Pamięć wspólnotowa a tradycja konstytucyjna

Ewa Malinowska

doi:10.25167/Stylistyka28.2019.18

Collectivememory and Constitutional Tradition

Ewa Malinowska

Uniwersytet Opolski
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0783-0029

DOI: https://doi.org/10.25167/Stylistyka28.2019.18

Abstract

There are two dates of particular importance for Polish collective memory, namely 11November 1918 – the day of the regaining of independence after 123 years of partitions, and 4 June 1989 – the day which started the process of Poland regaining its full internal and external sovereignty. These two turning points determine the beginnings of the respective discourses on the directions of changes in the political systems of the Second and Third Republics. This paper focuses on the discourses concerning the political systems during the periods of transition and is based on the content of The March Constitution of 1921 and The Constitution of the Republic of Poland of 1997. A basic law is a text of fundamental importance for any country as it establishes the principles of its organisation, regulates the functioning of its institutions and determines the position of the citizen vis-à-vis the state. It is also a testimony to various understandings of the notion of nation and to a considerable extent determines a sense of national and state community as well as citizens’ collective ememory.

Keywords:

nation, collectivememory, changes in political system, constitutional tradition

References

Abramowicz M., 1993, Wolność. – Nazwy wartości. Studia leksykalno-semantyczne, red.J. Bartmiński, Lublin.
Google Scholar

Adamczyk M., PastuszkaS., 1985, Konstytucje polskie w rozwoju dziejowym 1791 – 1982, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Chlebda W., 2018,Pamięć a język. Zarys relacji. –Pamięć w ujęciu lingwistycznym. Zagadnienia teoretyczne i metodyczne, red. W.Czachur,Warszawa,s.56–67.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31338/uw.9788323530077.pp.56-68 Google Scholar

Czachur W., 2018, Lingwistyka pamięci. Założenia, zakres badań i metody analizy. – Pamięć w ujęciu lingwistycznym. Zagadnienia teoretyczne i metodyczne, red. W. Czachur, Warszawa, s. 7–55.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31338/uw.9788323530077.pp.7-55 Google Scholar

Dubisz S., 1992, Język i polityka. Szkice z historii stylu retorycznego, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Głowiński M., 2008, Nowomowa i ciągi dalsze. Szkice dawne i nowe, Kraków.
Google Scholar

Kallas M., 2005, Historia ustroju Polski, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Konstytucja Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej z dnia 2 kwietnia 1997 r. (Dz.U. z 1997 r. nr 78, poz. 483).
Google Scholar

Koper A.,1993,Państwo jakie jest i jakie być powinno. –Nazwy wartości. Studia leksykalno-semantyczne, red. J. Bartmiński, Lublin.
Google Scholar

Kruk M., 2002, Przyczynek do rozważań o inspiracjach Konstytucji RP z 1997 r., „Państwo i Prawo”, z. 2.
Google Scholar

Lizisowa M. T., 2002, Model komunikacji językowej w konstytucjach Rzeczypospolitej (relacja nadawczo-odbiorcza), „Biuletyn Polskiego Towarzystwa Językoznawczego”, z. LVIII, s. 75–92.
Google Scholar

Malinowska E., 2012, Konstytucja jako gatunek tekstu prawnego, Opole.
Google Scholar

Pietrzak M., 1969, Model ustroju politycznego w Konstytucji z 17 marca 1921 r. – Droga przez półwiecze. O Polsce lat 1918–1968. Referaty z sesji naukowych Polskiej Akademii Nauk i Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego poświęcone 50. rocznicy odzyskania niepodległości, Warszawa, s. 95–116.
Google Scholar

Puzynina J., 1996, Naród, społeczeństwo, państwo, kraj, „Poradnik Językowy”, nr 10.
Google Scholar

Puzynina J., 1998, Struktura semantyczna narodu a profilowanie. - Profilowanie w języku i tekście, red. J. Bartmiński i J. Tokarski, Lublin.
Google Scholar

Suchodolski B., 1969, Wychowanie pokoleń w okresie 1918–1968. – Droga przez półwiecze. O Polsce lat 1918–1968. Referaty z sesji naukowych Polskiej Akademii Nauk i Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego poświęcone 50. rocznicy odzyskania niepodległości, Warszawa, s. 117–147.
Google Scholar

Winczorek P., 2012, O państwie, prawie i polityce, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Wronkowska S., Zmierczak M., 1999, Kompendium wiedzy o społeczeństwie, państwie i prawie, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Zakrzewska J., 1990, Nowa konstytucja IIII Rzeczypospolitej, „Państwo i Prawo”, z. 4, s. 3–11.
Google Scholar

Ziembiński Z., 1991, „Lex” a „ius” w okresie przemian, „Państwo i Prawo”,z. 6, s. 3–14.
Google Scholar

Download

pdf (Język Polski)

Published

2019-12-26

Cited by

Malinowska, E. (2019). Collectivememory and Constitutional Tradition. Stylistyka, 28, 289–301. https://doi.org/10.25167/Stylistyka28.2019.18

Authors

Ewa Malinowska
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0783-0029

Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

License

1. Copyrights to published works are held by the University of Opole (to the collective work) and the Authors (to individual parts of the collective work that have an independent meaning).

2. Only previously undistributed works can be published in the scientific journal "Stylistics".

3. The University of Opole does not restrict the possibility of the author's further dissemination of his work on condition that the scientific journal "Stylistics" is indicated as the original place of publication and the consent of the University Publishing House.

4. Consent to the publication of the work in the scientific journal "Stylistics" is tantamount to granting the author a non-exclusive license to the University of Opole, including the right to use the work without territorial restrictions and time limits in the following fields of exploitation:

a) within the scope of recording and multiplication of the work - production of any number of copies of the work in whole or in part using a specified technique, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital technique, introduction of the work into computer memory and computer networks,

b) within the scope of circulation of the original or copies on which the work has been recorded - circulation, lending or hiring of the original or copies,

c) within the scope of dissemination of the work in a manner other than specified in item 2 - making the work or its abstract available on the Internet by enabling the recipients to access the work on-line or enabling them to download the work to their own device that makes it possible to read it, placing the work in electronic databases that disseminate scientific works, including in particular the CEEOL database (Central and Eastern Online Libray) and the abstract in English in the CEJSH database (The Central Europaen Journal of Social Scienes and Humanites).

d) within the scope of creating and distributing dependent works created using the work - using them in the fields of exploitation specified in points 1-3.

5. The author is not entitled to compensation for granting the license to the work.

6. The author agrees that the University may grant further permission to use the work (sublicense) in the fields of exploitation specified in par. 2 paragraph 4.

7. The author agrees that, in connection with the distribution of the work, his or her personal information, that is, name, affiliation, and e-mail address, may be made public.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>