https://doi.org/10.25167/osap.4872
Artykuł porównuje regulacje sytuacji prawnej w sprawach przed wybranymi regionalnymi międzynarodowymi organami sądowymi lub quasi-sądowymi działającymi
w Afryce i Ameryce Łacińskiej, z perspektywy sporów środowiskowych. Autorka skupia się na aktywnej sytuacji prawnej prywatnych jednostek w spornych sprawach wnoszonych przeciwko państwu. Artykuł systematyzuje reguły rządzące stanem prawnym w dwóch szerokich
kategoriach: sporu subiektywnego (opartego na prawach) oraz obiektywnego konfliktu interesów. Następnie, podejście każdego z sądów zostaje przeanalizowane na podstawie jego reguł proceduralnych i orzecznictwa. Można wyróżnić kilka trendów, włącznie ze skłanianiem
się sądów praw człowieka w stronę traktowania takich spraw jako obiektywnego konfliktu interesów, trendem udzielania organizacjom pozarządowym uprzywilejowanej pozycji wszczynania sporów środowiskowych, oraz wzmacnianiem podejścia opartego na prawach społeczności przez sądy w celu regionalnej integracji ekonomicznej, które mogą stać się istotne w przyszłości.
Pobierz pliki
Zasady cytowania
Licencja
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
Bibliografia
African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (27.06.1981) 26363 UNTS 1520.
Google Scholar
American Convention on Human Rights (22.11.1969) 17955 UNTS 1144.
Google Scholar
American Declaration on the Rights and Duties of Man (02.05.1948) Res. XXX of the
Google Scholar
Ninth International Conference of American States, OEA/Ser. L/V/l.50 Doc. 6, Rev. 1.
Google Scholar
Consolidated Version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (25.03.1957) OJ C 326 of 26.10.2012.
Google Scholar
Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-Making and Access to
Google Scholar
Justice in Environmental Matters (Aarhus Convention) (25.06.1998) 2161 UNTS 37770.
Google Scholar
Convention on the Statute of the Central American Court of Justice (10.12.1992) 31191 UNTS 1821.
Google Scholar
Decisión 472, Treaty Creating the Court of Justice of the Cartagena Agreement (16.09.1999)
Google Scholar
GOAC No 483 of 17.09.1999.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0730-725X(98)00174-X
Google Scholar
Protocol A/P.L/7/91 on the Community Court of Justice (06.07.1991) 14843 UNTS 2375, as amended by the Supplementary Protocol A/SP.1/01/05 (19.01.2005).
Google Scholar
Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights on the Establishment of an African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights (10.06.1998) (unreported).
Google Scholar
Regional Agreement on Access to Information, Public Participation and Justice in Environmental Matters in Latin America and the Caribbean (Escazú Agreement) (04.03.2018) UNTS 56654.
Google Scholar
Report of the First Meeting of the Parties, Addendum, Decision I/7 on Compliance Review
Google Scholar
(02.04.2002) ECE/MP.PP/2/Add.8.
Google Scholar
Report of the First Meeting of the Parties, Decision I/3 on Rules Relating to the Structure
Google Scholar
and Functions of the Committee to Support Implementation and Compliance Review (22.04.2022) 22-00344.
Google Scholar
Revised Treaty of Chaguaramas Establishing the Caribbean Community Including the
Google Scholar
CARICOM Single Market and Economy (05.07.2001) 40269 UNTS 2259.
Google Scholar
Rules of Procedure of the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights (2020) (unreported).
Google Scholar
Treaty for the Establishment of the East African Community (30.11.1999) 37437 UNTS 2144.
Google Scholar
Hungary ACCC/C/2004/04. Aarhus Compliance Committee, 18.02.2005.
Google Scholar
Union Interafricaine Des Droits De L’homme and others v Angola. ACmHPR, 11.11.1997, 159/96.
Google Scholar
Malawi African Association and others v Mauritania. ACmHPR, 11.05.2000, 54/91, 61/91, 98/93, 164/97, 196/97, 210/98.
Google Scholar
Social and Economic Rights Action Center (SERAC) and Center for Economic and Social
Google Scholar
Rights (CESR) v Nigeria (Ogoniland). ACmHPR, 27.10.2001, 155/96.
Google Scholar
Democratic Republic of Congo v Burundi, Rwanda, Uganda. ACmHPR, 29.05.2003, 227/99.
Google Scholar
Gunme v Cameroon. ACmHPR, 27.05.2009, 266/2003.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0210-5691(03)79912-4
Google Scholar
Haregewoin Gabre-Selassie and IHRDA (on behalf of former Dergue Officials) v Ethiopia. ACmHPR, 12.10.2013, 301/05.
Google Scholar
Spilg and others v Botswana. ACmHPR, 12.10.2013, 277/2003.
Google Scholar
Centre for Independence of Judges and Lawyers v Algeria. ACmHPR, 13.07.2017, 104/94; 109/94; 126/94.
Google Scholar
Secretary General of SIECA. CACJ, 11.04.1997, 1-1-3-1997. XYZ v Benin. ACtHPR, 27.11.2020, 010/2020.
Google Scholar
Pérez Campos and Succari v Panama. CACJ, 18.02.2010, 1-18-2-2010.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1062798709990421
Google Scholar
Asociación Foro Nacional De Reciclaje (FONARE) and Fundación Nicaragüense Para El Desarrollo
Google Scholar
Sostenible (FUNDENIC) v Costa Rica. CACJ, 21.06.2012, 12-06-12-2011.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1618772
Google Scholar
Trinidad Cement Limited v Guyana. CCJ, 15.01.2009, [2009] CCJ 1 (OJ).
Google Scholar
AG of Tanzania v Africa Network for Animal Welfare (ANAW). EACJ Division of Appeal, 29.07.2014, Appeal No 3 of 2014.
Google Scholar
Anyang’ Nyong’o and other v AG of Kenya and Others. EACJ First Instance Division, 29.03.2007, Ref No 1 of 2006.
Google Scholar
Katabazi and others v Secretary General of the EAC and Uganda. EACJ First Instance Division, 31.10.2007, Ref 1 of 2007.
Google Scholar
East African Law Society and others v AG of Kenya and Others. EACJ First Instance Division, 31.08.2008, Ref No 3/2007.
Google Scholar
Africa Network for Animal Welfare (ANAW) v AG of Tanzania. EACJ First Instance Division, 20.06.2014, Ref No 9 of 2010.
Google Scholar
Registered Trustees of the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) v Nigeria
Google Scholar
and Universal Basic Education Commission (UBEC). ECOWAS CJ, 27.10.2009, ECW/ CCJ/APP/0808.
Google Scholar
Registered Trustees of the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) v Nigeria (Ogoniland). ECOWAS CJ, 10.12.2010, ECW/CCJ/APP/07/10.
Google Scholar
Osaghae and others v Nigeria. ECOWAS CJ, 10.10.2017, ECW/CCJ/JUD/03/17.
Google Scholar
Dexter Oil Limited v Liberia. ECOWAS CJ, 06.02.2019, ECW/CCJ/APP/24/17.
Google Scholar
Reverend Mfa and others v Nigeria and others (Fulani Herdsmen). ECOWAS CJ, 26.02.2019, ECW/CCJ/JUD/06/19.
Google Scholar
Registered Trustees of the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) v Nigeria. ECOWAS CJ, 26.04.2021, ECW/CCJ/JUD/08/21.
Google Scholar
Diaz and others v Colombia. IACmHR, 12.03.1997, Petition 11.227.
Google Scholar
Mevopal Sociedad Anónima v Argentina. IACmHR, 11.03.1999.
Google Scholar
Constitutional Court v Peru. IACmHR, 24.09.1999, Series C No 55.
Google Scholar
Yakye Axa Indigenous Community of the Enxet-Lengua People v Paraguay. IACmHR, 27.02.2002, Petition 12.313.
Google Scholar
Panama Metropolitan Reserve v Panama. IACmHR, 22.10.2003, Petition 11.533.
Google Scholar
Maya Indigenous Communities of the Toledo District v Belize. IACmHR, 12.10.2004, Petition 12.053.
Google Scholar
Community of San Mateo De Huanchor and its Members v Peru. IACmHR, 15.10.2004, Petition 504-03.
Google Scholar
Chang Bravo v Guatemala. IACmHR, 24.07.2008, Petition 283-06.
Google Scholar
Community of La Oroya v Peru. IACmHR, 05.09.2009, Petition 1473-06.
Google Scholar
Inhabitants of the „Barão De Mauá” Residential Complex v Brazil. IACmHR, 12.07.2012, Petition 1073-05.
Google Scholar
Navarro Pizarro and others v Colombia. IACmHR, 01.12.2021, Petition 638-12.
Google Scholar
Saramaka People v Suriname. IACtHR, 28.11.2007, Series C No 172.
Google Scholar
Advisory Opinion on the Environment and Human Rights (State Obligations in Relation to the Environment in the Context of the Protection and Guarantee of the Rights to Life and to Personal Integrity) (OC-23/17). IACtHR, 15.11.2017, Series A No 23.
Google Scholar
Indigenous Communities of the Lhaka Honhat (Our Land) Association v Argentina. IACtHR, 06.02.2020, Series C No 400.
Google Scholar
Moyano Bonilla v Commission of the Andean Community. TJAC, 01.02.2002, 14-AN-2001.
Google Scholar
GOAC 991.
Google Scholar
Moyano Bonilla v Colombia. TJAC, 29.05.2002, 75-AI-2001. GOAC, No 825.
Google Scholar
Farmagro SA and Others v Peru. TJAC, 27.01.2009, 05-AI-2008. GOAC 1824.
Google Scholar
Bayer Sociedad Anónima and others v Peru. TJAC, 22.06.2011, 02-AI-2010. GOAC 1973.
Google Scholar
Farmex Sociedad Anónima and others v Peru. TJAC, 19.07.2012, 01-AI-2011. GOAC 2086.
Google Scholar
Farmex Sociedad Anónima and others v Peru. TJAC, 26.07.2013, 01-AI-2012. GOAC 2265.
Google Scholar
Asociación Colombiana de la Industria de Grasas y Aceites Comestibles v Commission of the
Google Scholar
Andean Community. TJAC, 19.05.2016, 01-RO-2015.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1391046
Google Scholar
Vélez Escalón v Colombia. TJAC, 07.07.2017, 01-AI-2015. GOAC 3100.
Google Scholar
Flores Maravilla Sociedad Anónima v Colombia. TJAC, 03.10.2017, 03-AI-2017. GOAC 3143.
Google Scholar
Flores Maravilla Sociedad Anónima v Colombia (Recurso De Consideración). TJAC, 17.11.2017,
Google Scholar
-AI-2017. GOAC, No 3143.
Google Scholar
Aceves, William. 2003. Actio Popularis – the Class Action in International Law. University
Google Scholar
of Chicago Legal Forum (1): 353–402.
Google Scholar
Alter, Karen. 2014. The Multiplication of International Court and Tribunals After the End
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780199660681.003.0004
Google Scholar
of the Cold War. In: The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication, (eds.) Cesare
Google Scholar
Romano and Karen Alter, Yuval Shany 68-89. Oxford/New York: OUP.
Google Scholar
Alter, Karen. 2014. The New Terrain of International Law: Courts, Politics, Rights. Princeton/
DOI: https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691154749.003.0001
Google Scholar
Oxford: PUP.
Google Scholar
Alter, Karen and Liesbet Hooghe. 2016. Regional Dispute Settlement. In: The Oxford Handbook
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199682300.013.24
Google Scholar
of Comparative Regionalism, (eds.) Tanja Börzel, Thomas Risse, 538–58. Oxford: OUP.
Google Scholar
Alter, Karen and Laurence Helfer, Mikael Rask Madsen, eds. 2018. International Court Authority. Oxford: OUP.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198795582.003.0016
Google Scholar
Börzel, Tanja and Thomas Risse, eds. 2016. The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Regionalism. Oxford: OUP.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199682300.001.0001
Google Scholar
Eliantonio, Mariolina, and Haakon Roer-Eide. 2014. Regional Courts and Locus Standi for
Google Scholar
Private Parties: Can the CJEU Learn Something from the Others? Law and Practice of
Google Scholar
International Courts and Tribunals 13(1): 27–53.
Google Scholar
Faúndez Ledesma, Héctor. 2008. The Inter-American System for the Protection of Human
Google Scholar
Rights: Institutional and Procedural Aspects. 3rd ed. San José: IIDH.
Google Scholar
Peel, Jacqueline and Jolene Lin. 2019. Transnational Climate Litigation: The Contribution
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2019.48
Google Scholar
of the Global South. In: American Journal of International Law 113(4): 679–726.
Google Scholar
General Secretariat of the Andean Community. Derechos Del Ciudadano Andino. https:// www.comunidadandina.org/StaticFiles/2011225165851derechos_CAN.pdf (accessed 13.07.2022).
Google Scholar
Graaf, Kars de and Bert Marseille, Sacha Prechal, Rob Widdershoven, Heinrich Winter, eds. 2021. Grensoverstijgende Rechtsbeoefening. Zutphen: Uitgeverij Paris.
Google Scholar
Grande Salazar and César Ernesto, Enrique N. Ulate Chacón. 2013. Manual De Derecho
Google Scholar
Comunitario Centroamericano. 2nd ed. San Salvador: Imprenta y Offset Ricaldone.
Google Scholar
Grant, Evadne. 2015. International Human Rights Courts and Environmental Human Rights: Re-Imagining Adjudicative Paradigms. Journal of Human Rights and the Environment 6(2): 156–176.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/jhre.2015.02.02
Google Scholar
Grotius, Hugo. 2005. The Rights of War and Peace (1625). In: Natural Law and Enlightenment
Google Scholar
Classics, (eds.) Knud Haakonssen and Richard Tuck 1. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
Google Scholar
Haakonssen, Knud and Béla Kapossy, Richard Whatmore, eds. 2008. Natural Law and Enlightenment Classics. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
Google Scholar
Haakonssen, Knud and Richard Tuck, eds. 2005. Natural Law and Enlightenment Classics. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
Google Scholar
Hirschl, Ran. 2006. The New Constitutionalism and the Judicialization of Pure Politics Worldwide. Fordham Law Review (75): 721–754.
Google Scholar
Hoeffner, Werner. 2016. L’accès de l’individu à la Cour Africaine des Droits de l’Homme et
Google Scholar
des Peuples. Revista Jurídica del Centro Universitario Curitiba 43(2): 825–883.
Google Scholar
Jans, Jan. 2003. EU Environmental Policy and the Civil Society. In: The European Convention
Google Scholar
and the Future of European Environmental Law, (ed.) Jan Jans, 55–67. Groningen: Europa Law Publishing.
Google Scholar
Jans, Jan. Ed. 2003. The European Convention and the Future of European Environmental Law. Groningen: Europa Law Publishing.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/15.3.323
Google Scholar
Jendrośka, Jerzy. 2021. Procedural Environmental Rights: Observations on the Escazú Agreement
Google Scholar
as compared with the Aarhus Convention. In: Grensoverstijgende Rechtsbeoefening,
Google Scholar
(eds.) Kars de Graaf, Bert Marseille, Sacha Prechal, Rob Widdershoven, Heinrich Winter, 345–53. Zutphen: Uitgeverij Paris.
Google Scholar
Kruger, Thalia. 2008. Regional Organisations and their Dispute Settlement Bodies. De Jure 41 (2): 305–319.
