Experiencing parenthood in early adulthood
Fenomenographic reconstruction in educational research
Ewa Małgorzata Przybylska
Szkoła Główna Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego w WarszawieDanuta Wajsprych
Wyższa Szkoła Bankowa w GdańskuAbstract
This article attempts to present ways of experiencing parenthood among 17 young adults who have become mothers/fathers. The study was carried out using the phenomenographic method, which sought to describe how the young parents gave meanings to the phenomenon of parenthood; what it meant for them to be a parent. Based on the approach designed by the creators of the phenomenographic research method, we made the epistemological assumption that there is no other world besides the one that an individual experiences. A family was recognised as a special place for learning and experiencing the world, which appears to young adults as a concept of parenthood in their consciousness. The detailed categories of description, revealing concepts of experiencing parenthood, proved to be discursive and strongly context-related. There was considerable ambivalence in the findings, indicating that parenthood fluctuates between polar interpretations of experience and significantly goes beyond an educational context of upbringing. The circumstances accompanying experiencing of parenthood are strongly connected with cultural messages conveyed to groups and individuals by various lifeworld agencies: our interviewees proved to be completely embedded in them. Our findings support the hypothesis that the problem of educational practice connected with experiencing parenthood places it in the world of contemporary culture, which is torn apart by ambiguity and chaos of changing offers, as well as complexity-saturated “reversible” culture, the contents of which are subject to constant reconstruction. This provides essential reasons for developing a theory of lifelong learning in the family.
Schlagworte:
Family, ambivalence, ambiguity of cultural message, life cycle, early adulthoodLiteraturhinweise
Barnacle R., 2005. Interpreting Interpretation: A phenomenological perspective on phenomenography, in: J.A. Bowden, P. Green (eds.), Doing developmental phenomenography, Melbourne, 47–55.
Google Scholar
Barnard A., McCosker H., Gerber R., 1999. Phenomenography: A qualitative research approach for exploring understanding in health care, Qualitative Health Research, 2, 212– 226.
Google Scholar
Beavers R., Hampson R.B., 2008. The Beavers Systems Model of Family Functioning, Journal of Family Therapy, 2, 128–143.
Google Scholar
Broderick C.B., 1993. Understanding Family Process: Basics of Family Systems Theory, Newbury Park.
Google Scholar
Bruce C., 1994. Reflections on the experience of the phenomenographic interview, in: R. Ballantyne, C. Bruce (eds.), Phenomenography: Philosophy and Practice Conference, Brisbane, Australia, 47–56.
Google Scholar
Duvall E.M., 1977. Marriage and family development, Philadelphia.
Google Scholar
Erikson E.H., 1959. Identity and the Life Cycle, New York.
Google Scholar
Głażewski M., 2010. Dystopia: pedagogiczne konteksty systemów autopojetycznych Niklasa Luhmanna [Dystopia: Educational Contexts of Niklas Luhmann’s Autopoietic Systems], Zielona Góra.
Google Scholar
Haley J., 1993. Uncommon Therapy. The Psychiatric Techniques of Milton H. Erickson, M.D., Oxford.
Google Scholar
Koczanowicz L., 2003. Praktyka, polityka i życie codzienne [Practice, Politics and Everyday Life], Teraźniejszość – Człowiek – Edukacja, special issue, 53–67.
Google Scholar
Kossobucka A., Fenomenografia jako metoda diagnozy genetycznej [Phenomenography as a Method of Genetic Diagnosis], in: B. Niemierko, M.K. Szmigel (eds.), Polska edukacja w świetle diagnoz prowadzonych z różnych perspektyw badawczych [Polish Education in the Light of Diagnoses Carried out from Various Perspectives], Kraków 2013, 405–413.
Google Scholar
Kvale S., 1983. The qualitative research interview – a phenomenolgical and hermeneutical mode of understanding, Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 14, 171–196.
Google Scholar
Luhmann N., 1987. Soziale Systeme. Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie, Frankfurt am Main.
Google Scholar
Marody M., Giza-Poleszczuk A., 2004. Przemiany więzi społecznych. Zarys teorii zmiany społecznej [Transformations of Social Ties. The Basic Theory of Social Change], Warsaw.
Google Scholar
Marton F., 1981. Phenomenography – describing conceptions of the world around us, Instructional Science, 10, 177–200.
Google Scholar
Marton F., 1986. Phenomenography – A research approach to investigating different understandings of reality, Journal of Thought, 21, 28–49.
Google Scholar
Marton F., 1994. On the structure of awareness, in: J.A. Bowden, E. Walsh, (eds.), Phenomenographic Research: Variations in Methods, Melbourne, 89–100.
Google Scholar
Marton F., Asplund-Carlsson M., Halász L., 1992. Differences in understanding and the use of reflective learning in reading, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 62, 1– 16.
Google Scholar
McCubbin M.A., McCubbin H.I., 1996. Resiliency in families: A conceptual model of family adjustment and adaptation in response to stress and crises, in: H.I. McCubbin, A.I. Thompson, M.A. McCubbin (eds.), Family assessment: Resiliency, coping and adaptation – Inventories for research and practice, Madison, 1–64.
Google Scholar
Męczkowska A., 2002. Od świadomości nauczyciela do konstrukcji świata społecznego. Nauczycielskie koncepcje wymagań dydaktycznych a problem rekonstrukcyjnej kompetencji ucznia [From the Teacher’s Awareness to the Construction of the Social World: Teacher Concepts of Educational Requirements and the Problem of Reconstructive Competence of the Student], Kraków.
Google Scholar
Mengel M., 2017. Familienbildung, Die Zeitschrift für Erwachsenenbildung, 1, 18–19.
Google Scholar
Milerski B., Karwowski M., 2016. Racjonalność procesu kształcenia. Teoria i badania, [Rationality of the Education Process: Theory and Research], Kraków.
Google Scholar
Miller I.W., Ryan C.E., Keitner G.I., Bishop D.S., Epstein N.B., 2008. The McMaster Approach to families: theory, assessment, treatment and research, Journal of Family Therapy, 22, 168–189.
Google Scholar
Moles A., 1986. Théorie structural de la communication et société [Structural theory of communication and society], Paris.
Google Scholar
Nuissl E., 2016. Keine lange Weile. Texte zur Erwachsenenbildung aus fünf Jahrzehnten, Bielefeld.
Google Scholar
Olson D., 2011. FACES IV and the Circumplex Model: validation study, Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 1, 64–80.
Google Scholar
Parsons T., 1951. The Social System, New York.
Google Scholar
Plopa M., 2008. Psychologia rodziny. Teoria i badania [Family Psychology. Theory and Research], Kraków.
Google Scholar
Skelton J.A., Buehler C., Irby M.B., Grzywacz J.G., 2012. Where are family theories in family – based obesity treatment? Conceptualizing the study of families in pediatric weight management, International Journal of Obesity, 36, 891–900.
Google Scholar
Szlendak T., 2010. Socjologia rodziny. Ewolucja, historia, zróżnicowanie [Family Sociology: Evolution, History, Diversity], Warszawa.
Google Scholar
Trigwell K., 2000. A phenomenographic interview on phenomenography, in: J.A Bowden, E. Walsh (eds.), Phenomenography, Melbourne, 62–82.
Google Scholar
Turner J.H., 1970. Family interaction, New York.
Google Scholar
Turner J.H., 2003. The Structure of Sociological Theory, New York.
Google Scholar
Viladrich G.B., Phenomenography: A qualitative Research Approach for Exploring Understanding in Education, in: J.A. Bowden, P. Green (eds.), Doing developmental phenomenography, Melbourne 2005, 63–73.
Google Scholar
Wiatr M., 2013. Rodzina jako środowisko uczące się [Family as a Learning Environment], Pedagogika Społeczna, 2, 7–21.
Google Scholar
Yates C., Partridge H.L., Bruce C.S., 2012. Exploring information experiences through phenomenography, Library and Information Research, 112, 96–119.
Google Scholar
