impact assessment act).
Google Scholar

Bundesgesetz über die Überwachung des handels mit exemplaren wildlebender Tier- und Pflanzenarten (artenhandelsgesetz 2009 – arthg 2009), BgBl I 2010/16 idF BgBl I 2019/104 (translates to austrian Species Trafficking act).
Google Scholar

Bundesgesetz über eine nachhaltige abfallwirtschaft (abfallwirtschaftsgesetz 2002 – aWg 2002), BgBl I 2002/102 idF BgBl I 2021/200 (translates to: austrian Waste Managament act).
Google Scholar

Bundesgesetz über Umwelthaftung zur Vermeidung und Sanierung von Umweltschäden (Bundes-Umwelthaftungsgesetz – B-Uhg), BgBl I 2009/55 idF BgBl I 2018/74 (translates to: austrian environmental Liability act).
Google Scholar

Bundesgesetz vom 5. März 1986 über die staatsanwaltschaftlichen Behörden (Staatsanwalt-schaftsgesetz – Stag), BgBl I 1984/164 idF BgBl I 2018/32 (translates to: austrian Prosecutor‘s Office act).
Google Scholar

Bundesgesetz, mit dem das abfallwirtschaftsgesetz 2002, das Immissionsschutzgesetz – Luft und das Wasserrechtsgesetz 1959 geändert werden (aarhus-Beteiligungsgesetz 2018), BgBl I 2018/73 (translates to: austrian aarhus Participation act).
Google Scholar

council Directive 92/43/eec of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora , 1992 OJ L 206/7.
Google Scholar

Proposal for a Directive of the european Parliament and of the council on the protection of the environment through criminal law and replacing Directive 2008/99/ec, cOM (2021) 851 final.
Google Scholar

Strafprozessordnung 1975, BgBl 1975/631 idF BgBl 2021/243 (translates to: austrian code of criminal Procedure). Un convention on access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and access to Justice in environmental Matters (aarhus convention), 25.06.1998. Wasserrechtsgesetz, BgBl 1959/215 idF BgBl I 2018/73 (translates to: austrian Water Law act).
Google Scholar

echr 31.05.2001, 37591/97 Metzger/Deutschland.
Google Scholar

ecJ Judgement of the court (grand chamber) of 8 March 2011 in case c-240/09, Brown Bear I, ecLI:eU:c:2011:125.
Google Scholar

ecJ Judgement of the court (grand chamber) of 20 December 2017 in case c-664/15, Protect, ecLI:eU:c:2017:985.
Google Scholar

ecJ Judgement of the court (grand chamber) of 12 May 2011 in case c-115/09, Bund für Umwelt und Naturschutz, ecLI:eU:c:2011:289.
Google Scholar

Ogh (Supreme court of Justice) 28.06.2016, 6 Ob 229/16v.
Google Scholar

Ogh (Supreme court of Justice) 06.03.2014, 17 Os 9/14y.
Google Scholar

Ogh (Supreme court of Justice) 26.02.1997, 7 Ob 47/97f.
Google Scholar

OLg graz (graz higher regional court) 27.03.2008, 11 Bs 63/08k.
Google Scholar

OLg Wien (Vienna higher regional court) 10.10.2011, 18 Bs 244/11f.
Google Scholar

OLg Wien (Vienna higher regional court) 26.06.2008, 23 Bs 231/98a.
Google Scholar

Vwgh (The Supreme administrative court) 28.03.2018, ra 2015/07/0152.
Google Scholar

Vwgh (The Supreme administrative court) 28.05.2018, ra 2015/07/005
Google Scholar

Findings and recommendations of the aarhus convention compliance committee with regard to communiction accc/c/2005/11 regarding compliance by Belgium with its obligations under the aarhus convention in relation to the rights of environmental organizations to have access to justice, ece/MP.PP/c.1/2006/4/add.2.
Google Scholar

Findings and recommendations of the aarhus convention compliance committee with regard to communication accc/c/2006/18 regarding compliance by Denmark, ece/ MP.PP/2008/5/add.4.
Google Scholar

Findings and recommendations with regard to communication accc/c/2008/27 concern-ing compliance by the United kingdom of great Britain and northern Ireland, ece/MP .PP/c.1/2010/6/add.2.
Google Scholar

Findings and recommendations with regard to communication accc/c/2008/33 concern-ing compliance by the United kingdom of great Britain and northern Ireland, ece/MP .PP/c.1/2010/6/add.3.
Google Scholar

Findings and recommendations of the aarhus convention compliance committee with regard to communication accc/c/2010/48 concerning compliance by austria, ece/MP .PP/c.1/2012/4.
Google Scholar

Findings and recommendations of the aarhus convention compliance committee with regard to communication accc/c/2011/63 concerning compliance by austria, ece/MP.PP/c.1/2014/3.
Google Scholar

response of the Party concerned to the accc’s Draft findings and recommendations regarding communication accc/c/2011/63 concerning compliance by austria, ece/MP.PP/c.1/2014/3.
Google Scholar

Findings and recommendations of the aarhus convention compliance committee with regard to communications accc/c/2013/85 and accc/c/2013/86 concerning compliance by the United kingdom of great Britain and northern Ireland, ece/MP.PP/c.1/2016/10.
Google Scholar

austrian government Program 2020-2024, https://www.dieneuevolkspartei.at/Download/regierungsprogramm_2020.pdf (last accessed 30 March 2022).
Google Scholar

austrian Ministry for Justice, Sicherheitsbericht 2013. Bericht über die Tätigkeit der Strafjustiz (2013).
Google Scholar

austrian Ministry for Justice, Sicherheitsbericht 2019. Bericht über die Tätigkeit der Strafjustiz (2019).
Google Scholar

communication from the commission on access to Justice in environmental Matters, cOM (2017) 2616 final.
Google Scholar

council of the european Union, council conclusions on countering environmental crime, Doc. 15412/16, enFOPOL 484 enV 791 enFOcUSTOM 235.
Google Scholar

ecce Task Force access to Justice, Study on the Possibilities for non-governmental organizations promoting environmental protection (engOs) to claim Damages on Behalf of the environment in Four Selected countries (2017)
Google Scholar

erläutrV 113 Blgnr 24. gP (explanatory remarks of the Legislator).
Google Scholar

erläutrV 181 Blgnr 25. gP. (explanatory remarks of the Legislator).
Google Scholar

erläutrV 25 Blgnr 22. gP. (explanatory remarks of the Legislator).
Google Scholar

erläutrV 648 Blgnr 22. gP. (explanatory remarks of the Legislator).
Google Scholar

Milieu Study, Measures on access to justice in environmental matters (article 9(3)), country report for austria (2007) https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DaM/env/pp/compliance/ c2010-48/correspondence/Submissions%20commun%2011.10.2010/annex_10_MilieuStudy2007austria_Final_report.pdf (last accessed on 30.03.2022).
Google Scholar

Ökobüro, rechtsschutz im Umweltrecht. rechtsbehelfe zur Umsetzung von art 9 abs 3 der aarhus-konvention (2018), https://www.oekobuero.at/files/357/positionspapier_aarhus9-3_update_2020sbff.pdf (last accessed 05.11.2022).
Google Scholar

Unece, The aarhus convention. an Implementation guide, 2nd edition (2014). Secondary sources
Google Scholar

Bianco, Floriana and annalisa Lucifora and grazia Vagliasindi. 2015. Fighting Environmental Crime in France: A Country Report. Study in the framework of the EFFACE research project. catania: University of catania.
Google Scholar

Epiney, Astrid and Stefan Diezig, Benedict Pirker, Stefan reitemeyer. 2018. Aarhus-Konvention. Handkommentar. Baden-Baden: nomos.
Google Scholar

Fajardo, Teresa and Juan Fuentes and Inmaculada ramos and Jesús Verdú. 2015. Fighting Environmental Crime in Spain: A Country Report. Study in the framework of the EFFACE research project. granada: University of granada.
Google Scholar

Fasoli, Elena. 2017. The Possibilities for nongovernmental Organizations Promoting environmental Protection to claim Damages in relation to the environment in France, Italy, the netherlands and Portugal, RECIEL (26): 30-37.
Google Scholar

Faure, Michael and günter heine. 2002. Final Report Criminal Penalities in EU Member States‘ Environmental Law. Maastricht: University of Maastricht.
Google Scholar

Faure, Michael and katarina Svatikova. 2012. criminal or administrative Law to Protect the environment? evidence from Western europe. Journal of Environmental Law (24): 253-286.
Google Scholar

Faure, Michael et al. 2016. Conlusions and Recommendations. A report in the framework of the EFFACE research project. Maastricht: University of Maastricht.
Google Scholar

Fellner, Markus and kurt Wratzfeld. 2009. Access to Justice – Umsetzungsoptionen für die 3. Säule der Aarhus-Konvention im Lichte aktueller europarechtlicher Entwicklungen. Wien: BMk. gappmayer, Wolfgang. 2013. Opferbegriff und juristische Prozessbegleitung in der StPO. Wien: Manz. germani, anita and christiane gerstetter and christoph Stefes. 2015. The role of the vic-tims of environmental crime and civil society. In: EFFACE Evaluation of the strengths, weaknesses, threats and opportunities associated with EU efforts to combat environmental crime, andrew Farmer et al (ed.) 53-62.
Google Scholar

Hadjiyianni, Ioanna. 2020. Multi-Level governance in action: access to Justice in national courts in Light of the aarhus convention. European Public Law (26): 889-920.
Google Scholar

Holzer, christian. 2017. Der sachliche anwendungsbereich des art 9 abs 3 aarhus-kon-vention. ÖZW (1): 33-43.
Google Scholar

Jendrośka, Jerzy. 2020. access to Justice in the aarhus convention – genesis, Legislative history and Overview of the Main Interpretation Dilemmas, JEEPL 2020 (17): 372-408.
Google Scholar

Kienapfel, Diethelm and kurt Schmoller. 2009. Strafrecht Besonderer Teil III. 2nd edition. Wien: Manz.
Google Scholar

Kier, roland. 2008. § 9 StPO. In: WK-StPO, helmut Fuchs and eckart ratz (ed.).
Google Scholar

Kier, roland. 2018. § 65 StPO. In: WK-StPO, helmut Fuchs and eckart ratz (ed.).
Google Scholar

Kirschenhofer, gunter. 2015a. § 65 StPO. In: Kommentar zur StPO, gabriele Schmölzer and Thomas Mühlbacher (ed.).
Google Scholar

Kirschenhofer, gunter. 2015b. § 69 StPO. In: Kommentar zur StPO, gabriele Schmölzer and Thomas Mühlbacher (ed.).
Google Scholar

Kirschenhofer, gunter. 2015c. § 72 StPO. In: Kommentar zur StPO, gabriele Schmölzer and Thomas Mühlbacher (ed.).
Google Scholar

Korn, gottfried and Peter Zöchbauer. 2019a. § 69 StPO. In: WK-StPO, helmut Fuchs and eckart ratz (ed.).
Google Scholar

Korn, gottfried and Peter Zöchbauer. 2019b. § 72 StPO. In: WK-StPO, helmut Fuchs and eckart ratz (ed.).
Google Scholar

Lendl, Frederick. 2021. § 380 StPO. In: WK-StPO, helmut Fuchs and eckart ratz (ed.).
Google Scholar

nordmeyer, hagen. 2017. § 195 StPO. In: WK-StPO, helmut Fuchs and eckart ratz (ed.).
Google Scholar

Sadeleer, nicolas and gerhard roller and Miriam Dross. 2002. Access to Justice in Environmental Matters. Final report. enV.a.3/eTU/2002/0030.
Google Scholar

Schroll, kurt and robert kert. 2019. Vor §§ 198–209b. In: WK-StPO, helmut Fuchs and eckart ratz (ed.).
Google Scholar

Schulev-Steindl, eva. 2009. Rechtliche Optionen zur Verbesserung des Zugangs zu Gerichten im österreichischen Umweltrecht gemäß der Aarhus-Konvention (Artikel 9 Absatz 3). Wien: BMk.
Google Scholar

Schulev-Steindl, eva. 2019. Das aarhus-Beteiligungsgesetz – ende gut, alles gut? Österreichische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 1, 14-25.
Google Scholar

Schütz, hannes. 2017. Franz von Liszt und die Prinzipien der Strafverfolgung. In: FS 150 Jahre Wiener Jurisitische Gesellschaft. clemens Jabloner (ed.), 49-62.
Google Scholar

Sina, Stephan. 2015. Fighting Environmental Crime in Germany: A Country Report. Study in the framework of the EFFACE research project. Berlin: ecologic Institute.
Google Scholar

Spenling, anton. 2013. § 369 StPO. In: WK-StPO, helmut Fuchs and eckart ratz (ed.).
Google Scholar

Wagner, erika and Wilhelm Bergthaler and Stefanie Fasching. 2018. Umsetzung der Aarhus-Konvention in Umweltverfahren. Linz: Johannes kepler University.
Google Scholar

Weichsel-goby, Barbara. 2018. Völker- und unionsrechtliche Anforderungen an einen Zugang zu Gerichten. Rechtswissenschaftliche Studie zu Artikel 9 Abs 3 Aarhus-Konvention. Wien: Umweltdachverband.
Google Scholar