Individual style and the universality of style category

Dorota Brzozowska



Abstract

The aim of this paper is to raise the questions of style and communication as universal notions and as culture specific phenomena. Different definitions of style are given and the perspectives of two main cultural views dealing with this subject are shown. The points of view of representative of Polish scholars is compared with the focus on linguistic perception of style in Mandarin Chinese. The presentation of the most important essentials of the Professor's Gajda individual style has been chosen as he has been studying various aspects of style for over forty years and he uses concepts typical for Slavic and European scholars. A predominance of analyses of actual texts is based on a comparison of his own text on academic style. It also contains selected most characteristic elements from his other texts and a comparison of his early comments on style and stylistics and the latest definitions thereof. The understanding of style as a concept connected with the Western philosophical, aesthetic and linguistic tradition is compared with the Eastern i.e. – Chinese views on this phenomenon to track differences and similarities showing the universal character of some concepts connected with human language and cognition.

Keywords:

style, communication, culture, Polish, Chinese, language, stylistics

Boryś W., 2005, Słownik etymologiczny języka polskiego, Kraków.
  Google Scholar

Brzozowska D., 2015a, Professor Stanisław Gajda’s style, „Medialingvistika.Meždunarodnyj naučnyj žurnal”, No 3(9), http://medialing.spbu.ru/part10/, s. 7–12.
  Google Scholar

Brzozowska D. 2015b, Style, Communication and Culture. – Lingvistikabez granic. Sbornik statej pamâti doktora filologičeskih nauk, professora Vâčeslava Borisoviča Kaškina, red. K.M. Šilihina, Voronež.
  Google Scholar

Chinese English Dictionary, 2005–2014, http://www.chinese-tools.com/tools/dictionary.html (dostęp: 12.11.2015).
  Google Scholar

Długosz-Kurczabowa K., 2006, Słownik etymologiczny języka polskiego, Warszawa.
  Google Scholar

Gajda S., 1974, Uwagi o stylu naukowym, „Studia Śląskie”, s. 95–103.
  Google Scholar

Gajda S.,1982, Podstawy badań stylistycznych nad językiem naukowym, Warszawa–Wrocław.
  Google Scholar

Gajda S.,1990, Wprowadzenie do teorii terminu,Opole.
  Google Scholar

Gajda S., 1996, Styl osobniczy uczonych. –Styl a tekst, red. S. Gajda, M. Balowski, Opole.
  Google Scholar

Gajda S.,2001, Styl naukowy.–Współczesny język polski, red. J. Bartmiński, Lublin.
  Google Scholar

Gajda S., 2008, Metafora w dyskursie naukowym, „Studia Litteraria Polono-Slavica”, nr8, s. 29–42.
  Google Scholar

Gajda S.,2010, Prestiż a język, „Nauka”, nr 4, s. 147–162.
  Google Scholar

Gajda S., 2012, Styl narodowy jako kategoria stylistyczna, „Stylistyka”,XXI, s. 7–18.
  Google Scholar

Gajda S.,2013a, Współczesna polska polityka językowa.–70 lat współczesnej polszczyzny. Zjawiska –Procesy –Tendencje, red. A. Dunin-Dudkowska, A. Małyska, Lublin.
  Google Scholar

Gajda S., 2013b, Teoria stylu i stylistyka. –Style współczesnej polszczyzny. Przewodnik po stylistyce polskiej, red. E. Malinowska, J. Nocoń, U. Żydek-
  Google Scholar

Bednarczuk, Kraków.
  Google Scholar

Gajda S., 2013c, Styl naukowy. –Style współczesnej polszczyzny. Przewodnik po stylistyce polskiej, red. E. Malinowska, J. Nocoń, U. Żydek-Bednarczuk, Kraków.
  Google Scholar

Gajda S., 2014, Styl jako emergentna własność tekstu. –Teksty, podteksty i konteksty. O współczesnej polszczyźnie i jej kontaktach z innymi językami słowiańskimi. Tom jubileuszowy dedykowany Profesor Bożenie Ostromęckiej-Frączak, red. B. Grochala, E. Pałuszyńska, Łódź.
  Google Scholar

Gajda S., 2015, Zwrot dyskursywny w humanistyce, wystąpienie na Warsztatach Analizy Dyskursu, Kędzierzyn-Koźle, 20–22 maja 2015 r.
  Google Scholar

Gajda S. (red.), 1995, Przewodnik po stylistyce polskiej, Opole.
  Google Scholar

Gajda S. (red.), 2003, Językoznawstwo w Polsce. Stan i perspektywy, Opole.
  Google Scholar

Gajda S.(red.), 2012, Horyzonty humanistyki, Opole.
  Google Scholar

Harbaugh R., 1996–2015, Chinese Characters: A Genealogy and Dictionary, Yale Press,http://zhongwen.com/ (dostęp: 12.11.2015).
  Google Scholar

Kopaliński W., Słownik wyrazów obcych i zwrotów obcojęzycznych, http://www.slownik-online.pl/kopalinski (dostęp: 02.12.2015).
  Google Scholar

Niewiara A., 2015, Słowa klucze kultury w sytuacji bliskiego sąsiedztwa kultur i powinowactwa językowego (dusza –serce), „LingVaria. Półrocznik Wydziału Polonistyki Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego”, nr 2 (20), s. 291–304.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12797/LV.10.2015.20.22   Google Scholar

Skórka S., 1997–2007, Wirtualna historia książek i bibliotek,http://www.wsp.krakow.pl/ (dostęp: 15.12.2015).
  Google Scholar


Published
2020-01-10

Cited by

Brzozowska, D. (2020). Individual style and the universality of style category. Stylistyka, 25, 59–70. https://doi.org/10.25167/Stylistyka.25.2016.2

Authors

Dorota Brzozowska 

Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.


License

1. Copyrights to published works are held by the University of Opole (to the collective work) and the Authors (to individual parts of the collective work that have an independent meaning).

2. Only previously undistributed works can be published in the scientific journal "Stylistics".

3. The University of Opole does not restrict the possibility of the author's further dissemination of his work on condition that the scientific journal "Stylistics" is indicated as the original place of publication and the consent of the University Publishing House.

4. Consent to the publication of the work in the scientific journal "Stylistics" is tantamount to granting the author a non-exclusive license to the University of Opole, including the right to use the work without territorial restrictions and time limits in the following fields of exploitation:

a) within the scope of recording and multiplication of the work - production of any number of copies of the work in whole or in part using a specified technique, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital technique, introduction of the work into computer memory and computer networks,

b) within the scope of circulation of the original or copies on which the work has been recorded - circulation, lending or hiring of the original or copies,

c) within the scope of dissemination of the work in a manner other than specified in item 2 - making the work or its abstract available on the Internet by enabling the recipients to access the work on-line or enabling them to download the work to their own device that makes it possible to read it, placing the work in electronic databases that disseminate scientific works, including in particular the CEEOL database (Central and Eastern Online Libray) and the abstract in English in the CEJSH database (The Central Europaen Journal of Social Scienes and Humanites).

d) within the scope of creating and distributing dependent works created using the work - using them in the fields of exploitation specified in points 1-3.

5. The author is not entitled to compensation for granting the license to the work.

6. The author agrees that the University may grant further permission to use the work (sublicense) in the fields of exploitation specified in par. 2 paragraph 4.

7. The author agrees that, in connection with the distribution of the work, his or her personal information, that is, name, affiliation, and e-mail address, may be made public.