Prosecutor’s professional style: stylistic features and speech genres
Lilijâ R. Duskaeva
Abstract
Based on the integrative concept of style, developed in the works of Professor Stanis³aw Gajda, the article justifies the allocation of prosecutorial professional style as a speech variety of business style, which is realized in a system of prescribing, requesting and informing genres. Analysis of the internal differentiation of the Russian prosecutors’ professional style shows that, along with stylistic features that are common to business macro style, this professional style has specific traits – legal evaluation and contrary relations of semantic positions, – which are expressed in each speech genre in a different way. Stylistical and speech analysis of these two genre models shows that typical algorithms of prosecutors’ professional speech activity are reflected in the models. The study shows that the professional style of prosecutors represents one of the types of speech activities in the legal field.
Keywords:
Stanisław Gajda, professional style, speech genresReferences
Bahtin M. M., 2000, Problema rečevyh žanrov. - Avtor igeroj. K osnovam gumanitarnyh nauk, Sankt-Peterburg.
Google Scholar
Zežbicka A., 1997, Rečevye žanry, „Žanry reči", vyp. 1.
Google Scholar
Vinokurov Û. E. (red.), 2005, Prokurorskij nadzor, Moskva.
Google Scholar
Gaida St., 1986, Problemy žanra. - Funkcionalʹnaâ stilistika: teoriâ stilej i ih âzykovaâ realizaciâ, Permʹ.
Google Scholar
Duskaeva L. R., 2004, Dialogičeskaâ priroda gazetnyh rečevyh žanrov, Permʹ.
Google Scholar
Duskaeva L. R., 2012, Intencionalʹnostʹ rečevoj deâtelʹnosti žurnalista: ontologiâ istruktura,, „ Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta", Seriâ9: Filologiâ. ostokovedenie, Žurnalistika, № 2, s. 253-260.
Google Scholar
Duskaeva L. R., 2013, Stilističeskij intent-analiz kak vektor izučeniâ rečevyh raznovidnostejtika, „ Medialingvistika", t. 1, s.81-91.
Google Scholar
Kožina M. N., 1977, Stilistika russkogo âzyka, Moskva.
Google Scholar
Kožina M. N., Duskaeva L. R., Salimovskij V. A., 2008, Stilistika russkogo âzyka, Moskva.
Google Scholar
Salimovskij V. A., 2002, Žanry reči v funkcionalʹno-stilističeskom osveŝenii (naučnyj akademičeskij tekst), Permʹ.
Google Scholar
Formanovskaâ N. I., 1998, Kommunikativno-pragmatičeskie aspekty edinic obŝeniâ, Moskva.
Google Scholar
Šmeleva T. V., 1997, Modelʹ rečevogo žanra, „Žanry reči", vyp. 1.
Google Scholar
Cechova M., Chloupek J., Krćmova M., Minafova E., 2003, Soućasna ćeska stylistika. Praha.
Google Scholar
Gajda S. 1993, Gatunkowe wzorce wypowiedzi. - Encyklopedia kultury polskiej XX wie¬ku, t. 2: Współczesny język polski, red. J. Bartmiński.
Google Scholar
Gajda S., 1982, Podstawy badań stylistycznych nad językiem naukowym, Warszawa.
Google Scholar
Gajda S., 1983, Styl jako humanistyczna struktura tekstu, „Z Polskich Studiów Slawistycznych", seria 6, t. 2, s. 235-243.
Google Scholar
Gajda S., 1992, Stan współczesnej stylistyki a synteza stylistyczna. - Synteza w stylistyce słowiańskiej, red. S. Gajda, Opole.
Google Scholar
Gajda S. [red.], 1995, Przewodnik po stylistyce polskiej, Opole.
Google Scholar
Mistrik J., 1997, Stylistika, Bratislava.
Google Scholar
Authors
Lilijâ R. DuskaevaStatistics
Downloads
License
1. Copyrights to published works are held by the University of Opole (to the collective work) and the Authors (to individual parts of the collective work that have an independent meaning).
2. Only previously undistributed works can be published in the scientific journal "Stylistics".
3. The University of Opole does not restrict the possibility of the author's further dissemination of his work on condition that the scientific journal "Stylistics" is indicated as the original place of publication and the consent of the University Publishing House.
4. Consent to the publication of the work in the scientific journal "Stylistics" is tantamount to granting the author a non-exclusive license to the University of Opole, including the right to use the work without territorial restrictions and time limits in the following fields of exploitation:
a) within the scope of recording and multiplication of the work - production of any number of copies of the work in whole or in part using a specified technique, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital technique, introduction of the work into computer memory and computer networks,
b) within the scope of circulation of the original or copies on which the work has been recorded - circulation, lending or hiring of the original or copies,
c) within the scope of dissemination of the work in a manner other than specified in item 2 - making the work or its abstract available on the Internet by enabling the recipients to access the work on-line or enabling them to download the work to their own device that makes it possible to read it, placing the work in electronic databases that disseminate scientific works, including in particular the CEEOL database (Central and Eastern Online Libray) and the abstract in English in the CEJSH database (The Central Europaen Journal of Social Scienes and Humanites).
d) within the scope of creating and distributing dependent works created using the work - using them in the fields of exploitation specified in points 1-3.
5. The author is not entitled to compensation for granting the license to the work.
6. The author agrees that the University may grant further permission to use the work (sublicense) in the fields of exploitation specified in par. 2 paragraph 4.
7. The author agrees that, in connection with the distribution of the work, his or her personal information, that is, name, affiliation, and e-mail address, may be made public.
