Visual surveillance of a person: Legality issue
SERHII CHERNYAVSKY
a:1:{s:5:"en_US";s:59:"The Law Journal of the National Academy of Internal Affairs";}MYKHAILO HRIBOV
VOLODYMYR YUSUPOV
Abstract
The relevance of the study stems from the legal ambiguity surrounding specific aspects of visual surveillance utilised by law enforcement agencies, journalists, private detectives, and other individuals with a need for it. The purpose of the study is to identify indicators that can differentiate between legal and illegal covert visual surveillance of individuals in public spaces, establish the circumstances under which such surveillance should be deemed a criminal offence, define the specific aspects of documenting this offence, and explore methods of proving the guilt of those responsible. Historical-legal, formal-legal, logical-normative, logical-semantic, sociological and statistical research methods are applied in the study. The criteria for the legality of covert visual surveillance of a person in publicly accessible places are: its conduct by authorised subjects (investigators or employees of operational units); implementation only within the framework of criminal proceedings (or proceedings in an intelligence gathering case); the existence of a decision of the investigating judge on permission to conduct visual surveillance of a specific person; strict compliance with the requirements of the Criminal Procedure Law regarding the procedure for conducting visual surveillance and restrictions established by the decision of the investigating judge. It is found that representatives of civilian professions can conduct visual surveillance in publicly accessible places only in an open way. Covert visual surveillance of a person to collect information about them constitutes a criminal offence consisting in violation of privacy. To bring illegal observers to criminal responsibility, factual data indicating the purpose of visual surveillance (collecting confidential information about a person), motives, time, place, means of committing the crime, and other circumstances are collected during the pre-trial investigation. The practical value of the paper is the possibility of using the obtained data to prevent illegal actions of private detectives, journalists, and other entities who secretly collect information about a person through visual surveillance, and to ensure effective investigation of such activities.
References
Act of 28 June 1996 on Constitution of Ukraine (Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, 1996, No. 30, Art. 141 as amended).
Google Scholar
Act of 5 April 2001 on Criminal Code of Ukraine (Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, 2001, No. 25-26, Art. 131 as amended).
Google Scholar
Act of 13 April 2012 on Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine (Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, 2013, No. 9–10, No. 1–12, No. 13, Art. 88 as amended).
Google Scholar
Act of 2 October 1992 about information (Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, 1992, No. 48, Art. 650 as amended).
Google Scholar
Act of 18 February 1992 on operational and investigative activity (Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, 1992, No. 22, Art. 303 as amended).
Google Scholar
The Lutsk City and District Court of the Volyn Region, verdict of 17 December 2019 (No. 161/19355/19).
Google Scholar
The Kovel city and district court of the Volyn region, verdict of 3 February 2022 (No. 159/4835/19).
Google Scholar
The Primorsky District Court of Odesa, resolution of 11 December 2018 (No. 522/1290/14-k).
Google Scholar
The Supreme Court, resolution of 17 November 2022 (No. 686/14363/18).
Google Scholar
The Supreme Court, resolution of 26 March 2019 (No. 431/3002/16-k).
Google Scholar
The Supreme Court, resolution of 1 July 2021 (No. 134/1776/18).
Google Scholar
The Supreme Court, resolution of 2 November 2018 (No. 656/28/17).
Google Scholar
The Supreme Court, judgement of 2 July 2021 (No. 1– 368/11).
Google Scholar
Abdallah, Raed, Salima Benbernou, Yéhia Taher, Muhammad Younas, and Rafiqul Haque. 2023.