Google Scholar
Lindblom, Anna-Karin. 2009. Non-Governmental Organisations in International Law. New York: CUP.
Google Scholar
Lukic, Sebastian. The Rise of International Environmental Law in Litigation and Arbitration. https://www.schoenherr.eu/content/the-rise-of-international-environmental-lawin-litigation-and-arbitration/ (accessed 12.08.2022).
Google Scholar
Martin, Claudia. 2006. The Moiwana Village Case: A New Trend in Approaching the Rights of Ethnic Groups in the Inter-American System. Leiden Journal of International Law 19(2): 491–504.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156506003402
Google Scholar
Meijknecht, Anna. 2015. The Contribution of the Inter-American Human Rights System to Sustainable Development. In: Regional Environmental Law – Transregional Comparative
Google Scholar
Lessons in Pursuit of Sustainable Development, (eds.) Werner Scholtz, Jonathan Verschuuren, 177–219. Cheltenham: Elgar.
Google Scholar
Milej, Tomasz. 2018. Human Rights Protection by International Courts – What Role for the East African Court of Justice. African Journal of International and Comparative Law 26(1): 108–129.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3366/ajicl.2018.0222
Google Scholar
Onoria, Henry. 2010. Locus Standi of Individuals and Non-State Entities Before Regional Economic Integration Judicial Bodies in Africa. African Journal of International and Comparative Law 18(2): 143–169.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3366/ajicl.2010.0002
Google Scholar
Parlett, Kate. 2011. The Individual in the International Legal System: Continuity and Change in International Law. New York: CUP.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511921858
Google Scholar
Pasqualucci, Jo. 2013. The Practice and Procedure of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. 2nd ed. New York: CUP.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511843884
Google Scholar
Pedersen, Morten. 2006. Standing and the African Commission on Human and Peoples’
Google Scholar
Rights. African Human Rights Law Journal 6(2): 407–422.
Google Scholar
Romano, Cesare and Karen Alter, Yuval Shany, eds. 2014. The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication. Oxford/New York: OUP.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780199660681.001.0001
Google Scholar
Schall, Christian. 2008. Public Interest Litigation Concerning Environmental Matters Before
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqn025
Google Scholar
Human Rights Courts: A Promising Future Concept? Journal of Environmental Law 20(3): 417–454.
Google Scholar
Scholtz, Werner and Jonathan Verschuuren, eds. 2015. Regional Environmental Law – Transregional Comparative Lessons in Pursuit of Sustainable Development. Cheltenham: Elgar.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781951781
Google Scholar
Shelton, Dinah. 2015. Legitimate and Necessary: Adjudicating Human Rights Violations
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/jhre.2015.02.01
Google Scholar
Related to Activities Causing Environmental Harm or Risk. Journal of Human Rights and the Environment 6(2): 139–155.
Google Scholar
Stec, Stephen and Jerzy Jendrośka. 2019. The Escazú Agreement and the Regional Approach to Rio Principle 10: Process, Innovation, and Shortcomings. Journal of Environmental Law: 1–13.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqz027
Google Scholar
UN Economic Council for Europe. The Aarhus Convention – an Implementation Guide. https://unece.org/environment-policy/publications/aarhus-convention-implementationguide-second-edition (accessed 24.08.2022).
Google Scholar
Vattel, Emer de. 2008. The Law of Nations, Or, Principles of the Law of Nature, Applied to the Conduct and Affairs of Nations and Sovereigns (1758). In: Natural Law and Enlightenment Classics, (eds.) Knud Haakonssen, Béla Kapossy and Richard Whatmore.
Google Scholar
Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
Google Scholar
Yk, Briang S. 2011. Friends, Persons, Citizens: Comparative Perspectives on Locus Standi and the Access of Private Applicants to Sub-Regional Trade Judiciaries in Africa. Oregon Review of International Law 13(2): 355–394.
Google Scholar
English
Język Polski
