90-letni Zygmunt Bauman: Schopferkraft i jego dwoistości

Tony Blackshaw



Abstract

Zygmunt Bauman turned 90 years of age in November 2015, as vital, productive, and intelligently alive as ever. After more than seventy books written over five decades, each one taking a single subject and finding doors to open in all directions, his work remains an essential reference point in sociology. Bauman continues to be one of most electrifying writers in sociology, among the sharpest and most supple thinkers of his generation. This explains why some commentators have described him as the most important living sociologist. Yet his work has also come in for some severe critique. After outlining what his detractors have had to say, the view developed in this article is that generally speaking this criticism says more about present culture in sociology than it does about the quality of the work as such. The way in which Bauman practices his craft may have the appearance of idiosyncrasy, yet nothing about it is unusual; it has had a previous life in sociology. Other important sociologists have played the same nonconformist game that Bauman plays – Marx, Simmel, Weber – but none in the contemporary period. It is explained that in common with other important nonconformists Bauman is a product of his own unusual biography. And like some of them he has also been able to take the advantage of an émigré’s double vision which has sharpened his personal awareness of the ambivalence of modernity. It is subsequently demonstrated that in Bauman’s hands sociology is compelled into a different cognitive mapping of what we ordinarily understand as reality, the one we all experience and take for granted. What we find in his work is the demand that sociology begin with a hermeneutic understanding of the contingency and ambivalence of life’s flux. It is argued thereafter that the metaphors Bauman uses to describe this modernity are messianic and ecological: they are saving a certain kind of sociology, an endangered species. The final part of the article challenges the tendency of Bauman’s critics to assume that the ultimate defence of sociology as an academic discipline lies in an authority beyond that of society – the authority of the objective is. It is argued that Bauman leaves no room for such an authority since his sociology is established between two ‘realities’ – hermeneutic sociology and sociological hermeneutics. As a result of a continuous reciprocal process between the two, he is able to ‘disclose that which exists’. And it is the sense of freedom emanating from this dialectic that he communicates in his work.

Keywords:

ambivalence, Bauman Effect, cultural politics, hermeneutic sociology and sociological, hermeneutics, imagination, knowledge, liquid modernity, metaphor, Schöpfung

Althusser L. (1971). Lenin and Philosophy and other Essays. London: Monthly Review Press.
  Google Scholar

Bauman Z. (1989). Hermeneutics and Modern Social Theory. [w:] Held D., Thompson J.B. (red.). Social Theory and Modern Societies: Anthony Giddens and His Critics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  Google Scholar

Bauman Z. (1992). Nowoczesność i Zagłada. Warszawa: Fundacja Masada.
  Google Scholar

Bauman Z. (1995). Wieloznaczność nowoczesna, nowoczesność wieloznaczna, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
  Google Scholar

Bauman Z. (1996). Socjologia. Poznań: Zysk i S-ka.
  Google Scholar

Bauman Z. (1998). Śmierć i nieśmiertelność. O wielości strategii życia. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
  Google Scholar

Bauman Z. (2000). Ponowoczesność jako źródło cierpień. Warszawa: Sic!
  Google Scholar

Bauman Z. (2006). Płynna nowoczesność. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Literackie.
  Google Scholar

Bauman Z. (2007). Tożsamość. Rozmowy z Benedetto Vecchim. Gdańsk: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.
  Google Scholar

Bauman Z. (2014). Rozmowy o socjologii. Zygmunt Bauman w rozmowie z Michaelem-Hviidem Jacobsenem i Keithem Testerem. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
  Google Scholar

Bech H. (1997). When Men Meet: Homosexuality and Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  Google Scholar

Beilharz P. (2001). Reading Zygmunt Bauman. [w:] Beilharz P. (red.). The Bauman Reader. Oxford: Blackwell.
  Google Scholar

Berger J. (2001) .Selected Essays: Edited by Geoff Dyer. London: Bloomsbury.
  Google Scholar

Best S. (2013). Zygmunt Bauman: Why Good People Do Bad Things. Aldershot: Ashgate.
  Google Scholar

Blackshaw T. (2002). Interview with Zygmunt Bauman. „Network: Newsletter of the British Sociological Association”.
  Google Scholar

Blackshaw T. (2005) Zygmunt Bauman. London: Routledge.
  Google Scholar

Blackshaw T. (2008). Zygmunt Bauman. [w:] R. Stones R. (red.) Key Sociological Thinkers. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  Google Scholar

Blackshaw T. (2010). Leisure. London: Routledge.
  Google Scholar

Davis M. (2008). Freedom and Consumerism: A Critique of Zygmunt Bauman’s Sociology. Aldershot: Ashgate.
  Google Scholar

Deleuze G., Guattari F. (1987). A Thousand Plateaus. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  Google Scholar

Elliott A. (red.) (2007). The Contemporary Bauman. London: Routledge.
  Google Scholar

Foucault M. (2007). Słowa i rzeczy – archeologia nauk humanistycznych. Gdańsk: „Słowo/Obraz/Terytoria".
  Google Scholar

Keats J. (1899). The Complete Poetical Works and Letters of John Keats. Cambridge Edition: Houghton, Mifflin and Company.
  Google Scholar

Kundera M. (1985). Nieznośna lekkość bytu. Warszawa: W.A.B.
  Google Scholar

McCarthy T. (2015). The Death of Writing. „Guardian Review”, 7 marca. Nisbet R. A. (1966). The Sociological Tradition. London: Heinemann.
  Google Scholar

Rattansi A. (2014). Zygmunt Bauman: An Adorno for ‘Liquid Modern’ Times? „The Sociological Review” 62, 908–917.
  Google Scholar

Nisbet R. A. (1966). The Sociological Tradition. London: Heinemann.
  Google Scholar

Ray L. (2007). From Postmodernity to Liquid Modernity: What’s in a Metaphor. [w:] Elliott A. (red.). The Contemporary Bauman. London: Routledge.
  Google Scholar

Rorty R. (2007). Philosophy as Cultural Politics: Philosophical Papers Volume 4. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  Google Scholar

Stevens W. (1997). The Shaper. [w:] Kermode F., Robinson J. (red.). Wallace Stevens: Collected Poetry and Prose. New York: Literary Classics of the United States, Inc.
  Google Scholar

Tester K. (2004). The Social Thought of Zygmunt Bauman. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  Google Scholar

Varcoe I. (2002). Zygmunt Bauman. [w:] Elliott A., Ray L. (red.). Key Contemporary Social Theorists. Oxford: Blackwell.
  Google Scholar


Published
2019-10-29

Cited by

Blackshaw, T. (2019). 90-letni Zygmunt Bauman: Schopferkraft i jego dwoistości. Studia Krytyczne/Critical Studies, (2), 21–41. https://doi.org/10.25167/sk.1388

Authors

Tony Blackshaw 

Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.