Suŝestvuet li ritorika naučnogo diskursa?
Èleonora R. Lassan
Abstract
The article focuses on the phenomenon of the contemporary academie discourse and námely on those processes that lead to its becoming senseless, as the author suggests. It happens as a resull of the unifícation of the formulas of the academie discourse, which are accepted as rituál ones in the academie community. Since the consciousness that seeks to aware is hidden behind the forms that are above individual, it, on the one hand, dechneš the responsibility for the mechanisms of the paradigm chosen in the research, and, on the other hand - communicates the academie elites, dictating “the rules of the game”, about the academie loyalty of the former. In thus sense the comparison of the contemporary academie rhetoric, as a systém of the means to get adapted to the existing demands, to the rhetoric of totalitarian discourses suggests itself: in both cases the consciousness that is behind the text does not allow oneself to stand out as individuality but, on the contrary, demonstrates its submission to the existing rules, or in other words, to the loyalty demanded by the community.
Keywords:
the rhetoric o f the academie discourse, the desemantization of the academie discourse, implication, academie loyaltyAuthors
Èleonora R. LassanStatistics
Downloads
License
1. Copyrights to published works are held by the University of Opole (to the collective work) and the Authors (to individual parts of the collective work that have an independent meaning).
2. Only previously undistributed works can be published in the scientific journal "Stylistics".
3. The University of Opole does not restrict the possibility of the author's further dissemination of his work on condition that the scientific journal "Stylistics" is indicated as the original place of publication and the consent of the University Publishing House.
4. Consent to the publication of the work in the scientific journal "Stylistics" is tantamount to granting the author a non-exclusive license to the University of Opole, including the right to use the work without territorial restrictions and time limits in the following fields of exploitation:
a) within the scope of recording and multiplication of the work - production of any number of copies of the work in whole or in part using a specified technique, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital technique, introduction of the work into computer memory and computer networks,
b) within the scope of circulation of the original or copies on which the work has been recorded - circulation, lending or hiring of the original or copies,
c) within the scope of dissemination of the work in a manner other than specified in item 2 - making the work or its abstract available on the Internet by enabling the recipients to access the work on-line or enabling them to download the work to their own device that makes it possible to read it, placing the work in electronic databases that disseminate scientific works, including in particular the CEEOL database (Central and Eastern Online Libray) and the abstract in English in the CEJSH database (The Central Europaen Journal of Social Scienes and Humanites).
d) within the scope of creating and distributing dependent works created using the work - using them in the fields of exploitation specified in points 1-3.
5. The author is not entitled to compensation for granting the license to the work.
6. The author agrees that the University may grant further permission to use the work (sublicense) in the fields of exploitation specified in par. 2 paragraph 4.
7. The author agrees that, in connection with the distribution of the work, his or her personal information, that is, name, affiliation, and e-mail address, may be made public.
