The European Union’s instruments on fighting illegal logging – selected legal issues

Adriana Kalicka-Mikołajczyk

University of Wrocław
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1250-5052

Abstract

Illegal logging is a significant problem of major international community concern because it has a devastating impact on some of the world’s most valuable remaining forests and contributes to tropical deforestation and forest degradation. Furthermore, it threatens biodiversity and undermines sustainable forest management, having a negative impact on poverty reduction, sustainable and inclusive economic growth and development. The article presents instruments adopted by the EU in order to combat illegal timber logging. The author describes their material scope and legal character, dividing them into two groups: internal and international legally binding instruments and soft law instruments, in order to answer the question about their legal character and position in the EU legal order and in national orders of the Member States.

Keywords:

Deforestation, forest certification, illegal logging, international forest politics, sustainable forest management, tropical timber trade

Commission delegated Regulation of 23.2.2012 on the procedural rules for the recognition and withdrawal of recognition of monitoring organisations as provided for in Regulation (EU) No 995/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the obligations of operators who place timber and timber products on the market, OJ L 115/12, 27.4.2012.
  Google Scholar

Commission Implementing Regulation No 607/2012 of 6 July 2012 on the detailed rules concerning the due diligence system and the frequency and nature of the checks on monitoring organisations as provided for in Regulation (EU) No 995/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the obligations of operators who place timber and timber products on the market, OJ L 177/16,7.7.2012.
  Google Scholar

Council Regulation (EC) No 2173/2005 of 20 December 2005 on the establishment of a FLEGT licensing scheme for imports of timber into the European Community, OJ L 347, 30.12.2005, p. 1–6.
  Google Scholar

Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 of 9 December 1996 on the protection of species of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein, OJ L 61, 03.03.1997.
  Google Scholar

Decision No 1386/2013/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 November 2013 on a General Union Environment Action Programme to 2020 ‘Living well, within the limits of our planet’, OJ L 354/171, 28.12.2013, p. 177– 200.
  Google Scholar

Regulation No 995/2010 of the European Parliament and the Council of 20 October 2010 laying down the obligations of operators who place timber and timber products on the market, OJ L 295/23, 12.11.2010.
  Google Scholar

Case 104/81 Kupferberg, EU:C:1982:362.
  Google Scholar

Case 181/73 Haegeman, EU:C:1974:41.
  Google Scholar

Case C-13/00 Commission v Ireland, EU:C:2002:184.
  Google Scholar

Case C-149/96 Portugal v Council, EU:C:1999:574.
  Google Scholar

Case C-162/96 Racke, EU:C:1998:293.
  Google Scholar

Case C-280/93 Germany v Council, EU:C:1994:367.
  Google Scholar

Case C-288/96 Germany v Commission, EU:C:2000:537.
  Google Scholar

Case C-313/90 CIRFS v Commission, EU:C:1993:111.
  Google Scholar

Case C-322/88 Grimaldi, EU:C:1989:646.
  Google Scholar

Case C-61/94 Commission v Germany, EU:C:1996:313.
  Google Scholar

Case T-105/95 WWF UK v Commission, EU:T:1997:26.
  Google Scholar

Case C-239/03 Commission v France, EU:C:2004:598.
  Google Scholar

Case C-240/09 Lesoochranárske zoskupenie, EU:C:2011:125.
  Google Scholar

Case C-308/06 Intertanko, EU:C:2008:312.
  Google Scholar

Case C-421/06 Fratelli Martini and Cargill, EU:C:2007:662.
  Google Scholar

Case C-465/01 Commission v Austria, EU:C:2004:530.
  Google Scholar

Case 6/68 Zuckerfabrik , EU:C:1968:43.
  Google Scholar

Case 12/86 Demirel, EU:C:1987:400.
  Google Scholar

Case C-91/01 Italy v Commission, EU:C:2004:244.
  Google Scholar

Joined Cases 21/72 to 24/72 International Fruit Company and Others, EU:C:1972:115.
  Google Scholar

Joined Cases C-300/98 and C-392/98 Dior and Others, EU:C:2000:688.
  Google Scholar

Hoare A., Tackling Illegal Logging and the Related Trade: What progress and where next? London 2015.
  Google Scholar

Humprehreyes D., Deforestation and the Crisis of Global Governance, London 2006.
  Google Scholar

Illegal Logging and Global Wood Markets: The Competitive Impacts on the U.S. Wood Products Industry, Seneca Creek Associates & Wood Resources International, http://www.illegal-logging.info/sites/default/files/uploads/1_AF_and_PA_summary.pdf (12.5.2019).
  Google Scholar

Illegal Logging and Related Trade: Indicators of the Global Response, Chatham House, 01 July 2010, http://awsassets.panda.org/downloads/chatham_house_illegallogging_2010.pdf (6.6.2019).
  Google Scholar

Jonsson R., Giurca A., Maseiro M., Pepke E., Pettenella D., Prestemon J., Winkel G., Assessment of the EU Timber Regulation and FLEGT Action Plan, From Science to Policy, European Forest Institute, http://www.efi.int/files/attachments/publications/efi_fstp_1_2015.pdf (25.7.2019).
  Google Scholar

Kaimowitz D., Forest law enforcement and rural livelihoods, “International Forestry Review” 2001, No. 5(3).
  Google Scholar

Leiopold S., Soitiorov M., Frei T., Winkel G., Protecting „First World” Markets and „Third World” Nature: The Politics of Illegal Logging in Australia, the European Union and the United States, “Global Environmental Change” 2016, No. 39.
  Google Scholar

Levashova Y., How effective is the New EU Timber Regulation in the Fight against Illegal Logging?, “Review of European Community & International Environmental Law” 2011, No. 20 (3).
  Google Scholar

org/research/publications/publications-repository/trade-and-deforestation-a-literature-review (28.6.2019).
  Google Scholar

Ozinga S., Mowat H., Strategies to Prevent Illegal Logging, [in:] A Handbook of Globalisation and Environmental Policy, F. Wijen, K. Zoeteman and J. Pieters (eds.), Edward Elgar publishing 2013.
  Google Scholar

Pillon B., Pettenella D., EU FLEGT initiative: Analysis of national legislation of relevance to excluding illegal timber from EU market: Italy study, http://www.illegal logging.info/item_single.php?it_id=109&it=presentation (25.7.2019).
  Google Scholar

Rice T., Marijnissen C., Ozinga S., Trade liberalisation and the impact on forests, http://www.fern.org/node/536 (12.5.2019).
  Google Scholar

Robalino J., Herrera L.D., Trade and Deforestation, http://www.efdinitiative
  Google Scholar

Senden L., Soft Law in European Community Law, Hart Publishing 2004.
  Google Scholar

Van Vooren B., Wessel R.A., EU External Relations Law. Text, Cases and Materials, Cambridge 2014.
  Google Scholar

Commission Notice of 12.2.2016 Guidance Document for the EU Timber Regulation, C(2016) 755 final.
  Google Scholar

Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament, Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade (FLEGT): Proposal for an EU Action Plan, COM(2003) 251 final.
  Google Scholar

Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council, Regulation EU/995/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 October 2010 laying down the obligations of operators who place timber and timber products on the market (the EU Timber Regulation), COM(2016) 74 final.
  Google Scholar

Report from the Commission, Annual Synthesis Report for the year 2017 on the implementation of the FLEGT licensing scheme provided for in Regulation (EC) No 2173/2005 of 20 December 2005 on the establishment of a FLEGT licensing scheme for imports of timber into the European Community, COM(2019) 249 final.
  Google Scholar

World Bank, Strengthening Forest law Enforcement and Governance: Assessing a Systematic Constrain to Sustainable Development, World Bank, August 2006, http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/330441468161667685/pdf/366380REVISED010Forest0Law01PUBLIC1.pdf (6.6.2019).
  Google Scholar

Download


Published
2020-01-27

Cited by

Kalicka-Mikołajczyk, A. (2020). The European Union’s instruments on fighting illegal logging – selected legal issues. The Opole Studies in Administration and Law, 17(4), 53–68. https://doi.org/10.25167/osap.1885

Authors

Adriana Kalicka-Mikołajczyk 
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1250-5052

Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.


License

Author’s economic rights to published works are held by Opole University (collective works) and individual Authors (individual parts of the collective work, ones that form a separate entity).

The journal Opole Studies in Administration and Law accepts for publication only works which have not been in circulation before.

On the basis of the Regulation (2016/679) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (referred to as General Data Protection Regulation or RODO) Opole University, based at 11a Plac Kopernika, 45-040 Opole, is the personal data controller for all the authors publishing their works in the Opole Studies in Administration and Law.

The articles published in Opole Studies in Administration and Law are available under a licence Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

 

For aricles till 2017 your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation  –  see: 
Ustawa z dnia 4 lutego 1994 r. o prawie autorskim i prawach pokrewnych

Read more about the license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

View Legal Code:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode