Biden’s Burden: Cleaning up Trump’s environmental mess
Abstract
Before the US can make progress on climate policy or environmental policy more generally, the new administration of President Joseph R. Biden must first undo the damage created by his predecessor in office, who dismantled existing US climate policy, pulled the US from the Paris Agreement, and sought to disable the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) from regulating polluters. The courts blocked some of the Trump Administration’s more egregious anti-environmental protection policies for violating the 1946 Administrative
Procedures Act and/or the express terms of an environmental protection statute (such as the Clean Air Act or Clean Water Act), but the Biden Administration still has a great deal of work to do. Already, Biden has announced that the US will rejoin the Paris Agreement as part of its plans not just to reinstate but to expand on climate policies adopted during the Obama Administration. This essay explains how the Biden Administration plans to achieve these climate policy goals, using mostly the very same administrative tools that the Trump Administration used to undo Obama era climate policies. Inter alia, advantages and disadvantages of pursuing policy goals administratively, rather than through legislative processes, will be addressed.
Keywords:
Administrative Procedure, Executive Orders, Climate ChangeReferences
Agrawala, Shardul and Steinar Andresen. 1999. Indispensability and Indefensibility? The United States in the Climate Treaty Negotiations. Global Governance 5, no. 4 (Oct.-Dec.): 457-482.
Google Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen, Maxwell Palmer, and Benjamin Schneer. 2018. Divided Government and Significant Legislation: A History of Congress from 1789 to 2010. Social Science History 42, no. 1 (Spring): 81-108.
Google Scholar
Barr, Andy. 2010. The GOP’s no-compromise pledge. Politico, 28 Nov. at The GOP’s nocompromise pledge - POLITICO.
Google Scholar
Barrón-López, Laura. 2021. Biden won’t embrace filibuster reforms even as the rest of his party does. Politico, 08 March, at Biden won’t embrace filibuster reforms even as the rest of his party does - POLITICO.
Google Scholar
Black, Ian. 2001. EU dismay as Bush reneges on Kyoto. The Guardian, 30 March, available at https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2001/mar/30/usnews.globalwarming.
Google Scholar
Borger, Julian. 2021. Bush Kills Global Warming Treaty. The Guardian, 29 March, available at https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2001/mar/29/globalwarming.usnews.
Google Scholar
Broder, John M. 2009. Obama to Go to Copenhagen With Emissions Target, New York Times, 25 Nov. 2009, at https://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/26/us/politics/26climate.html.
Google Scholar
Byers, Jason S., Jamie L. Carson, and Ryan D. Williamson. 2020. Policymaking by the Executive: Examining the Fate of Presidential Agenda Items. Congress & the Presidency 47 (1): 1-31.
Google Scholar
Cama, Timothy. 2015. Obama vetoes GOP push to kill climate rules. The Hill, 19 Dec.
Google Scholar
Cillizza, Chris. 2020. Yes, things are worse now than ever before. CNN.com, 21 Jan.
Google Scholar
Cillizza, Chris, 2007. Getting to 60 in the Senate. Washington Post, 25 April.
Google Scholar
Cole, Jared. 2016. An Introduction to Judicial Review of Federal Agency Action. Congressional Research Service R44699, 7 Dec.
Google Scholar
Davenport, Coral. 2016. Donald Trump, in Pittsburgh, Pledges to Boost Both Coal and Gas. New York Times 22 Sept., at https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/23/us/politics/donald-trump-fracking.html.
Google Scholar
Depledge, Joanna. 2005. Against the Grain: The United States and the Global Climate Change Regime. Global Change, Peace & Security 17 (1): 11-27.
Google Scholar
Erikson, Robert S. 1998. Explanations of Midterm Loss. The Journal of Politics 50 (4): 1011-1029.
Google Scholar
Everett, Burgess and Seung Min Kim, 2013. Senate goes for ‘nuclear option. Politico 22 Nov. at https://www.politico.com/story/2013/11/harry-reid-nuclear-option-100199.
Google Scholar
Folke, Olle and James M. Snyder. 2012. Gubernatorial Midterm Slumps. American Journal of Political Science 56 (4): 931-948.
Google Scholar
Frazin, Rachel. 2021. Biden administration asks court to halt litigation on California emissions waiver, methane rollback. The Hill 2, at https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/536854-biden-administration-asks-court-to-halt-litigation-on-california
Google Scholar
Goyal, Rishav, Matthew H. England, Alex Sen Gupta, and Martin Junker. 2019. Reducation in surface climate change achieved by the 1987 Montreal Protocol. Environmental Research Letters 14: 1124041.
Google Scholar
Hale, Zack and Molly Christian, 2021. Biden to order review of Trump EPA rules as part of climate focus. S&P Global Market Intelligence 20 Jan.
Google Scholar
Hamilton, Alexander [in] Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay. 2020. The Federalist Papers 22 [1787-1788].
Google Scholar
Henry, Laura A. and Lisa McIntosh Sundstrom. 2007. Russia and the Kyoto Protocol: Seeking an Alignment of Interests and Image. Global Environmental Politics 7 (4): 47-69.
Google Scholar
Hutchens, Myiah J., Jay D. Hmielowski, and Michael A. Beam. 2019. Reinforcing spirals of political discussion and affective polarization. Communications Monographs 86 (3): 357-376.
Google Scholar
Jacobi, Tonja and Jeff VanDam. 2013. The Filibuster and Reconciliation: The Future of Majoritarian Lawmaking in the U.S. Senate. U.C. Davis Law Review 47: 261-342.
Google Scholar
Jones, Craig A. 2019. Weaponizing the EPA: Presidential Control and Wicked Problems. Idaho Law Review 55 (1): 157-[xxiv].
Google Scholar
Kuyper, Jonathan, Heike Schroeder, and Björn-Ola Linnér. 2018. The Evolution of the UNFCCC. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 43: 343-368.
Google Scholar
Lehmann, Evan and Nathanael Massey, 2013. Obama Warns Congress to Act on Climate Change, or He Will. Climate Wire 13 Feb.
Google Scholar
McKeever, Amy. 2021. The origins of the filibuster – and how it came to exasperate the U.S. Senate. National Geographic 2 Feb. at https://www.nationalgeographic.com/history/article/origins-of-filibuster-united-states-senate.
Google Scholar
Meyer, Robinson. 2018. The Problem With The New York Times’ Big Story on Climate Change. The Atlantic 1 Aug.
Google Scholar
Murse, Tom. 2020. Why the President’s Party Loses Seats in Midterm Elections. ThoughtCo.4 Feb. at https://www.thoughtco.com/historical-midterm-election-results-4087704.
Google Scholar
Nash, Jonathan Remy and Joanna Shepherd. 2020. Filibuster Change and Judicial Appointments. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 17: 646-695.
Google Scholar
Osaka, Shannon. 2020. In Obama’s new memoir, a warning for Biden’s climate plans. Grist 27 Nov.
Google Scholar
Revkin, Andrew. 2010. With No Obama Push, Senate Punts on Climate. New York Times 22 July.
Google Scholar
Rodgers Jr., William H. 2001. Executive Orders and Presidential Commands: Presidents Riding to the Rescue of the Environment, Journal of Land, Resources, & Environmental Law 21 (1): 13-24.
Google Scholar
Segers, Grace. 2021. Biden signals he’s open to eliminating Senate filibuster over GOP ‘abuse. CBS News, 26 March.
Google Scholar
Shanley, Robert A. 1983. Presidential Executive Orders and Environmental Policy. Presidential Studies Quarterly 13 (3): 405-416.
Google Scholar
Shapiro, Stuart. 2015. The Congressional Review Act, rarely used and (almost always) unsuccessful. The Hill 17 April.
Google Scholar
Shear, Michael D. 2017. Trump Will Withdraw U.S. From Paris Climate Agreement. New York Times 1 June, at https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/01/climate/trump-paris-climateagreement.html
Google Scholar
Shepardson, David and Ben Klayman. 2019. California, four automakers defy Trump, agree to tighten emissions rules. Reuters 25 July, at https://www.reuters.com/article/us-autosemissions-idUSKCN1UK1OD.
Google Scholar
Shouse, Kate C., Jonathan L. Ramseur, and Linda Tsang. 2020. EPA’s Affordable Clean Energy Rule: In Brief. Congressional Research Service, R46568, 15 Oct.
Google Scholar
Stegner, Wallace. 2002. Where the Bluebird Sings to the Lemonade Springs: Living and Writing in the West. New York: The Modern Library.
Google Scholar
Stracqualursi, Veronica, Daniella Diaz, and Annie Grayer. 2021. Sanders, Ocasio-Cortez, and Blumenauer unveil bill pushing Biden to declare national climate emergency: ‘We are out of time’. CNN 4 Feb. at https://www.cnn.com/2021/02/04/politics/sanders-aocclimate-change-emergency-bill/index.html.
Google Scholar
Tau, Byron and Siobhan Hughes. 2017. Senate Eliminates Filibuster for Supreme Court Nominees. Wall Street Journal, 6 April, at https://www.wsj.com/articles/senate-is-expectedto-vote-to-end-supreme-court-filibuster-thursday-1491471004.
Google Scholar
Thatcher, Margaret, 1988. Speech to the Royal Society, 27 Sept. at https://www.margaretthatcher.org/document/107346.
Google Scholar
Tzoumis, Kelly, Susan Bennett, and Elizabeth Stoffel. 2015. The executive order in the United States: a policy tool used that has shaped environmental policy and decisions from Presidents Franklin D. Roosevelt to Barack Obama. Environmental Systems and Decisions 35: 401-409.
Google Scholar
WMO (World Meteorological Organization). Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project, Report No. 52, Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 2010.
Google Scholar
-1985 Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Ozone Layer, U.N.T.S.,1513: 129.
