How opinions of the Czech Ombudsman influence the decision-making of administrative courts

Anna Chamráthová

Masaryk University in Brno

Abstract

The paper deals with the possibilities the Czech Ombudsman has to influence the decision-making of the administrative courts in the Czech Republic. It describes both direct and indirect means of their influence, with the emphasis on the indirect means, as the direct means are very limited in the Czech Republic and are rarely used. The first part is concerned with the enumeration of means of how the opinions of the Ombudsman can become known to the administrative courts and their description and analyses the efficiency of the means described. The second part deals with the problems which occur while trying to assess their efficiency and mentions possible improvements.

Keywords:

ombudsman, administrative courts, means of influence

Černín K., Opomenutý účastník a jeho opravné prostředky, [in]: Stavební řád, Kancelář veřejného ochránce práv 2009.
  Google Scholar

Pondikasová T., Postavení judikatury: nezávazná interpretace nebo pramen práva?, [in]: Večeřa M., et al., Nové trendy v soudcovské tvorbě práva, Brno 2015.
  Google Scholar

Passer J., Pohled soudů na veřejného ochránce práv, [in]: Přidal M. (ed.), Role veřejného ochránce práv v politickém systému České republiky, Brno 2011.
  Google Scholar

Sládeček V., Zákon o Veřejném ochránci práv: komentář, 2nd ed., Praha 2011.
  Google Scholar

Varvařovský P., et al., Veřejné cesty – místní a účelové komunikace, Brno 2011.
  Google Scholar

https://www.ochrance.cz/aktualne/tiskove-zpravy-2016/verejny-ochrance-prav-a-ceske-soudymaji-obvykle-stejny-pravni-nazor/, Accessed: 24 May 2017.
  Google Scholar

http://nssoud.cz/main2Col.aspx?cls=Statistika&menu=190, Accessed: 31 May 2017.
  Google Scholar

http://www.nssoud.cz/-p-General-Information-p-/art/557?menu=173, Accessed: 2 November 2017.
  Google Scholar

http://www.psp.cz/sqw/historie.sqw?o=7&T=379, Accessed: 9 November 2017.
  Google Scholar

Download


Published
2019-09-18

Cited by

Chamráthová, A. (2019). How opinions of the Czech Ombudsman influence the decision-making of administrative courts. The Opole Studies in Administration and Law, 16(4 (2), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.25167/osap.1218

Authors

Anna Chamráthová 

Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.


License

Author’s economic rights to published works are held by Opole University (collective works) and individual Authors (individual parts of the collective work, ones that form a separate entity).

The journal Opole Studies in Administration and Law accepts for publication only works which have not been in circulation before.

On the basis of the Regulation (2016/679) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (referred to as General Data Protection Regulation or RODO) Opole University, based at 11a Plac Kopernika, 45-040 Opole, is the personal data controller for all the authors publishing their works in the Opole Studies in Administration and Law.

The articles published in Opole Studies in Administration and Law are available under a licence Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

 

For aricles till 2017 your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation  –  see: 
Ustawa z dnia 4 lutego 1994 r. o prawie autorskim i prawach pokrewnych

Read more about the license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

View Legal Code:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode