Legal Standing in Environmental Litigation before Regional International Courts in Africa and Latin America

Sonja Kahl

a:1:{s:5:"en_US";s:21:"Universität Freiburg";}

Abstrakt

Artykuł porównuje regulacje sytuacji prawnej w sprawach przed wybranymi regionalnymi międzynarodowymi organami sądowymi lub quasi-sądowymi działającymi
w Afryce i Ameryce Łacińskiej, z perspektywy sporów środowiskowych. Autorka skupia się na aktywnej sytuacji prawnej prywatnych jednostek w spornych sprawach wnoszonych przeciwko państwu. Artykuł systematyzuje reguły rządzące stanem prawnym w dwóch szerokich
kategoriach: sporu subiektywnego (opartego na prawach) oraz obiektywnego konfliktu interesów. Następnie, podejście każdego z sądów zostaje przeanalizowane na podstawie jego reguł proceduralnych i orzecznictwa. Można wyróżnić kilka trendów, włącznie ze skłanianiem
się sądów praw człowieka w stronę traktowania takich spraw jako obiektywnego konfliktu interesów, trendem udzielania organizacjom pozarządowym uprzywilejowanej pozycji wszczynania sporów środowiskowych, oraz wzmacnianiem podejścia opartego na prawach społeczności przez sądy w celu regionalnej integracji ekonomicznej, które mogą stać się istotne w przyszłości.


African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (27.06.1981) 26363 UNTS 1520.
  Google Scholar

American Convention on Human Rights (22.11.1969) 17955 UNTS 1144.
  Google Scholar

American Declaration on the Rights and Duties of Man (02.05.1948) Res. XXX of the
  Google Scholar

Ninth International Conference of American States, OEA/Ser. L/V/l.50 Doc. 6, Rev. 1.
  Google Scholar

Consolidated Version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (25.03.1957) OJ C 326 of 26.10.2012.
  Google Scholar

Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-Making and Access to
  Google Scholar

Justice in Environmental Matters (Aarhus Convention) (25.06.1998) 2161 UNTS 37770.
  Google Scholar

Convention on the Statute of the Central American Court of Justice (10.12.1992) 31191 UNTS 1821.
  Google Scholar

Decisión 472, Treaty Creating the Court of Justice of the Cartagena Agreement (16.09.1999)
  Google Scholar

GOAC No 483 of 17.09.1999.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0730-725X(98)00174-X   Google Scholar

Protocol A/P.L/7/91 on the Community Court of Justice (06.07.1991) 14843 UNTS 2375, as amended by the Supplementary Protocol A/SP.1/01/05 (19.01.2005).
  Google Scholar

Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights on the Establishment of an African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights (10.06.1998) (unreported).
  Google Scholar

Regional Agreement on Access to Information, Public Participation and Justice in Environmental Matters in Latin America and the Caribbean (Escazú Agreement) (04.03.2018) UNTS 56654.
  Google Scholar

Report of the First Meeting of the Parties, Addendum, Decision I/7 on Compliance Review
  Google Scholar

(02.04.2002) ECE/MP.PP/2/Add.8.
  Google Scholar

Report of the First Meeting of the Parties, Decision I/3 on Rules Relating to the Structure
  Google Scholar

and Functions of the Committee to Support Implementation and Compliance Review (22.04.2022) 22-00344.
  Google Scholar

Revised Treaty of Chaguaramas Establishing the Caribbean Community Including the
  Google Scholar

CARICOM Single Market and Economy (05.07.2001) 40269 UNTS 2259.
  Google Scholar

Rules of Procedure of the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights (2020) (unreported).
  Google Scholar

Treaty for the Establishment of the East African Community (30.11.1999) 37437 UNTS 2144.
  Google Scholar

Hungary ACCC/C/2004/04. Aarhus Compliance Committee, 18.02.2005.
  Google Scholar

Union Interafricaine Des Droits De L’homme and others v Angola. ACmHPR, 11.11.1997, 159/96.
  Google Scholar

Malawi African Association and others v Mauritania. ACmHPR, 11.05.2000, 54/91, 61/91, 98/93, 164/97, 196/97, 210/98.
  Google Scholar

Social and Economic Rights Action Center (SERAC) and Center for Economic and Social
  Google Scholar

Rights (CESR) v Nigeria (Ogoniland). ACmHPR, 27.10.2001, 155/96.
  Google Scholar

Democratic Republic of Congo v Burundi, Rwanda, Uganda. ACmHPR, 29.05.2003, 227/99.
  Google Scholar

Gunme v Cameroon. ACmHPR, 27.05.2009, 266/2003.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0210-5691(03)79912-4   Google Scholar

Haregewoin Gabre-Selassie and IHRDA (on behalf of former Dergue Officials) v Ethiopia. ACmHPR, 12.10.2013, 301/05.
  Google Scholar

Spilg and others v Botswana. ACmHPR, 12.10.2013, 277/2003.
  Google Scholar

Centre for Independence of Judges and Lawyers v Algeria. ACmHPR, 13.07.2017, 104/94; 109/94; 126/94.
  Google Scholar

Secretary General of SIECA. CACJ, 11.04.1997, 1-1-3-1997. XYZ v Benin. ACtHPR, 27.11.2020, 010/2020.
  Google Scholar

Pérez Campos and Succari v Panama. CACJ, 18.02.2010, 1-18-2-2010.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1062798709990421   Google Scholar

Asociación Foro Nacional De Reciclaje (FONARE) and Fundación Nicaragüense Para El Desarrollo
  Google Scholar

Sostenible (FUNDENIC) v Costa Rica. CACJ, 21.06.2012, 12-06-12-2011.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1618772   Google Scholar

Trinidad Cement Limited v Guyana. CCJ, 15.01.2009, [2009] CCJ 1 (OJ).
  Google Scholar

AG of Tanzania v Africa Network for Animal Welfare (ANAW). EACJ Division of Appeal, 29.07.2014, Appeal No 3 of 2014.
  Google Scholar

Anyang’ Nyong’o and other v AG of Kenya and Others. EACJ First Instance Division, 29.03.2007, Ref No 1 of 2006.
  Google Scholar

Katabazi and others v Secretary General of the EAC and Uganda. EACJ First Instance Division, 31.10.2007, Ref 1 of 2007.
  Google Scholar

East African Law Society and others v AG of Kenya and Others. EACJ First Instance Division, 31.08.2008, Ref No 3/2007.
  Google Scholar

Africa Network for Animal Welfare (ANAW) v AG of Tanzania. EACJ First Instance Division, 20.06.2014, Ref No 9 of 2010.
  Google Scholar

Registered Trustees of the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) v Nigeria
  Google Scholar

and Universal Basic Education Commission (UBEC). ECOWAS CJ, 27.10.2009, ECW/ CCJ/APP/0808.
  Google Scholar

Registered Trustees of the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) v Nigeria (Ogoniland). ECOWAS CJ, 10.12.2010, ECW/CCJ/APP/07/10.
  Google Scholar

Osaghae and others v Nigeria. ECOWAS CJ, 10.10.2017, ECW/CCJ/JUD/03/17.
  Google Scholar

Dexter Oil Limited v Liberia. ECOWAS CJ, 06.02.2019, ECW/CCJ/APP/24/17.
  Google Scholar

Reverend Mfa and others v Nigeria and others (Fulani Herdsmen). ECOWAS CJ, 26.02.2019, ECW/CCJ/JUD/06/19.
  Google Scholar

Registered Trustees of the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) v Nigeria. ECOWAS CJ, 26.04.2021, ECW/CCJ/JUD/08/21.
  Google Scholar

Diaz and others v Colombia. IACmHR, 12.03.1997, Petition 11.227.
  Google Scholar

Mevopal Sociedad Anónima v Argentina. IACmHR, 11.03.1999.
  Google Scholar

Constitutional Court v Peru. IACmHR, 24.09.1999, Series C No 55.
  Google Scholar

Yakye Axa Indigenous Community of the Enxet-Lengua People v Paraguay. IACmHR, 27.02.2002, Petition 12.313.
  Google Scholar

Panama Metropolitan Reserve v Panama. IACmHR, 22.10.2003, Petition 11.533.
  Google Scholar

Maya Indigenous Communities of the Toledo District v Belize. IACmHR, 12.10.2004, Petition 12.053.
  Google Scholar

Community of San Mateo De Huanchor and its Members v Peru. IACmHR, 15.10.2004, Petition 504-03.
  Google Scholar

Chang Bravo v Guatemala. IACmHR, 24.07.2008, Petition 283-06.
  Google Scholar

Community of La Oroya v Peru. IACmHR, 05.09.2009, Petition 1473-06.
  Google Scholar

Inhabitants of the „Barão De Mauá” Residential Complex v Brazil. IACmHR, 12.07.2012, Petition 1073-05.
  Google Scholar

Navarro Pizarro and others v Colombia. IACmHR, 01.12.2021, Petition 638-12.
  Google Scholar

Saramaka People v Suriname. IACtHR, 28.11.2007, Series C No 172.
  Google Scholar

Advisory Opinion on the Environment and Human Rights (State Obligations in Relation to the Environment in the Context of the Protection and Guarantee of the Rights to Life and to Personal Integrity) (OC-23/17). IACtHR, 15.11.2017, Series A No 23.
  Google Scholar

Indigenous Communities of the Lhaka Honhat (Our Land) Association v Argentina. IACtHR, 06.02.2020, Series C No 400.
  Google Scholar

Moyano Bonilla v Commission of the Andean Community. TJAC, 01.02.2002, 14-AN-2001.
  Google Scholar

GOAC 991.
  Google Scholar

Moyano Bonilla v Colombia. TJAC, 29.05.2002, 75-AI-2001. GOAC, No 825.
  Google Scholar

Farmagro SA and Others v Peru. TJAC, 27.01.2009, 05-AI-2008. GOAC 1824.
  Google Scholar

Bayer Sociedad Anónima and others v Peru. TJAC, 22.06.2011, 02-AI-2010. GOAC 1973.
  Google Scholar

Farmex Sociedad Anónima and others v Peru. TJAC, 19.07.2012, 01-AI-2011. GOAC 2086.
  Google Scholar

Farmex Sociedad Anónima and others v Peru. TJAC, 26.07.2013, 01-AI-2012. GOAC 2265.
  Google Scholar

Asociación Colombiana de la Industria de Grasas y Aceites Comestibles v Commission of the
  Google Scholar

Andean Community. TJAC, 19.05.2016, 01-RO-2015.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1391046   Google Scholar

Vélez Escalón v Colombia. TJAC, 07.07.2017, 01-AI-2015. GOAC 3100.
  Google Scholar

Flores Maravilla Sociedad Anónima v Colombia. TJAC, 03.10.2017, 03-AI-2017. GOAC 3143.
  Google Scholar

Flores Maravilla Sociedad Anónima v Colombia (Recurso De Consideración). TJAC, 17.11.2017,
  Google Scholar

-AI-2017. GOAC, No 3143.
  Google Scholar

Aceves, William. 2003. Actio Popularis – the Class Action in International Law. University
  Google Scholar

of Chicago Legal Forum (1): 353–402.
  Google Scholar

Alter, Karen. 2014. The Multiplication of International Court and Tribunals After the End
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780199660681.003.0004   Google Scholar

of the Cold War. In: The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication, (eds.) Cesare
  Google Scholar

Romano and Karen Alter, Yuval Shany 68-89. Oxford/New York: OUP.
  Google Scholar

Alter, Karen. 2014. The New Terrain of International Law: Courts, Politics, Rights. Princeton/
DOI: https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691154749.003.0001   Google Scholar

Oxford: PUP.
  Google Scholar

Alter, Karen and Liesbet Hooghe. 2016. Regional Dispute Settlement. In: The Oxford Handbook
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199682300.013.24   Google Scholar

of Comparative Regionalism, (eds.) Tanja Börzel, Thomas Risse, 538–58. Oxford: OUP.
  Google Scholar

Alter, Karen and Laurence Helfer, Mikael Rask Madsen, eds. 2018. International Court Authority. Oxford: OUP.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198795582.003.0016   Google Scholar

Börzel, Tanja and Thomas Risse, eds. 2016. The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Regionalism. Oxford: OUP.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199682300.001.0001   Google Scholar

Eliantonio, Mariolina, and Haakon Roer-Eide. 2014. Regional Courts and Locus Standi for
  Google Scholar

Private Parties: Can the CJEU Learn Something from the Others? Law and Practice of
  Google Scholar

International Courts and Tribunals 13(1): 27–53.
  Google Scholar

Faúndez Ledesma, Héctor. 2008. The Inter-American System for the Protection of Human
  Google Scholar

Rights: Institutional and Procedural Aspects. 3rd ed. San José: IIDH.
  Google Scholar

Peel, Jacqueline and Jolene Lin. 2019. Transnational Climate Litigation: The Contribution
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2019.48   Google Scholar

of the Global South. In: American Journal of International Law 113(4): 679–726.
  Google Scholar

