Judicial protection and interpretation of the right to take part in a referendum – an overview of the jurisprudence of the Hungarian Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court
Csaba Erdös
Széchenyi István University, National University for Public ServiceAbstract
This paper gives an overview of the jurisprudence of the Hungarian Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court regarding the right to take part in a referendum. This is a fundamental right of political participation, not unlike the right to vote and to stand as a candidate in parliamentary elections. It being a genuine fundamental right, the Constitutional Court interpreted its authentic meaning and stipulated the most important constitutional requirements related to this right. One of the most important requirements was the establishment of a system of remedies, where the final decision on the certification of a question proposed for a referendum must be taken by the Constitutional Court. Parliament fulfilled this legislative requirement and since 1998 the Constitutional Court has controlled the constitutionality of the decisions taken by the National Election Committee on the certification of the referendum questions proposed. The 2013 Act on referendum transferred this competence to the Supreme Court. Since then, the Constitutional Court shall only decide referendum-cases which were submitted with the so-called ‘direct constitutional complaint’, an extraordinary type of constitutional remedy. The present paper compares these two remedy systems introduced for the protection of the right to take part in a referendum.
Keywords:
right to take part in a referendum, direct democracy, political participation, HungaryReferences
Ackerman B., The New Separation of Powers, “Harvard Law Review” 2000 v 3.
Google Scholar
Beramendi, V. et al., Direct Democracy. The International IDEA Handbook. International Institute of Democracy and Electoral Assistance, Stockholm, 2008.
Google Scholar
Erdős Cs., A rendeleti szabályozás esete az Országgyűlés hatáskörével – avagy az Országgyűlés hatáskörébe tartozás mint népszavazási szűrő értelmezésének változásai. [Changes in the Interpretation of the Parliament’s Competence as a Filter of Referendum Initiatives.] [in] Új Nemzeti Kiválóság Tanulmánykötet. [Proceedings of New National Excellence Program] Széchenyi István Egyetem, Győr, 2017, p. 168-179.
Google Scholar
Győrfi, T. et al, 2. § Alkotmányos alapelvek; ellenállási jog [Constitutional principles, right to resistance]. [in] Az Alkotmány kommentárja. [Commentary of the Constitution], Jakab A, Századvég, Budapest, 2009.
Google Scholar
Radics K. A., Ami a Parlamentet is köti: népszavazás a jogalkalmazók szemszögéből. [By What Even the Parliament is Bound: Referendum from the Point of View of those Applying the Law], “Parlamenti Szemle” [“Parliamentary Review”] 2018/1.
Google Scholar
Act XX of 1949 on the Constitution of the Republic of Hungary.
Google Scholar
Act XVII of 1989 on the Referendum and Citizens’ Initiative.
Google Scholar
Act LXI of 1994 on the modification of Act XX of 1949 on the Constitution of the Republic of Hungary.
Google Scholar
Act XXXVI of 2013 on Electoral Procedure.
Google Scholar
Act CCXXXVIII of 2013 on Initiating Referenda, the European Citizens’ Initiative and Referendum
Google Scholar
Decision no. 987/B/1990/3. of the CC.
Google Scholar
Decision no. 52/1997. (X. 14.) of the CC.
Google Scholar
Decision no. 3003/2014. (I. 31.) of the CC.
Google Scholar
Decision no. 28/2015. (IX. 24.) of the CC.
Google Scholar
Decision no. 30/2015. (X. 15.) of the CC.
Google Scholar
Decision no. 3195/2015. CC.
Google Scholar
Decision no. 3150/2016. CC.
Google Scholar
Marbury v. Madison 5 U.S. 137 (1803).
Google Scholar
Authors
Csaba ErdösStatistics
Downloads
License
Author’s economic rights to published works are held by Opole University (collective works) and individual Authors (individual parts of the collective work, ones that form a separate entity).
The journal Opole Studies in Administration and Law accepts for publication only works which have not been in circulation before.
On the basis of the Regulation (2016/679) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (referred to as General Data Protection Regulation or RODO) Opole University, based at 11a Plac Kopernika, 45-040 Opole, is the personal data controller for all the authors publishing their works in the Opole Studies in Administration and Law.
The articles published in Opole Studies in Administration and Law are available under a licence Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
For aricles till 2017 your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation – see:
Ustawa z dnia 4 lutego 1994 r. o prawie autorskim i prawach pokrewnych
Read more about the license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
View Legal Code:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode
