Stilʹ i diskurs:  shodstva i različiâ: Sim ilarities  a n d  Differences

Branko Tošovič

Published: 2020-01-10

Vol. 23 (2014)

Style and Discourse: Similarities and Differences

Branko Tošovič

Sim ilarities a n d Differences

Abstract

The páper provides a critical inlerpretation of too broad, nontermological and trendy use of discourse in the linguistics and stylistics. The author emphasizes that the concept of discourse cannot replace and displace the notion of style because they are completely different concepts. The páper maintains that it is in the best interest of both, discourse theory and the theory o f style, to determinate the elear dislinction between these two terms.

Keywords:

Style, Discourse, Similarities Differences, discourse theory, theory o fstyle

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Branko Tošović, Lili Lalauna , Stylistyka: Vol. 25 (2016): Gajda i stylistyka
Branko Tošovič, National Style as a Manifestation of the National Languages of Serbs, Croats, Bosniaks and Montenegrins , Stylistyka: Vol. 21 (2012): Styl narodowy
Branko Tošovič, Die Funktionen der Sprache , Stylistyka: Vol. 9 (2000): Czech Stylistics
Branko Tošovič, Struktura glagolʹnoj metafory , Stylistyka: Vol. 7 (1998): Slavic Stylistics
, Značenje kao semantičko-stilistička kategorija , Stylistyka: Vol. 4 (1995): Tekst i styl - Text and style - Текст и стиль
, Milosav Ž. Čarkić, Fonika Stiha, Beograd: Naučna kn̂iga,1992, 349 str. 1 , Stylistyka: Vol. 3 (1994): Comparative Stylistics
BRANKO TOŠOVIĆ, Stilistička istraživanja Milosava Ž. Čarkića (1948–2022) , Stylistyka: Vol. 32 No. 32 (2023): Stylistyka

Download files

pdf (Русский)

Citation rules

Tošovič, B. (2020). Style and Discourse: Similarities and Differences: Sim ilarities a n d Differences. Stylistyka, 23, 19–29. Retrieved from https://czasopisma.uni.opole.pl/index.php/s/article/view/1823

Cited by / Share