General Secretariat of the Andean Community. Derechos Del Ciudadano Andino. https:// www.comunidadandina.org/StaticFiles/2011225165851derechos_CAN.pdf (accessed 13.07.2022).
  Google Scholar

Graaf, Kars de and Bert Marseille, Sacha Prechal, Rob Widdershoven, Heinrich Winter, eds. 2021. Grensoverstijgende Rechtsbeoefening. Zutphen: Uitgeverij Paris.
  Google Scholar

Grande Salazar and César Ernesto, Enrique N. Ulate Chacón. 2013. Manual De Derecho
  Google Scholar

Comunitario Centroamericano. 2nd ed. San Salvador: Imprenta y Offset Ricaldone.
  Google Scholar

Grant, Evadne. 2015. International Human Rights Courts and Environmental Human Rights: Re-Imagining Adjudicative Paradigms. Journal of Human Rights and the Environment 6(2): 156–176.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/jhre.2015.02.02   Google Scholar

Grotius, Hugo. 2005. The Rights of War and Peace (1625). In: Natural Law and Enlightenment
  Google Scholar

Classics, (eds.) Knud Haakonssen and Richard Tuck 1. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
  Google Scholar

Haakonssen, Knud and Béla Kapossy, Richard Whatmore, eds. 2008. Natural Law and Enlightenment Classics. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
  Google Scholar

Haakonssen, Knud and Richard Tuck, eds. 2005. Natural Law and Enlightenment Classics. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
  Google Scholar

Hirschl, Ran. 2006. The New Constitutionalism and the Judicialization of Pure Politics Worldwide. Fordham Law Review (75): 721–754.
  Google Scholar

Hoeffner, Werner. 2016. L’accès de l’individu à la Cour Africaine des Droits de l’Homme et
  Google Scholar

des Peuples. Revista Jurídica del Centro Universitario Curitiba 43(2): 825–883.
  Google Scholar

Jans, Jan. 2003. EU Environmental Policy and the Civil Society. In: The European Convention
  Google Scholar

and the Future of European Environmental Law, (ed.) Jan Jans, 55–67. Groningen: Europa Law Publishing.
  Google Scholar

Jans, Jan. Ed. 2003. The European Convention and the Future of European Environmental Law. Groningen: Europa Law Publishing.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/15.3.323   Google Scholar

Jendrośka, Jerzy. 2021. Procedural Environmental Rights: Observations on the Escazú Agreement
  Google Scholar

as compared with the Aarhus Convention. In: Grensoverstijgende Rechtsbeoefening,
  Google Scholar

(eds.) Kars de Graaf, Bert Marseille, Sacha Prechal, Rob Widdershoven, Heinrich Winter, 345–53. Zutphen: Uitgeverij Paris.
  Google Scholar

Kruger, Thalia. 2008. Regional Organisations and their Dispute Settlement Bodies. De Jure 41 (2): 305–319.
  Google Scholar

Lindblom, Anna-Karin. 2009. Non-Governmental Organisations in International Law. New York: CUP.
  Google Scholar

Lukic, Sebastian. The Rise of International Environmental Law in Litigation and Arbitration. https://www.schoenherr.eu/content/the-rise-of-international-environmental-lawin-litigation-and-arbitration/ (accessed 12.08.2022).
  Google Scholar

Martin, Claudia. 2006. The Moiwana Village Case: A New Trend in Approaching the Rights of Ethnic Groups in the Inter-American System. Leiden Journal of International Law 19(2): 491–504.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156506003402   Google Scholar

Meijknecht, Anna. 2015. The Contribution of the Inter-American Human Rights System to Sustainable Development. In: Regional Environmental Law – Transregional Comparative
  Google Scholar

Lessons in Pursuit of Sustainable Development, (eds.) Werner Scholtz, Jonathan Verschuuren, 177–219. Cheltenham: Elgar.
  Google Scholar

Milej, Tomasz. 2018. Human Rights Protection by International Courts – What Role for the East African Court of Justice. African Journal of International and Comparative Law 26(1): 108–129.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3366/ajicl.2018.0222   Google Scholar

Onoria, Henry. 2010. Locus Standi of Individuals and Non-State Entities Before Regional Economic Integration Judicial Bodies in Africa. African Journal of International and Comparative Law 18(2): 143–169.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3366/ajicl.2010.0002   Google Scholar

Parlett, Kate. 2011. The Individual in the International Legal System: Continuity and Change in International Law. New York: CUP.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511921858   Google Scholar

Pasqualucci, Jo. 2013. The Practice and Procedure of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. 2nd ed. New York: CUP.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511843884   Google Scholar

Pedersen, Morten. 2006. Standing and the African Commission on Human and Peoples’
  Google Scholar

Rights. African Human Rights Law Journal 6(2): 407–422.
  Google Scholar

Romano, Cesare and Karen Alter, Yuval Shany, eds. 2014. The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication. Oxford/New York: OUP.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780199660681.001.0001   Google Scholar

Schall, Christian. 2008. Public Interest Litigation Concerning Environmental Matters Before
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqn025   Google Scholar

Human Rights Courts: A Promising Future Concept? Journal of Environmental Law 20(3): 417–454.
  Google Scholar

Scholtz, Werner and Jonathan Verschuuren, eds. 2015. Regional Environmental Law – Transregional Comparative Lessons in Pursuit of Sustainable Development. Cheltenham: Elgar.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781951781   Google Scholar

Shelton, Dinah. 2015. Legitimate and Necessary: Adjudicating Human Rights Violations
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/jhre.2015.02.01   Google Scholar

Related to Activities Causing Environmental Harm or Risk. Journal of Human Rights and the Environment 6(2): 139–155.
  Google Scholar

Stec, Stephen and Jerzy Jendrośka. 2019. The Escazú Agreement and the Regional Approach to Rio Principle 10: Process, Innovation, and Shortcomings. Journal of Environmental Law: 1–13.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqz027   Google Scholar

UN Economic Council for Europe. The Aarhus Convention – an Implementation Guide. https://unece.org/environment-policy/publications/aarhus-convention-implementationguide-second-edition (accessed 24.08.2022).
  Google Scholar

Vattel, Emer de. 2008. The Law of Nations, Or, Principles of the Law of Nature, Applied to the Conduct and Affairs of Nations and Sovereigns (1758). In: Natural Law and Enlightenment Classics, (eds.) Knud Haakonssen, Béla Kapossy and Richard Whatmore.
  Google Scholar

Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
  Google Scholar

Yk, Briang S. 2011. Friends, Persons, Citizens: Comparative Perspectives on Locus Standi and the Access of Private Applicants to Sub-Regional Trade Judiciaries in Africa. Oregon Review of International Law 13(2): 355–394.
  Google Scholar

Pobierz


Opublikowane
2023-03-08

Cited By / Share

Kahl, S. (2023). Legal Standing in Environmental Litigation before Regional International Courts in Africa and Latin America. Opolskie Studia Administracyjno-Prawne, 20(2), 63–86. https://doi.org/10.25167/osap.4872

Autorzy

Sonja Kahl 

Statystyki

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.


Licencja

Prawa autorskie (c) 2023 Opolskie Studia Administracyjno-Prawne

Creative Commons License

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.

Prawa autorskie majątkowe do opublikowanych utworów ma Uniwersytet Opolski (do utworu zbiorowego) oraz poszczególni Autorzy (do poszczególnych części utworu zbiorowego, mających samodzielne znaczenie).
W Opolskich Studiach Administracyjno - Prawnych mogą być publikowane tylko utwory wcześniej nie rozpowszechnione.
Na podstawie Rozporządzenia Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady (UE) 2016/679 z dnia 27 kwietnia 2016r. w sprawie ochrony osób fizycznych w związku z przetwarzaniem danych osobowych i w sprawie swobodnego przepływu takich danych oraz uchylenia dyrektywy 95/46/WE (określane jako „RODO") administratorem danych osobowych osób publikujących w Opolskich Studiach Administracyjnoprawnych (Wydawnictwo UO) jest Uniwersytet Opolski z siedzibą przy pl. Kopernika 11a, 45-040 Opole.

Artykuły zamieszczone w czasopiśmie objęte są licencją Uznanie autorstwa - Użycie niekomercyjne - Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe
(CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)

Z pozostałych zamieszczonych w niniejszym czasopiśmie utworów można korzystać w ramach dozwolonego użytku zgodnie z art. 23-35 Ustawy z dnia 4 lutego 1994 r. o prawie autorskim i prawach pokrewnych.

Więcej szczegółów o licencji CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 znajdą Państwo na stronie:

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.pl

Treść licencji dostępna pod linkiem: