Konsolidacja struktur administracyjnych obszarów metropolitalnych a efektywność – doświadczenia anglosaski

Marian Kachniarz

Published: 2020-10-21

Vol. 4 (2011)

Consolidation of the administrative structures in metropolitan areas versus efficiency – anglo-saxon experience

Marian Kachniarz

Abstract

One of the effects of metropolization is the urban area expansion on adjacent to the core of administrative units. This makes it necessary to build mechanisms for coordinating the performance of public services throughout the metropolitan assembly. Often posed a postulate in such cases is the consolidation of administrative structures which consists of the incorporation of units adjacent to the core. Supporters of such measures are based on the conviction that such a centralization of management will be conducive to the efficiency of public services (including administration). Conviction is based on the so-called economies of scale and economies of scope. An article in the analysis of processes of consolidation which was made in England, Canada, the United States, Australia and New Zealand, does not confirm these convictions. In many cases, such actions have led to a decline in efficiency and thus the main factor incentive to change.

Keywords:

metropolisation, local government, economies of scale, efficiency

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Marian Kachniarz, Institutional forms of cooperation between self-government units In agglomeration areas , Studia Miejskie: Vol. 8 (2012)

Download files

pdf (Język Polski)

Citation rules

Kachniarz, M. (2020). Consolidation of the administrative structures in metropolitan areas versus efficiency – anglo-saxon experience. Studia Miejskie, 4, 217–224. Retrieved from https://czasopisma.uni.opole.pl/index.php/sm/article/view/2292

Cited by / Share

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

Bish R., 2001, Local government amalgamations: Discredited nineteenth-century ideals alive in the twentyfirst, „The Urban Papers” C. D. Howe Institute, Toronto.
Google Scholar

Boyne G.A. 1995, Population size and economies of scale in local government, „Policy and Politics” vol. 23, nr 3.
Google Scholar

Boyne G.A., 2007, Local government structure and performance: Lessons from America?,„Public Administration” vol. 20, Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Google Scholar

Byrnes J., Dollery B., 2002, Do economies of scale exist in Australian local government? A review of the empirical evidence, „Working Paper Series in Economics” nr 2, University of New England.
Google Scholar

Dahl R., Dahl A., Tufte E.R., 1973, Size and Democracy, Stanford University Press, Stanford.
Google Scholar

Dollery B., Crase L., 2004, Is bigger local government better? An evaluation of the economic case for Australian municipal amalgamation programs, „Working Paper Series in Economics” nr 4, University of New England.
Google Scholar

Dollery B., Keogh C., Crase L., 2005, Alternatives to amalgamation in Australian local government: Lessons from the New Zealand experience, „Working Paper Series in Economics” nr 15, University of New England.
Google Scholar

Hall L. Jeremy, 2007, Assessing the effects of size and structural variation in substate regional economic development districts, Southern Political Science Association, New Orleans.
Google Scholar

Houlberg K., 2008, Municipal size, economy and democracy, consolidation or fragmentation? Lessons learned from teritorial consolidation reforms – the European experience, UW, Warsaw.
Google Scholar

Improving the efficiency and effectiveness of local government. Australian Government Report of Structural Reform, 2008, Cannberra.
Google Scholar

Keenan B., 2008, Efficiency, accountability and sustainability of Auckland’s local government, Royal Commission, Auckland.
Google Scholar

Local government structure and efficiency. A report prepared for local government New Zealand, 2006, McKinlay Douglas Limited, Wellington.
Google Scholar

Markowski T., Marszał T., 2005, Metropolie, obszary metropolitalne, metropolizacja. Problemy i pojęcia podstawowe, KPZK PAN, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Mizutani F., Tanaka T., 2007, Estimation of optimal city size, ESPA, Liverpool.
Google Scholar

Newton K., 1982, Is small really so beautiful? Is big really so ugly? Size, effectiveness and democracy in local government, „Political Studies” nr 30.
Google Scholar

Sancton A., 2000, Merger mania, McGill-Queens University Press, Montreal.
Google Scholar