The need for protection of environmental defenders from digital intimidation: an analysis of Article 3(8) of the Aarhus Convention

Lien Stolle

doi:10.25167/osap.4980

Published: 2023-07-16

Vol. 21 No. 1 (2023)

The need for protection of environmental defenders from digital intimidation: an analysis of Article 3(8) of the Aarhus Convention

Lien Stolle

The Opole Studies in Administration and Law

Section: Articles

https://doi.org/10.25167/osap.4980

Abstract

Digital technologies are becoming increasingly important to environmental defenders,
both in terms of tools that facilitate speaking out and/or taking action, and in terms
of (digital) risks they face as a result of their involvement. A growing concern has been
expressed about the use of various forms of online and technology-facilitated intimidation
or “digital intimidation” against environmental defenders. While the existing research on
cyberbullying, digital violence and online intimidation can provide some insight, few studies
and data exist on the use of such tactics against environmental defenders in particular.
By leaving this issue unexamined, there remains a lack of awareness about the risks and
challenges environmental defenders may face in terms of online safety and digital intimidation,
which may ultimately curtail public debate on environmental issues. Fortunately, the
protections under Article 3(8) of the Aarhus Convention and the recently introduced Special
Rapporteur for Environmental Defenders can be useful in providing protection against
digital intimidation. This paper, therefore, looks at the application of Article 3(8) to digital
intimidation, through the decisions of the Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee, and
also considers the mandate given to the Special Rapporteur at the 2020 Meeting of the
Parties. The analysis shows that there is certainly potential for protection against digital intimidation
under Article 3(8) AC, but more explicit attention and awareness may be needed.

Keywords:

Environmental defenders, Aarhus Convention, Digital harassment

Download files

pdf

Citation rules

Stolle, L. (2023). The need for protection of environmental defenders from digital intimidation: an analysis of Article 3(8) of the Aarhus Convention. The Opole Studies in Administration and Law, 21(1), 199–219. https://doi.org/10.25167/osap.4980

Cited by / Share

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

References

Council of Europe Recommendation 2016: Recommendation CM/Rec(2016)4 of the Committee of Ministers to member States on the protection of journalism and safety of journalists and other media actors.
Google Scholar

Directive 2003/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 May 2003 providing for public participation in respect of the drawing up of certain plans and programmes relating to the environment and amending with regard to public participation
Google Scholar

and access to justice Council Directives 85/337/EEC and 96/61/EC, CONSIL, EP, 156 OJ L (2003).
Google Scholar

The UNECE Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters (Aarhus Convention) (1998).
Google Scholar

Directive 2003/4/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2003 on public access to environmental information and repealing Council Directive 90/313/EEC, CONSIL, EP, 041 OJ L (2003).
Google Scholar

ECtHR, Khadija Ismayilova c. Azerbaïdjan, Nr. 65286/13, 57270/14 (10 January 2019).
Google Scholar

ECtHR, Volodina c. Russie (n° 2), Nr. 40419/19 (14 September 2021).
Google Scholar

Findings and recommendations Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee of 7 June 2021, ACCC/C/2013/98 Lithuania, ECE/MP.PP/C.1/2021/15.
Google Scholar

Findings and recommendations Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee of 18 June 2010, ACCC/C/2009/36 Spain, ECE/MP.PP/C.1/2010/4/Add.2.
Google Scholar

Findings and recommendations Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee of 17 December 2010, ACCC/C/2009/43 Armenia, ECE/MP.PP/2011/11/Add.1.
Google Scholar

Findings and recommendations Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee of 18 June 2017, ACCC/C/2014/102 Belarus, ECE/MP.PP/C.1/2017/19.
Google Scholar

Recommendations Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee of 1 July 2020, ACCC/A/2020/2 Kazakhstan, ECE/MP.PP/C.1/2021/6.
Google Scholar

Article 19. 2020. Investigating online harassment and abuse of women journalists. Article 19. https://www.article19.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Gender-Paper-Brief-3-.pdf.
Google Scholar

Barker, Kim, and Olga Jurasz. 2019. Online Misogyny as Hate Crime A Challenge for Legal Regulation? Taylor & Francis. DOI: 10.4324/9780429956805.
Google Scholar

Barker, Kim, and Olga Jurasz. 2022. Violence Against Women, Hate and Law: Perspectives from Contemporary Scotland. Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-99375-7.
Google Scholar

Belga 2020. Actie klimaatactivisten op Autosalon krijgt juridisch staartje. VRT, https://www.vrt.be/vrtnws/nl/2020/01/21/actie-klimaatactivisten-op-autosalon-krijgt-juridisch-staartje/.
Google Scholar

Belga and HL. 2020. Extinction Rebellion verstoort Autosalon: al zeker 185 actievoerders opgepakt. De Morgen, https://www.demorgen.be/nieuws/extinction-rebellion-verstoort-autosalon-al-zeker-185-actievoerders-opgepakt~b2d5693b/.
Google Scholar

Barritt, Emily. 2021. Foundations of the Aarhus convention: Environmental democracy, rights and stewardship. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Google Scholar

Bille Larsen, Peter, Phillipe Le Billon, Mary Menton, Jose Aylwin, Jorg Balsiger, David Boyd, Michel Forst, Fran Lambrick, Claudelice Santos, Hannah Storey, and Susan Wilding. 2021. Understanding and responding to the environmental human rights
Google Scholar

defenders crisis: The case for conservation action. Conservation Letters 14(3): e12777. DOI: 10.1111/conl.12777.
Google Scholar

Boren, Zach, and Damian Kahya. 2019. German far right targets Greta Thunberg in anti-climate push. Unearthed, https://unearthed.greenpeace.org/2019/05/14/germany-climate- denial-populist-eike-afd/.
Google Scholar

Butt, Natalie, Frances Lambrick, Mary Menton, and Anna Renwick. 2019. The supply chain of violence. Nature Sustainability, 2(8): 742-747. DOI: 10.1038/s41893-019-0349-4.
Google Scholar

Dunn, Suzie. 2020. Technology-facilitated gender-based violence: An overview. Centre for International Governance Innovation. Supporting a Safer Internet Paper 1, https://www.cigionline.org/static/documents/documents/SaferInternet_Paper%20no%201_0.pdf.
Google Scholar

Eklöw, Karolina, and José Francisco Alvarado Cóbar. 2021. Surveillance as slow violence: Experiences from young environmental activists. SIPRI, https://www.sipri.org/commentary/ blog/2021/surveillance-slow-violence-experiences-young-environmental-activists.
Google Scholar

Ferrier, Michelle, and Nisha Garud-Patkar. 2018. Trollbusters: Fighting online harassment of women Journalists. Mediating Misogyny: Gender, Technology, and Harassment, (eds.)
Google Scholar

Jacqueline Ryan Vickery, Tracy Everbach, 311–332. Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-72917-6_16.
Google Scholar

Front Line Defenders. 2021. Front Line Defenders Global Analysis 2020. https://www.frontlinedefenders. org/sites/default/files/fld_global_analysis_2020.pdf.
Google Scholar

Front Line Defenders. 2022. Front Line Defenders Global Analysis 2021. https://www.frontlinedefenders.org/sites/default/files/2021_global_analysis_-_final.pdf.
Google Scholar

George, Jordana, and Dorothy E. Leidner. 2019. From clicktivism to hacktivism: Understanding digital activism. Information and Organization 29(3): 100249. DOI: 10.1016/j. infoandorg.2019.04.001.
Google Scholar

Global Witness. 2021. Annual report 2021: Our case for change, https://www.globalwitness.org/en/about-us/global-witness-annual-reports/.
Google Scholar

GREVIO Recommendation. 2021. General Recommendation No. 1 on the digital dimension of violence against women, https://rm.coe.int/grevio-rec-no-on-digital-violence-againstwomen/1680a49147.
Google Scholar

Karagiannopoulos, Vasileos. 2018. Looking into the positive and negative aspects of hacktivism.Living With Hacktivism: From Conflict to Symbiosis, (ed.) V Vasileos Karagiannopoulos, 43-90. Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-71758-6_3.
Google Scholar

Kleemola, Katie, Masashi Crete-Nishihata, Adam Senft, and Irene Poetranto. 2015. Targeted malware attacks against NGO linked to attacks on Burmese government websites.
Google Scholar

Citizen Lab Research Report – University of Toronto 65, https://citizenlab.ca/2015/10/targeted-attacks-ngo-burma/.
Google Scholar

Lewis, Seth C., Rodrigo Zamith, and Mark Coddington. 2020. Online harassment and its
Google Scholar

implications for the journalist – audience relationship. Digital Journalism 8(8): 1047-1067. DOI: 10.1080/21670811.2020.1811743.
Google Scholar

Lloro, Teresa. 2018. An ecofeminist account of cyberbullying: Implications for environmental
Google Scholar

and social justice scholar-educator-activists. The Journal of Environmental Education 49: 1-10. DOI: 10.1080/00958964.2017.1400513.
Google Scholar

Lomba, Niombo, Cecilia Navarra, and Meenakshi Fernandes. 2021. Combating gender-based violence: Cyber violence. Think Tank. European Parliament (PE 662.621). European Parliamentary Research Service (EPRS).
Google Scholar

Macpherson, Aida. 2021. (Not) Part of the Job: Een exploratief onderzoek naar de ervaringen van gekleurde vrouwelijke journalisten en opiniemakers in Vlaanderen en Brussel met online intimidatie. De Vlaamse ScripteBank. KU Leuven Publicaties, https://www.
Google Scholar

scriptiebank.be/scriptie/2021/not-part-job-een-exploratief-onderzoek-naar-de-ervaringen-van-gekleurde-vrouwelijke.
Google Scholar

McCully, Jonathan, and Scot Griffen. 2019. Legal Responses to Online Harassment and Abuse of Journalists: Perspectives from Finland, France and Ireland. OSCE.
Google Scholar

Nadim, Marjan, and Audun Fladmoe. 2021. Silencing women? Gender and online harassment. Social Science Computer Review 39(2): 245-258. DOI: 10.1177/0894439319865518.
Google Scholar

Nevett, Joshua. 2019. Greta Thunberg: Why are young climate activists facing so much hate? BBC News, https://www.bbc.com/news/world-49291464.
Google Scholar

Nixon, Rob. 2013. Slow Violence and the Environmentalism of the Poor. Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar

Nogrady, Bianca. 2021. ‘I hope you die’: How the COVID pandemic unleashed attacks on scientists. Nature 598: 250-253. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-021-02741-x.
Google Scholar

Nogrady, Bianca. 2022. Online harassment: A toolkit for protecting yourself from abuse. Nature 609: 205-207. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-022-02766-w.
Google Scholar

O’Malley, G. 2013. Hacktivism: Cyber activism or cyber crime. Trinity College Law Review 16: 137.
Google Scholar

Pen America. 2018. Defining “Online Abuse”: A Glossary of Terms. Online Harassment
Google Scholar

Field Manual. https://onlineharassmentfieldmanual.pen.org/defining-online-harassmenta- glossary-of-terms/.
Google Scholar

Poetranto, I., S. Chan, and S. Anstis. (2020). ON/OFFLINE: Multidimensional threats faced by environmental human rights defenders in Southeast Asia. Global Information Society Watch 2020 – Technology, the Environment and a Sustainable World: Responses from the Global South, (eds.) A. Finlay, L. Nordstorm, 72-77. Association for Progressive Communications and Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency.
Google Scholar

Press Release UN Special Rapporteur on Environmental Defenders. 2022. UN Special Rapporteur on Environmental Defenders presents his vision for mandate to ensure protection under the Aarhus Convention. https://unece.org/climate-change/press/un-special-rapporteur- environmental-defenders-presents-his-vision-mandate.
Google Scholar

