Access to justice regarding plans and programmes related to the environment – Polish law in the light of Article 9.3 of the Aarhus Convention
Magdalena Bar
Jendrośka Jerzmański Bar i Wspólnicy. Prawo gospodarcze i ochrony środowiskaAbstract
Article 9.3 of the Aarhus Convention grants members of the public (meeting certain requirements, if a Party to the Convention so specifies) access to a review procedure (access to justice) to challenge acts or omissions by private persons or public authorities that contravene provisions of its national law relating to the environment. According to Article 2.4 of the Convention, non-governmental organisations should also be considered as "members of the public".
According to the jurisprudence of the Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee, the activities of public authorities covered by the requirements of Article 9.3 of the Convention include adoption of plans and programmes which may have an impact on the environment.
In accordance with the Polish law (often following the requirements of EU law), administrative authorities adopt a whole range of plans and programmes relating to the environment or having an impact on the environment. These documents are developed either by regional or local authorities (self-governmental authorities or regional government administration) or at the central level.
Polish law provides very limited opportunities to challenge plans or programmes. With respect to documents created at the central level, there are no such possibilities at all, and with respect to documents created at lower levels, certain, limited, rights in this respect are granted only to private entities whose legal interest has been violated. The possibility for NGOs to challenge plans or programmes is completely excluded.
Such a situation should be considered non-compliant with the Aarhus Convention.
References
The Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-Making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters (the Aarhus Convention) signed on 25 June 1998 in Aarhus, Denmark (publication in Poland: Journal of Laws No. 78, item 706).
Google Scholar
Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (Official Journal C 202, 7/06/2016 P. 0047-0388).
Google Scholar
Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora (Official Journal L 206, 22/07/1992 P. 0007-0050).
Google Scholar
Directive 2008/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2008 on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe (OJ L 152, 11.6.2008, p. 1-44).
Google Scholar
Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy (OJ L 327, 22.12.2000, p. 1-73).
Google Scholar
Directive 2002/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 June 2002 relating to the assessment and management of environmental noise (OJ L 189, 18.7.2002, p. 12-25).
Google Scholar
Directive 2007/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on the assessment and management of flood risks (OJ L 288, 6.11.2007, p. 27-34).
Google Scholar
Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives (OJ L 312, 22.11.2008, p. 3-30).
Google Scholar
Commission Notice on Access to Environmental Justice. Communication from the Commission of 28.4.2017; C(2017) 2616 final.
Google Scholar
Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Improving access to justice in environmental matters in the EU and its Member States. Brussels,
Google Scholar
10.2020 COM(2020) 643 final.
Google Scholar
Act of 14 June 1960 – Code of Administrative Procedure (Journal of Laws of 2022 item 2000 as amended).
Google Scholar
Act of 8 March 1990 on community self-government (Journal of Laws of 2023, item 40).
Google Scholar
Act of 28 September 1991 on forests (Journal of Laws of 2022 item 672 as amended).
Google Scholar
Act of 13 October 1995 – Hunting Law (Journal of Laws of 2022 item 1173 as amended).
Google Scholar
Act of 5 June 1998 on province self-government (Journal of Laws 2022, item 1526).
Google Scholar
Act of 5 June 1998 on regional self-government (Journal of Laws of 2022, item 2094).
Google Scholar
Act of 27 April 2001 – Environmental Protection Law (Journal of Laws of 2022 item 2556 as amended).
Google Scholar
Act on 27 March 2003 on spatial planning and development Journal of Laws of 2022 item 503 as amended).
Google Scholar
Act of 16 April 2004 on Nature Protection (Journal of Laws of 2022 item 916 as amended).
Google Scholar
Act of 23 January 2009 on the governor and government administration in the region
Google Scholar
(Journal of Laws of 2022, item 135).
Google Scholar
Act of 14 December 2012 on waste (Journal of Laws of 2022 item 699 as amended).
Google Scholar
Act of 20 July 2017 – Water Law (Journal of Laws of 2022 item 2625 as amended).
Google Scholar
The Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee (ACCC/C/2004/6, Kazakhstan).
Google Scholar
The Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee (ACCC/C/2005/11, Belgium).
Google Scholar
The Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee (ACCC/C/2006/18, Denmark).
Google Scholar
The Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee (ACCC/C/2008/31, Germany).
Google Scholar
The Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee (ACCC/C/2011/58, Bulgaria).
Google Scholar
The Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee (ACCC/C/2011/61, United Kingdom).
Google Scholar
The Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee (ACCC/C/2014/105, Hungary).
Google Scholar
The Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee (ACCC/C/2014/120, Slovakia).
Google Scholar
Janecek, the Court of Justice, judgement of 25 July 2008 (C-237/07).
Google Scholar
Lesoochranárske zoskupenie, the Court of Justice, judgement of 8 March 2011 (C-240/09).
Google Scholar
Lesoochranárske zoskupenie, the Court of Justice, judgement of 8 November 2016 (C-243/15).
Google Scholar
Protect, the Court of Justice, judgement of 20 December 2017 (C-664/15).
Google Scholar
European Commission vs Poland, the Court of Justice, judgement of 2 March 2023 (C-432/21).
Google Scholar
The Supreme Administrative Court, verdict of 28 June 2007 (II OSK 1596/06).
Google Scholar
The Supreme Administrative Court, verdict of 14 April 2011, the Supreme Administrative Court (I OSK 5/11).
Google Scholar
The Supreme Administrative Court, decision of 8 October 2013 (II OZ 787/13).
Google Scholar
The Supreme Administrative Court, verdict of 25 March 2014 (II OSK 355/14).
Google Scholar
The Supreme Administrative Court, verdict of 5 November 2014 (II OSK 977/13).