Google Scholar
-1987 Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer, U.N.T.S., 1522: 3.
Google Scholar
-1992 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, U.N.T.S., 1771: 107.
Google Scholar
-1997 Kyoto Protocol, U.N.T.S. 2303: 162.
Google Scholar
Massachusetts v. EPA, 549 U.S. 497 (2007).
Google Scholar
Utility Air Regulatory Group v. EPA, 573 U.S. 302 (2014).
Google Scholar
West Virginia v. EPA, S.Ct. No. 15A773 (9 Feb. 2016)
Google Scholar
American Lung Association v. EPA, 985 F.3d 914 (D.C. Cir. 2021).
Google Scholar
Administrative Procedures Act of 1946, 5 U.S.C. §500 et. seq.
Google Scholar
Affordable Care Act of 2010, 42 U.S.C. §18001 et. seq.
Google Scholar
Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§2000a et. seq.
Google Scholar
Clean Air Act of 1970 (as amended), 42 U.S.C. §7401 et. seq.
Google Scholar
Clean Water Act of 1972 (as amended), 33 U.S.C. §§1251-1387.
Google Scholar
Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act, a.k.a., “The Budget Act” of 1974, 2 U.S.C. §§601-688.
Google Scholar
Contract with America Advancement Act (including Congressional Review Act) of 1996, 5 U.S.C. §§801-808.
Google Scholar
Endangered Species Act of 1973 (as amended), 16 U.S.C. §1531 et. seq.
Google Scholar
Global Climate Research Act of 1990, 15 U.S.C. §2921 et. seq
Google Scholar
National Climate Program Act of 1978, 15 U.S.C. §2901 et. seq.
Google Scholar
Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976 (as amended), 53 U.S.C. §2601 et. seq.
Google Scholar
Senate Resolution (S.Res.) 98, 105th Congress, 1st Session, Conditions Regarding U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change, 21 July 1997.
Google Scholar
- 117th Cong., 1st Sess. H.R. 1512. “To build a clean and prosperous future by addressing the climate crisis, protecting the health and welfare of all Americans, and putting the Nation on the path to a net-zero greenhouse gas economy by 2050, and for other purposes,” a.k.a., “The Clean Future Act,” introduced 2 Mar. 2021.
Google Scholar
- 117th Cong., 1st Sess. H.R. 794, “Climate Emergency Act of 2021,” introduced 4 Feb. 2021.
Google Scholar
EO 13653 of 1 Nov. 2013. “Preparing the United States for the Impacts of Climate Change,” 78 Fed. Reg. 66817.
Google Scholar
EO 13783 of 28 March 2017. “Promoting Energy Independence and Economic Growth,” 82 Fed. Reg. 16093.
Google Scholar
EO 13990 of 20 Jan. 2021. “Protecting Public Health and the Environment and Restoring Science to Tackle the Climate Crisis,” 86 Fed. Reg. 7037.
Google Scholar
EO 14008 of 27 Jan. 2021. “Tackling the Climate Crisis at Home and Abroad,” 86 Fed. Reg. 7619.
Google Scholar
- 2009 Mandatory Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule, 40 C.F.R. Part 98.
Google Scholar
- 2010 Light-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards and Corporate Average FuelEconomy Standards (“Tailpipe Rule”), 75 Fed. Reg. 25324
Google Scholar
- 2011 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards and Fuel Efficiency Standards for Medium- and Heavy-Duty Engines and Vehicles, 76 Fed. Reg. 57106.
Google Scholar
- 2015 Clean Power Plan, 80 Fed. Reg. at 64719.
Google Scholar
- 2016 Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Fuel Economy Standards for Medium- and Heavy-Duty Engines and Vehicles – Phase 2, 81 Fed. Reg. 73478.
Google Scholar
- 2018, Affordable Clean Energy, 84 Fed. Reg. 32534.
Google Scholar
- 2019 Safer Affordable Fuel Efficient Vehicles, Part I, 84 Fed. Reg. 51310.
Google Scholar
- 2020 Safer Affordable Fuel Efficient Vehicles, Part II, 85 Fed. Reg. 24174.
Google Scholar
- 2021 Review of Standards for Performance for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from New, Modified, and Reconstructed Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units, 86 Fed. Reg. 2542
Google Scholar
Statistics
Downloads
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Author’s economic rights to published works are held by Opole University (collective works) and individual Authors (individual parts of the collective work, ones that form a separate entity).
The journal Opole Studies in Administration and Law accepts for publication only works which have not been in circulation before.
On the basis of the Regulation (2016/679) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (referred to as General Data Protection Regulation or RODO) Opole University, based at 11a Plac Kopernika, 45-040 Opole, is the personal data controller for all the authors publishing their works in the Opole Studies in Administration and Law.
The articles published in Opole Studies in Administration and Law are available under a licence Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
For aricles till 2017 your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation – see:
Ustawa z dnia 4 lutego 1994 r. o prawie autorskim i prawach pokrewnych
Read more about the license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
View Legal Code:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode
