Stylistic studies of the linguists of Kharkiv philological school in the 1920s and 1930s

Харківський національний економічний університет імені Семена Кузнеця
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3360-8421

Abstract

The article focuses on the concept of historical memory on the basis of the Ukrainian linguistics ofthe 1920s and 1930s. The aspects of the scientific work of linguists of the Kharkiv Philological School (O. Vetukhov, M. Yogansen, O. Kurylo, M. Nakonechnyi, K. Nymchynov, V. Simovych, O. Synyavskyi, S. Smerechynskyi, M. Sulyma, B. Tkachenko, О. Finkel), who were in creative interaction with the Slavic and European scientific circles, are characterised; the influence of the ideas of the Prague linguistic circle, in particular its structural-semantic paradigm, on the directions of scientific research of Ukrainian linguists during the mentioned period is noted. Attention is focused on the main achievements of Ukrainian linguistics in the field of stylistics. The work of O. Kurylo Attention on the modern Ukrainian literary language (1920) is analysed in view of the terminology apparatus of stylistics, including theoretical and methodological principles of Ukrainian and Slavic linguistics in general. The stylistic advisers of M. Gladkyi, which highlight the cultural aspects of journalism and literature, and peculiarities of word-formation in the language of the press and fiction, are discussed. The work Ukrainian phrase. Short Sketches (1928) by M. Sulyma, devoted to issues of stylistic morphology and stylistic syntax is investigated as well as the terminology of stylistics used in the work of S. Smerechynskyi Essays on the Ukrainian syntax (in connection with phraseology and stylistics) (1932); M. Yogansen’s scientific discoveries Elementary laws of versification (1922) and How the narrative is constructed. Analysis of Prose Samples (1927) as well as O. Finkel’s: A Brief Introduction to Theoretical Stylistics (1927), L. Bulakhovsky’s The Basics of Linguistics (1931–1932) are scrutinised. The course of B. Tkachenko’s Essay of Ukrainian Stylistics (Kharkiv, 1929–1930?), created under the influence of French stylistics by S. Bally is noted, in which for the first time in Ukrainian linguistics, the necessity of studying stylistics as a separate educational discipline was proved, its purpose and task were articulated, and conceptual apparatus outlined; the essence and nature of the interrelations of the literary language with individual and folk-colloquial language are investigated.

Keywords:

Kharkiv linguistic school, stylistics of the Ukrainian language, culture of language, functional styles, individual language, literary language, normativity

Bevzenko S., 1991, Istoriya ukrayins’koho movoznavstva. Istoriya vyvchennya ukrayins’koyi movy, Kyyiv.
  Google Scholar

Hantsov V., 1925, Problemy rozvytku nashoyi literaturnoyi movy, «Zhyttya y revolyutsiya », № 10, s. 61–65.
  Google Scholar

Hladkyy M., 1928, Nasha hazetna mova, http://elib.nplu.org/object.html?id=9706 (data zvernennya: 28.11.2018)
  Google Scholar

Hladkyy M., 1929, Mova suchasnoho ukrayins’koho pys’menstva, «Zhyttya y revolyutsiya », Kn. IV, s. 92–100.
  Google Scholar

Hladkyy M., 1930, Mova suchasnoho ukrayins’koho pys’menstva, Harkiv–Kyyiv.
  Google Scholar

Horbach O., «Bili» y temni plyamy v istoriyi movoznavstva URSR 1930-ykh rr., https://r2u.org.ua/node/224 (data zvernennya: 27.11.2018).
  Google Scholar

Horbach O., 1990, O. Smerechyns’koho narysy z ukrayins’koyi syntaksy [Pislyaslovo]. – Smerechyns’kyy S., Narysy z ukrayins’koyi syntaksy v zv”yazku z frazeolohiyeyu ta stylistykoyu, Myunkhen.
  Google Scholar

Hryshchenko A., 2005, O. N. Synyavs’kyy: mistse v istoriyi ukrayins’koho movoznavstva, «Ukrayins’ka mova», № 4, s. 22–62.
  Google Scholar

Dotsenko R., 2006, Hladkyy Mykola Dmytrovych. – Entsyklopediya suchasnoyi Ukrayiny (ESU) [Elektronnyy resurs], http://esu.com.ua/search_articles.php?id=16147 (data zvernennya: 29.11. 2018).
  Google Scholar

Zhovtobryukh M., 1991, Narys istoriyi ukrayins’koho radyans’koho movoznavstva (1918–1941), red. V. M. Rusanivs’kyy, Kyyiv.
  Google Scholar

Yohansen M., 2009, Vybrani tvory, uporyad. R. Mel’nykiv, Kyyiv.
  Google Scholar

Yermolenko S. Ya., 2014, Puryzm. – Ukrayins’ka mova: entsyklopediya, red. V. M. Rusanivs’kyy, O.O. Taranenko, M. P. Zyablyuk ta in., Kyyiv, s. 541.
  Google Scholar

Yermolenko S. Ya., 2004, Styl’. – Ukrayins’ka mova: entsyklopediya, red. V. M. Rusanivs’kyy, O. O. Taranenko, M. P. Zyablyuk ta in., Kyyiv, s. 652.
  Google Scholar

Kurylo O., 2004, Uvahy do suchasnoyi ukrayins’koyi literaturnoyi movy, Kyyiv (peredruk vydannya 1925 r.).
  Google Scholar

Matviyenko O., 1932, Stylistychni paraleli (proty puryzmu), Kharkiv.
  Google Scholar

Matsyuk H., 2018, Vplyv ideolohiyi na movu, movoznavstvo i movoznavtsiv: shtrykhy doobrazu ukrayins’koho suspil’stva pershoyi tretyny XX st., «Studia Ucrainica Varsoviensia», vyp. 6, s. 199–217.
  Google Scholar

Muromtseva O., 2000, Kurylo Olena Borysivna. – Ukrayins’ka mova: entsyklopediya, red. V. M. Rusanivs’kyy, O. O. Taranenko, M. P. Zyablyuk ta in., Kyyiv, s. 266.
  Google Scholar

Mushynka M., Khobzey N., 2014, Zilyns’kyy Ivan Mykhaylovych. – Entsyklopediya suchasnoyi Ukrayiny (ESU) [Elektronnyy resurs], http://esu.com.ua/search_articles.php?id=16147 (data zvernennya: 29.11.2018).
  Google Scholar

Ohiyenko I. (Mytropolyt Ilarion), 1995, Istoriya ukrayins’koyi literaturnoyi movy, uporyad., avt. ist.-biohr. narysu ta prymit. M. S. Tymoshyk, Kyyiv.
  Google Scholar

Repyna L., 2006, Pamyat’ y ystoryoopysanye. – Ystoryya y pamyat’: ystorycheskaya kul’tura Evropы do nachala novoho vremeny, red. L. P. Repyna, Moskva, s. 19–46.
  Google Scholar

Synyavs’kyy O., 1922, Poradnyk ukrayins’koyi movy, Kharkiv–Berlin–N’Yu-York.
  Google Scholar

Smerechyns’kyy S., 1932, Narysy z ukrayins’koyi syntaksy v zv”yazku z frazeolohiyeyu ta stylistykoyu, Kharkiv.
  Google Scholar

Struhanets’ L., 2002, Dynamika leksychnykh norm ukrayins’koyi literaturnoyi Movy XX stolittya: monohrafiya, Ternopil’.
  Google Scholar

Sulyma M., 1927, Z pryvodu nashykh movnykh zlydniv, «Radyans’ka osvita», № 2, s. 25–33.
  Google Scholar

Sulyma M., 1928, Problema literaturnoyi normy v ukrayins’kiy movi, «Shlyakh osvity», № 4, s. 132–141.
  Google Scholar

Sulyma M., 1928, Ukrayins’ka fraza: Koroten’ki nacherky, Kharkiv, https://r2u.org.ua/node/186 (data zvernennya: 27.11.2018).
  Google Scholar

Sumtsov M., 1918, Nacherk rozvytku ukrayins’koyi literaturnoyi movy, Kharkiv, s. 6–16.
  Google Scholar

Pohrebennyk F., 2005, Vasyl’ Simovych – ukrayins’kyy vchenyy i hromads’ko-kul’turnyy diyach. – Vasyl’ Simovych, pratsi u dvokh tomakh, t. 2: Literaturoznavstvo.
  Google Scholar

Kul’tura, uporyadk. L. Tkach, O. Ivasyuk za uchastyu R. Pylypchuka, Ya. Pohrebennyk; peredm. F. Pohrebennyk, Chernivtsi, s. 11–22.
  Google Scholar

Prazhskyy lynhvystycheskyy kruzhok, 1967, Moskva, s. 17–41.
  Google Scholar

Tkachenko B., 1929–1930?, Narys ukrayins’koyi stylistyky, red. L. Bulakhovs’kyy, Kharkiv.
  Google Scholar

Shevel’ov Yu., 2002, Portrety ukrayins’kykh movoznavtsiv, Kyyiv.
  Google Scholar

Shevel’ov Yu., 2005, Nezastupna vtrata. – Vasyl’ Simovych – movoznavets’. Vasyl’ Simovych, pratsi u dvokh tomakh, t. 1: Movoznavstvo, uporyadk. i peredm. L. Tkach, Chernivtsi, s. 426–430.
  Google Scholar

Shevel’ov Yu., 1966, Puryzm v ukrayins’kiy movi, http://movahistory.org.ua/wiki/%D0%A8%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B5%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%BE-%D0%B2_%D0%AE._%D0%9F%D1%83%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%B7%D0%BC_%D0%B2_%D1%83%D0%BA%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%97%D0%BD%D1%81%D1%8C%D0%BA%D1%96%D0%B9_%D0%BC%D0%BE-%D0%B2%D1%96 (data zvernennya: 27.11.2018).
  Google Scholar

Shevchenko T. 2004, Smerechyns’yy Serhiy Stepanovych [Ctefanovych]: entsyklopediya, red. V.M. Rusanivs’kyy, O.O. Taranenko, M.P. Zyablyuk ta in., Kyyiv, s. 628.
  Google Scholar

Doroszewski W. 1954, Rozmowy о języku, t. 3, Warszawa.
  Google Scholar


Published
2019-12-26

Cited by

Čeremsʹka, O. (2019). Stylistic studies of the linguists of Kharkiv philological school in the 1920s and 1930s. Stylistyka, 28, 373–392. https://doi.org/10.25167/Stylistyka28.2019.24

Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.


License

1. Copyrights to published works are held by the University of Opole (to the collective work) and the Authors (to individual parts of the collective work that have an independent meaning).

2. Only previously undistributed works can be published in the scientific journal "Stylistics".

3. The University of Opole does not restrict the possibility of the author's further dissemination of his work on condition that the scientific journal "Stylistics" is indicated as the original place of publication and the consent of the University Publishing House.

4. Consent to the publication of the work in the scientific journal "Stylistics" is tantamount to granting the author a non-exclusive license to the University of Opole, including the right to use the work without territorial restrictions and time limits in the following fields of exploitation:

a) within the scope of recording and multiplication of the work - production of any number of copies of the work in whole or in part using a specified technique, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital technique, introduction of the work into computer memory and computer networks,

b) within the scope of circulation of the original or copies on which the work has been recorded - circulation, lending or hiring of the original or copies,

c) within the scope of dissemination of the work in a manner other than specified in item 2 - making the work or its abstract available on the Internet by enabling the recipients to access the work on-line or enabling them to download the work to their own device that makes it possible to read it, placing the work in electronic databases that disseminate scientific works, including in particular the CEEOL database (Central and Eastern Online Libray) and the abstract in English in the CEJSH database (The Central Europaen Journal of Social Scienes and Humanites).

d) within the scope of creating and distributing dependent works created using the work - using them in the fields of exploitation specified in points 1-3.

5. The author is not entitled to compensation for granting the license to the work.

6. The author agrees that the University may grant further permission to use the work (sublicense) in the fields of exploitation specified in par. 2 paragraph 4.

7. The author agrees that, in connection with the distribution of the work, his or her personal information, that is, name, affiliation, and e-mail address, may be made public.