The current status of the right to the environment at the global international law
Vivien dr. Köböl-Benda
Pázmány Péter Catholic University, Faculty of Law and Political Scienceshttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0625-9326
Abstrakt
Artykuł skupia się na prawie do zdrowego środowiska, które stało się wyzwaniem dla prawa międzynarodowego, gdyż dopiero niedawno kwestia ta została jednoznacznie podjęta na poziomie globalnym. Instrumenty związane z prawami człowieka, jakie posiada ONZ, nie zawierają postanowień dotyczących środowiska. Jednakże podejście do „zazielenienia” istniejących praw człowieka można zaobserwować w kilku formach, takich jak ogólne
komentarze. Międzynarodowe prawo środowiskowe wprowadziło podobną ideę „podejścia praw człowieka”, które łączy kwestie środowiskowe z prawami człowieka. Zakładamy, że te dwa pojęcia ułatwią wypracowanie deklaracji o prawie do zdrowego środowiska. Zarazem
jednak skuteczności tych idei nie można porównywać z formalnie przyjętym prawem do zdrowego środowiska. Stawiamy tezę, że uznanie na poziomie światowym prawa do zdrowego środowiska mogłoby połączyć te dwie gałęzie prawa międzynarodowego oraz złagodzić jego fragmentację. Artykuł ma na celu zbadać i ocenić istniejące prawne zaplecze na poziomach regionalnym i globalnym. Działając w tym kierunku, przeanalizujemy prawnie obowiązujące i miękkie instrumenty prawa oraz właściwe orzecznictwo w obszarach praw człowieka na poziomie prawa międzynarodowego i międzynarodowego prawa środowisko-
wego. Artykuł podkreśla ostatnie dokonania w sferze prawnej, w ślad za przyjęciem w roku 2021 Rezolucji nr 48/13 przez Komitet Praw Człowieka ONZ. Promuje ona prawo do czystego, zdrowego oraz zrównoważonego środowiska. W artykule proponuje się również sugestie co do opracowania tego prawa na poziomie światowym. Zarazem jednak analiza ujawniła, że międzynarodowe prawo posiada już kilka instrumentów i pojęć, które można uważać za punkt wyjścia dla ww. deklaracji. Jednakże proponujemy, aby nowe innowacyjne podejścia zostały wyrażone w przyszłości, w powiązaniu z prawem do zdrowego środowiska.
Słowa kluczowe:
right to a healthy environment, international human rights law, international environmental law, United Nations, regional human rights lawBibliografia
I. Primary sources
Google Scholar
Legal acts
Google Scholar
Additional Protocol to the American Convention on Human Rights in the Area of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Protocol of San Salvador. Signed at San Salvador, El Salvador, on November 17, 1988. OAS. Official records; OEA6Ser.A/44, Treaty Series no. 69.
Google Scholar
African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, adopted 27 June 1981, OAU Doc. CAB/ LEG/67/3 rev. 5, 21 I.L.M. 58 (1982), entered into force on 21 October 1986.
Google Scholar
American Convention on Human Rights, adopted at the Inter-American Specialized Confer ence on Human Rights, San José, Costa Rica, 22 November 1969.
Google Scholar
Arab Charter on Human Rights 2004. 2006.Translated to English: Al-Midani, Mohammed Amin-Cabanettes, Mathilde. Boston University International Law Journal, 24 (2).
Google Scholar
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Opened at Roma, 4. November 1950. European Treaty Series, No. 005.
Google Scholar
Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-Making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters. Open for signature at Aarhus, Denmark, on 25 June 1998, United Nations Treaty Series, vol. 2161, p. 447.
Google Scholar
Decision (EU) 2022/591 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 April 2022 on a General Union Environmental Action Programme to 2030. PE/83/2021/REV/1. OJ L 114, 12.4.2022, p. 22–36
Google Scholar
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 16 December 1966, United Nations Treaty Series, vol. 999, p. 171.
Google Scholar
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, 16 December 1966, United Nations Treaty Series, vol. 993, p. 3.
Google Scholar
Paris Agreement, 12 December 2015. United Nations Treaty Series, vol. 3156.
Google Scholar
Documents
Google Scholar
ASEAN Human Rights Declaration. Adopted 19 November 2012 in Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Google Scholar
Brundtland report – Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development:
Google Scholar
Our Common Future. 1987.
Google Scholar
CCPR General Comment No. 6: Article 6 (Right to Life). Adopted at the Sixteenth Session of the Human Rights Committee on 30 April 1982.
Google Scholar
CESCR General Comment No. 14: The Right to the Highest Attainable Standard of Health (Art. 12) Adopted at the Twenty-second Session of the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, on 11 August 2000 (Contained in Document E/C.12/2000/4)
Google Scholar
Normative content of article 12, p. 4.
Google Scholar
CESCR General Comment No. 15 (2002) on the right to water. A/RES/64/292.
Google Scholar
Charter of the United Nations, 24 October 1945, 1 UNTS XVI.
Google Scholar
Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment. In.: A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1. Chapter I. 3–6.
Google Scholar
Follow-up to the report of the ad hoc open-ended working group established pursuant to General Assembly resolution 72/277. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 30 August 2019. A/RES/73/33.
Google Scholar
Human rights and access to safe drinking water and sanitation. Resolution adopted by the United Nations Human Rights Council on 28 March 2008. Resolution 7/22.
Google Scholar
Human rights and access to safe drinking water and sanitation. Resolution adopted by the United Nations Human Rights Council on 12 October 2009. A/HRC/RES/12/8.
Google Scholar
Issue of human rights obligations relating to the enjoyment of a safe, clean, healthy and sustainable environment. Report of the Special Rapporteur. 8 January 2019. A/HRC/ 40/55.
Google Scholar
Johannesburg Declaration on Sustainable Development. Adopted at the World Summit on Sustainable Development, Johannesburg, South Africa, 26 August – 4 September 2002. A/RES/69/2016.
Google Scholar
Joint statement of United Nations entities on the right to healthy environment. https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/statements/joint-statement-united-nations-entities-right-healthy-environment
Google Scholar
Knox, John H. 2012. Report of the Independent Expert on the issue of human rights obligations relating to the enjoyment of a safe, clean, healthy and sustainable environment. Preliminary report. 24 December, 2012. A/HRC/22/43. 13–14.
Google Scholar
Le Club des Juristes. Draft Project – Global Pact for the Environment. Launched at the Sorbonne, Paris, 24 June 2017.
Google Scholar
Mandate of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights in the context of climate change. Resolution adopted by the Human Rights Council on 8 October 2021. A/HRC/RES/48/14.
Google Scholar
Recommendation 1614 (2003). Environment and Human Rights. Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly. Adopted by the Assembly on 27 June 2003. Recommendation 1862 (2009). Environmentally included migration and displacement: a 21st-century challenge. Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly. Adopted by the Assembly on 30 January 2009
Google Scholar
Reply from the Committee of Ministers to the Parliamentary Assembly’s Recommendation 1614 (2003) on Environment and human rights. Council of Europe Committee of Min-isters. Adopted at the 869 th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies, 21 January 2004.
Google Scholar
Reply from the Committee of Ministers to the Parliamentary Assembly’s Recommendation 1862 (2009) on Environmentally included migration and displacement: a 21 st century challenge. Council of Europe Committee of Ministers. Adopted at the 1063 meeting of
Google Scholar
the Ministers’ Deputies, 17 July 2009.
Google Scholar
Report of the ad hoc open-ended working group established pursuant to General Assembly resolution 72/277. Third substantive session, 13 June 2019. A/AC.289/6/Rev.1
Google Scholar
Resolution 2395 (2021). Anchoring the right to a healthy environment: need for enhanced action by the Council of Europe. Council of Europe, Parliamentary Assembly. Adopted on 29 September 2021.
Google Scholar
Rio Declaration on Environment and Development. The United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, Having met at Rio de Janeiro from 3 to 14 June 1992. In: Report of the United Nations’ Conference on Environment and Development. A/CONF.151/26/Rev.1. (Vol. I.). 3-9.
Google Scholar
The future we want. Resolution adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on 27 July 2012. A/RES/66/288*.
Google Scholar
The human right to a clean, healthy and sustainable environment. Resolution adopted by the Human Rights Council on 8 October 2021. A/HRC/RES/48/13.
Google Scholar
The human right to water and sanitation. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 28 July 2010. A/RES/64/292
Google Scholar
Third party intervention by the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights, application No. 39371/20 Cláudia Duarte Agosthino and others v. Portugal and 32 other States.
Google Scholar
Towards a Global Pact for the Environment. Resolution adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on 10 May 2018. A/RES/72/277.
Google Scholar
Transforming our World: The 230 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Resolution adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on 25 September 2015. A/RES/70/1.
Google Scholar
UN Secretary-General: Gaps in international environmental law and environment-related instruments towards a global pact for the environment. 3 November 2018. A/73/419*.
Google Scholar
United Nations’ Millennium Daclaration. Resolution adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on 8 September 2000. A/RES/55/2.
Google Scholar
Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 10 December 1948, 217 A(III)
Google Scholar
Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action. World conference on Human Rights, Vienna 14-25 June 1993. A/CONF.157/23
Google Scholar
Case law
Google Scholar
EHP (on behalf of Port Hope Environmental Group and Present and future citizens of Port Hope, Ontario, Canada) v. Canada, United Nations Human Rights Committee, 27 October 1982, Communication no. 67/1980, UN Doc CCPR/C/17/D/67/1980
Google Scholar
Social and Economic Rights Action Center (SERAC) and Center for Economic and Social Rights (CESR) / Nigeria. African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Right, 27 October 2001, Communication no. 155/96. Banjul, p. 50–54
Google Scholar
Centre for Minority Rights Development (Kenya) and Minority Rights Group International on behalf of Endorois Welfare Council v Kenya. African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Right, 11-25 November 2009, Communication no. 276 / 2003, Banjul, p. 228, 245.
Google Scholar
African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights v. Republic of Kenya, African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights, 26 May 2017, Application No. 006/2012.
Google Scholar
Advisory opinion requested by the Republic of Columbia, The environment and human rights, Inter-American Court of Human Rights, 15 November 2017, OC-23/17 15, p. 60.
Google Scholar
Case of the Indigenous Communities of the Lhaka Honhat (Our Land) Association v. Argentina, Inter-American Court of Human Rights, 6 February 2020, Series C No. 420, p. 202.
Google Scholar
Case of López Ostra v. Spain, European Court of Human Rights, 9 December 1994, no. 16798/90, Strasbourg p. 8.
Google Scholar
Guerra and others v. Italy, European Court of Human Rights, 19 February 1998, no. 116/1996/735/932, Strasbourg, p. 56–60 .
Google Scholar
Moreno Gómez v. Spain, European Court of Human Rights, 16 November 2004, no. 4143/02, Strasbourg, p. 53.
Google Scholar
Fadeyeva v. Russia, European Court of Human Rights, 9 June 2005, no 55723/00, Strasbourg, p. 66–70.
Google Scholar
Taşkin and others v. Turkey, European Court of Human Rights, 30 March 2005, no. 46117/99, Strasbourg, p. 98–100.
Google Scholar
Hatton and others v. the United Kingdom, European Court of Human Rights, 8 July 2003, Strasbourg, no. 36022/97, p. 85–86.
Google Scholar
Tyrer v. The United Kingdom, European Court of Human Rights, 25 April 1978, no. 5856/72.
Google Scholar
Handyside v. The united kingdom, European Court of Human Rights, 7 December 1976,No. 5493/72.
Google Scholar
Request of Cláuda Duarte Agosthino and others against Portugal and 33 other States, European Court of Human Rights, 7 September 2020, No. 39371/20.
Google Scholar
II. Secondary sources
Google Scholar
Abbot, Kenneth W. and Snidal, Duncan. 2003. Hard and Soft Law in International Governance. International Organization. 54(3): 434–450. DOI:10.1162/002081800551280.
Google Scholar
Atapattu, Sumudu. 2002. The Right to a Healthy Life or the Right to Die Polluted: The Emergence of a Human Right to a Healthy Environment under International Law. Tulane Environmental Law Journal 16(1): 111–112.
Google Scholar
Atapattu, Sumudu. 2019. Environmental Rights and International Human Rights Covenants: What Standards Are Relevant? In: Environmental Rights – The Development of Standards, (eds.) Stephen J. Turner, Dinah L. Shelton, Jona Razzaque, Owen McIntyre, James
Google Scholar
R. May. 21–24. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Bándi, Gyula. 2021. Az Emberi Jogok Európai Egyezménye, a Szociális Karta és a környezeti jogok. Acta Humana – Emberi Jogi Közlemények 9(2): 188. DOI: 10.32566/ah.2021.2.8.
Google Scholar
Boyd, David E. 2018. Catalyst for Change – Evaluating Forty Years of Experience. In: Implementing the Right to a Healthy Environment, (eds.) Knox, John H. and Pejan, Ramin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 17–18. 23–25.
Google Scholar
Brown Weiss, Edith. 1993. International Environmental Law: Contemporary Issues and the Emergence of a New World Order. Georgetown University Law Center 81: 688–690, 708.
Google Scholar
Brunnée, Jutta. 2008. The Stockholm Declaration and the Structure and Processes of International Environmental Law. In: The Future of Ocean Regime Building: Essays in Tribute to Douglas M. Johnston, (eds.) Aldo Chircop, Ted McDorman. Kluwer Law, 12.
Google Scholar
Cima, Elena. 2022. The right to a healthy environment: Reconceptualizing human rights in the face of climate change. Review of European. Comparative & International Law 31(1): 48. DOI:10.1111/reel.12430CIMA49.
Google Scholar
Dzehtsiarou, Kanstantsin. 2011. European Consensus and the Evolutive Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights. German Law Journal 12: 1731–1734. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1951371.
Google Scholar
Feria-Tinta, Monica and Milnes, Simon C. 2019. International Environmental Law for the 21st Century: The Constitutionalization of the Right to a Healthy Environment in the Inter-American Court of Human Rights Advisory Opinion. 23. ACDI – Anuario Colombiano de Derecho Internacional (Colombian Yearbook of International Law) 12: 74–77.
Google Scholar
Kiss, Alexandre and Shelton, Dinah. 1991. International environmental law. Transnational Publishers, Inc. 21–31.
Google Scholar
Marinkás, György. 2014. Az Endorois ügy, egy hosszú út eredménye – avagy az afrikai emberi jogvédelmi mechanizmus joggyakorlata és az: őslakos népek jogainak védelme.
Google Scholar
Debreceni Jogi Műhely 12: 1–2. Available at: https://deenkdev.lib.unideb.hu/ojs/DJM/ article/view/6617. DOI: 10.24169/DJM/2014/1-2/10.
Google Scholar
Nwobike, Justice C. 2005. The African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights and the Demystification of Second and Third Generation Rights under the African Charter: Social and Economic Rights Action Center (SERAC) and the Center for Economic and
Google Scholar
Social Rights (CESR) v. Nigeria. African Journal of Legal Studies 2: 145–146. DOI: 10. 1163/221097312X13397499736101.
Google Scholar
Orellana, Marcos. 2018. Quality Control of the Right to a Healthy Environment. In: The Global Right to a Healthy Environment, (eds.) Knox, John H. and Pejan, Ramin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 184–187.
Google Scholar
Perruso, Camila. 2021. L’affirmation d’un droit à un environnement propre, sain et durable universel. Notes sur la Résolution 48/13 du Conseil des droits de l’Homme des Nations Unies. La Revue des droits de l’homme. Available online: 15 November 2021. http://
Google Scholar
journals.openedition.org/revdh/13063. DOI: 10.4000/revdh.13063.
Google Scholar
Ruiz-Chiriboga, Oswaldo R. 2011. The American Convention and the Protocol of San Salvador: Two Intertwined Treaties. Non-Enforceability of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in the Inter-American System. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 31(2):
Google Scholar
–170. DOI: 10.1177/016934411303100203.
Google Scholar
Sohn, Lous B. 1973. The Stockholm Declaration on the Human Environment. Harvard International Law Journal 14(3): 452–453
Google Scholar
Vasak, Karel. 1977. A 30-year struggle; the sustained efforts to give force of law to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The UNESCO Courier: a window open on the world 30(1): 29.
Google Scholar
Vibhute, Khushal, Aynalem, Filipos. 2009. Legal Research Methods. Addis Abeba: Justice and Legal System Research Institute 15–18. Available at: https://chilot.files.wordpress. com/2011/06/legal-research-methods.pdf.
Google Scholar
Voeten, Erik. 2017. Competition and Complementarity between Global and Regional Human Rights Institutions. Global Policy 8(1): 119–121. DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.12395.
Google Scholar
Whelan, Daniel J. 2010. Indivisible Human Rights – A History. University of Pennsylvania Press. 3–6.
Google Scholar
Wolfe, Karrie. 2003. Greening the International Human Rights Sphere – Environmental Rights and the Draft Declaration of Principles on Human Rights and the Environment. Review of Current Law and Law Reform 9: 58.
Google Scholar
Zang, Sheryl M. Benjenk, Ivy. Breakey, Suellen. Pusey-Reid, Eleonor and Nicholas, Patrice K. 2020. The intersection of climate change with the era of COVID-19. Public Health Nursing 38: 331. DOI: 10.1111/phn.12866
Google Scholar
Statystyki
Downloads
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2022 Opolskie Studia Administracyjno-Prawne
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
Prawa autorskie majątkowe do opublikowanych utworów ma Uniwersytet Opolski (do utworu zbiorowego) oraz poszczególni Autorzy (do poszczególnych części utworu zbiorowego, mających samodzielne znaczenie).
W Opolskich Studiach Administracyjno - Prawnych mogą być publikowane tylko utwory wcześniej nie rozpowszechnione.
Na podstawie Rozporządzenia Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady (UE) 2016/679 z dnia 27 kwietnia 2016r. w sprawie ochrony osób fizycznych w związku z przetwarzaniem danych osobowych i w sprawie swobodnego przepływu takich danych oraz uchylenia dyrektywy 95/46/WE (określane jako „RODO") administratorem danych osobowych osób publikujących w Opolskich Studiach Administracyjnoprawnych (Wydawnictwo UO) jest Uniwersytet Opolski z siedzibą przy pl. Kopernika 11a, 45-040 Opole.
Artykuły zamieszczone w czasopiśmie objęte są licencją Uznanie autorstwa - Użycie niekomercyjne - Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe
(CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
Z pozostałych zamieszczonych w niniejszym czasopiśmie utworów można korzystać w ramach dozwolonego użytku zgodnie z art. 23-35 Ustawy z dnia 4 lutego 1994 r. o prawie autorskim i prawach pokrewnych.
Więcej szczegółów o licencji CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 znajdą Państwo na stronie:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.pl
Treść licencji dostępna pod linkiem:
