The substantive right to environment and the procedural environmental rights under the Aarhus Convention – Part II
Jerzy Jendrośka
Uniwersytet OpolskiAbstract
The current article provides Part II of the study presenting the mutual relations between substantive and procedural environmental rights against the background of the typology of the substantive rights to the environment and challenges encountered when designing the right to a healthy environment. While Part I was devoted to presenting the development of the respective legal provisions regarding substantive rights, including both
human rights and rights of nature, the current Part II follows it by presenting the genesis and conceptual roots for the UneCe aarhus Convention as an attempt to codify environmental procedural rights and foster participatory democracy in environmental matters. In this context a more detailed account is provided regarding the process of including a reference to a substantive right to environment in the aarhus Convention and the final design of article 1 addressing this issue. This is complemented with a brief overview of the scope and structure of the Convention and its links with Principle 10 of the rio declaration as well as with some comments regarding the design of the Convention which is commonly considered to employ a “rights based approach”. The above analysis provides the basis for the remarks regarding the respective roles of the three types of legal schemes of access to justice as regulated by paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 of article 9 of the aarhus Convention in protecting environmental rights covered by the Convention and – more generally – in participatory democracy. In this respect the conclusions of the study runs counter many of the conventional views.
First of all it shows that access to justice provisions under article 9.1 cover only access to information rights under article 4, while possibility to enforce provisions of article 5
(commonly considered as also providing rights to the public) is not very clear under the Convention. Secondly, access to justice provisions under article 9.2 only in case of environmental organizations can be treated as a remedy regarding participation rights, while in case of natural persons it may be treated only as a remedy regarding their subjective rights to a “private” environment while their possibility to enforce provisions of article 6 (providing procedural participation rights to the public) is not very clear under the Convention. Thirdly, article 9.3 cannot be treated as a remedy in relation to a substantive right to
a healthy environment referred to in article 1 of the Convention, and its role as a remedy regarding other procedural rights granted by the Convention is far from being clear as the Convention provides in this case quite a wide discretion to the Parties in establishing the
criteria for standing. Finally, the results of the study underlines the need for interpreting article 9.3 in light of the various conceptual roots of the Convention i.e. not only in relation to environmental rights but also in relation to its role in assuring the effectiveness of environmental protection and fostering participatory democracy and the rule of law.
Keywords:
right to environment, Aarhus Convention, procedural environmental rightsReferences
Aarhus Implementation Guide 2014 – ebbesson, Jonas, Helmut Gaugitsch, Jerzy Jendrośka, Stephen Stec, and Fiona Marshall. 2014. The aarhus Convention. an Implementation Guide, second edition, United nations.
Google Scholar
CeP report 1996 – The report of the special session 17 January 1996 ece/cep/18, an-
Google Scholar
nex I.
Google Scholar
Commission notice on access to Justice in environmental Matters, C(2017) 2616 final, para 107.
Google Scholar
Council decision of 17 February 2005 on the conclusion, on behalf of the european Community, of the Convention on access to information, public participation in decisionmaking and access to justice in environmental matters (2005/370/eC) official Journal
Google Scholar
of the european Union of 17.5.2005 L 124/1.
Google Scholar
Draft elements for the convention on access to environmental information and public participation in environmental decision-making (cep/ac.3/r.1) http://www.unece.org/env/pp/adwg.html.
Google Scholar
eCS rights Fact Sheet – office of the United nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
Google Scholar
European Governance. a White Paper, european Commission, CoM (2001) 428 final, 25.7.2001.
Google Scholar
Frequently asked Questions on economic, Social and Cultural rights, Fact Sheet no. 33
Google Scholar
Guide to aCCC 2019 - Guide to the aarhus Convention Compliance Committee, Second edition, May 2019 https://unece.org/daM/env/pp/Publications/Guide_to_the_Compliance_Committee__second_edition__2019_/english/Guide_to_the_aarhus_Conven-
Google Scholar
tion_Compliance_Committee__2019.pdf
Google Scholar
Reports of the aarhus Convention negotiating sessions https://unece.org/environment-policy/public-participation/aarhus-convention/reports-negotiations-convention
Google Scholar
Report of the first session CeP/aC.3/r.1 (11 april 1996).
Google Scholar
Report of the second session CeP/aC.3/4 (11 november 1996).
Google Scholar
Report of the second session CeP/aC.3/16 (17 december 1997).
Google Scholar
Opinion of advocate General (AG) in Stichting Varkens in nood and others (C-826/18).
Google Scholar
eCtHr judgment of in Case Verein klimaSeniorinnen Schweiz and others vs Switzerland
Google Scholar
CJeU Judgement of 14.1.2021 – case C-826/18 Stichting Varkens in nood and others 5 para 51.
Google Scholar
Findings of aCCC in Case aCCC/C/2005/11, Belgium, eCe/MP.PP/C.1/2006/4/add.2.
Google Scholar
Bandi, Guyla. 2014. right to environment – Procedural Guarantees. In: Environmental Democracy and Law, (ed.) Guyla Bandi, 79-94. Groningen: europa Law Publishing.
Google Scholar
Barrit, emily. 2020. The Foundations of the Aarhus Convention. Environmental Democracy, Rights and Stewardship, oxford: Hart Publishing.
Google Scholar
Betaille, Julien. 2009. The direct effect of the aarhus Convention as seen by the French ‘Conseild’etat’. Environmental Law Network International Review 2: 63-73 https://www. elni.org/fileadmin/elni/dokumente/archiv/2009/Heft_2/elni_review_2009-2_Betaille.pdf.
Google Scholar
Boyd, david. 2020. Introductory presentation. In: High-level Conference on Environmental Protection and Human Rights, Council of europe, 27 II 2020: 17-21.
Google Scholar
Boyle, allan. 2006. Human rights or environmental rights? a reassessment. Fordham Environmental Law Review 18(3): 470-511.
Google Scholar
Boyle, allan. 2012. Human rights and the environment: Where next? The European Journal of International Law 23 (3): 613–642.
Google Scholar
Boyle, allan. 2015. Human rights and the environment: Where next? In: Environmental Law Dimensions of Human Rights, (ed.) Ben Boer, 201-239. oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Brady, kathy. 1998. new Convention on access to Information and Public Participation in environmental Matters. Environmental Policy and Law 28(2): 69-75.
Google Scholar
Braig katharina and nadezhda kutepova. 2022. Playing Second Fiddle to the aarhus Convention: Why the eCtHr Can and Should Go Further. Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law 19(1-2): 74-102. doI:10.1163/18760104-19010006.
Google Scholar
Brakeland, Jean Francoise. 2014. access to justice in environmental matters – developments at eU level. Gyoseiho-kenkyu 5: 1-24 http://greenaccess.law.osaka-u.ac.jp/wpcontent/ uploads/2013/04/10pjp_brakeland.pdf
Google Scholar
De Sadeleer nicolas, Gerhard roller and Miriam dross. 2005. Access to justice in environmental matters and the role of ngos; empirical findings and legal appraisal. Groningen: Europa Law Publishing.
Google Scholar
Ebbesson, Jonas. 2002. Comparative Introduction. In: Access to Justice in Environmental Matters in the EU, (ed.) Jonas ebbesson, 1-47, kluwer Law International
Google Scholar
Ebbesson, Jonas, 2022. Getting it right: advances in Human rights and the environment from Stockholm 1972 to Stockholm 2022. Environmental Policy and Law 52 (2): 79-92
Google Scholar
Eckes Christina and Tessa Trapp. 2024. The aarhus Convention’s relevance for Climate Litigation Through the Lens of klimaSeniorinnen. European Law Blog, https://www.europeanlawblog.eu/pub/xx9vrteu/release/1
Google Scholar
Hallo, ralph (ed.). 1996. Access to environmental information in Europe, Kluwer Law International.
Google Scholar
Haas, Peter, Marc a. Levy and edward a. Parson. 1992. appraising the earth Summit: How Should We Judge UnCed’s Success?. Environment 34(8): 6-33.
Google Scholar
Hayward, Tim. 2005. Constitutional Environmental Rights, oxford: oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Jendrośka, Jerzy. 2005a. aarhus Convention and Community Law: the Interplay. Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law 2(1): 12-21.
Google Scholar
Jendrośka, Jerzy. 2005b. Public Information and Participation in eC environmental Law; origins, Milestones and Trends. In Reflections on 30 Years of EU Environmental Law; A High Level of Protection?, (ed.) Richard Macrory, 63-84. Groningen: Europa Law Publishing.
Google Scholar
Jendrośka, Jerzy. 2011a. Public Participation in environmental decision-Making. Interactions Between the Convention and eU Law and other key Legal Issues in its Implementation in the Light of the opinions of the aarhus convention Compliance Committee. In: The
Google Scholar
Aarhus convention at Ten. Interactions and Tensions between Conventional International Law and EU Environmental Law, (ed.) Marc Pallemaerts, 91-147. Groningen: Europa Law Publishing.
Google Scholar
Jendrośka, Jerzy. 2011b. aarhus Convention Compliance Committee: origins, Status and activities. Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law 8(4): 301-314.
Google Scholar
Jendrośka, Jerzy. 2012. Citizen’s rights in european environmental Law: Stock-Taking of key Challenges and Current developments in relation to Public access to Information, Participation and access to Justice. Journal for European Environmental & Planning
Google Scholar
Law 9(1): 71-90.
Google Scholar
Jendrośka, Jerzy. 2020a. access to Justice in the aarhus Convention – Genesis, Legislative History and overview of the Main Interpretation dilemmas. Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law 17(4): 372-408.
Google Scholar
Jendrośka, Jerzy. 2020b. el acuerdo de escazú a la luz de la experiencia del Convenio de aarhus. In: Acuerdo de Escazú, Hacia la democracia ambiental en América Latina y el Caribe, (eds) Michel Prieur, Gonzalo Sozzo and andrés nápoli, 71-83. ediciones
Google Scholar
UnL.
Google Scholar
Jendrośka, Jerzy. 2021. Procedural environmental rights: some observations on the escazu agreement as compared with the aarhus Convention. In: Grensoverstijgende rechts-beoefening. Liber amicorum Jan Jans, (ed.) kars de Graaf, 345-353. Uitgeverij Paris.
Google Scholar
Jendrośka, Jerzy and alina anapianova. 2023. Towards a Green energy Transition: rePowereU directive vs environmental acquis. Environmental Law Network International Review 23: 1-5. doI: 10.46850/elni.2023.001.
Google Scholar
Jendrośka, Jerzy, Moritz reese and Lorenzo Squintani. 2021. Towards a new legal framework for sustainability under the european Green deal. The Opole Studies in Administration and Law 19(2): 87-116.
Google Scholar
Jendrośka, Jerzy and Stephen Stec. 2001. The aarhus Convention: Towards a new era in environmental democracy. Environmental Liability 9(3): 140-151.
Google Scholar
Kiss, alexandre and dinah Shelton. 2007. International Environmental Law, 2nd ed. New York: 69-70.
Google Scholar
Lambert, elisabeth. 2020. The Environment and Human Rights. Introductory Report to the High-Level Conference Environmental Protection and Human Rights, Strasbourg, 27 February, available at https://rm.coe.int/report-e-lambert-en/16809c827f.
Google Scholar
Lavrysen, Luc. 2010. The aarhus Convention: Between environmental Protection and Human rights. In : Liege, Strasbourg, Bruxelles: Parcours Des Droits de l’homme, (ed.) Paul Martens, 647-671. anthemis.
Google Scholar
Majtenyi, Balazs. 2008. a right without a subject? Fundamentum 5: 22-35.
Google Scholar
Mason, Michael. 2010. Information disclosure and environmental rights: The aarhus Convention. Global Environmental Politics 10(3): 10-28.
Google Scholar
Mullerova, Hanna et al. 2013. Public Participation in Environmental Decision-Making: Implementation of the Aarhus Convention, Praha.
Google Scholar
Pallemaerts, Marc. 2011. Introduction. In: The Aarhus convention at Ten: Interactions and Tensions between Conventional International Law and EU Environmental Law, (ed.) Marc Pallemaerts, 3-15. Groningen: europa Law Publishing.
Google Scholar
Raustiala, Kal. 1997. The “Participatory revolution” in International environmental Law.
Google Scholar
Harvard Environmental Law Review 21(2): 537-586.
Google Scholar
Rehbinder, Eckard and Demetrio Loperena. 2001. Legal Protection of environmental rights: The role and experience of the International Court of environmental arbitration and Conciliation. Environmental Policy and Law 31(6): 282-293.
Google Scholar
Sharman, Nicola. 2023. objectives of Public Participation in environmental decision-Making. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 72: 333-360.
Google Scholar
Scherdtfeger, Angela. 2023. The Human rights dimension. In: Sustainability through Participation?, (eds.) Birgit Peters and eva Julia Lohse, 291-319. Brill/nijhoff.
Google Scholar
Shelton, Dinah. 1992. What Happened in rio to Human rights?, Yearbook of International Environmental Law 3(1): 75–93. doI: 10.1093/yiel/3.1.75.
Google Scholar
Shelton, Dinah. 2006. Human rights and the environment: What Specific environmental rights Have Been recognized. Denver Journal of International Law & Policy 35(1): 129-171.
Google Scholar
Stone, Christopher. 1972. Should Trees Have Standing. Toward Legal right for natural objects. Southern California Law Review 45: 450-501.
Google Scholar
Suman, anna Berti. 2024. Civic Monitoring for Environmental Law Enforcement. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Google Scholar
Vasak, Karel. 1977. a 30-year struggle. The sustained efforts to give force of law to the Universal declaration of Human rights. The UNESCO Courier 11: 29-32.
Google Scholar
Villavicencio Calzadilla, Paola and Louis kotzé. 2023, re-imagining Participation in the anthropocene: The Potential of the rights of nature Paradigm. In: Sustainability through Participation?, (eds.) Birgit Peters and eva Julia Lohse, 51-72. Brill/nijhoff.
Google Scholar
Authors
Jerzy JendrośkaStatistics
Downloads
License
Copyright (c) 2024 The Opole Studies in Administration and Law
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Author’s economic rights to published works are held by Opole University (collective works) and individual Authors (individual parts of the collective work, ones that form a separate entity).
The journal Opole Studies in Administration and Law accepts for publication only works which have not been in circulation before.
On the basis of the Regulation (2016/679) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (referred to as General Data Protection Regulation or RODO) Opole University, based at 11a Plac Kopernika, 45-040 Opole, is the personal data controller for all the authors publishing their works in the Opole Studies in Administration and Law.
The articles published in Opole Studies in Administration and Law are available under a licence Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
For aricles till 2017 your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation – see:
Ustawa z dnia 4 lutego 1994 r. o prawie autorskim i prawach pokrewnych
Read more about the license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
View Legal Code:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Jerzy Jendrośka, Moritz REESE, Lorenzo SQUINTANI, Towards a new legal framework for sustainability under the European Green Deal , The Opole Studies in Administration and Law: Vol. 19 No. 2 (2021)
- Magdalena Bar, Jerzy Jendrośka, Dr Jan Jerzmański (1957-2021) , The Opole Studies in Administration and Law: Vol. 19 No. 2 (2021)
- Jerzy Jendrośka, The substantive right to environment and the procedural environmental rights under the Aarhus Convention – Part I , The Opole Studies in Administration and Law: Vol. 21 No. 2 (2023): The Opole Studies in Administration and Law
