Published: 2025-12-31

Progress and change, or a curiosity in the light of administrative law? Administrative institutions established by non-public entities – the example of non-public museums

Aleksandra Główczewska
The Opole Studies in Administration and Law
Section: Articles
DOI https://doi.org/10.25167/osap.5911

Abstract

The article addresses the issue of non-public museums which perform the same public tasks as their public counterparts, thereby justifying the recognition of the former as administrative institutions within the framework of contemporary Polish administrative law. The study formulates a research question concerning the statutory definition of a museum and whether it allows accepting functional equivalence between public and non-public museums. It emphasizes the need to acknowledge non-public museums as administrative institutions that carry out identical public tasks in the fields of culture and protection of cultural heritage. The applied methods: dogmatic legal analysis of regulations concerning museums and administrative institutions, comparative examination of doctrinal positions (structural-organizational vs. material-functional approaches), and analysis of case law regarding private entities performing public tasks — enabled formulation of the final conclusions.
The findings suggest that all museums, regardless of their founding entity, serve the same public functions related to preservation of cultural heritage. The increasingly prominent

Download files

Citation rules

Główczewska, A. (2025). Progress and change, or a curiosity in the light of administrative law? Administrative institutions established by non-public entities – the example of non-public museums. The Opole Studies in Administration and Law, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.25167/osap.5911

Cited by / Share

This website uses cookies for proper operation, in order to use the portal fully you must accept cookies.