The current status of the right to the environment at the global international law

Vivien dr. Köböl-Benda

Pázmány Péter Catholic University, Faculty of Law and Political Sciences
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0625-9326

Abstract

This article focuses on the right to a healthy environment, which is a challenging aspect of international law because, until recently, it was not explicitly addressed at the global level. The United Nations' human rights instruments do not contain provisions related to the environment, but the approach of 'greening the existing' human rights can be observed in several forms, for instance, in general comments. International environmental law introduced a similar concept, the 'human rights approach', which connects environmental issues with human rights. We assume that these two concepts can serve as the foundation for declaring the right to a healthy environment but do not replace that. We argue that the global recognition of the right to a healthy environment could connect the two branches of international law and ease its fragmentation. This article aims to examine and evaluate the existing international legal background at the global and regional levels. While doing so, we will analyze the legally binding and soft law instruments and the relevant case law of international human rights law and international environmental law. The article emphasized the recent legal development, as the United Nations Human Rights Committee adopted 2021 resolution no. 48/13, which promotes the right to a clean, healthy and sustainable environment. Here, we also present suggestions for the further global elaboration of the right. On the one hand, the examination reveals that international law already has several instruments and concepts that can be considered a starting point for the declaration. On the other hand, we propose that innovation, new approaches should be expressed in the future, related to the right to a healthy environment.  

Keywords:

right to a healthy environment, international human rights law, international environmental law, United Nations, regional human rights law

I. Primary sources
  Google Scholar

Legal acts
  Google Scholar

Additional Protocol to the American Convention on Human Rights in the Area of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Protocol of San Salvador. Signed at San Salvador, El Salvador, on November 17, 1988. OAS. Official records; OEA6Ser.A/44, Treaty Series no. 69.
  Google Scholar

African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, adopted 27 June 1981, OAU Doc. CAB/ LEG/67/3 rev. 5, 21 I.L.M. 58 (1982), entered into force on 21 October 1986.
  Google Scholar

American Convention on Human Rights, adopted at the Inter-American Specialized Confer ence on Human Rights, San José, Costa Rica, 22 November 1969.
  Google Scholar

Arab Charter on Human Rights 2004. 2006.Translated to English: Al-Midani, Mohammed Amin-Cabanettes, Mathilde. Boston University International Law Journal, 24 (2).
  Google Scholar

Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Opened at Roma, 4. November 1950. European Treaty Series, No. 005.
  Google Scholar

Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-Making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters. Open for signature at Aarhus, Denmark, on 25 June 1998, United Nations Treaty Series, vol. 2161, p. 447.
  Google Scholar

Decision (EU) 2022/591 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 April 2022 on a General Union Environmental Action Programme to 2030. PE/83/2021/REV/1. OJ L 114, 12.4.2022, p. 22–36
  Google Scholar

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 16 December 1966, United Nations Treaty Series, vol. 999, p. 171.
  Google Scholar

International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, 16 December 1966, United Nations Treaty Series, vol. 993, p. 3.
  Google Scholar

Paris Agreement, 12 December 2015. United Nations Treaty Series, vol. 3156.
  Google Scholar

Documents
  Google Scholar

ASEAN Human Rights Declaration. Adopted 19 November 2012 in Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
  Google Scholar

Brundtland report – Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development:
  Google Scholar

Our Common Future. 1987.
  Google Scholar

CCPR General Comment No. 6: Article 6 (Right to Life). Adopted at the Sixteenth Session of the Human Rights Committee on 30 April 1982.
  Google Scholar

CESCR General Comment No. 14: The Right to the Highest Attainable Standard of Health (Art. 12) Adopted at the Twenty-second Session of the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, on 11 August 2000 (Contained in Document E/C.12/2000/4)
  Google Scholar

Normative content of article 12, p. 4.
  Google Scholar

CESCR General Comment No. 15 (2002) on the right to water. A/RES/64/292.
  Google Scholar

Charter of the United Nations, 24 October 1945, 1 UNTS XVI.
  Google Scholar

Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment. In.: A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1. Chapter I. 3–6.
  Google Scholar

Follow-up to the report of the ad hoc open-ended working group established pursuant to General Assembly resolution 72/277. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 30 August 2019. A/RES/73/33.
  Google Scholar

Human rights and access to safe drinking water and sanitation. Resolution adopted by the United Nations Human Rights Council on 28 March 2008. Resolution 7/22.
  Google Scholar

Human rights and access to safe drinking water and sanitation. Resolution adopted by the United Nations Human Rights Council on 12 October 2009. A/HRC/RES/12/8.
  Google Scholar

