Factors for successful and conflict communication in the conditions of cultural and stylistic diversity (based on Internet communication)
Tatʹâna V. Černyšova
Abstract
The article presents the results of a comparative study of two types of public speech communication – of the official (media texts) and informal (social network) – in identifying their cultural and stylistic originality, and describes a set of linguistic and non-linguistic factors which are shaping the stylistic tone of the conflicting verbal interaction of participants of social networks. The object of study is the set (or sequence) of speech acts participants communications which was embodied in the text, allowing to trace the process of verbal interaction and its stages, favour or impede successful communication, i.e. implementation of authorial intention. As a tool of stylistic analysis the category of the “usual-style complex” is used. It is seen as a stylistic mechanism of selection, which allows us to describe the “real language of real era” with the given extra linguistic factors – namely, the context of the situation in which the interaction of participants of public communication occurs. The study concluded: despite the fact that the texts of formal and informal communication (media and social networks) have much in common, evaluation comments in social media are more specific, opponents are expressing their point of view and their promptings designed for the addressee: anger, accusations, refusal communication, etc. in the straightforward way. There are a lot of varieties of means and ways of expression – both verbal and nonverbal. Cultural and social skills of verbal communication play an important role in conditions of formal and informal public communication.
Keywords:
public speech communication, formal and informal public speech, cultural and stylistic originality, stylistic factors, stylistic tone speech conflict, social networks
Authors
Tatʹâna V. ČernyšovaStatistics
Downloads
License
1. Copyrights to published works are held by the University of Opole (to the collective work) and the Authors (to individual parts of the collective work that have an independent meaning).
2. Only previously undistributed works can be published in the scientific journal "Stylistics".
3. The University of Opole does not restrict the possibility of the author's further dissemination of his work on condition that the scientific journal "Stylistics" is indicated as the original place of publication and the consent of the University Publishing House.
4. Consent to the publication of the work in the scientific journal "Stylistics" is tantamount to granting the author a non-exclusive license to the University of Opole, including the right to use the work without territorial restrictions and time limits in the following fields of exploitation:
a) within the scope of recording and multiplication of the work - production of any number of copies of the work in whole or in part using a specified technique, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital technique, introduction of the work into computer memory and computer networks,
b) within the scope of circulation of the original or copies on which the work has been recorded - circulation, lending or hiring of the original or copies,
c) within the scope of dissemination of the work in a manner other than specified in item 2 - making the work or its abstract available on the Internet by enabling the recipients to access the work on-line or enabling them to download the work to their own device that makes it possible to read it, placing the work in electronic databases that disseminate scientific works, including in particular the CEEOL database (Central and Eastern Online Libray) and the abstract in English in the CEJSH database (The Central Europaen Journal of Social Scienes and Humanites).
d) within the scope of creating and distributing dependent works created using the work - using them in the fields of exploitation specified in points 1-3.
5. The author is not entitled to compensation for granting the license to the work.
6. The author agrees that the University may grant further permission to use the work (sublicense) in the fields of exploitation specified in par. 2 paragraph 4.
7. The author agrees that, in connection with the distribution of the work, his or her personal information, that is, name, affiliation, and e-mail address, may be made public.
