Wazektomia. Krytyczne studium popularności tego zjawiska pośród Brytyjczyków

Anna Odrowąż-Coates

doi:10.25167/sk.1374

Published: 2019-10-28

No. 1 (2015)

Wazektomia. Krytyczne studium popularności tego zjawiska pośród Brytyjczyków

Anna Odrowąż-Coates

Studia Krytyczne/Critical Studies

Section: Varia

https://doi.org/10.25167/sk.1374

Abstract

This paper reflects on the popularity of vasectomy surgery in the world in general and particularly in the UK. Cultural, moral, legal and medical aspects are discussed and differences of opinions on birth control, demographic policies, and opportunities for self-determination are analyzed. The article also concerns the stereotypes associated with fertility, masculinity and gender. The economic and health advantages along with costs are balanced against each other. The author looks at reasons for the popularity of this method of contraception. In the context of increasing moral freedom, one can ask questions: whether the choice of vasectomy demonstrates the attitude of modern man to increasing sexual freedom and uncontrollable Freudian instincts? Or, is it a rational, carefully thought through decision, in the interests of health and freedom of choice for women?

Download files

PDF (Język Polski)

Citation rules

Odrowąż-Coates, A. (2019). Wazektomia. Krytyczne studium popularności tego zjawiska pośród Brytyjczyków. Studia Krytyczne/Critical Studies, (1), 146–162. https://doi.org/10.25167/sk.1374

Cited by / Share

References

Aronson E. (2012). Człowiek – istota społeczna. Warszawa: PWN. Awsare N.S, Krishnan J., Boustead G.B. et al. (2005). Complications of vasectomy. “Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England”, 87(6), 406-410.
Google Scholar

Bauman Z. (2008). Płynny lęk. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Literackie.
Google Scholar

Bertero E., Hallak J., Gromatzky C., Lucon A. M., Arap S. (2005). Assessment of sexual function in patients undergoing vasectomy using the international index of erectile function. “International Brazilian Journal of Urology”, 31(5), 452-458.
Google Scholar

Catechism of the Catholic Church (?), http://www.scborromeo.org/ccc/p3s2c2a6.htm#2399 [17.03.2013].
Google Scholar

Damrosz J. (red.) (1998). Kultura polska w nowej sytuacji historycznej. Warszawa: Instytut Kultury.
Google Scholar

de Rougemont D. (1999). Miłość a świat kultury zachodniej. Warszawa: Instytut Wydawniczy PAX.
Google Scholar

De Stefano C. (2010). Niepokorne kobiety które zmieniły świat. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Literackie.
Google Scholar

Eisenberg M.L., Lipshutz L.I. (2010). Estimating the number of vasectomies performed annually in the United States: data from the National Survey of Family Growth. „Urology” 184(5), 2068-2072.
Google Scholar

Foucault M. (1980). Power/Knowledge. Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977. New York: Pantheon Books.
Google Scholar

Furmaga L. (2000). Gwałt. Gdańsk: Tower Press.
Google Scholar

Glendon M. A. (1998). Spojrzenie na nowy feminizm. „Więź” 1.
Google Scholar

Haldar N., Cranston D., Turner E., MacKenzie I., Guillebaud J. (2000). How reliable is a vasectomy? Long-term follow-up of vasectomised men. „Lancet” 356, 43-44.
Google Scholar

Hosseini H., Abdi F. (2012). Experiences of Vasectomy: A Phenomenological Study. „North American Journal of Medical Sciences” 4(12), 619-623.
Google Scholar

Ibrahim A. (2014). Islam and birth control, http://islamiclearningmaterials.com/islam-birthcontrol [17.03.2013].
Google Scholar

Jakubowski M. (?). Z prawnego punktu widzenia, http://www.swiat-zdrowia.pl/artykul/zprawnego-punktu-widzenia [17.03.2013].
Google Scholar

Katechizm Kościoła Katolickiego (1994). Poznań: Pallottinum.
Google Scholar

Kymlicka W. (1998). Współczesna filozofia polityczna. Kraków: Znak.
Google Scholar

Łoś M. (1993). Czy feminizm wyzwolił kobiety Ameryki Północnej?. „Więź” 1.
Google Scholar

MacFarquhar N. (1996). With Iran population boom, vasectomy receives blessing. „New York Times”, http://www.nytimes.com/1996/09/08/world/with-iran-populationboom-vasectomy-receives-blessing.html [17.03.2013].
Google Scholar

Melosik Z. (2010). Tożsamość, ciało i władza w kulturze instant. Kraków: Impuls.
Google Scholar

Moszynski P. (2009). Rwanda denies plan to forcibly sterilise people with learning difficulties. „British Medical Journal” 339(6), b2712.
Google Scholar

NSPCC (2012). Child protection registers statistics – Number of children on child protection registers or subject to a child protection plan at 31 March 2012.
Google Scholar

Odrowąż-Coates A. (2008). Sytuacja kobiety aktywnej zawodowo w Polsce i we Włoszech. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek.
Google Scholar

Philliber S. G., Philliber W. W. (1985). Social and Psychological Perspectives on Voluntary Sterilization: A Review. „Studies in Family Planning, Population Council” 16(1), 129.
Google Scholar

Prado Y., Weisfeld C., Hill E., Slatcher R. B. (2013). Machismo and Marital Satisfaction in Mexican American Couples. „Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology” 44(2), 299-315.
Google Scholar

Przecławska A. (1996). Pedagogika społeczna – Kręgi poszukiwań. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Żak.
Google Scholar

Radlińska H. (1961). Pedagogika społeczna. Wrocław: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich.
Google Scholar

Riesman D. (1996). Samotny tłum. Warszawa: Warszawskie Wydawnictwo Literackie „Muza”.
Google Scholar

Rosaldo M. Z. (1974). Women, culture and society: a theoretical overview [w:] Rosaldo M. Z., Lamphere L. Women Culture and Society. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.
Google Scholar

Rowlands S., Hannaford P. (2003). The incidence of sterilisation in the UK. „BJOG British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology: An International Journal” 110(9), 819-824.
Google Scholar

Samples S. (1996). African Germans in the Third Reich [w:] Blackshire-Belay C. A. The African German Experience. Westport and London: Praeger Publishers.
Google Scholar

Sterilised Roma woman wins human rights appeal (2011), http://www.humanrightseurope.org/2011/11/sterilised-roma-woman-wins-humanrights-appeal/ [17.03.2013].
Google Scholar

Stoyanova G. (2013). Forced sterilization of Romani women – a persistent human rights violation, http://romediafoundation.wordpress.com/2013/02/07/forced-sterilization-ofromani-women-a-persisting-human-rights-violation/ [17.03.2013].
Google Scholar

Terry G., Braun V. (2011). I’m committed to her and the family: positive accounts of vasectomy among New Zealand men. „Journal of Reproductive & Infant Psychology” 29(3), 276-291.
Google Scholar

Tinder G. (1995). Myślenie polityczne, odwieczne pytania. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Google Scholar

Vasectomies don't always prevent pregnancy (2007), http://www.webmd.com/sex/birthcontrol/news/20040505/vasectomies-pregnancy-prevention [17.03.2013].
Google Scholar

Weiske W. H. (2001). Vasectomy. „Andrologia” 33, 125-134.
Google Scholar

Wright M.R. (1972). Psychological Aspects of Vasectomy Counseling. „The Family Coordinator, National Council of Family Relations” 21(3), 159-265.
Google Scholar