Issue of human rights obligations relating to the enjoyment of a safe, clean, healthy and sustainable environment. Report of the Special Rapporteur. 8 January 2019. A/HRC/ 40/55.
  Google Scholar

Johannesburg Declaration on Sustainable Development. Adopted at the World Summit on Sustainable Development, Johannesburg, South Africa, 26 August – 4 September 2002. A/RES/69/2016.
  Google Scholar

Joint statement of United Nations entities on the right to healthy environment. https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/statements/joint-statement-united-nations-entities-right-healthy-environment
  Google Scholar

Knox, John H. 2012. Report of the Independent Expert on the issue of human rights obligations relating to the enjoyment of a safe, clean, healthy and sustainable environment. Preliminary report. 24 December, 2012. A/HRC/22/43. 13–14.
  Google Scholar

Le Club des Juristes. Draft Project – Global Pact for the Environment. Launched at the Sorbonne, Paris, 24 June 2017.
  Google Scholar

Mandate of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights in the context of climate change. Resolution adopted by the Human Rights Council on 8 October 2021. A/HRC/RES/48/14.
  Google Scholar

Recommendation 1614 (2003). Environment and Human Rights. Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly. Adopted by the Assembly on 27 June 2003. Recommendation 1862 (2009). Environmentally included migration and displacement: a 21st-century challenge. Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly. Adopted by the Assembly on 30 January 2009
  Google Scholar

Reply from the Committee of Ministers to the Parliamentary Assembly’s Recommendation 1614 (2003) on Environment and human rights. Council of Europe Committee of Min-isters. Adopted at the 869 th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies, 21 January 2004.
  Google Scholar

Reply from the Committee of Ministers to the Parliamentary Assembly’s Recommendation 1862 (2009) on Environmentally included migration and displacement: a 21 st century challenge. Council of Europe Committee of Ministers. Adopted at the 1063 meeting of
  Google Scholar

the Ministers’ Deputies, 17 July 2009.
  Google Scholar

Report of the ad hoc open-ended working group established pursuant to General Assembly resolution 72/277. Third substantive session, 13 June 2019. A/AC.289/6/Rev.1
  Google Scholar

Resolution 2395 (2021). Anchoring the right to a healthy environment: need for enhanced action by the Council of Europe. Council of Europe, Parliamentary Assembly. Adopted on 29 September 2021.
  Google Scholar

Rio Declaration on Environment and Development. The United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, Having met at Rio de Janeiro from 3 to 14 June 1992. In: Report of the United Nations’ Conference on Environment and Development. A/CONF.151/26/Rev.1. (Vol. I.). 3-9.
  Google Scholar

The future we want. Resolution adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on 27 July 2012. A/RES/66/288*.
  Google Scholar

The human right to a clean, healthy and sustainable environment. Resolution adopted by the Human Rights Council on 8 October 2021. A/HRC/RES/48/13.
  Google Scholar

The human right to water and sanitation. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 28 July 2010. A/RES/64/292
  Google Scholar

Third party intervention by the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights, application No. 39371/20 Cláudia Duarte Agosthino and others v. Portugal and 32 other States.
  Google Scholar

Towards a Global Pact for the Environment. Resolution adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on 10 May 2018. A/RES/72/277.
  Google Scholar

Transforming our World: The 230 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Resolution adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on 25 September 2015. A/RES/70/1.
  Google Scholar

UN Secretary-General: Gaps in international environmental law and environment-related instruments towards a global pact for the environment. 3 November 2018. A/73/419*.
  Google Scholar

United Nations’ Millennium Daclaration. Resolution adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on 8 September 2000. A/RES/55/2.
  Google Scholar

Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 10 December 1948, 217 A(III)
  Google Scholar

Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action. World conference on Human Rights, Vienna 14-25 June 1993. A/CONF.157/23
  Google Scholar

Case law
  Google Scholar

EHP (on behalf of Port Hope Environmental Group and Present and future citizens of Port Hope, Ontario, Canada) v. Canada, United Nations Human Rights Committee, 27 October 1982, Communication no. 67/1980, UN Doc CCPR/C/17/D/67/1980
  Google Scholar

Social and Economic Rights Action Center (SERAC) and Center for Economic and Social Rights (CESR) / Nigeria. African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Right, 27 October 2001, Communication no. 155/96. Banjul, p. 50–54
  Google Scholar

Centre for Minority Rights Development (Kenya) and Minority Rights Group International on behalf of Endorois Welfare Council v Kenya. African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Right, 11-25 November 2009, Communication no. 276 / 2003, Banjul, p. 228, 245.
  Google Scholar

African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights v. Republic of Kenya, African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights, 26 May 2017, Application No. 006/2012.
  Google Scholar

Advisory opinion requested by the Republic of Columbia, The environment and human rights, Inter-American Court of Human Rights, 15 November 2017, OC-23/17 15, p. 60.
  Google Scholar

Case of the Indigenous Communities of the Lhaka Honhat (Our Land) Association v. Argentina, Inter-American Court of Human Rights, 6 February 2020, Series C No. 420, p. 202.
  Google Scholar

Case of López Ostra v. Spain, European Court of Human Rights, 9 December 1994, no. 16798/90, Strasbourg p. 8.
  Google Scholar

Guerra and others v. Italy, European Court of Human Rights, 19 February 1998, no. 116/1996/735/932, Strasbourg, p. 56–60 .
  Google Scholar

Moreno Gómez v. Spain, European Court of Human Rights, 16 November 2004, no. 4143/02, Strasbourg, p. 53.
  Google Scholar

Fadeyeva v. Russia, European Court of Human Rights, 9 June 2005, no 55723/00, Strasbourg, p. 66–70.
  Google Scholar

Taşkin and others v. Turkey, European Court of Human Rights, 30 March 2005, no. 46117/99, Strasbourg, p. 98–100.
  Google Scholar

Hatton and others v. the United Kingdom, European Court of Human Rights, 8 July 2003, Strasbourg, no. 36022/97, p. 85–86.
  Google Scholar

Tyrer v. The United Kingdom, European Court of Human Rights, 25 April 1978, no. 5856/72.
  Google Scholar

Handyside v. The united kingdom, European Court of Human Rights, 7 December 1976,No. 5493/72.
  Google Scholar

Request of Cláuda Duarte Agosthino and others against Portugal and 33 other States, European Court of Human Rights, 7 September 2020, No. 39371/20.
  Google Scholar

II. Secondary sources
  Google Scholar

Abbot, Kenneth W. and Snidal, Duncan. 2003. Hard and Soft Law in International Governance. International Organization. 54(3): 434–450. DOI:10.1162/002081800551280.
  Google Scholar

Atapattu, Sumudu. 2002. The Right to a Healthy Life or the Right to Die Polluted: The Emergence of a Human Right to a Healthy Environment under International Law. Tulane Environmental Law Journal 16(1): 111–112.
  Google Scholar

Atapattu, Sumudu. 2019. Environmental Rights and International Human Rights Covenants: What Standards Are Relevant? In: Environmental Rights – The Development of Standards, (eds.) Stephen J. Turner, Dinah L. Shelton, Jona Razzaque, Owen McIntyre, James
  Google Scholar

R. May. 21–24. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  Google Scholar

Bándi, Gyula. 2021. Az Emberi Jogok Európai Egyezménye, a Szociális Karta és a környezeti jogok. Acta Humana – Emberi Jogi Közlemények 9(2): 188. DOI: 10.32566/ah.2021.2.8.
  Google Scholar

Boyd, David E. 2018. Catalyst for Change – Evaluating Forty Years of Experience. In: Implementing the Right to a Healthy Environment, (eds.) Knox, John H. and Pejan, Ramin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 17–18. 23–25.
  Google Scholar

Brown Weiss, Edith. 1993. International Environmental Law: Contemporary Issues and the Emergence of a New World Order. Georgetown University Law Center 81: 688–690, 708.
  Google Scholar

Brunnée, Jutta. 2008. The Stockholm Declaration and the Structure and Processes of International Environmental Law. In: The Future of Ocean Regime Building: Essays in Tribute to Douglas M. Johnston, (eds.) Aldo Chircop, Ted McDorman. Kluwer Law, 12.
  Google Scholar

Cima, Elena. 2022. The right to a healthy environment: Reconceptualizing human rights in the face of climate change. Review of European. Comparative & International Law 31(1): 48. DOI:10.1111/reel.12430CIMA49.
  Google Scholar

Dzehtsiarou, Kanstantsin. 2011. European Consensus and the Evolutive Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights. German Law Journal 12: 1731–1734. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1951371.
  Google Scholar

Feria-Tinta, Monica and Milnes, Simon C. 2019. International Environmental Law for the 21st Century: The Constitutionalization of the Right to a Healthy Environment in the Inter-American Court of Human Rights Advisory Opinion. 23. ACDI – Anuario Colombiano de Derecho Internacional (Colombian Yearbook of International Law) 12: 74–77.
  Google Scholar

Kiss, Alexandre and Shelton, Dinah. 1991. International environmental law. Transnational Publishers, Inc. 21–31.
  Google Scholar

Marinkás, György. 2014. Az Endorois ügy, egy hosszú út eredménye – avagy az afrikai emberi jogvédelmi mechanizmus joggyakorlata és az: őslakos népek jogainak védelme.
  Google Scholar

Debreceni Jogi Műhely 12: 1–2. Available at: https://deenkdev.lib.unideb.hu/ojs/DJM/ article/view/6617. DOI: 10.24169/DJM/2014/1-2/10.
  Google Scholar

Nwobike, Justice C. 2005. The African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights and the Demystification of Second and Third Generation Rights under the African Charter: Social and Economic Rights Action Center (SERAC) and the Center for Economic and
  Google Scholar

Social Rights (CESR) v. Nigeria. African Journal of Legal Studies 2: 145–146. DOI: 10. 1163/221097312X13397499736101.
  Google Scholar

Orellana, Marcos. 2018. Quality Control of the Right to a Healthy Environment. In: The Global Right to a Healthy Environment, (eds.) Knox, John H. and Pejan, Ramin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 184–187.
  Google Scholar

Perruso, Camila. 2021. L’affirmation d’un droit à un environnement propre, sain et durable universel. Notes sur la Résolution 48/13 du Conseil des droits de l’Homme des Nations Unies. La Revue des droits de l’homme. Available online: 15 November 2021. http://
  Google Scholar

journals.openedition.org/revdh/13063. DOI: 10.4000/revdh.13063.
  Google Scholar

Ruiz-Chiriboga, Oswaldo R. 2011. The American Convention and the Protocol of San Salvador: Two Intertwined Treaties. Non-Enforceability of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in the Inter-American System. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 31(2):
  Google Scholar

–170. DOI: 10.1177/016934411303100203.
  Google Scholar

Sohn, Lous B. 1973. The Stockholm Declaration on the Human Environment. Harvard International Law Journal 14(3): 452–453
  Google Scholar

Vasak, Karel. 1977. A 30-year struggle; the sustained efforts to give force of law to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The UNESCO Courier: a window open on the world 30(1): 29.
  Google Scholar

Vibhute, Khushal, Aynalem, Filipos. 2009. Legal Research Methods. Addis Abeba: Justice and Legal System Research Institute 15–18. Available at: https://chilot.files.wordpress. com/2011/06/legal-research-methods.pdf.
  Google Scholar

Voeten, Erik. 2017. Competition and Complementarity between Global and Regional Human Rights Institutions. Global Policy 8(1): 119–121. DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.12395.
  Google Scholar

Whelan, Daniel J. 2010. Indivisible Human Rights – A History. University of Pennsylvania Press. 3–6.
  Google Scholar

Wolfe, Karrie. 2003. Greening the International Human Rights Sphere – Environmental Rights and the Draft Declaration of Principles on Human Rights and the Environment. Review of Current Law and Law Reform 9: 58.
  Google Scholar

Zang, Sheryl M. Benjenk, Ivy. Breakey, Suellen. Pusey-Reid, Eleonor and Nicholas, Patrice K. 2020. The intersection of climate change with the era of COVID-19. Public Health Nursing 38: 331. DOI: 10.1111/phn.12866
  Google Scholar

Download


Published
2022-11-29

Cited by

dr. Köböl-Benda, V. (2022). The current status of the right to the environment at the global international law. The Opole Studies in Administration and Law, 20(1), 117–143. https://doi.org/10.25167/osap.4770

Authors

Vivien dr. Köböl-Benda 
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0625-9326

Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.


License

Copyright (c) 2022 The Opole Studies in Administration and Law

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Author’s economic rights to published works are held by Opole University (collective works) and individual Authors (individual parts of the collective work, ones that form a separate entity).

The journal Opole Studies in Administration and Law accepts for publication only works which have not been in circulation before.

On the basis of the Regulation (2016/679) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (referred to as General Data Protection Regulation or RODO) Opole University, based at 11a Plac Kopernika, 45-040 Opole, is the personal data controller for all the authors publishing their works in the Opole Studies in Administration and Law.

The articles published in Opole Studies in Administration and Law are available under a licence Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

 

For aricles till 2017 your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation  –  see: 
Ustawa z dnia 4 lutego 1994 r. o prawie autorskim i prawach pokrewnych

Read more about the license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

View Legal Code:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode