Biden’s Burden: Cleaning up Trump’s environmental mess

Daniel H. Cole

doi:10.25167/osap.4268

Opublikowane: 2021-06-02

Tom 19 Nr 2 (2021)

Biden’s Burden: Cleaning up Trump’s environmental mess

Daniel H. Cole

Opolskie Studia Administracyjno-Prawne

Dział: Articles

https://doi.org/10.25167/osap.4268

Abstrakt

Zanim Stany Zjednoczone będą w stanie zrobić postęp w dziedzinie polityki klimatycznej czy, mówiąc ogólniej, polityce środowiskowej, nowa administracja Josepha R. Bidena musi najpierw naprawić zniszczenia dokonane przez jego poprzednika na urzędzie prezydenckim, który rozmontował działającą do tej pory politykę klimatyczną USA, wyprowadził kraj z Porozumienia Paryskiego i rozpoczął proces odbierania Agencji Ochrony Środowiska (EPA) możliwości przeciwdziałania trucicielom. Sądy blokowały niektóre z bardziej jawnych antyśrodowiskowych polityk forsowanych przez Administrację Trumpa z uwagi na naruszenia Ustawy o Procedurach Administracyjnych z roku 1946 i/lub wyraźnych postanowień zawartych w statutach o ochronie środowiska (takich jak Ustawa od Czystym Powietrzu lub Ustawa o Czystej Wodzie), ale Administracja Bidena wciąż ma wiele pracy do wykonania w tej kwestii. Do tej pory Biden już ogłosił, że USA powrócą do Porozumienia Paryskiego, jako część swoich planów nie tylko odbudowania lecz także rozszerzenia polityki klimatycznej przyjętej wcześniej przez Administrację Obamy. Niniejszy esej wyjaśnia jak Administracja Bidena planuje osiągnąć cele polityki klimatycznej, stosując w większości te same narzędzia administracyjne jakie Administracja Trumpa wykorzystała ażeby zdemontować politykę klimatyczną z czasów prezydentury Obamy. Autorzy koncentrują się, między innymi, na zaletach i wadach jakie niesie ze sobą administracyjne realizowanie celów raczej niż omawiają procesy prawne typowe dla tego obszaru

Słowa kluczowe:

procedura administracyjna, dekret prezydencki, zmiana klimatu

Pobierz pliki

PDF (English)

Zasady cytowania

Cole, D. H. (2021). Biden’s Burden: Cleaning up Trump’s environmental mess. Opolskie Studia Administracyjno-Prawne, 19(2), 43–68. https://doi.org/10.25167/osap.4268

Cited by / Share

Licencja

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.

Bibliografia

Agrawala, Shardul and Steinar Andresen. 1999. Indispensability and Indefensibility? The United States in the Climate Treaty Negotiations. Global Governance 5, no. 4 (Oct.-Dec.): 457-482.
Google Scholar

Ansolabehere, Stephen, Maxwell Palmer, and Benjamin Schneer. 2018. Divided Government and Significant Legislation: A History of Congress from 1789 to 2010. Social Science History 42, no. 1 (Spring): 81-108.
Google Scholar

Barr, Andy. 2010. The GOP’s no-compromise pledge. Politico, 28 Nov. at The GOP’s nocompromise pledge - POLITICO.
Google Scholar

Barrón-López, Laura. 2021. Biden won’t embrace filibuster reforms even as the rest of his party does. Politico, 08 March, at Biden won’t embrace filibuster reforms even as the rest of his party does - POLITICO.
Google Scholar

Black, Ian. 2001. EU dismay as Bush reneges on Kyoto. The Guardian, 30 March, available at https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2001/mar/30/usnews.globalwarming.
Google Scholar

Borger, Julian. 2021. Bush Kills Global Warming Treaty. The Guardian, 29 March, available at https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2001/mar/29/globalwarming.usnews.
Google Scholar

Broder, John M. 2009. Obama to Go to Copenhagen With Emissions Target, New York Times, 25 Nov. 2009, at https://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/26/us/politics/26climate.html.
Google Scholar

Byers, Jason S., Jamie L. Carson, and Ryan D. Williamson. 2020. Policymaking by the Executive: Examining the Fate of Presidential Agenda Items. Congress & the Presidency 47 (1): 1-31.
Google Scholar

Cama, Timothy. 2015. Obama vetoes GOP push to kill climate rules. The Hill, 19 Dec.
Google Scholar

Cillizza, Chris. 2020. Yes, things are worse now than ever before. CNN.com, 21 Jan.
Google Scholar

Cillizza, Chris, 2007. Getting to 60 in the Senate. Washington Post, 25 April.
Google Scholar

Cole, Jared. 2016. An Introduction to Judicial Review of Federal Agency Action. Congressional Research Service R44699, 7 Dec.
Google Scholar

Davenport, Coral. 2016. Donald Trump, in Pittsburgh, Pledges to Boost Both Coal and Gas. New York Times 22 Sept., at https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/23/us/politics/donald-trump-fracking.html.
Google Scholar

Depledge, Joanna. 2005. Against the Grain: The United States and the Global Climate Change Regime. Global Change, Peace & Security 17 (1): 11-27.
Google Scholar

Erikson, Robert S. 1998. Explanations of Midterm Loss. The Journal of Politics 50 (4): 1011-1029.
Google Scholar

Everett, Burgess and Seung Min Kim, 2013. Senate goes for ‘nuclear option. Politico 22 Nov. at https://www.politico.com/story/2013/11/harry-reid-nuclear-option-100199.
Google Scholar

Folke, Olle and James M. Snyder. 2012. Gubernatorial Midterm Slumps. American Journal of Political Science 56 (4): 931-948.
Google Scholar

Frazin, Rachel. 2021. Biden administration asks court to halt litigation on California emissions waiver, methane rollback. The Hill 2, at https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/536854-biden-administration-asks-court-to-halt-litigation-on-california
Google Scholar

Goyal, Rishav, Matthew H. England, Alex Sen Gupta, and Martin Junker. 2019. Reducation in surface climate change achieved by the 1987 Montreal Protocol. Environmental Research Letters 14: 1124041.
Google Scholar

Hale, Zack and Molly Christian, 2021. Biden to order review of Trump EPA rules as part of climate focus. S&P Global Market Intelligence 20 Jan.
Google Scholar

Hamilton, Alexander [in] Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay. 2020. The Federalist Papers 22 [1787-1788].
Google Scholar

Henry, Laura A. and Lisa McIntosh Sundstrom. 2007. Russia and the Kyoto Protocol: Seeking an Alignment of Interests and Image. Global Environmental Politics 7 (4): 47-69.
Google Scholar

Hutchens, Myiah J., Jay D. Hmielowski, and Michael A. Beam. 2019. Reinforcing spirals of political discussion and affective polarization. Communications Monographs 86 (3): 357-376.
Google Scholar

Jacobi, Tonja and Jeff VanDam. 2013. The Filibuster and Reconciliation: The Future of Majoritarian Lawmaking in the U.S. Senate. U.C. Davis Law Review 47: 261-342.
Google Scholar

Jones, Craig A. 2019. Weaponizing the EPA: Presidential Control and Wicked Problems. Idaho Law Review 55 (1): 157-[xxiv].
Google Scholar

Kuyper, Jonathan, Heike Schroeder, and Björn-Ola Linnér. 2018. The Evolution of the UNFCCC. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 43: 343-368.
Google Scholar

Lehmann, Evan and Nathanael Massey, 2013. Obama Warns Congress to Act on Climate Change, or He Will. Climate Wire 13 Feb.
Google Scholar

McKeever, Amy. 2021. The origins of the filibuster – and how it came to exasperate the U.S. Senate. National Geographic 2 Feb. at https://www.nationalgeographic.com/history/article/origins-of-filibuster-united-states-senate.
Google Scholar

Meyer, Robinson. 2018. The Problem With The New York Times’ Big Story on Climate Change. The Atlantic 1 Aug.
Google Scholar

Murse, Tom. 2020. Why the President’s Party Loses Seats in Midterm Elections. ThoughtCo.4 Feb. at https://www.thoughtco.com/historical-midterm-election-results-4087704.
Google Scholar

Nash, Jonathan Remy and Joanna Shepherd. 2020. Filibuster Change and Judicial Appointments. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 17: 646-695.
Google Scholar

Osaka, Shannon. 2020. In Obama’s new memoir, a warning for Biden’s climate plans. Grist 27 Nov.
Google Scholar

Revkin, Andrew. 2010. With No Obama Push, Senate Punts on Climate. New York Times 22 July.
Google Scholar

Rodgers Jr., William H. 2001. Executive Orders and Presidential Commands: Presidents Riding to the Rescue of the Environment, Journal of Land, Resources, & Environmental Law 21 (1): 13-24.
Google Scholar

Segers, Grace. 2021. Biden signals he’s open to eliminating Senate filibuster over GOP ‘abuse. CBS News, 26 March.
Google Scholar

Shanley, Robert A. 1983. Presidential Executive Orders and Environmental Policy. Presidential Studies Quarterly 13 (3): 405-416.
Google Scholar

Shapiro, Stuart. 2015. The Congressional Review Act, rarely used and (almost always) unsuccessful. The Hill 17 April.
Google Scholar

Shear, Michael D. 2017. Trump Will Withdraw U.S. From Paris Climate Agreement. New York Times 1 June, at https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/01/climate/trump-paris-climateagreement.html
Google Scholar

Shepardson, David and Ben Klayman. 2019. California, four automakers defy Trump, agree to tighten emissions rules. Reuters 25 July, at https://www.reuters.com/article/us-autosemissions-idUSKCN1UK1OD.
Google Scholar

Shouse, Kate C., Jonathan L. Ramseur, and Linda Tsang. 2020. EPA’s Affordable Clean Energy Rule: In Brief. Congressional Research Service, R46568, 15 Oct.
Google Scholar

Stegner, Wallace. 2002. Where the Bluebird Sings to the Lemonade Springs: Living and Writing in the West. New York: The Modern Library.
Google Scholar

Stracqualursi, Veronica, Daniella Diaz, and Annie Grayer. 2021. Sanders, Ocasio-Cortez, and Blumenauer unveil bill pushing Biden to declare national climate emergency: ‘We are out of time’. CNN 4 Feb. at https://www.cnn.com/2021/02/04/politics/sanders-aocclimate-change-emergency-bill/index.html.
Google Scholar

Tau, Byron and Siobhan Hughes. 2017. Senate Eliminates Filibuster for Supreme Court Nominees. Wall Street Journal, 6 April, at https://www.wsj.com/articles/senate-is-expectedto-vote-to-end-supreme-court-filibuster-thursday-1491471004.
Google Scholar

Thatcher, Margaret, 1988. Speech to the Royal Society, 27 Sept. at https://www.margaretthatcher.org/document/107346.
Google Scholar

Tzoumis, Kelly, Susan Bennett, and Elizabeth Stoffel. 2015. The executive order in the United States: a policy tool used that has shaped environmental policy and decisions from Presidents Franklin D. Roosevelt to Barack Obama. Environmental Systems and Decisions 35: 401-409.
Google Scholar

WMO (World Meteorological Organization). Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project, Report No. 52, Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 2010.
Google Scholar

-1985 Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Ozone Layer, U.N.T.S.,1513: 129.
Google Scholar

-1987 Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer, U.N.T.S., 1522: 3.
Google Scholar

-1992 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, U.N.T.S., 1771: 107.
Google Scholar