Google Scholar
A smart video surveillance system for Helping law enforcement agencies in Detecting knife related crimes. Communication Dans Un Congrès 541: 65–78. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-16035-6_6.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16035-6_6
Google Scholar
Abdelhameed, Adam, and Kamal Hassan. 2019. Modern Means of Evidence Collection and their Effects on the Accused Privacy: The US Law. Journal of Politics and Law 12(1): 85–97. DOI: 10.5539/jpl.v12n1p 85.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/jpl.v12n1p85
Google Scholar
Alegria, Antonio Magdaleno. 2019. The use of the hidden camera in the investigative journalism: a certainty and a conundrum. Revista De Derecho Politico 104: 87–116. DOI: 10.5944/rdp.104.2019.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5944/rdp.104.2019
Google Scholar
Atul, Alexander, and Tushar Krishna. 2022. Pegasus Project: Re-Questioning the Legality of the Cyber-Surveillance Mechanism. Laws 11(6): 85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/laws11060085
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/laws11060085
Google Scholar
Boukabous, Mohammed, and Mostafa Azizi. 2023. Image and video-based crime prediction using object detection and deep learning. Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics 12(3): 1630–1638. DOI: 10.11591/eei.v12i3.5157.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/eei.v12i3.5157
Google Scholar
Bragias, Adelaide, Kelly Hine, and Robert Fleet. 2021. ‘Only in our best interest, right?’ Public perceptions of police use of facial recognition technology. Police Practice and Research 22(6): 1637–1654. DOI: 10.1080/15614263.2021.1942873.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15614263.2021.1942873
Google Scholar
Button, Mark, Richard Kapend, and Peter Stiernstedt. 2023. Investigative private policing.
Google Scholar
beyond the police: an exploratory study. Policing and Society 33(2): 150–169. DOI: 10.1080/10439463.2022.2071894.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2022.2071894
Google Scholar
Colin, Atkinson. 2023. Deception: a critical discourse analysis of undercover policing and intelligence operations in Star Wars: The Clone Wars. Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism 18(1): 95–111. DOI: 10.1080/18335330.2022.2030489.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/18335330.2022.2030489
Google Scholar
Chisnikov, Volodymyr. 2010. External observation (historical aspect). In: International police encyclopedia, ed. Rymarenko, Yury. Kyiv: Atika, 322–323.
Google Scholar
Dahl, Johanne. 2022. Chameleonizing: A microsociological study of covert physical surveillance European Journal of Criminology 19(2): 220–236. DOI: 10.1177/1477370819896204.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370819896204
Google Scholar
Galagan, Volodymyr, Serhii Ablamskyi, Zhanna Udovenko, and Victoriia Ablamska. 2021.
Google Scholar
Judicial control as a guarantee of non-interference in private life during the pre-trial investigation: An observation under the European Court of Human Rights. Dixi 23(2): 1–18. DOI: 10.16925/2357-5891.2021.02.12.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16925/2357-5891.2021.02.12
Google Scholar
Goral, Zbigniew, and Anneta Tyc. 2020. Commentary to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 17 October 2019 in the case of Lopez Ribalda and others vs. Spain, application numbers 1874/13 and 8567/13. Przegląd Sejmowy 3: 255–262.
Google Scholar
DOI: 10.31268/PS.2020.43.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31268/PS.2020.43
Google Scholar
Hribov, Mykhailo, Oleh Yemetsm, and Dmytro Rusnak. 2020. Visual surveillance of a person, thing or place as a means of countering human trafficking. Scientific Bulletin of the National Academy of Internal Affairs 3(116): 8–21. DOI: 10.33270/01201163.8.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33270/01201163.8
Google Scholar
Jung, Yeondae, and Andrew Wheeler. 2023. The effect of public surveillance cameras on crime clearance rates. Journal of Experimental Criminology 19(1): 143–164. DOI: 10.1007/s11292-021-09477-8.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-021-09477-8
Google Scholar
Karnauch, Bogdan. 2020. Abuse of law and its legal consequences. Entrepreneurship, Economy and Law 9: 31–36. DOI: 10.32849/2663-5313/2020.9.06.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.32849/2663-5313/2020.9.06
Google Scholar
Kniaziev, Serhii, Serhii Cherniavskyi, and Mykhailo Hribov. 2021. Legislative regulation of investigative activities: problems and ways to solve them. Legal Journal of the National Academy of Internal Affairs 20(2): 8–20. DOI: 10.33270/04202002.8.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33270/04202002.8
Google Scholar
Kravchenko, Ihor. 2020. Problems of legal regulation of video surveillance and other measures of control over hired workers. Philosophical and Methodological Problems of Law 2(20): 114–125. DOI: 10.33270/02202002.114.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33270/02202002.114
Google Scholar
Kyslyi, Anatolii, Mariia Pysmenna, Oleksandr Kolomoiets, Olena Volobuieva, and Vadym Bezusyi. 2020. Educational processes of training, retraining and advanced training of private detectives in Ukraine. Cuestiones Políticas 38(66): 421–435. DOI: 10.46398/
DOI: https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.38e.28
Google Scholar
cuestpol.38e.28.
Google Scholar
Loftus, Bethan. 2019. Normalizing covert surveillance: the subterranean world of policing The British Journal of Sociology 70: 2070–2091. DOI: 10.1111/1468-4446.12651.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12651
Google Scholar
Montasari, Reza. 2023. The Application of Big Data Predictive Analytics and Surveillance Technologies in the Field of Policing. Countering Cyberterrorism: The Confluence of Artificial Intelligence, Cyber Forensics and Digital Policing in US and UK National Cybersecurity.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21920-7
Google Scholar
Heidelberg: Springer, 57–70. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-21920-7_5.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21920-7_5
Google Scholar
Murray, Daragh, and Pete Fussey. 2019. Bulk Surveillance in the Digital Age: Rethinking the Human Rights Law Approach to Bulk Monitoring of Communications Data. Israel Law Review 52(1): 31-60. DOI: 10.1017/S0021223718000304.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021223718000304
Google Scholar
Pryhunov, Pavlo, Oleksandr Tronko, Serhii Sekunov, and Serhii Hrinin. 2020. Visual detection by law enforcement officers in the process of professional activity of possible surveillance of them by criminal structures or individual criminal elemen. Kyiv: MNDTsPBOZ
Google Scholar
RNBO, 47.
Google Scholar
Pryhunov, Pavlo, Oleksandr Tronko, Serhii and Hrinin. 2022. Visual detection of possible surveillance by law enforcement officers in the process of professional activity. Kyiv: Alerta, 326.
Google Scholar
Rojszczak, Marcin. 2020. Surveillance, Legal Restraints and Dismantling Democracy: Lessons from Poland. Democracy & Security 17(1): 1–29. DOI: 10.1080/17419166.2020.1841367.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17419166.2020.1841367
Google Scholar
Shendryk, Vladyslav, and Nataliia Voitovych. 2009. Historical and legal aspect of the development of visual observation. Law and Security 3: 57–60.
Google Scholar
Warren, Ian, Monique Mann, and Adam Molnar. 2020. Lawful Illegality: Authorizing Extraterritorial Police Surveillance. Surveillance & Society 18(3): 357–369. DOI: 10.24908/ss.v18i3.12795.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v18i3.12795
Google Scholar
Widen, William. 2008. Smart Cameras and the Right to Privacy. Proceedings of the Ieee 96(10): 1688–1697. DOI: 10.1109/JPROC.2008.928764.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2008.928764
Google Scholar
Yadav, Pavinder, Nidhi Gupta, and Pawan Sharma. 2023. A comprehensive study towards high-level approaches for weapon detection using classical machine learning and deep learning methods. Expert Systems with Applications 212: 118698. DOI: 10.1016/j.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118698
Google Scholar
eswa.2022.118698.
Google Scholar
Zhaldak, Serhii. 2014. The evolution of surveillance of a person, thing or place as a means of collecting evidence in domestic criminal proceedings. Bulletin of E.O. Didorenko Luhansk State University of Internal Affairs 1: 327–334.
Google Scholar
Authors
SERHII CHERNYAVSKYAuthors
MYKHAILO HRIBOVAuthors
VOLODYMYR YUSUPOVStatistics
Downloads
License
Copyright (c) 2023 The Opole Studies in Administration and Law
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Author’s economic rights to published works are held by Opole University (collective works) and individual Authors (individual parts of the collective work, ones that form a separate entity).
The journal Opole Studies in Administration and Law accepts for publication only works which have not been in circulation before.
On the basis of the Regulation (2016/679) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (referred to as General Data Protection Regulation or RODO) Opole University, based at 11a Plac Kopernika, 45-040 Opole, is the personal data controller for all the authors publishing their works in the Opole Studies in Administration and Law.
The articles published in Opole Studies in Administration and Law are available under a licence Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
For aricles till 2017 your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation – see:
Ustawa z dnia 4 lutego 1994 r. o prawie autorskim i prawach pokrewnych
Read more about the license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
View Legal Code:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode