The legal protection of individual rights in the health care sphere: overcoming the ambiguity of the legal regulation of voluntary and informed consent to treatment
Maria A. Kapustina
Saint Petersburg State UniversityAbstrakt
The individual rights in the health care sphere are ensured, among other things, by overcoming uncertainty in legal regulation. The problem of ambiguity, filling gaps, contradictory to legal regulation is of relevance in the court hearings of specific cases in the health care sphere. The health care sphere is one of the most important spheres of the legal protection of individual’s rights, because it concerns all the population. In modern medical law, the standardized approach to the regulation of relations in the health care sphere has received widespread recognition. The notions “standard” and “order” are widely applied to the regulation of medical activity and patients’ rights. In the health care sphere the ambiguity of legal regulation is connected with requirements of getting from patient informed consent to treatment. The informed consent must be given by the patient voluntarily and before the medical treatment.
Słowa kluczowe:
legal protection of individual rights, health care legislation, ambiguity of legal regulation, consent to treatment, legal practice in the health care sphereBibliografia
Alekseev S.S., Voshozhdenie k pravu. Poiski I resheniya [The rise to law. Search and solutions], Moscow 2001.
Google Scholar
Brock D.W., Paternalism and Autonomy, “Ethics” 1988, v. 98.
Google Scholar
Civil Code of the Russian Federation. The Corpus of the Legislation of the Russian Federation, 1994, no. 32, Art. 3301, 3302.
Google Scholar
Etel’ А.А, Informed consent as an autonomous solution to medical intervention, “Administrative Law and Procedure” 2006, no. 2.
Google Scholar
Federal Law of 21.11.2011 № 323-FZ “On the Basics of Citizens’ Health in the Russian federation” [Ob osnovakh okhrany zdorov’ya grazhdan v Rossiiskoi Federatsii]. in: The Corpus of Legislation of the Russian Federation. 2011. № 48. Art. 6724. (with amendments and additions on 29.12.2017)
Google Scholar
Kapustina M.A., Deistvie yuridicheskikh norm vo vremeni. [The operation of legal norms over time], St.Petersburg 2001.
Google Scholar
Kapustina M.A., Konstitutsionno-pravovoe regulirovanie: ustanovlenie i vospolnenie probelov v prave Russian, “Constitutionalism in the Context of Historic-Legal Studies” [Constitutional-Legal Regulation: Detection and Filling Gaps in Law], St. Petersburg 2014.
Google Scholar
Kapustina M.A., Normativno-pravovoe regulirovanie: formalnaya opredelennost’ pravoustanovleniy v usloviyakh integratsii v evrasiyskom prostranstve, „Evrasiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal” [Normative-legal Regulation: Formal Certainty of Law provisions in the Context of Integration in Eurasian Space, “Eurasian Legal Journal”] 2016, no. 7 (98).
Google Scholar
Kapustina M.A., Pravovaya opredelennost’ i formalnoe ravenstvo kak printsipy normativno-pravovogo regulirovaniya, „Printsip formalnogo ravenstva I vzaimnoe priznanie prava: kollectivnaya monografiya” [Legal Certainty and Formal Equality as Principles of Normative-Legal Regulation/ “Principle of Formal Equality and Mutual Recognition of Law”], ed. V.V. Lapaeva, A.V. Polyakov, V.V. Denisenko, Moscow 2016.
Google Scholar
Kapustina M.A., Probely v prave [Gaps in Law], St. Petersburg 2014.
Google Scholar
Kapustina M.A., Bondareva E.A., The right to information about health services: legal safeguards in the system of legal regulation of relations in health care, “Zasada proporcjonalności a ochrona praw odstawowych w państwach Europy” [“The principle of proportionality and the protection of the fundamental rights in the European states”], ed. P. Szymaniec, Wałbrzych 2015.
Google Scholar
Korkunov N.M., Entsiklopediya prava [The Encyclopedia of Law], St. Petersburg 1883.
Google Scholar
Korkunov N.M., Lektsii po obshchey teorii prava [Lectures on General Theory of law], St. Petersburg 1897.
Google Scholar
Leenen H.J.J., Gevers J.K.M., Pinet G., The Rights of Patients in Europe: A Comparative Study, Deventer–Boston: Kluwer 1993.
Google Scholar
Livshits R.Z., Teoriya prava [The Theory of Law], Moscow 2001.
Google Scholar
Maleshina A.V., Ugolovno-pravovaya okhrana “budushchey zhizni” [Criminal-Legal Protection of “future life”], „Pravovedenie” 2011, no. 3.
Google Scholar
Mikkola M., Right to Health as a Human Right in Europe, “Medicine and Law” 2012, no. 3.
Google Scholar
Pishcheta А.N., Consent to Treatment, Moscow 2006.
Google Scholar
Romanovskiy G.B., Pravovoe regulirovanie biomeditsinskikh tekhnologiy [Legal Regulation of Biomedical Technology], “Pravovedenie” 2011, no. 4.
Google Scholar
Shtykova N.N., Ensuring patients’ rights to informed consent to medical intervention in the Russian Federation, “Ensuring the Individual Rights and Interests of the State in Modern Society” Murom 2004.
Google Scholar
Tsytelman E., Probely v prave (rech’ proiznesennaya pri vstuplenii v dolzhnost’ rektora Reinskogo universiteta im. Fridrikha Wilgelma v Bonne 18 oktyabrya 1902 g.), “Rossiyskiy ezhegodnik teorii prava” [Gaps in Law (the inaugural address of the President of Rhine University named after Frederick Wilhelm in Bonn on the 18th October 1902), “Russian Annual of Law Theory”] 2010, no. 3.
Google Scholar
Case DH and Others vs Czech Republic (No. 57325/00)/ http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-83256#{“itemid”:[“001-83256”, European Court of Human Rights.
Google Scholar
Case Glass vs UK (No. 61827/00)/ http://docs.pravo.ru/document/view/19381620, European Court of Human Rights.
Google Scholar
Case Hermi vs Italy (No. 18114/02)/ http://echr.ketse.com/doc/18114.02-en-20050628, European Court of Human Rights.
Google Scholar
Case V.C. vs Slovakia (No. 18968/07)/ http://www.refworld.org/pdfid/4a648cb42.pdf, European Court of Human Rights.
Google Scholar
Autorzy
Maria A. KapustinaStatystyki
Downloads
Licencja
Prawa autorskie majątkowe do opublikowanych utworów ma Uniwersytet Opolski (do utworu zbiorowego) oraz poszczególni Autorzy (do poszczególnych części utworu zbiorowego, mających samodzielne znaczenie).
W Opolskich Studiach Administracyjno - Prawnych mogą być publikowane tylko utwory wcześniej nie rozpowszechnione.
Na podstawie Rozporządzenia Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady (UE) 2016/679 z dnia 27 kwietnia 2016r. w sprawie ochrony osób fizycznych w związku z przetwarzaniem danych osobowych i w sprawie swobodnego przepływu takich danych oraz uchylenia dyrektywy 95/46/WE (określane jako „RODO") administratorem danych osobowych osób publikujących w Opolskich Studiach Administracyjnoprawnych (Wydawnictwo UO) jest Uniwersytet Opolski z siedzibą przy pl. Kopernika 11a, 45-040 Opole.
Artykuły zamieszczone w czasopiśmie objęte są licencją Uznanie autorstwa - Użycie niekomercyjne - Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe
(CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
Z pozostałych zamieszczonych w niniejszym czasopiśmie utworów można korzystać w ramach dozwolonego użytku zgodnie z art. 23-35 Ustawy z dnia 4 lutego 1994 r. o prawie autorskim i prawach pokrewnych.
Więcej szczegółów o licencji CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 znajdą Państwo na stronie:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.pl
Treść licencji dostępna pod linkiem:
