Notes on style as a humanistic structure of text: (to the 70th anniversary of Professor Stanisław Gajda)

Valerij A. Mišlanov



Vladimir A. Salimovskij



Abstract

The paper analyzes a notion of style developed by S. Gajda as a humanistic structure of a text. The characteristics of a scientist’s notion with presumably wide (for stylistics) subject area – implementation of personal author and social cultural manifestations of text activity in different versions of comprehensive organisation of a verbal product – and stylistics categories with huge potential for synthesis are given. The sources of a style as a higher organizational body for a text in the works of the representatives of aesthetic realism school, Russian and Czech scientists are looked at. The fruitfulness of the introduction of human activity understandings into the integrated research of style is justified.

Keywords:

style, text, activity, genre, communication, stylistic concepts

Ahutina T. V., 1984, Teoriâ rečevogo obŝeniâ v trudah M. M. Bahtina i L. S. Vygotskogo, «Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta», ser.14, № 3.
  Google Scholar

Bahtin M. M., 1979, Èstetika slovesnogo tvorčestva, Moskva.
  Google Scholar

Bahtin M. M., 1993, Pod maskoj. Maska tretʹâ, Vološinov V. N. Marksizm i filosofiâ âzyka, Moskva.
  Google Scholar

Vasilʹeva A. N., 1983, O formah suŝestvovaniâfunkcionalʹno-stilističeskoj sistemy. - Struktura lingvostilistiki i ee osnovnye kategorii, Permʹ.
  Google Scholar

Vasilʹeva V. V., Salimovskij V. A., 2011, O mehanizme producirovaniâ massme-dijnogo političeskogo teksta. - Myslʹ. Tekst. Stilʹ, Sankt-Peterburg.
  Google Scholar

Vekšin G. V., 2009, Žanr i funkcionalʹnyj stilʹ: âzykovoe i rečevoe, «Žanry reči», vyp. 6, Saratov.
  Google Scholar

Vinogradov V. V., 1959, O âzyke hudožestvennoj literatury, Moskva.
  Google Scholar

Vinogradov V. V.. 1971, O teorii hudožestvennoj reči, Moskva.
  Google Scholar

Vitgenštejn L.. 1994, Filosofskie raboty, t. 1, Moskva.
  Google Scholar

Gajda S., 2013, Čto takoe stilʹ? - Medialingvistika. Slavânskaâ stilistika. Vek XXI, vyp. 1, Sankt-Peterburg. http://jf.spbu.ru/upload/files/file_1397457423_ 5824.pdf (data obraŝeniâ 01.09.2015)
  Google Scholar

Gauzenblas K., 1967, K utočneniû ponâtiâ «stilʹ» i k voprosu ob obʺeme stilističeskogo issledovaniâ, «Voprosy âzykoznaniâ», № 5.
  Google Scholar

Demenʹev V. V., 2010, Teoriâ rečevyh žanrov, Moskva.
  Google Scholar

Duskaeva L. R., 2013, Kulʹtura i stilʹ: vzaimodejstvie v rečevom obŝenii, „Stylistyka", XXII.
  Google Scholar

Kožina M. N., 2014, Rečevedenie. Teoriâ funkcionalʹnoj stilistiki: izbrannye trudy, Moskva.
  Google Scholar

Leontʹev A. N., 1975, Deâtelʹnostʹ.Soznanie. Ličnostʹ, Moskva.
  Google Scholar

Naer V. L., 1987, K probleme žanra v sisteme funkcionalʹno-stilevoj differenciacii âzyka. - Stilističeskie aspekty ustnoj i pisʹmennoj kommunikacii, Moskva.
  Google Scholar

Orlova N. V., 1997, Žanry razgovornoj reči i ih «stilističeskaâ obrabotka»,«Žanry reči», vyp. 1, Saratov.
  Google Scholar

Polnyj pravoslavnyj bogoslovskij slovarʹ, 1992, t. P., Moskva.
  Google Scholar

Rubinštejn S. L., 2002, Osnovy obŝej psihologii, Sankt-Peterburg.
  Google Scholar

Tarasov E. F., 1989, Stilistika i psiholingvistika. - Problemy sovremennoj stilistiki, Moskva.
  Google Scholar

Fossler K., 2007, Èstetičeskij idealizm. Izbrannye raboty po âzykoznaniû, Moskva.
  Google Scholar

Šklovskij V. B., 1990, Iskusstvo kak priem. - V. B. Šklovskij, Gamburgskij sčet, Moskva.
  Google Scholar

Špitcer L., 2007, Slovesnoe iskusstvo i nauka o âzyke. - O. Valʹcelʹ, V. Dibelius, K. Fossler, L. Špitcer, Problemy literaturnoj formy, Moskva.
  Google Scholar

Âkubinskij L. P., 1986, O dialogičeskoj reči. - L. P. Âkubinskij, Âzyk i ego funkcionirovanie, Moskva.
  Google Scholar

Gajda S., 1982, Podstawy badań stylistycznych nad językiem naukowym, Warszawa, Wrocław.
  Google Scholar

Gajda S., 1983, Styl jako humanistyczna struktura tekstu. - Z polskich studiów slawistycznych, Warszawa.
  Google Scholar

Gajda S., 1991, Stan współczesnej stylistyki a synteza stylistyczna. - Synteza w stylistyce słowiańskiej, Opole.
  Google Scholar

Gajda S., 1992, Stylistics Today, „Stylistyka", 1.
  Google Scholar

Gajda S., 2001, Stylistyka funkcjonalna, stylistyka pragmatyczna, stylistyka kognitywna. - Stylistyka a pragmatyka, Katowice.
  Google Scholar

Gajda S., 2009. Gatunki wypowiedzi i genologia. - Lingwistyka tekstu w Polsce i w Niemczech. Pojęcia, problemy, perspektywy, red. Z. Bilut-Homplewicz, W. Czachur, M. Smykała, Wrocław.
  Google Scholar

Hausenblas K, 1972, Vystavba jazykovych projevu a styl, Praha.
  Google Scholar

Hausenblas K, 1996, Od tvaru k smyslu textu - stylisticke reflexe a interpretace, Praha.
  Google Scholar

Synteza w stylistyce słowiańskiej, 1991, Opole.
  Google Scholar

Spitzer L., 1962, Linguistics and Literary History. Essays in Stylistics, New York.
  Google Scholar


Published
2020-01-10

Cited by

Mišlanov, V. A., & Salimovskij, V. A. (2020). Notes on style as a humanistic structure of text: (to the 70th anniversary of Professor Stanisław Gajda). Stylistyka, 25, 109–122. https://doi.org/10.25167/Stylistyka.25.2016.6

Authors

Valerij A. Mišlanov 

Authors

Vladimir A. Salimovskij 

Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.


License

1. Copyrights to published works are held by the University of Opole (to the collective work) and the Authors (to individual parts of the collective work that have an independent meaning).

2. Only previously undistributed works can be published in the scientific journal "Stylistics".

3. The University of Opole does not restrict the possibility of the author's further dissemination of his work on condition that the scientific journal "Stylistics" is indicated as the original place of publication and the consent of the University Publishing House.

4. Consent to the publication of the work in the scientific journal "Stylistics" is tantamount to granting the author a non-exclusive license to the University of Opole, including the right to use the work without territorial restrictions and time limits in the following fields of exploitation:

a) within the scope of recording and multiplication of the work - production of any number of copies of the work in whole or in part using a specified technique, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital technique, introduction of the work into computer memory and computer networks,

b) within the scope of circulation of the original or copies on which the work has been recorded - circulation, lending or hiring of the original or copies,

c) within the scope of dissemination of the work in a manner other than specified in item 2 - making the work or its abstract available on the Internet by enabling the recipients to access the work on-line or enabling them to download the work to their own device that makes it possible to read it, placing the work in electronic databases that disseminate scientific works, including in particular the CEEOL database (Central and Eastern Online Libray) and the abstract in English in the CEJSH database (The Central Europaen Journal of Social Scienes and Humanites).

d) within the scope of creating and distributing dependent works created using the work - using them in the fields of exploitation specified in points 1-3.

5. The author is not entitled to compensation for granting the license to the work.

6. The author agrees that the University may grant further permission to use the work (sublicense) in the fields of exploitation specified in par. 2 paragraph 4.

7. The author agrees that, in connection with the distribution of the work, his or her personal information, that is, name, affiliation, and e-mail address, may be made public.