-1997 Kyoto Protocol, U.N.T.S. 2303: 162.
Google Scholar

Massachusetts v. EPA, 549 U.S. 497 (2007).
Google Scholar

Utility Air Regulatory Group v. EPA, 573 U.S. 302 (2014).
Google Scholar

West Virginia v. EPA, S.Ct. No. 15A773 (9 Feb. 2016)
Google Scholar

American Lung Association v. EPA, 985 F.3d 914 (D.C. Cir. 2021).
Google Scholar

Administrative Procedures Act of 1946, 5 U.S.C. §500 et. seq.
Google Scholar

Affordable Care Act of 2010, 42 U.S.C. §18001 et. seq.
Google Scholar

Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§2000a et. seq.
Google Scholar

Clean Air Act of 1970 (as amended), 42 U.S.C. §7401 et. seq.
Google Scholar

Clean Water Act of 1972 (as amended), 33 U.S.C. §§1251-1387.
Google Scholar

Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act, a.k.a., “The Budget Act” of 1974, 2 U.S.C. §§601-688.
Google Scholar

Contract with America Advancement Act (including Congressional Review Act) of 1996, 5 U.S.C. §§801-808.
Google Scholar

Endangered Species Act of 1973 (as amended), 16 U.S.C. §1531 et. seq.
Google Scholar

Global Climate Research Act of 1990, 15 U.S.C. §2921 et. seq
Google Scholar

National Climate Program Act of 1978, 15 U.S.C. §2901 et. seq.
Google Scholar

Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976 (as amended), 53 U.S.C. §2601 et. seq.
Google Scholar

Senate Resolution (S.Res.) 98, 105th Congress, 1st Session, Conditions Regarding U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change, 21 July 1997.
Google Scholar

- 117th Cong., 1st Sess. H.R. 1512. “To build a clean and prosperous future by addressing the climate crisis, protecting the health and welfare of all Americans, and putting the Nation on the path to a net-zero greenhouse gas economy by 2050, and for other purposes,” a.k.a., “The Clean Future Act,” introduced 2 Mar. 2021.
Google Scholar

- 117th Cong., 1st Sess. H.R. 794, “Climate Emergency Act of 2021,” introduced 4 Feb. 2021.
Google Scholar

EO 13653 of 1 Nov. 2013. “Preparing the United States for the Impacts of Climate Change,” 78 Fed. Reg. 66817.
Google Scholar

EO 13783 of 28 March 2017. “Promoting Energy Independence and Economic Growth,” 82 Fed. Reg. 16093.
Google Scholar

EO 13990 of 20 Jan. 2021. “Protecting Public Health and the Environment and Restoring Science to Tackle the Climate Crisis,” 86 Fed. Reg. 7037.
Google Scholar

EO 14008 of 27 Jan. 2021. “Tackling the Climate Crisis at Home and Abroad,” 86 Fed. Reg. 7619.
Google Scholar

- 2009 Mandatory Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule, 40 C.F.R. Part 98.
Google Scholar

- 2010 Light-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards and Corporate Average FuelEconomy Standards (“Tailpipe Rule”), 75 Fed. Reg. 25324
Google Scholar

- 2011 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards and Fuel Efficiency Standards for Medium- and Heavy-Duty Engines and Vehicles, 76 Fed. Reg. 57106.
Google Scholar

- 2015 Clean Power Plan, 80 Fed. Reg. at 64719.
Google Scholar

- 2016 Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Fuel Economy Standards for Medium- and Heavy-Duty Engines and Vehicles – Phase 2, 81 Fed. Reg. 73478.
Google Scholar

- 2018, Affordable Clean Energy, 84 Fed. Reg. 32534.
Google Scholar

- 2019 Safer Affordable Fuel Efficient Vehicles, Part I, 84 Fed. Reg. 51310.
Google Scholar

- 2020 Safer Affordable Fuel Efficient Vehicles, Part II, 85 Fed. Reg. 24174.
Google Scholar

- 2021 Review of Standards for Performance for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from New, Modified, and Reconstructed Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units, 86 Fed. Reg. 2542
Google Scholar