Fonostylistics of massmedia news programmes
Svetlana F. Baryševa
Abstract
The main corpus of media speech consists of news bulletins. The subject of analysis at the level of phonetics has arisen due to the growing importance of phonetic standards of speech. They started to be perceived as a sort of norm in Russian literary language and won general recognition. The aim of the research is: 1) to describe the news discourse as a set of phonetic sub-systems; 2) to analyze sub-systems of the first type, that is the speech of the leading journalists from the point of view of the phonetic, segmental norm. 1. In general the news discourse can be characterized as a complex phonetic entity, because it consists of at least three phonetic sub-systems. Media speech consists of two main types: the speech of the presenter and that of the leading journalist or correspondent. The speech of the presenter is a more clear-cut type of media style, because information must be conveyed in an objective and impersonal way. A journalist can feel more free in this aspect, his speech is not subject to very strict rules and it shows style and stylistic properties of phonetic units. In fact, the speech of television journalists can also be sub-divided into two types: the speech in front of the camera and in the background. Besides, in some reports journalists have to act as interpreters of the interviewed heroes who speak in a foreign language. Consequently it can be logically divided according to the type of the conveyed speech: first person narration and interpreting the speech of foreigners. The latter can also show stylistic properties of sounds of speech. pronunciation peculiarities in the media discourse. Secondly, to compare the speech in the leading programs and the speech of correspondents. a) The analysis of both professional groups showed the presence of pronunciation variants as among the vowels, so among the consonants. However, one can claim that informational media speech remains within the genre of the official type. As a matter of fact, the majority of fixed colloquial patterns are spontaneous, are not used to increase the emotional value of meaning and can’t be noticed by the average listener. b) The expected dominance of colloquial phonetic features in the speech of journalists as compared to the speech of presenters has been proven. The colloquial pronunciation variants exist in the speech of both professional groups to a similar degree. This again confirms the expressed above idea about the spontaneous character of the described phonetic phenomena.
2. The aim of the research of the first type sub-system – the leading journalists’ and television journalists’ speech is: firstly, to define the degree of popularity of different
Keywords:
massmedia news, fonostylistics, oral pronunciation variantsAuthors
Svetlana F. BaryševaStatistics
Downloads
License
1. Copyrights to published works are held by the University of Opole (to the collective work) and the Authors (to individual parts of the collective work that have an independent meaning).
2. Only previously undistributed works can be published in the scientific journal "Stylistics".
3. The University of Opole does not restrict the possibility of the author's further dissemination of his work on condition that the scientific journal "Stylistics" is indicated as the original place of publication and the consent of the University Publishing House.
4. Consent to the publication of the work in the scientific journal "Stylistics" is tantamount to granting the author a non-exclusive license to the University of Opole, including the right to use the work without territorial restrictions and time limits in the following fields of exploitation:
a) within the scope of recording and multiplication of the work - production of any number of copies of the work in whole or in part using a specified technique, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital technique, introduction of the work into computer memory and computer networks,
b) within the scope of circulation of the original or copies on which the work has been recorded - circulation, lending or hiring of the original or copies,
c) within the scope of dissemination of the work in a manner other than specified in item 2 - making the work or its abstract available on the Internet by enabling the recipients to access the work on-line or enabling them to download the work to their own device that makes it possible to read it, placing the work in electronic databases that disseminate scientific works, including in particular the CEEOL database (Central and Eastern Online Libray) and the abstract in English in the CEJSH database (The Central Europaen Journal of Social Scienes and Humanites).
d) within the scope of creating and distributing dependent works created using the work - using them in the fields of exploitation specified in points 1-3.
5. The author is not entitled to compensation for granting the license to the work.
6. The author agrees that the University may grant further permission to use the work (sublicense) in the fields of exploitation specified in par. 2 paragraph 4.
7. The author agrees that, in connection with the distribution of the work, his or her personal information, that is, name, affiliation, and e-mail address, may be made public.