Romagna, Marco. 2020. Hacktivism: Conceptualization, techniques, and historical view.
Google Scholar

The Palgrave handbook of international cybercrime and cyberdeviance, 743-769. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-78440-3_34.
Google Scholar

Scheidel, Arnim, Daniela Del Bene, Juan Liu, Grettel Navas, Sara Mingorría, Federico Demaria,
Google Scholar

Sofía Avila, Brototi Roy, Irmak Ertör, Leah Temper, and Joan Martínez-Alier. 2020. Environmental conflicts and defenders: A global overview. Global Environmental Change, 63: 102104. DOI: 0.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102104.
Google Scholar

Siatisa, I. 2021. Freedom of assembly under attack: General and indiscriminate surveillance and interference with internet communications. International Review of the Red Cross. http:// international-review.icrc.org/articles/freedom-assembly-under-attack-surveillance-interference-internet-communications-913.
Google Scholar

Smith, K. 2019. The Harassment of Environmental Defenders in the European Union: a case study report. EEB, https://eeb.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/The-Harassment-of-Environmental-Defenders-in-the-European-Union-%E2%80%93-A-Case-Study-Report.pdf.
Google Scholar

Smith, Peter J., and Elizabeth Smythe. 1999. Globalization, citizenship and technology: The mai meets the internet. Canadian Foreign Policy Journal 7(2): 83-105. DOI: 10.1080/11926422.1999.9673213.
Google Scholar

Swedish Society for Nature Conservation. 2019. Environmental Report defenders under attack: The threats facing people who protect nature. Swedish Society for Nature Conservation, https://www.naturskyddsforeningen.se/artiklar/report-environmental-defenders-
Google Scholar

under-attack-the-threats-facing-people-who-protect-nature/.
Google Scholar

UN General Assembly. 2016. Situation of human rights defenders (A/71/281).
Google Scholar

UN Human Rights Council. 2018. Report of the Special Rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences on online violence against women and girls from a human rights perspective (A/HRC/38/47).
Google Scholar

UNECE. 2014. The Aarhus Convention: An implementation guide (Second edition).
Google Scholar

UNECE. 2019. Guide to the Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee, https://unece.org/
Google Scholar

info/Environment-Policy/Public-participation/pub/2291.
Google Scholar

UNECE. 2021. Decision VII/9 on a Rapid Response Mechanism to Deal with Cases Related to Article 3 (8) of the Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters’. UN Doc ECE/
Google Scholar

MP.PP/2021/CRP.8, https://unece.org/sites/default/files/2021-11/ECE.MP_.PP_.2021_ RRM_CRP.8_3.pdf
Google Scholar

van der Wilk, Adriane. 2018. Cyber violence and hate speech online against women. European Parliament’s Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality. DOI: 10.2861/738618.
Google Scholar

Verweijen, Judith, Fran Lambrick, Philippe Le Billon, Felipe Milanez, Ansumana Manneh and Melisa Moreano Venegas. 2021. “Environmental defenders”: The power/disempowerment of a loaded term. Environmental and Land Defenders: Deadly Struggles for Life and Territory, (eds.) Mary Menton and Philippe Le Billion, 37-49. Routledge.
Google Scholar

Vogels, E.A. 2021. The State of Online Harassment. Pew Research Center, https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2021/01/13/the-state-of-online-harassment/.
Google Scholar

Weber, Teresa. 2022. Are climate activists protected by the Aarhus Convention? A note on Article 3(8) Aarhus Convention and the new Rapid Response Mechanism for environmental defenders. Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law. DOI: 10.1111/reel.12465.
Google Scholar

Winkelman, Sloane Burke, Jody Oomen Early, Ashley D. Walker, Lawrence Chu, and Alice Yick-Flanagan. 2015. Exploring cyber harrassment among women who use social media. Universal Journal of Public Health 3(5): 194-201. DOI: 10.13189/ujph.2015.030504.
Google Scholar