Historyczność i “ponadhistoryczność” krzyża i zmartwychwstania w refleksji ks. Jerzego Klingera: od Maksyma Wyznawcy do Rudolfa Bultmanna i z powrotem

Bogna Kosmulska

doi:10.25167/so.5733

The Historicity and “Transhistoricity” of the Cross and Resurrection in the Reflections of Fr. Jerzy Klinger: from Maximus the Confessor to Rudolf Bultmann and Back Again

Bogna Kosmulska

Uniwersytet Warszawski, Wydział Filozofii

DOI: https://doi.org/10.25167/so.5733

Abstract

The aim of the paper is, first of all, to recall the inspiring work Doktryna krzyża i zmartwychwstania według Rudolfa Bultmanna w konfrontacji z teologią Kościoła prawosławnego (The Doctrine of the Cross and Resurrection according to Rudolf Bultmann in Confrontation with the Theology of the Orthodox Church) by Fr. Jerzy Klinger and to analyze the way in which this outstanding Polish Orthodox theologian made one of his non-obvious revelations of the "essence of Orthodoxy". Bultmann, a famous German Lutheran theologian, under Klinger’s pen, turns out to intuitively understand something that was perhaps not emphasized enough in the Orthodox tradition, even though it was constantly present in it. This thing, according to father Jerzy, is the existential perspective of faith as primarily an individual experience, at least to some extent independent of the historically accepted image of the world (including its metaphysical description). Apart from this reconstruction, this paper supplements these considerations with inspirations from reading of Maximus the Confessor in the approach of Dumitru Stăniloae, a Romanian theologian, congenial to Klinger. The comparison of the two models of soteriology – existential (as in Bultmann) and cosmic (as in Maximus) – allows for a critical assessment of Bultmann's and, to some extent, also Klinger's position.

Keywords:

Jerzy Klinger, Rudolf Bultmann, Maximus the Confessor, Dumitru Stăniloae, soteriology

References

Balthasar Hans U. von. 1947. Liturgie cosmique. Maxime le Confesseur. Paris: Aubier.
Google Scholar

Berger Calinic. 2013. A Contemporary Synthesis of St Maximus’ Theology. W Knowing the Purpose of Creation trough the Resurrection. Proceedings of the Symposium on St Maximus the Confessor. Belgrade, October 18–21, 2012. Ed. Maxim Vasiljevic, 389–405. Alhambra, CA: Sebastian Press & The Faculty of Orthodox Theology – University of Belgrade.
Google Scholar

Bielawski Maciej. 1997. The Philocalical Vision of the World in the Theology of Dumitru Stăniloae. Bydgoszcz: Wydawnictwo HOMINI.
Google Scholar

Blowers Paul M. 1997. „Realized Eschatology in Maximus the Confessor, Ad Thalassium 22”. Studia Patristica 32: 258–263.
Google Scholar

Bultmann Rudolf. 2015. W kwestii demitologizacji. Odpowiedź skierowana do Karla Jaspersa. W Karl Jaspers, Rudolf Bultmann. Problem demitologizacji. Tłum. Dawid Kolasa, Tomasz Kupś, Maciej Pawlicki. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UMK, 91–110.
Google Scholar

Klinger Jerzy. 2023. Dzieła zebrane. T. 1: Geneza sporu o epiklezę. T. 2: O istocie prawosławia. T. 3: Varia. T. 4: Poezje. Red. Henryk Paprocki, Witali Michalczuk. Kraków: Tyniec. Wydawnictwo Benedyktynów 2023.
Google Scholar

Klinger Jerzy. 1983. O istocie prawosławia. Wybór pism. Warszawa: Instytut Wydawniczy „PAX”.
Google Scholar

Klinger Michał. 2023. Kalendarium życia ks. Jerzego Klingera. W Jerzy Klinger. 2023. Dzieła zebrane. T. 1: Geneza sporu o epiklezę. Red. Henryk Paprocki, 5–17. Kraków: Tyniec. Wydawnictwo Benedyktynów 2023.
Google Scholar

Kłoczowski Jan A. 1994. Więcej niż mit. Leszka Kołakowskiego spory o religię. Kraków: Znak.
Google Scholar

[Maksym Wyznawca]. 1980. Maximi Confessoris Quaestiones ad Thalassium. I Quaestiones I–LV una cum latine interpretation Ioannis Scotti Eriugenae iuxta posita. Wyd. Carlos Laga, Carlos Steel. CCSG 7. Turnhout-Leuven: Brepols.
Google Scholar

[Maksym Wyznawca]. 1988. Ambigua ad Iohannem iuxta Iohannis Scotti Eriugenae latinam interpretatione. Wyd. Eduard Jeauneau. CCSG 18. Turnhout-Leuven: Brepols.
Google Scholar

[Maksym Wyznawca]. 2011. Mystagogia una cum latina interpretation Anastasii Bibliothecarii. Wyd. Charles Boudignon. CCSG 69. Turnhout: Brepols.
Google Scholar

Nesteruk Alexei V. 2013. The Cosmos of the World and the Cosmos of the Church: Saint Maximus the Confessor, Modern Cosmology, and the Sense of the Universe. W Knowing the Purpose of Creation trough the Resurrection. Proceedings of the Symposium on St Maximus the Confessor. Belgrade, October 1821, 2012. Ed. Maxim Vasiljevic, 297–333. Alhambra, CA: Sebastian Press & The Faculty of Orthodox Theology – University of Belgrade.
Google Scholar

Plested Marcus. 2004. The Macarian Legacy. The Place of Macarius-Symeon in the Eastern Christian Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0199267790.001.0001 Google Scholar

Stăniloae Dumitru. 1999. Teologia krzyża. Tłum. Marianna Cielecka. W Maciej Bielawski. Teologia rumuńska w pięciu odsłonach. Bydgoszcz: Wydawnictwo HOMINI, 79–98.
Google Scholar

Download

pdf (Język Polski)

Published

2024-12-28

Cited by

Kosmulska, B. (2024). The Historicity and “Transhistoricity” of the Cross and Resurrection in the Reflections of Fr. Jerzy Klinger: from Maximus the Confessor to Rudolf Bultmann and Back Again. Studia Oecumenica, 24, 33–45. https://doi.org/10.25167/so.5733