Google Scholar
The Supreme Administrative Court, verdict of 20 November 2014 (I OSK 1747/14).
Google Scholar
The Supreme Administrative Court, verdict of 10 February 2017 (II OSK 1344/15).
Google Scholar
The Supreme Administrative Court, verdict of 15 February 2017 (II OSK 1277/15).
Google Scholar
The Supreme Administrative Court, verdict of 22 February 2017 (II OSK 1497/15).
Google Scholar
The Supreme Administrative Court, verdict of 7 March 2017 (II OSK 1587/15).
Google Scholar
The Supreme Administrative Court, verdict of 7 March 2017 (II OSK 1679/15).
Google Scholar
The Supreme Administrative Court, verdict of 21 March 2017 (II OSK 2865/15).
Google Scholar
The Supreme Administrative Court, verdict of 30 March 2017 (II OSK 1941/15).
Google Scholar
The Supreme Administrative Court, verdict of 20 April 2017 (II GSK 1912/15).
Google Scholar
The Supreme Administrative Court, verdict of 31 May 2017 (II OSK 2298/15).
Google Scholar
The Supreme Administrative Court, verdict of 20 June 2017 (II OSK 2648/15).
Google Scholar
The Supreme Administrative Court, verdict of 17 October 2017 (II OSK 2559/16).
Google Scholar
The Supreme Administrative Court, verdict of 14 November 2017 (II OSK 457/16).
Google Scholar
The Supreme Administrative Court, decision of 23 January 2018 (II OSK 3218/17).
Google Scholar
Secondary sources
Google Scholar
Bar, Magdalena, and Jerzy Jendrośka. 2020. Analiza prawna dotycząca prawidłowości wdrożenia wymagań konwencji z Aarhus. Raport Fundacji WWF Polska.
Google Scholar
Dauter, Bogusław, Bogusław Gruszczyński, Andrzej Kabat, and Małgorzata Niezgódka-Medek. 2009. Prawo o postępowaniu przed sądami administracyjnymi. Komentarz. Warszawa.
Google Scholar
Ebbeson, Jonas, Helmut Gaugitsch, Jerzy Jendrośka, Stephen Stec, and Fiona Marshall. 2014.
Google Scholar
The Aarhus Convention. An Implementation Guide. United Nations. Geneva.
Google Scholar
Eliantonio, Mariolina, Chris W. Backes, Cornelis H. van Rhee, Taru N.B.M. Spronken, and
Google Scholar
Anna Berlee. 2013. Standing up for Your Right(s) in Europe. A Comparative Study on Legal Standing (Locus Standi) before the EU and Member States’ Courts. Cambridge–Antwerp–Portland: Intersentia.
Google Scholar
Fasoli, Elena, and Alister McGlone. 2018. The Non-Compliance Mechanism Under the Aarhus Convention as ‘Soft’ Enforcement of International Environmental Law: Not So Soft After All! Netherlands International Law Review 65: 27-53. DOI: 10.1007/s40802-018-0102-0.
Google Scholar
Hauser, Roman, and Marek Wierzbowski (eds.). 2011. Prawo o postępowaniu przed sądami administracyjnymi. Komentarz. Warszawa.
Google Scholar
Jendrośka, Jerzy. 2011. Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee: Origins, Status and Activities. JEEPL 8(4): 301-314.
Google Scholar
Jendrośka, Jerzy. 2020. Access to Justice in the Aarhus Convention – Genesis, Legislative History and Overview of the Main Interpretation Dilemmas. Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law 17(4): 372-408.
Google Scholar
Jendrośka, Jerzy, and Lorenzo Squintani. 2020. The Courts as Guardians of the Environment – New Developments in Access to Justice and Environmental Litigation, Environment & Climate Change Law ICLG.com.
Google Scholar
Koester, Veit. 2007. The Compliance Committee of the Aarhus Convention – An Overview of Procedures and Jurisprudence. Environmental Policy & Law 83: 83-96.
Google Scholar
Ryall, Áine. 2019. The Aarhus Convention: Standards for access to justice in environmental matters. Environmental Rights: The Development of Standards, (eds.) Stephen J. Turner, Dinah L. Shelton, Jona Razzaque, Owen McIntyre, James R. May, 116-146. DOI: 10.1017/9781108612500.006. Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Samvel, Gor. 2020. Non-Judicial, Advisory, Yet Impactful? The Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee as a Gateway to Environmental Justice. Transnational Environmental Law 9(2): 211–38. DOI:10.1017/S2047102519000426.
Google Scholar
Woś, Tadeusz, Hanna Knysiak-Molczyk, and Marta Romańska. 2005. Prawo o postępowaniu przed sądami administracyjnymi. Komentarz. Warszawa.
Google Scholar
Authors
Magdalena BarStatistics
Downloads
License
Copyright (c) 2023 The Opole Studies in Administration and Law
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Author’s economic rights to published works are held by Opole University (collective works) and individual Authors (individual parts of the collective work, ones that form a separate entity).
The journal Opole Studies in Administration and Law accepts for publication only works which have not been in circulation before.
On the basis of the Regulation (2016/679) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (referred to as General Data Protection Regulation or RODO) Opole University, based at 11a Plac Kopernika, 45-040 Opole, is the personal data controller for all the authors publishing their works in the Opole Studies in Administration and Law.
The articles published in Opole Studies in Administration and Law are available under a licence Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
For aricles till 2017 your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation – see:
Ustawa z dnia 4 lutego 1994 r. o prawie autorskim i prawach pokrewnych
Read more about the license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
View Legal Code:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Magdalena Bar, Jerzy Jendrośka, Dr Jan Jerzmański (1957-2021) , The Opole Studies in Administration and Law: Vol. 19 No. 2 (2021)
